Rheumatic fever prophylaxis using benzathine penicillin G (BPG): two- week versus four-week regimens: comparison of two brands of BPG.

OBJECTIVE: This prospective study was aimed at answering two important questions: 1) Is a biweekly schedule of 1.2 million U intramuscular benzathine penicillin G (BPG) superior to a 4-week one in the prevention of upper respiratory Group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal (GABHS) infections and rheumatic fever (RF) recurrences? 2) Is there a difference in the bioavailability of BPG obtained from different manufacturers? METHODOLOGY: Three hundred sixty rheumatic patients aged 4 to 20 years were randomly assigned to either a biweekly (190 patients) or 4-week (160 patients) BPG prophylactic schedule and were followed-up monthly for 2 years by clinical examination, throat swab culture for GABHS and measurement of antistreptolysin O titer to detect GABHS infection and/or recurrences of RF (according to revised Jones' Criteria). Thereafter, 34 rheumatic subjects, aged 8 to 16 years were randomly assigned to receive a 4-week injection of 1.2 million U of either a locally manufactured BPG brand (22 patients) or an imported one (12 patients). Sera of all patients were tested for penicillin level by plate diffusion method on days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 14, 21, and 28 after the intramuscular injection of BPG. RESULTS: The GABHS infection rate was found to be 0.2% and 0.3% for patients on the biweekly and 4-week BPG schedules, respectively, with no significant differences between them. However, the RF recurrence rate/patient/year for the 4-week schedule patients (0.12) was double that for the biweekly schedule ones (0.06). Estimation of the bioavailability of the two different brands of BPG demonstrated a difference in their pharmacokinetics and a decrease in the serum penicillin concentration below the minimum inhibitory concentration 3 weeks after the injection of either brand. CONCLUSION: Although a biweekly schedule may not be superior in preventing upper respiratory GABHS infection, it may play a role in preventing the sequelae of such infections. The short duration of penicillinemia explains the superiority of the 2-week schedule in RF prophylais. The difference in the pharmacokinetics of penicillin brands might contribute to the high recurrence rate of RF reported in Egypt.

Smectite in acute diarrhea in children: a double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Dioctahedral smectite (DS) a natural adsorbent clay capable of adsorbing viruses, bacteria, and other intestinal irritants in vitro, is claimed to possess beneficial "antidiarrheal" properties. This study tested the effect of DS on the duration of diarrhea and the frequency and amount of liquid stools. Ninety well-nourished boys, aged 3-24 months, with acute watery diarrhea and mild, moderate, or severe dehydration were included in a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. After initial rehydration, they received DS or placebo (1.5 g freshly dissolved in 50 ml of water, four times daily for 3 days) along with oral rehydration solution (ORS) and adequate feeding. The clinical characteristics of both groups were comparable on admission. Patients in the smectite group had a significantly shorter duration of diarrhea (mean +/- SD, 54 +/- 16 vs. 73 +/- 13 h) and significantly fewer stools (2.6 +/- 0.8 vs. 3 +/- 0.7 on second day; 1.9 +/- 0.7 vs. 2.4 +/- 0.7 on third day; and 11.3 +/- 3.2 vs. 13.8 +/- 3 overall). The amount of liquid stools was not significantly reduced. Weight gain at 24, 48, and 72 h and on recovery was significantly higher in the smectite group despite the comparable fluid and food intake in both groups. These results suggest a beneficial effect of DS in shortening the duration of diarrhea and reducing the frequency of liquid stools in children rehydrated with ORS.

Benzathine penicillin G for rheumatic fever prophylaxis: 2-weekly versus 4-weekly regimens.

Rheumatic fever is still one of the major public health problems in Egypt and the developing countries. It is characterized by a high tendency to recur following streptococcal infections. The use of long acting penicillin for prophylaxis against strep infections was a good achievement in this field, yet, recurrences have been reported in patients following monthly prophylactic programs. Clinical experience in Alexandria have shown for a long time that giving penicillin every 2 weeks is followed by less recurrences of rheumatic fever. Recently, reports came showing that effective penicillin levels are not maintained except for 2 to 3 weeks after the injection. In the present study, we compared two regimens of prophylaxis with 190 patients in the 2-weekly regimen, and 170 patients in the 4-weekly regimen being followed up for 2 consecutive years. Two hundred and sixty nine streptococcal infections occurred during this period. Although the streptococcal infection rate was equal in both groups, the rheumatic fever recurrence rate and the RF attack rate were significantly higher in the group of patients on the 4-weekly schedule. The results of this study have shown the superiority of the 2-weekly schedule in the adequate control of RF recurrences. We suggest that this schedule should be implemented for secondary prophylaxis of rheumatic fever in Egypt and other areas with severe RF.