Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Vet Rec ; 188(7): e113, 2021 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33835588

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of a laparoscopic absorbable fixation device (Securestrap) in total laparoscopic gastropexy in dogs susceptible to gastric dilatation-volvulus (GDV) compared to laparoscopic gastropexy performed with a barbed suture. We hypothesised that both techniques provide suitable gastropexy. METHODS: The gastropexy was performed by straps (TLG-SS group, n = 6) or with a barbed suture (TLG-Vloc group, n = 6). The total surgery time, gastropexy time, the number of straps used and suture bites were recorded. Clinical and ultrasound investigations were performed during follow-up. RESULTS: The total surgery time was 30 minutes in the TLG-SS, while it was 46.66 minutes in the TLG-Vloc. In the TLG-SS group, gastropexy time was 13 minutes, while 36.3 minutes in the TLG-Vloc. The number of straps employed in TLG-SS was 9, while seven bites were employed in TLG-Vloc. Linear regression analysis of gastropexy time versus the number of procedures was highly correlated (r2 = 0.84) in the TLG-SS. Complications, clinical and ultrasound findings did not differ between the two techniques at 90 days post-surgery. CONCLUSION: TLG-SS laparoscopic technique can be employed safely and effectively in less time and is associated with a relatively short learning curve, which could encourage the widespread use of prophylactic laparoscopic gastropexy.


Assuntos
Doenças do Cão/cirurgia , Gastropexia/veterinária , Laparoscopia/veterinária , Técnicas de Sutura/veterinária , Animais , Cães , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Gastropexia/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Masculino , Duração da Cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA