Epstein-Barr Virus-associated Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Identified in a Breast Implant Capsule: A New Breast Implant-Associated Lymphoma?

BACKGROUND: Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma is a relatively uncommon T-cell lymphoma with about 900 reported cases worldwide to April 2020 according to the American Society of Plastic Surgeons Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma Physician Resources information. CASE PRESENTATION: A 51-year old woman was found to have an Epstein-Barr virus-related diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (EBV-DLCBCL) in her left breast periimplant capsule at the time of a second revision breast implant surgery for recurrent severe capsular contractures following cosmetic breast augmentation 21 years previously. The first revision operation, 15 years earlier, had comprised simple implant exchange from smooth-saline to textured-silicone gel prostheses. RESULTS: Histopathological and immunohistochemical analyses of the periimplant capsulectomy specimen confirmed a B cell lymphoma which was, in addition, positive for EBV-encoded RNA on in-situ hybridization. Staging investigations including positron emission tomography-computed tomography did not reveal any metastatic disease. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Despite recommendations to the contrary (by 2 independent hematological malignancy multidisciplinary teams), the patient has declined explantation of her new breast implants choosing instead to be observed under a watch-and-wait protocol. She remains disease-free 2 years postdiagnosis. To date, a diffuse B-cell lymphoma has never been documented as arising in a breast implant capsule or in association with breast augmentation whether associated with EBV or not. This is the first such report in the world.

Assessment of breast symmetry in breast cancer patients undergoing therapeutic mammaplasty using the Breast Cancer Conservation Therapy cosmetic results software (BCCT.core).

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic mammaplasty (TM) is a standard oncoplastic technique utilising aesthetic breast reduction principles to facilitate tumour resection and breast reshaping. Simultaneous contralateral mammaplasties are often performed to maintain symmetry. BCCT.core software, which principally assesses breast symmetry, has been previously employed for evaluating cosmetic results after standard breast conservation therapy and latterly TMs for upper pole tumours. The purpose of this study was to validate this novel tool for TMs in all breast zones. METHODS: Standardised photographs of 20 consecutive patients who underwent TM were evaluated for symmetry using BCCT.core versus a plastic surgical panel completing a visual analogue scale. Results were rated as (excellent/good/fair/poor). Outcomes between the two methods were compared. RESULTS: Twenty patients aged 37 to 63 years with a median 36G bra size had 22 TMs (18 unilateral, 2 bilateral). Indications were invasive breast cancer (87%) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (13%). The median (range) tumour size was 22.5 mm (6-90 mm) with a resection weight of 245.8 g (16-1,079 g). Primary nipple pedicles were superomedial (63%), inferior (21%) and superolateral (16%). Five patients required a secondary glandular pedicle for volume redistribution to maintain breast shape. The BCCT.core software vs. panel symmetry assessments were 37% vs. 39% (excellent), 63% vs. 50% (good) and 0% vs. 11% (fair). Wilcoxon matched-pairs sign rank tests and Spearman rank correlations found the pairings to be statistically significant (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Despite small patient numbers, BCCT.core gave comparable findings with the panel and is thus useful for objectively assessing cosmesis of TMs in all breast zones.

Research priorities in light of current trends in microsurgical training: revalidation, simulation, cross-training, and standardisation.

Plastic surgery training worldwide has seen a thorough restructuring over the past decade, with the introduction of formal training curricula and work-based assessment tools. Part of this process has been the introduction of revalidation and a greater use of simulation in training delivery. Simulation is an increasingly important tool for educators because it provides a way to reduce risks to both trainees and patients, whilst facilitating improved technical proficiency. Current microsurgery training interventions are often predicated on theories of skill acquisition and development that follow a 'practice makes perfect' model. Given the changing landscape of surgical training and advances in educational theories related to skill development, research is needed to assess the potential benefits of alternative models, particularly cross-training, a model now widely used in non-medical areas with significant benefits. Furthermore, with the proliferation of microsurgery training interventions and therefore diversity in length, cost, content and models used, appropriate standardisation will be an important factor to ensure that courses deliver consistent and effective training that achieves appropriate levels of competency. Key research requirements should be gathered and used in directing further research in these areas to achieve on-going improvement of microsurgery training.