Pharmacokinetics of cefpodoxime in plasma and subcutaneous fluid following oral administration of cefpodoxime proxetil in male beagle dogs.

Pharmacokinetics of cefpodoxime in plasma (total concentration) and subcutaneous fluid (free concentration using microdialysis) was investigated in dogs following single oral administration of prodrug cefpodoxime proxetil (equivalent to 5 and 10 mg/kg of cefpodoxime). In a cross over study design, six dogs per dose were utilized after a 1 week washout period. Plasma, microdialysate, and urine samples were collected upto 24 h and analyzed using high performance liquid chromatography. The average maximum concentration (C(max) ) of cefpodoxime in plasma was 13.66 (±6.30) and 27.14 (±4.56) µg/mL with elimination half-life (t(1/2) ) of 3.01 (±0.49) and 4.72 (±1.46) h following 5 and 10 mg/kg dose, respectively. The respective average area under the curve (AUC(0-∞) ) was 82.94 (±30.17) and 107.71 (±30.79) µg·h/mL. Cefpodoxime was readily distributed to skin and average free C(max) in subcutaneous fluid was 1.70 (±0.55) and 3.06 (±0.93) µg/mL at the two doses. Urinary excretion (unchanged cefpodoxime) was the major elimination route. Comparison of subcutaneous fluid concentrations using pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic indices of fT(>MIC) indicated that at 10 mg/kg dose; cefpodoxime would yield good therapeutic outcome in skin infections for bacteria with MIC(50) upto 0.5 µg/mL while higher doses (or more frequent dosing) may be needed for bacteria with higher MICs. High urine concentrations suggested cefpodoxime use for urinary infections in dogs.

Applications of physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling and simulation during regulatory review.

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling and simulation is a tool that can help predict the pharmacokinetics of drugs in humans and evaluate the effects of intrinsic (e.g., organ dysfunction, age, genetics) and extrinsic (e.g., drug-drug interactions) factors, alone or in combinations, on drug exposure. The use of this tool is increasing at all stages of the drug development process. This report reviews recent instances of the use of PBPK in decision-making during regulatory review. The examples are based on Center for Drug Evaluation and Research reviews of several submissions for investigational new drugs (INDs) and new drug applications (NDAs) received between July 2008 and June 2010. The use of PBPK modeling and simulation facilitated the following types of decisions: the need to conduct specific clinical pharmacology studies, specific study designs, and appropriate labeling language. The report also discusses the challenges encountered when PBPK modeling and simulation were used in these cases and recommends approaches to facilitating full utilization of this tool.

Impact of pharmacometric reviews on new drug approval and labeling decisions--a survey of 31 new drug applications submitted between 2005 and 2006.

Exploratory analyses of data pertaining to pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and disease progression are often referred to as the pharmacometrics (PM) analyses. The objective of the current report is to assess the role of PM, at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), in drug approval and labeling decisions. We surveyed the impact of PM analyses on New Drug Applications (NDAs) reviewed over 15 months in 2005-2006. The survey focused on both the approval and labeling decisions through four perspectives: clinical pharmacology primary reviewer, their team leader, the clinical team member, and the PM reviewer. A total of 31 NDAs included a PM review component. Review of NDAs involved independent quantitative evaluation by FDA pharmacometricians. PM analyses were ranked as important in regulatory decision making in over 85% of the 31 NDAs. Case studies are presented to demonstrate the applications of PM analysis.

Population pharmacokinetics of methylprednisolone in accident victims with spinal cord injury.

OBJECTIVE: High-dose methylprednisolone (MP) is used to treat acute spinal cord injury (ASCI). The objective of the present study was to determine the pharmacokinetics of the pro-drug methylprednisolone hemisuccinate (MPHS) and MP in accident victims with ASCI. METHODS: The patients (n = 26) were treated with a bolus intravenous loading dose of 30 mg/kg MPHS within 2 h after injury and this was followed by a maintenance infusion of 5.4 mg/kg/h up to 24 h. Blood, CSF and saliva samples were collected up to 48 h after the initial dose and the samples were analyzed by HPLC. Concentration-time data of MPHS and MP were analyzed using population pharmacokinetic analysis with NONMEM software. RESULTS: MPHS and MP could be monitored in plasma and CSF. MP but not MPHS was present in saliva. High variability was seen in the MPHS levels in CSF. The pharmacokinetics of the pro-drug and the metabolite were adequately described by a 2-compartment model with exponential distribution models assigned to the interindividual and the residual variability. At steady state, the average measured MP concentration in plasma was 12.3+/-7.0 microg/ml and 1.74+/-0.85 microg/ml in CSF. The CSF levels of MP could be modeled as a part of the peripheral compartment. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that CSF concentrations of MP were sufficiently high after i.v. administration and reflected the concentrations of unbound drug in plasma. Salivary levels of MP were about 32% of the plasma level and may serve as an easily accessible body fluid for drug level monitoring.