Medical occurrence and safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination outside of the hospital setting.

During COVID-19 pandemic, vaccination has been strongly recommended and advocated to prevent COVID-19 infection and adverse outcomes, particularly among at-risk populations. The vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 (COVAC) occurred at off-site locations capable of accommodating large crowds, distinct from the hospital setting, where a team of intensivists, emergency physicians, and nurses, ensuring prompt medical attention (medical occurrences, MO) in cases of adverse event following immunization. Our aims were to estimate the incidence of MO, and to assess its association with demographics, and vaccine characteristics. Our retrospective cohort study included all subject aged 12 years and older who received vaccinations at two large out-of-hospital vaccination hubs (Fiera Milano City, Palazzo delle Scintille), between April 12th and August 31st, 2021. Nine hundred and ninety-five thousand and twenty-eight vaccinations were administrated. MOs incidence rate was 278/100,000 doses (95% confidence interval (CI) 268-289). Most MOs were mild (86.27%) and mainly observed in subjects who received the Comirnaty vaccine; 92 MOs (3.32%) were severe and mostly occurred in recipients of the Vaxzeria vaccine. The incidence rate for hospital transfers following vaccination was 4.7/100,000 doses (95% CI 3.5-6.2) and any level of anaphylaxis occurred in 0.4 cases per 100,000 administrated doses (95% CI 0.3.-0.7). Sex, age, type of vaccine and first dose were associated with incidence of MO. Our results showed a low incidence rate in MOs after COVAC, mainly mild and support the feasibility, effectiveness and safety of vaccinations administered in hubs with a dedicated SEU located outside of the hospital setting.

Corrigendum: Time-Trends in Air Pollution Impact on Health in Italy, 1990-2019: An Analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/ijph.2023.1605959.].

Treatment with inhaled Argon: a systematic review of pre-clinical and clinical studies with meta-analysis on neuroprotective effect.

BACKGROUND: Argon (Ar) has been proposed as a potential therapeutic agent in multiple clinical conditions, specifically in organ protection. However, conflicting data on pre-clinical models, together with a great variability in Ar administration protocols and outcome assessments, have been reported. The aim of this study was to review evidence on treatment with Ar, with an extensive investigation on its neuroprotective effect, and to summarise all tested administration protocols. METHODS: Using the PubMed database, all existing pre-clinical and clinical studies on the treatment with Ar were systematically reviewed (registration: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7983D). Study titles and abstracts were screened, extracting data from relevant studies post full-text review. Exclusion criteria included absence of full text and non-English language. Furthermore, meta-analysis was also performed to assess Ar potential as neuroprotectant agent in different clinical conditions: cardiac arrest, traumatic brain injury, ischemic stroke, perinatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, subarachnoid haemorrhage. Standardised mean differences for neurological, cognitive and locomotor, histological, and physiological measures were evaluated, through appropriate tests, clinical, and laboratory variables. In vivo studies were evaluated for risk of bias using the Systematic Review Center for Laboratory Animal Experimentation tool, while in vitro studies underwent assessment with a tool developed by the Office of Health Assessment and Translation. FINDINGS: The systematic review detected 60 experimental studies (16 in vitro, 7 ex vivo, 31 in vivo, 6 with both in vitro and in vivo) investigating the role of Ar. Only one clinical study was found. Data from six in vitro and nineteen in vivo studies were included in the meta-analyses. In pre-clinical models, Ar administration resulted in improved neurological, cognitive and locomotor, and histological outcomes without any change in physiological parameters (i.e., absence of adverse events). INTERPRETATION: This systematic review and meta-analysis based on experimental studies supports the neuroprotective effect of Ar, thus providing a rationale for potential translation of Ar treatment in humans. Despite adherence to established guidelines and methodologies, limitations in data availability prevented further analyses to investigate potential sources of heterogeneity due to study design. FUNDING: This study was funded in part by Italian Ministry of Health-Current researchIRCCS and by Ministero della Salute Italiano, Ricerca Finalizzata, project no. RF 2019-12371416.

Continuous vs intermittent Non-Invasive blood pressure MONitoring in preventing postoperative organ failure (niMON): study protocol for an open-label, multicenter randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Blood pressure has become one of the most important vital signs to monitor in the perioperative setting. Recently, the Italian Society of Anesthesia Analgesia Resuscitation and Intensive Care (SIAARTI) recommended, with low level of evidence, continuous monitoring of blood pressure during the intraoperative period. Continuous monitoring allows for early detection of hypotension, which may potentially lead to a timely treatment. Whether the ability to detect more hypotension events by continuous noninvasive blood pressure (C-NiBP) monitoring can improve patient outcomes is still unclear. Here, we report the rationale, study design, and statistical analysis plan of the niMON trial, which aims to evaluate the effect of intraoperative C-NiBP compared with intermittent (I-NiBP) monitoring on postoperative myocardial and renal injury. METHODS: The niMon trial is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, international, open-label, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial. Eligible patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive C-NiBP or I-NiBP as an intraoperative monitoring strategy. The proportion of patients who develop myocardial injury in the first postoperative week is the primary outcome; the secondary outcomes are the proportions of patients who develop postoperative AKI, in-hospital mortality rate, and 30 and 90 postoperative days events. A sample size of 1265 patients will provide a power of 80% to detect a 4% absolute reduction in the rate of the primary outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The niMON data will provide evidence to guide the choice of the most appropriate intraoperative blood pressure monitoring strategy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05496322, registered on the 5th of August 2023.

A non-invasive continuous and real-time volumetric monitoring in spontaneous breathing subjects based on bioimpedance-ExSpiron®Xi: a validation study in healthy volunteers.

Tidal volume (TV) monitoring breath-by-breath is not available at bedside in non-intubated patients. However, TV monitoring may be useful to evaluate the work of breathing. A non-invasive device based on bioimpedance provides continuous and real-time volumetric tidal estimation during spontaneous breathing. We performed a prospective study in healthy volunteers aimed at evaluating the accuracy, the precision and the trending ability of measurements of ExSpiron®Xi as compared with the gold standard (i.e. spirometry). Further, we explored whether the differences between the 2 devices would be improved by the calibration of ExSpiron®Xi with a pre-determined tidal volume. Analysis accounted for the repeated nature of measurements within each subject. We enrolled 13 healthy volunteers, including 5 men and 8 women. Tidal volume, TV/ideal body weight (IBW) and respiratory rate (RR) measured with spirometer (TVSpirometer) and with ExSpiron®Xi (TVExSpiron) showed a robust correlation, while minute ventilation (MV) showed a weak correlation, in both non/calibrated and calibrated steps. The analysis of the agreement showed that non-calibrated TVExSpiron underestimated TVspirometer, while in the calibrated steps, TVExSpiron overestimated TVspirometer. The calibration procedure did not reduce the average absolute difference (error) between TVSpirometer and TVExSpiron. This happened similarly for TV/IBW and MV, while RR showed high accuracy and precision. The trending ability was excellent for TV, TV/IBW and RR. The concordance rate (CR) was >95% in both calibrated and non-calibrated measurements. The trending ability of minute ventilation was limited. Absolute error for both calibrated and not calibrated values of TV, TV/IBW and MV accounting for repeated measurements was variably associated with BMI, height and smoking status. Conclusions: Non-invasive TV, TV/IBW and RR estimation by ExSpiron®Xi was strongly correlated with tidal ventilation according to the gold standard spirometer technique. This data was not confirmed for MV. The calibration of the device did not improve its performance. Although the accuracy of ExSpiron®Xi was mild and the precision was limited for TV, TV/IBW and MV, the trending ability of the device was strong specifically for TV, TV/IBW and RR. This makes ExSpiron®Xi a non-invasive monitoring system that may detect real-time tidal volume ventilation changes and then suggest the need to better optimize the patient ventilatory support.