Secondary prevention and follow-up of patients with ACS and not-at-target LDL: An Italian real-world retro-prospective analysis by the inertia group.

Background: In patients with recent ACS, the latest ESC/EAS guidelines for management of dyslipidaemia recommend intensification of LDL-C-lowering therapy. Objective: Report a real-world picture of lipid-lowering therapy prescribed and cholesterol targets achieved in post-ACS patients before and after a specific educational program. Methods: Retrospective data collection prior to the educational course and prospective data collection after the course of consecutive very high-risk patients with ACS admitted in 2020 in 13 Italian cardiology departments, and with a non-target LDL-C level at discharge. Results: Data from 336 patients were included, 229 in the retrospective phase and 107 in the post-course prospective phase. At discharge, statins were prescribed in 98.1% of patients, alone in 62.3% of patients (65% of which at high doses) and in combination with ezetimibe in 35.8% of cases (52% at high doses). A significant reduction was obtained in total and LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) from discharge to the first control visit. Thirty-five percent of patients achieved a target LDL-C <55 mg/dL according to ESC 2019 guidelines. Fifty percent of patients achieved the <55 mg/dL target for LDL-C after a mean of 120 days from the ACS event. Conclusions: Our analysis, though numerically and methodologically limited, suggests that management of cholesterolaemia and achievement of LDL-C targets are largely suboptimal and need significant improvement to comply with the lipid-lowering guidelines for very high CV risk patients. Earlier high intensity statin combination therapy should be encouraged in patients with high residual risk.

Persistent post-discharge symptoms after COVID-19 in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to describe persistent symptoms and sequelae in patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMD) after admission owing to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), assessing the role of autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs) compared with non-autoimmune rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (NARDs) on persistent symptoms and sequelae. METHODS: We performed an observational study including RMD patients who attended a rheumatology clinic in Madrid and required admission owing to COVID-19 (between March and May 2020) and survived. The study began at discharge and ran until October 2020. Main outcomes were persistence of symptoms and sequelae related to COVID-19. The independent variable was the RMD group (ARD and NARD). Covariates included sociodemographics, clinical and treatment data. We ran a multivariate logistic regression model to assess the risk of the main outcomes by RMD group. RESULTS: We included 105 patients, of whom 51.5% had ARD and 68.57% reported at least one persistent symptom. The most frequent symptoms were dyspnoea, fatigue and chest pain. Sequelae were recorded in 31 patients. These included lung damage in 10.4% of patients, lymphopenia in 10%, a central retinal vein occlusion and an optic neuritis. Two patients died. Eleven patients required re-admission owing to COVID-19 problems (16.7% ARD vs 3.9% NARD; P = 0.053). No statistically significant differences were found between RMD groups in the final models. CONCLUSION: Many RMD patients have persistent symptoms, as in other populations. Lung damage is the most frequent sequela. Compared with NARD, ARD does not seem to differ in terms of persistent symptoms or consequences, although ARD might have more re-admissions owing to COVID-19.

Hospital admissions in inflammatory rheumatic diseases during the peak of COVID-19 pandemic: incidence and role of disease-modifying agents.

AIMS: In this pandemic, it is essential for rheumatologists and patients to know the relationship between COVID-19 and inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs). We wanted to assess the role of targeted synthetic or biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (ts/bDMARDs) and other variables in the development of moderate-severe COVID-19 disease in IRD. METHODS: An observational longitudinal study was conducted during the epidemic peak in Madrid (1 March to 15 April 2020). All patients attended at the rheumatology outpatient clinic of a tertiary hospital in Madrid with a medical diagnosis of IRD were included. Main outcome: hospital admission related to COVID-19. Independent variable: ts/bDMARDs. Covariates: sociodemographic, comorbidities, type of IRD diagnosis, glucocorticoids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). Incidence rate (IR) of hospital admission related to COVID-19 was expressed per 1000 patient-months. Cox multiple regression analysis was run to examine the influence of ts/bDMARDs and other covariates on IR of hospital admission related to COVID-19. RESULTS: A total of 3951 IRD patients were included (5896 patient-months). Methotrexate was the csDMARD most used. Eight hundred and two patients were on ts/bDMARDs, mainly anti-TNF agents, and Rtx. Hospital admissions related to COVID-19 occurred in 54 patients (1.36%) with an IR of 9.15 (95% confidence interval: 7-11.9). In the multivariate analysis, older, male, comorbidities, and specific systemic autoimmune conditions (Sjögren, polychondritis, Raynaud, and mixed connective tissue disease) had more risk of hospital admissions. Exposition to ts/bDMARDs did not achieve statistical significance. Use of glucocorticoids, NSAIDs, and csDMARDs dropped from the final model. CONCLUSION: This study provides additional evidence in IRD patients regarding susceptibility to moderate-severe infection related to COVID-19.

Sumatriptan therapy for headache and acute myocardial infarction.

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD: Migraine is a common, debilitating, chronic neurovascular disorder. Triptans are considered the drugs of choice to treat migraine attacks; however, their use is limited owing to concerns about cardiovascular safety. AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW: The aim of this review is to describe: the mechanisms of action of triptans; the case-reports of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) associated with sumatriptan use; and the results of studies evaluating its tolerability and safety. WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN: Sumatriptan administration can be followed, in close temporal relationship, by AMI in young or adult migraine patients. Some of these cases have developed in subjects taking their first dose. Based on the results of prospective studies, the risk of severe cardiovascular adverse events after the use of a triptan is estimated at 1:100,000 treated attacks. These adverse events, albeit very infrequent, highlight the importance of careful adherence to the sumatriptan prescribing information. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: Inherent in its mechanism of action, sumatriptan could produce (coronary) vasospasm sometimes followed by AMI. The drug should not be prescribed to patients with history, symptoms or signs of ischemic vascular disease; an in-depth evaluation should be carried out in subjects at intermediate cardiovascular risk.

Angiotensin II receptor blockers in the prevention of atrial fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia. While antiarrhythmic agents and electrical cardioversion are highly effective in restoring sinus rhythm, the results obtained in prevention of recurrences are disappointing. Recently, angiotensin II has been recognized as a key factor in atrial structural and electrical remodeling associated with AF. So there are several potential mechanisms by which inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system may reduce AF. In this review, we report the results of studies evaluating the effect of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) in various clinical settings (i.e., lone AF, hypertension, high-risk patients, congestive heart failure, secondary prevention). However, many of these studies are small and retrospective and have a limited follow-up; moreover, since AF is related to several causes, chiefly heart diseases, patients with different characteristics have often been enrolled. Thus, it is not surprising that the results obtained are frequently conflicting. With these limitations and considering only the results of larger studies with longer follow-up, ARBs are effective in preventing AF in patients with congestive heart failure or hypertension with left ventricular hypertrophy or coronary artery/cerebrovascular disease. In any case, the use of ARBs is not recommended at present in clinical practice to prevent AF.

Age-related differences in factors associated with cigarette smoking among Italian high school students.

INTRODUCTION: Adolescents' cigarette smoking is related to several factors. The aim of this study among high school students was to test the hypothesis that factors related to smoking behavior could differ in early (14-16-year-old students, younger age group) vs. late (17-21-year-old students, older age group) adolescence. METHODS: The smoking behavior of 910 students was evaluated by a questionnaire. Students were categorized on the basis of their lifetime smoking behavior as never, former, occasional and regular smoker. Data were analyzed using Student's t-test, chi-square test and multinomial logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: In multinomial logistic regression analysis, variables related to adolescents' smoking behavior for both age groups were: positive attitude toward smoking (P < 0.001), illicit drug use (younger age group, P < 0.001; older age group, P = 0.003), smoking at home with parents (younger age group, P = 0.038; older age group, P < 0.001) and get drunk at least once (younger age group, P = 0.002; older age group, P = 0.026). In the younger age group, a significant association was also found between students' smoking behavior and having smoked a cigar at least once (P = 0.006) and smoking behavior of the best friend of the same sex (P = 0.001), whereas the relationship with the hours spent with friends of the opposite sex was of borderline significance (P = 0.058). In the older age group, other factors related to adolescent's smoking behavior were minimizing health consequences of smoking (P = 0.002) and the hours spent with friends of the same sex (P = 0.026). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that, as adolescence advances, factors related to smoking behavior can vary.

Lipoprotein(a) levels are increased in healthy young subjects with parental history of premature myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Most but not all studies in children, adolescents and young adults with a family history of coronary artery disease have reported an increase in lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) concentrations. The aim of this study was to assess if healthy children, adolescents and young adults with a parental history of premature myocardial infarction (PHPMI) have increased Lp(a) levels and are at higher risk of elevated (>30 mg/dl) Lp(a) concentrations. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred fifty healthy children, adolescents and young adults with PHPMI (55% males; age 18+/-6.7 years) and 150 age- (+/-1 year) and gender-matched control subjects participated in the study. Concentrations of total plasma cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, apolipoprotein (Apo) A-I and B, triglycerides and Lp(a) were determined after fasting for 14 h. Participants with PHPMI had higher concentrations of LDL-cholesterol (107.9+/-31.1 vs. 99.2+/-28.7 mg/dl, p=0.01), Apo B (89.6+/-26.4 vs. 82.8+/-20.2 mg/dl, p=0.011) and Lp(a) (26.7+/-34.0 vs. 19.2+/-23.2 mg/dl, p=0.012) and lower HDL-cholesterol concentrations (47.9+/-11.3 vs. 50.7+/-13.9 mg/dl, p=0.038) than participants without PHPMI. Thirty percent of PHPMI positive subjects had elevated Lp(a) concentrations vs. 16.7% of PHPMI negative subjects (p=0.009; relative risk 2.14; 95% CI 1.23-3.73). In a conditional logistic regression analysis, Lp(a) concentration was significantly and independently associated with PHPMI. CONCLUSIONS: Healthy young subjects with PHPMI have increased Lp(a) levels, a higher risk for elevated Lp(a) concentrations within an unfavourable lipid profile.