RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Late preterm infants, previously considered low risk, have been identified to be at risk of developmental problems in infancy and early childhood. There is limited information on the outcome of these infants in low and middle income countries. METHODS: Bayley scales of infant and toddler development, version III, were done on a group of late preterm infants in Johannesburg, South Africa. The mean composite cognitive, language and motor sub-scales were compared to those obtained from a group of typically developed control infants. Infants were considered to be "at risk" if the composite subscale score was below 85 and "disabled" if the composite subscale score was below 70. Infants identified with cerebral palsy were also reported. RESULTS: 56 of 73 (76.7%) late preterm infants enrolled in the study had at least one Bayley assessment at a mean age of 16.5 months (95% CI 15.2-17.6). The mean birth weight was 1.9 kg (95%CI 1.8-2.0) and mean gestational age 33.0 weeks (95% CI 32.56-33.51). There was no difference in the mean cognitive subscales between late preterm infants and controls (95.4 9, 95% CI 91.2-99.5 vs 91.9.95% CI 87.7-96.0). There was similarly no difference in mean language subscales (94.5, 95% CI 91.3-97.7 vs 95.9, 95% CI 92.9-99.0) or motor subscales (96.2, 95% CI 91.8-100.7 vs 97.6, 95% CI 94.7-100.5). There were four late preterm infants who were classified as disabled, two of whom had cerebral palsy. None of the control group was disabled. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that overall developmental outcome, as assessed by the Bayley scales of infant and toddler development, was not different between late preterm infants and a group of normal controls. However, 7.1% of the late preterm infants, had evidence of developmental disability. Thus late preterm infants in low and middle income countries require long term follow up to monitor developmental outcome. In a resource limited setting, this may best be achieved by including a parental screening questionnaire, such as the Ages and Stages Questionnaire, in the routine well baby clinic visits.
Assuntos
Deficiências do Desenvolvimento/diagnóstico , Disfunção Cognitiva/diagnóstico , Feminino , Seguimentos , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Transtornos do Desenvolvimento da Linguagem/diagnóstico , Masculino , Transtornos Motores/diagnóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , África do SulRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Advanced levels of delivery room resuscitation in very low birth weight infants are reported to be associated with death and complications of prematurity. In resource limited settings, the need for delivery room resuscitation is often used as a reason to limit care in these infants. METHODS: This was a review of delivery room resuscitation in very low birth weight infants born in a tertiary hospital in South Africa between 01 January 2013 and 30 June 2016. Outcomes included death and serious complications of prematurity. Advanced delivery room resuscitation was defined as the need for intubation, chest compressions or the administration of adrenaline. RESULTS: A total of 1511 very low birth weight infants were included in the study. The majority (1332/1511 (88.2%) required oxygen in the delivery room. Face mask ventilation was needed in 45.2% (683/1511). Advanced delivery room resuscitation was only required in 10.6% (160/1511). More than half the infants who required advanced delivery room resuscitation died (89/160; 55.6%). Advanced delivery room resuscitation was required in significantly more infants <1000 grams at birth than those infants >1000 grams (83/539 (15.4%) vs 77/972 (7.9%) p < 0.001). Advanced delivery room resuscitation was significantly associated with a 5 minute Apgar score < 6 (OR 13.8 (95%CI 8.6-22.0), supplemental oxygen at day 28 (OR 2.2 (95% CI 1.4-3.9), metabolic acidosis (OR 2.3 (95% CI 1.1-4.8) and death (OR 1.9 95% CI 1.1-3.3). Other serious complications of prematurity were not associated with advanced delivery room resuscitation. Mortality was increased in infants with a low admission temperature (35.1 °C (SD 0.92) vs 36.1 °C (SD 1.4) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: There was a high mortality rate associated with advanced delivery room resuscitation; however complications of prematurity were not increased in survivors..The need for advanced delivery room resuscitation alone should not be used as a predictor of poor outcome in very low birth weight infants. Survivors of advanced delivery room resuscitation should be afforded ventilatory support if required. Special care must be taken to avoid hypothermia in very low birth weight infants requiring resuscitation at birth.