T1-T2 Mismatch Sign as a Predictor of Ipsilateral Ischemic Change After Carotid Artery Stenting.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance (MR)-plaque imaging reflects the characteristics of carotid plaque. We evaluated the relationship between MR-plaque images and ischemic change after carotid artery stenting (CAS). METHODS: MR-plaque images were acquired from patients with carotid artery stenosis before CAS treatment. We calculated the relative signal intensity of plaque components compared with that of the sternocleidomastoid muscle and evaluated the presence/absence of T1-T2 mismatch and match sign. We then assessed the appearance of new ischemic lesions after CAS on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Factors associated with the appearance of a high-intensity lesion on DWI were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 64 patients with carotid artery stenoses treated with CAS were included in this study. In univariate analysis, T1-T2 mismatch sign was associated with the appearance of high-intensity lesions on DWI after CAS (odds ratio [OR], 12.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.593-40.072; P < 0.0001), whereas T1-T2 match sign and high intensity on T2-weighted imaging were negatively associated (OR, 0.061, 95% CI, 0.007-0.502, P = 0.009 and OR, 0.085; 95% CI, 0.022-0.334, P = 0.0004, respectively). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, T1-T2 mismatch sign was independently associated with the appearance of a high-intensity lesion on DWI after CAS (OR, 16.695; 95% CI, 1.324-210.52; P = 0.0295). CONCLUSIONS: T1-T2 mismatch sign on MR-plaque imaging is significantly associated with the appearance of new ischemic lesions after CAS. T1-T2 mismatch sign may be useful in considering treatment strategies for carotid artery stenosis.

Secondary meningioma after cranial irradiation: case series and comprehensive literature review.

BACKGROUND: Secondary meningioma after cranial irradiation, so-called radiation-induced meningioma, is one of the important late effects after cranial radiation therapy. In this report, we analyzed our case series of secondary meningioma after cranial irradiation and conducted a critical review of literature to reveal the characteristics of secondary meningioma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature review by using Pubmed, MEDLINE and Google scholar databases and investigated pathologically confirmed individual cases. In our institute, we found pathologically diagnosed seven cases with secondary meningioma between 2000 and 2018. Totally, 364 cases were analyzed based on gender, WHO grade, radiation dose, chemotherapy. The latency years from irradiation to development of secondary meningioma were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Spearman's correlation test was used to determine the relationship between age at irradiation and the latency years. RESULTS: The mean age at secondary meningioma development was 35.6 ± 15.7 years and the mean latency periods were 22.6 ± 12.1 years. The latency periods from irradiation to the development of secondary meningioma are significantly shorter in higher WHO grade group (P = 0.0026, generalized Wilcoxon test), higher radiation dose group (P < 0.0001) and concomitant systemic chemotherapy group (P = 0.0003). Age at irradiation was negatively associated with the latency periods (r = -0.23231, P < 0.0001, Spearman's correlation test). CONCLUSION: Cranial irradiation at older ages, at higher doses and concomitant chemotherapy was associated with a shorter latency period to develop secondary meningiomas. However, even low-dose irradiation can cause secondary meningiomas after a long latency period. Long-term follow-up is necessary to minimize the morbidity and mortality caused by secondary meningioma after cranial irradiation.