Evaluation of the VioOne HIV profile supplemental assay.

HIV is an ongoing global epidemic with estimates of more than a million new infections occurring annually. To combat viral spread, continuous innovations in areas including testing and treatment are necessary. In the United States, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend that laboratories follow an HIV testing algorithm that first uses a US Food and Drug Administration approved immunoassay to detect antibodies to HIV-1 or HIV-2 as well as HIV-1 p24 antigen in serum or plasma samples. An initially reactive specimen is tested by a supplemental assay for confirmation and to differentiate antibodies to HIV-1 or HIV-2. There are few Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved supplemental differentiation tests currently available. A multicenter investigation was conducted to determine the clinical performance for two independent versions of the Avioq VioOne HIV Profile Supplemental Assay (Avioq, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC). The performance of both assay versions compared favorably with the performance parameters for the Geenius HIV 1/2 Supplemental Assay as published in that assay package insert (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA), the current gold standard for HIV supplemental testing. When comparing the two VioOne assays, version 2 (lacking HIV-2 p27 antibody detection) demonstrated improved reproducibility, specificity, and sensitivity as compared to its predecessor. IMPORTANCE We evaluated the reproducibility, sensitivity, and specificity data for two versions of the VioOne HIV Profile Supplemental Assay and compared these results back to similar results for the Geenius HIV 1/2 Supplemental Assay that are publicly available. Our study concluded that the VioOne HIV Profile Supplemental Assay compared favorably with the Geenius HIV 1/2 Supplemental Assay, thus providing an additional option for clinical laboratories to improve and expand their HIV testing capabilities.

Increased mortality associated with elevated carcinoembryonic antigen in insurance applicants.

OBJECTIVE: Determine the relationship between the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) value and all-cause mortality in life insurance applicants aged 50 years and over. METHOD: By use of the Social Security Master Death Index, mortality was examined in 115,590 insurance applicants aged 50 and up for whom blood samples for CEA were submitted to the Clinical Reference Laboratory. Results were stratified by CEA value (<5 ng/mL, 5 to 9.9 ng/mL, 10+ ng/mL), smoking status, and age groups (50-59 years, 60-69 years, and 70 years and up). RESULTS: Relative mortality is increased at CEA values between 5 and 9.9 ng/mL and further increased at 10+ ng/mL for all age groups, with the most dramatic increase at the youngest ages. Excess mortality appears to last at least 3 to 4 years after the elevated result. Five-year all-cause mortality in applicants with CEA values of 10+ ng/mL is 25.2% with a mortality ratio relative to those with a CEA <5 ng/mL of 1156%. CONCLUSION: This study shows that CEA can detect the risk of early excess mortality in life insurance applicants; CEA levels of 5 ng/mL and over may be of concern. CEA testing beginning at age 50 years for life insurance applicants could capture 4.6% of early mortality if the threshold for further evaluation was set at 10 ng/mL. Only 0.4% of all applicants aged 50 and over have CEA values at or above this threshold.

Relationship of hemoglobin A1c to mortality in nonsmoking insurance applicants.

OBJECTIVE: Determine the relationship between hemoglobin A1c value and 5-year, all-cause mortality in nonsmoking life insurance applicants. METHOD: By use of the Social Security Master Death Index, mortality was examined in 286,443 non-smoking insurance applicants aged 40 and up for whom blood samples for hemoglobin A1c were submitted to the Clinical Reference Laboratory. Results were stratified by hemoglobin A1c value, gender and age bands 40 to 59, 60 to 69 and 70 and up. RESULTS: Increased mortality is apparent at hemoglobin A1c values of 6% and above, is linear, and on a percentage basis decreases with age. Hemoglobin A1c values less than 5% also are associated with increased mortality. Absolute mortality rates for females with elevated hemoglobin A1c are generally lower than rates for males, although mortality relative to the gender-specific reference group with hemoglobin A1c of 5% to 5.9% is generally the same for both. CONCLUSION: The importance of even small elevations of hemoglobin A1c above 5.9% is apparent. For screening, it is the degree of blood sugar elevation as measured by hemoglobin A1c rather than any diagnostic label that is critical in risk assessment.