Considerations for Industry-Preparing for the FDA Model-Informed Drug Development (MIDD) Paired Meeting Program.

A recent industry perspective published in this journal describes the benefits received by drug companies from participation in the MIDD Pilot Program. Along with the primary objectives of supporting good decision-making in drug development, there were substantial savings in time and development costs. Furthermore, many sponsors reported qualitative benefits such as new learnings and clarity on MIDD strategies and methodology that could be applied to other development programs. Based on the success of the Pilot Program, the FDA recently announced the continuation of the MIDD Paired Meeting Program as part of the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA VII). In this report, we describe the collective experiences of industry participants in the MIDD Program to date, including all aspects of the process from meeting request submission to follow-up actions. The purpose is to provide future participants with information to optimize the value of the MIDD Program.

A Quantitative Clinical Pharmacology-Based Framework For Model-Informed Vaccine Development.

Historically, vaccine development and dose optimization have followed mostly empirical approaches without clinical pharmacology and model-informed approaches playing a major role, in contrast to conventional drug development. This is attributed to the complex cascade of immunobiological mechanisms associated with vaccines and a lack of quantitative frameworks for extracting dose-exposure-efficacy-toxicity relationships. However, the Covid-19 pandemic highlighted the lack of sufficient immunogenicity due to suboptimal vaccine dosing regimens and the need for well-designed, model-informed clinical trials which enhance the probability of selection of optimal vaccine dosing regimens. In this perspective, we attempt to develop a quantitative clinical pharmacology-based approach that integrates vaccine dose-efficacy-toxicity across various stages of vaccine development into a unified framework that we term as model-informed vaccine dose-optimization and development (MIVD). We highlight scenarios where the adoption of MIVD approaches may have a strategic advantage compared to conventional practices for vaccines.

Model-Based Dose Selection of Fostemsavir for Pediatric Populations With Multidrug-Resistant HIV-1 and Relative Bioavailability Assessment in Healthy Adults.

Fostemsavir, a prodrug of the first-in-class HIV-1 attachment inhibitor temsavir, is approved for the treatment of multidrug-resistant HIV-1 in adults; its use in pediatric populations is currently being studied. Population pharmacokinetic modeling across pediatric weight bands was used to guide pediatric fostemsavir dose selection. Dosing simulations demonstrated that twice-daily fostemsavir 600-mg (adult dose) and 400-mg doses met safety and efficacy criteria for 35 kg or greater and 20 or greater to less than 35 kg pediatric weight bands, respectively. Temsavir relative bioavailability of 2 low-dose fostemsavir extended-release formulations (3 × 200 mg; formulations A and B) and reference formulation (600 mg extended release) was assessed in a 2-part, open-label, randomized, crossover study in healthy adults. Part 1 (N = 32) compared single-dose temsavir relative bioavailability, and Part 2 (N = 16) evaluated the impact of fed versus fasted conditions using the selected low-dose formulation. Temsavir geometric mean ratios for the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity and maximum concentration for formulation B were bioequivalent to the reference formulation. Temsavir maximum concentration for formulation B was similar in fed and fasted states, but area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity geometric mean ratio was increased under fed conditions, consistent with previous results in adults. These analyses demonstrated efficient pediatric dose selection using a model-based approach.

Opportunities and Challenges of Disease Progression Modeling in Drug Development - An IQ Perspective.

Disease progression modeling (DPM) represents an important model-informed drug development framework. The scientific communities support the use of DPM to accelerate and increase efficiency in drug development. This article summarizes International Consortium for Innovation & Quality (IQ) in Pharmaceutical Development mediated survey conducted across multiple biopharmaceutical companies on challenges and opportunities for DPM. Additionally, this summary highlights the viewpoints of IQ from the 2021 workshop hosted by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Sixteen pharmaceutical companies participated in the IQ survey with 36 main questions. The types of questions included single/multiple choice, dichotomous, rank questions, and open-ended or free text. The key results show that DPM has different representation, it encompasses natural disease history, placebo response, standard of care as background therapy, and can even be interpreted as pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling. The most common reasons for not implementing DPM as frequently seem to be difficulties in internal cross-functional alignment, lack of knowledge of disease/data, and time constraints. If successfully implemented, DPM can have an impact on dose selection, reduction of sample size, trial read-out support, patient selection/stratification, and supportive evidence for regulatory interactions. The key success factors and key challenges of disease progression models were highlighted in the survey and about 24 case studies across different therapeutic areas were submitted from various survey sponsors. Although DPM is still evolving, its current impact is limited but promising. The success of such models in the future will depend on collaboration, advanced analytics, availability of and access to relevant and adequate-quality data, collaborative regulatory guidance, and published examples of impact.

Fostemsavir and ethinyl estradiol drug interaction: Clinical recommendations for co-administration.

OBJECTIVES: Fostemsavir, a prodrug of temsavir, is indicated for heavily treatment-experienced adults with multidrug-resistant HIV-1 infection, antiretroviral (ARV) intolerance, or safety considerations. Understanding drug-drug interactions (DDIs) is important in individuals taking fostemsavir with hormonal contraceptives or menopausal or gender-affirming hormonal therapies. METHODS: Effect of temsavir (active moiety) on the pharmacokinetics of ethinyl estradiol (EE) and norethindrone (NET) was evaluated in an open-label, single-sequence, four-cycle, four-treatment study in 26 healthy female participants (study 206279, NCT02480881). Relevant ARV-contraceptive interaction studies and guideline recommendations were reviewed; that information was then applied to other contraceptive methods and hormone-based therapies to predict the impact of fostemsavir co-administration. RESULTS: Temsavir increased EE concentrations by 40% and had no effect on NET concentrations. Fostemsavir co-administration with hormone therapy is not expected to impact hormone treatment efficacy. Fostemsavir did not impact progestin; therefore, progestin-only and non-hormonal contraceptives will not be impacted by fostemsavir. Recommendations for co-administration of fostemsavir and hormonal contraceptives or menopausal or gender-affirming hormone therapies are based upon known and predicted DDIs, ensuring adequate hormonal concentrations to maintain the target effect. CONCLUSIONS: Applying the results of Study 206279 and other relevant ARV-contraceptive studies, we recommend that when co-administering fostemsavir with combined oral contraceptives (COCs) and other oestrogen-based therapies, EE dose should not exceed 30 µg or equivalent, and caution is advised in the case of individuals with risk factors for thromboembolic events. Other oestrogen-based therapies may be co-administered with fostemsavir, with monitoring of oestrogen concentrations and appropriate dose adjustments. No impact of fostemsavir on COC efficacy is expected.

Pharmacokinetics, metabolism and excretion of radiolabeled fostemsavir administered with or without ritonavir in healthy male subjects.

The pharmacokinetics, elimination, and metabolism of fostemsavir (FTR), a prodrug of the HIV-1 attachment inhibitor temsavir (TMR), were investigated in healthy volunteers. FTR was administered with and without ritonavir (RTV), a protease inhibitor previously shown to boost TMR exposures. In vitro studies were also used to identify the enzymes responsible for the metabolism of TMR.Total recovery of the administered dose ranged from 78% to 89%. Approximately 44% to 58% of the dose was excreted in urine, 20%-36% in faeces, and 5% in bile, as TMR and metabolites. RTV had no effect on the recovery of radioactivity in any matrix.Compared to FTR alone, pre-treatment of subjects with RTV increased the exposure of TMR by ∼66% and reduced the exposure of plasma total radioactivity by ∼68%.The major route of TMR elimination was through biotransformation. TMR, M28 (N-dealkylation), and M4 (amide hydrolysis) were the major circulating components in plasma. Pre-treatment with RTV increased the amount of TMR present, decreased the amount of circulating M28, and M4 was unchanged.CYP3A4 metabolism accounted for 21% of the dose, forming multiple oxidative metabolites. This pathway was inhibited by coadministration of RTV.

Pharmacokinetics of Temsavir, the Active Moiety of the HIV-1 Attachment Inhibitor Prodrug, Fostemsavir, Coadministered with Cobicistat, Etravirine, Darunavir/Cobicistat, or Darunavir/Ritonavir with or without Etravirine in Healthy Participants.

Fostemsavir is a prodrug of temsavir, a first-in-class attachment inhibitor that binds directly to HIV-1 gp120, preventing initial viral attachment and entry into host CD4+ T cells with demonstrated efficacy in phase 2 and 3. Temsavir is a P-glycoprotein and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) substrate; its metabolism is mediated by esterase and CYP3A4 enzymes. Drugs that induce or inhibit CYP3A, P-glycoprotein, and BCRP may affect temsavir concentrations. Understanding potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) following fostemsavir coadministration with antiretrovirals approved for HIV-1-infected treatment-experienced patients, including darunavir plus cobicistat (DRV/c) or DRV plus low-dose ritonavir (DRV/r) and etravirine, is clinically relevant. Open-label, single-sequence, multiple-dose, multicohort DDI studies were conducted in healthy participants (n = 46; n = 32). The primary objective was to assess the effects of DRV/r, etravirine, DRV/r plus etravirine, cobicistat, and DRV/c on temsavir systemic exposures; safety was a secondary objective. Compared with fostemsavir alone, coadministration with DRV/r increased the temsavir maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the concentration-time curve in one dosing interval (AUCtau), and plasma trough concentration (Ctau) by 52%, 63%, and 88%, respectively, while etravirine decreased the temsavir Cmax, AUCtau, and Ctau by ∼50% each. DRV/r plus etravirine increased the temsavir Cmax, AUCtau, and Ctau by 53%, 34%, and 33%, respectively. Compared with fostemsavir alone, coadministration with cobicistat increased the temsavir Cmax, AUCtau, and Ctau by 71%, 93%, and 136%, respectively; DRV/c increased the temsavir Cmax, AUCtau, and Ctau by 79%, 97%, and 124%, respectively. Fostemsavir with all combinations was generally well tolerated. No dose adjustment is required for fostemsavir when coadministered with strong CYP3A inhibitors, P-glycoprotein inhibitors, and modest inducers, including regimens with DRV/r, DRV/c, cobicistat, etravirine, and DRV/r plus etravirine based on the therapeutic margin for temsavir (ClinicalTrials.gov registration no. NCT02063360 and NCT02277600).

Evaluation of the pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction between the antiretroviral agents fostemsavir and maraviroc: a single-sequence crossover study in healthy participants.

BACKGROUND: Fostemsavir is an oral prodrug of temsavir, a first-in-class attachment inhibitor that binds HIV-1 gp120, preventing initial HIV attachment and entry into host immune cells. OBJECTIVE: The pharmacokinetic interaction was determined between temsavir and maraviroc, a CCR5 allosteric inhibitor indicated for CCR5-tropic HIV-1 that may be co-administered with fostemsavir as part of combination antiretroviral therapy in heavily treatment-experienced adults with multidrug-resistant HIV-1 infection. METHODS: This was a Phase 1, open-label, single-sequence, 3-period crossover study evaluating the effect of fostemsavir on maraviroc pharmacokinetics and the effect of maraviroc on temsavir pharmacokinetics (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02480894). Fourteen healthy participants received fostemsavir 600 mg twice daily (BID) for 4 days in Period 1 (followed by a 3-day washout), maraviroc 300 mg BID for 5 days in Period 2, and fostemsavir 600 mg BID with maraviroc 300 mg BID for 7 days in Period 3. Study drugs were administered orally with a standard meal. RESULTS: Following fostemsavir and maraviroc co-administration, maraviroc area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the dosing interval (AUCτ) increased 25% (from 1914 to 2382 ng.h/mL) and maraviroc plasma concentration at the end of the dosing interval (Ctrough) increased 37% (from 36.5 to 49.9 ng/mL), but there was no change in maximum observed concentration (Cmax). Following fostemsavir and maraviroc co-administration, temsavir AUCτ and Cmax increased 10-13% and Ctrough decreased 10%. CONCLUSIONS: Co-administration of fostemsavir and maraviroc did not result in clinically relevant changes in maraviroc or temsavir exposure. Fostemsavir and maraviroc may be co-administered without dose adjustment of either antiretroviral agent.

Effect of Renal and Hepatic Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics of Temsavir, the Active Moiety of Fostemsavir.

The oral prodrug fostemsavir (GSK3684394, formerly BMS-663068) is an antiretroviral treatment for HIV-1. Fostemsavir is metabolized to its active moiety, temsavir, a first-in-class HIV-1 attachment inhibitor that binds to the viral envelope glycoprotein 120. Long-term antiretroviral therapy, the resulting longer life expectancy, and/or certain coinfections can increase the risk of chronic liver and kidney disease in HIV-1-infected individuals. Two studies were conducted to collectively evaluate the impact of renal and hepatic impairment on temsavir pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety following a single dose of a 600-mg extended-release fostemsavir tablet. There was no clinically meaningful effect of renal or hepatic impairment on temsavir PK, although renal clearance decreased with increasing renal impairment from moderate to severe, and exposure (maximum concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity) tended to increase with increasing severity of hepatic impairment. No clinically meaningful effect of hemodialysis on temsavir PK parameters was observed. Fostemsavir was generally safe and well tolerated by treated subjects. Most adverse events (AEs) were mild, with the exception of 1 patient in the renal impairment study who discontinued due to 2 serious AEs unrelated to the study drug. No other treatment-emergent serious AEs occurred, and no other AEs leading to discontinuation were reported. Overall, these results suggest that fostemsavir can be used without dose modification in subjects with mild to severe renal impairment, including those with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis, and in subjects with mild to severe hepatic impairment.

Effects of Temsavir, Active Moiety of Antiretroviral Agent Fostemsavir, on QT Interval: Results From a Phase I Study and an Exposure-Response Analysis.

Fostemsavir, a prodrug of human immunodeficiency virus attachment inhibitor temsavir (TMR), is in phase III development in combination with other antiretroviral agents for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type I (HIV-1) infection in heavily treatment-experienced adults with multidrug-resistant HIV-1 infection for whom it is otherwise not possible to construct a suppressive antiviral regimen due to resistance, intolerance, or safety considerations. The proarrhythmic potential of fostemsavir was studied in a thorough QT study and exposure-response modeling was performed at therapeutic and supratherapeutic concentrations of TMR. Fostemsavir 1,200 mg b.i.d. did not result in a clinically meaningful change from placebo in baseline-adjusted Fridericia-corrected QTc (ddQTcF); however, at a supratherapeutic dose of 2,400 mg b.i.d., the upper bound of the two-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) of ddQTcF was 13.2 msec, exceeding the clinically important 10 msec threshold. A linear model of ddQTcF as a function of TMR plasma concentrations described these observations. Based on simulations with this model, TMR concentrations up to 7,500 ng/mL are expected to have an upper 90% CI bound for QTcF ≤ 10 msec. This concentration is 4.2-fold higher than the geometric mean TMR peak plasma concentration (Cmax ) of 1,770 ng/mL in heavily treatment-experienced HIV-1 infected patients administered fostemsavir 600 mg b.i.d. in the phase III BRIGHTE study (NCT02362503).

Methadone and buprenorphine pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics when coadministered with fostemsavir to opioid-dependent, human immunodeficiency virus seronegative participants.

AIMS: Regional human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevalence rates are high in people with history of injection drug use, including those managed with maintenance opioids. Fostemsavir (FTR) is an oral prodrug of temsavir, a first-in-class attachment inhibitor that binds HIV-1 gp120, preventing initial HIV attachment and entry into host immune cells. Here we determine the impact of FTR on the pharmacokinetics of opioids methadone (MET: R-, S- and total) or buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine (BUP and norBUP) when coadministered. METHODS: Study 206216 (NCT02666001) was a Phase I, open-label study, assessing the effect of FTR 600 mg (extended-release formulation) twice daily on pharmacokinetics of MET or BUP and norBUP, in non-HIV-infected participants on stable maintenance therapy with MET (40-120 mg; n = 16) or BUP plus naloxone (8-24 mg plus 2-6 mg; n = 16); pharmacodynamic response was assessed using standard opioid rating scales. RESULTS: Following coadministration with FTR, dose-normalized MET (R-, S- and total) exposures (maximum concentration in plasma, area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the dosing interval and concentration in plasma at 24 hours) increased 9-15% and BUP and norBUP exposures increased 24-39%. The 90% confidence interval ranges for MET (1.01-1.21) and BUP and norBUP (1.03-1.69) were within respective no-effect ranges (0.7-1.43 and 0.5-2.0). Opioid pharmacodynamic scores were similar with and without MET/BUP with no symptoms of withdrawal/overdose; no new safety signal for FTR when combined with a stable opioid regimen. CONCLUSIONS: FTR did not impact MET and had no clinically significant impact on BUP pharmacokinetics. Standardized assessments of opioid pharmacodynamics were unchanged throughout FTR administration with MET or BUP. FTR can be administered with MET or BUP without dose adjustment.

GSK2881078, a SARM, Produces Dose-Dependent Increases in Lean Mass in Healthy Older Men and Women.

Context: GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) 2881078 is a nonsteroidal, selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM) under investigation by GSK for treatment of reduced mobility and other functional limitation in men and women with muscle weakness associated with chronic and acute illnesses. Objective: This was a phase 1b study intended to explore across a dose range the pharmacokinetics (PK)-pharmacodynamics relationship and further safety and tolerability data for GSK2881078. This study also evaluated effects of CYP3A4 inhibition on PK of GSK2881078. Methods: This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, repeat-dose, dose-escalation study in healthy older males and postmenopausal females. A total of three cohorts of males and three cohorts of females were studied. Dosing at each dose level was twice daily for the first 3 days followed by once daily for up to 53 days. Repeated dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and MRI cross-sectional thigh scans were performed. The effect of CYP3A4 inhibition on GSK2881078 PK was evaluated in a separate cohort. Results: GSK2881078 was generally well tolerated and no serious adverse events were reported. Compared with placebo, there was greater lean mass accrual with all dose levels of GSK2881078. Females exhibited a greater response at lower doses than did males. Transient elevations of alanine aminotransferase were observed. The effect of CYP3A4 inhibition on GKS2881078 PK was unlikely to be of clinical significance. Conclusions: GSK2881078 yielded dose-dependent increases in lean mass with evidence of enhanced sensitivity in women. The compound was well tolerated.

A Randomized Phase 2 Study of an Anti-Amyloid ß Monoclonal Antibody in Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy of intravenous GSK933776, a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against the N-terminal amino acids of amyloid ß, for the treatment of geographic atrophy (GA) in age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked, multicenter phase 2 clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with GA secondary to AMD, a visual acuity score of at least 35 letters, and GA with a total area of 1.9 to 17 mm2 were enrolled. METHODS: Participants were monitored monthly for 4 months during an observation period to determine the rate of GA enlargement in the study eye. After the observation period, randomization was performed into 1 of 4 treatment arms (GSK933776 at 3, 6, and 15 mg/kg/month and placebo). At each monthly visit over 18 months, participants underwent visual acuity testing under normal luminance and low-luminance conditions. Ocular imaging included color fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence, fluorescein angiography, and spectral-domain OCT. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Enlargement in the area of GA measured from color fundus photographs with reference to fundus autofluorescence images. RESULTS: A total of 191 participants were randomized into the study, with 139 (73%) fulfilling the efficacy population criteria. Over 18 months, GSK933776 did not reduce the rate of GA enlargement relative to placebo. Overall, there were no consistent meaningful differences relative to placebo in any of the visual function measures. There was a correlation between the low-luminance visual acuity (LLVA) deficit at baseline and the rate of GA enlargement. Genetic variations in complement factor I (CFI) gene did not correlate with GA progression. No ocular serious adverse events considered related to the GSK933776 treatment were identified, and a similar number of nonocular serious adverse events were reported across all treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous amyloid ß inhibition with GSK933776 did not slow the rate of GA enlargement compared with placebo, and no clinically meaningful differences relative to placebo were observed in visual function testing over 18 months. The LLVA deficit was associated with faster GA enlargement; however, no correlation was shown between genetic variations in the CFI gene and the rate of GA enlargement.

A Phase 1 Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study Assessing the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Retosiban in Healthy, Nonpregnant Japanese Subjects.

This study characterized the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of retosiban in healthy, nonpregnant Japanese women prior to the enrollment of Japanese women in preterm labor in phase 3 trials. This study had 2 cohorts. Cohort 1 was a double-blind, sponsor-open, randomized study in Japanese women. Cohort 2 was an open-label study in white women to compare the pharmacokinetics with those of Japanese women. Retosiban was administered as a 6 mg/h infusion for 24 hours, followed by a 12 mg/h infusion over the next 24 hours; each infusion was preceded by a 6 mg loading dose administered over 5 minutes. Plasma concentrations of retosiban and its major metabolite, GSK2847065, were determined with an informal comparison of pharmacokinetics between Japanese and white women. There was minimal difference in exposure to retosiban or GSK2847065 between Japanese and white women (ratio of 1.03 in retosiban AUC and Cmax ). The 2 doses of retosiban were well tolerated across both populations, and no ethnic difference was observed in the safety profile. Given the results of this study and the known safety profile and dosing flexibility in the phase 3 trials, ethnic-specific dose adjustment of retosiban is not considered necessary for the Japanese and general Asian population.

Safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacological effects of the selective androgen receptor modulator, GSK2881078, in healthy men and postmenopausal women.

AIM: Selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs) induce anabolic effects on muscle without the adverse effects of androgenic steroids. In this first-in-human study, we report the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics of the SARM GSK2881078. METHODS: In Part A, healthy young men (n = 10) received a single dose of study drug (0 mg, 0.05 mg, 0.1 mg, 0.2 mg GSK2881078 or matching-placebo). In Part B, repeat-dose cohorts in men (n = 65) were 0.05 mg, 0.2 mg then 0.08 mg, 0.24 mg, 0.48 mg, 0.75 mg, or placebo; in women (n = 24) they were 0.24 mg, 0.35 mg, or placebo (7 days for 0.5 mg, 14 days for other doses). RESULTS: PK analysis showed dose-proportional increases in exposure and a long >100-h half-life. No significant effects on vital signs, electrocardiograms, cardiac telemetry or standard clinical laboratory studies were observed. A dose-response effect was observed on lowering both high-density lipoprotein and sex hormone-binding globulin. In females at 0.35 mg, differences from placebo were -0.518 (95% confidence interval: -0.703, -0.334) mmol l-1 and -39.1 (-48.5, -29.7) nmol l-1 , respectively. Women showed greater sensitivity to these parameters at lower doses than men. Drug-related adverse events (AEs) were mild. One woman developed a drug rash and was withdrawn. Two men had elevated creatine phosphokinase after physical exertion during follow-up. A serious AE occurred in a subject on placebo. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate pharmacodynamic effects with acceptable tolerability and support further clinical evaluation of this SARM.

Single and Multiple Dose Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Safety of the Novel Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2 Enzyme Inhibitor Darapladib in Healthy Chinese Subjects: An Open Label Phase-1 Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Darapladib is a lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) inhibitor. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of darapladib in healthy Chinese subjects. METHODS: Twenty-four subjects received darapladib 160 mg orally, approximately 1 hour after a standard breakfast, as a single dose and once daily for 28 days. Non-compartmental methods were used to determine the single and multiple dose pharmacokinetics of darapladib and its metabolite SB-553253. Repeat dose Lp-PLA2 activity and safety were evaluated. RESULTS: Systemic exposure (AUC(0-T), Cmax geometric mean (CVb%)) of darapladib was higher after multiple-dosing (519 ng.h/mL (33.3%), 34.4 ng/mL (49.9%)) compared to single-dose administration (153 ng.h/mL (69.0%), 17.9 ng/mL (55.2%). The steady-state accumulation ratio was less than unity (Rs = 0.80), indicating time-dependent pharmacokinetics of darapladib. Darapladib steady-state was reached by Day 14 of once daily dosing. Systemic exposure to SB-553253 was lower than darapladib with median (SB-553253: darapladib) ratios for AUC(0-τ) of 0.0786 for single dose and 0.0532 for multiple dose administration. On Day 28, pre-dose and maximum inhibition of Lp-PLA2 activity was approximately 70% and 75% relative to the baseline value, respectively and was dependent of darapladib concentration. The most common adverse events (≥ 21% subjects) were abnormal faeces, abnormal urine odour, diarrhoea and nasopharyngitis. CONCLUSION: Darapladib 160 mg single and repeat doses were profiled in healthy Chinese subjects. Single dose systemic exposure to darapladib in healthy Chinese subjects was consistent with that observed previously in Western subjects whereas steady-state systemic exposure was approximately 65% higher in Chinese than Western subjects. The Lp-PLA2 activity and adverse event profile were similar in healthy Chinese and previous reports in Western subjects. Ethnic-specific dose adjustment of darapladib is not considered necessary for the Chinese population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02000804.

The pharmacokinetics and safety of darapladib in subjects with severe renal impairment.

AIM: Darapladib is a potent and reversible orally active inhibitor of lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2 ). The aim of the study was to assess the effects of severe renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics and safety/tolerability of darapladib compared with normal renal function. METHODS: This was an open label, parallel group study of darapladib following 10 day once daily 160 mg oral dosing in subjects with normal (n = 8) and severe renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 ml min(-1) 1.73 m(-2) , n = 8). Plasma concentrations of total and unbound darapladib as well as total darapladib metabolites were determined in samples obtained over 24 h on day 10. RESULTS: Plasma concentrations of total and unbound darapladib as well as all three metabolites were higher in subjects with severe renal impairment. Area under the plasma concentration vs. time curve between time zero and 24 h (AUC(0,24 h) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) of total darapladib in severely renally impaired subjects were 52% and 59% higher than those in the matched healthy subjects, respectively. Similar results were found with the darapladib metabolites. Darapladib was highly plasma protein bound with 0.047% and 0.034% unbound circulating in plasma in severely renally impaired and healthy subjects, respectively. Unbound plasma darapladib exposures were more than two-fold higher in severely renally impaired subjects than in healthy controls. Adverse events (AE) were reported in 38% of healthy subjects and 75% of severely renally impaired subjects, most of which were mild or moderate in intensity. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study showed that darapladib exposure was increased in subjects with severe renal impairment compared with healthy controls. However, darapladib was generally well tolerated in both groups.

Darapladib, a lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 inhibitor, in diabetic macular edema: a 3-month placebo-controlled study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the potential of lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 inhibition as a novel mechanism to reduce edema and improve vision in center-involved diabetic macular edema (DME). DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled phase IIa study. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-four center-involved DME patients randomized 2:1 to receive darapladib (n = 36) or placebo (n = 18). METHODS: Darapladib 160 mg or placebo monotherapy was administered orally once daily for 3 months, and patients were followed up monthly for 4 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and the center subfield and center point of the study eye at month 3 as determined by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. RESULTS: Five patients in the study received intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor rescue therapy before the day 90 assessment, 2 of 36 (6%) in the darapladib arm and 3 of 18 (17%) in the placebo arm. Administration of 160 mg darapladib for 3 months resulted in statistically significant mean improvements, from baseline to month 3, in BCVA of 4.1 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3-5.8) and of 57 µm in central subfield thickness (95% CI, -84 to -30) in the study eyes. An increase in BCVA of 1.7 ETDRS letters (95% CI, -1.0 to 4.4) and a decrease in center subfield thickness of 34 µm (95% CI, -75 to 6.8) for the placebo group were not significant. No ocular severe adverse events (SAEs) or SAEs considered related to darapladib were reported. One SAE of myocardial infarction, not considered related to darapladib, was reported, and 1 SAE of severe diarrhea was reported in a placebo patient, subsequently withdrawn from the study. Study eye ocular adverse events (AEs) and nonocular AEs were similar between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily oral darapladib administered for 3 months demonstrated modest improvements in vision and macular edema that warrant additional investigation of this novel lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 inhibitory mechanism for the treatment of DME.

Utility of concentration-effect modeling and simulation in a thorough QT study of losmapimod.

A thorough QT study was conducted in healthy volunteers with losmapimod. Four treatment regimens were included: a therapeutic dose (7.5 mg BID for 5 days), a supratherapeutic dose (20 mg QD for 5 days), a positive control (400 mg moxifloxacin single dose on Day 5), and placebo for 5 days. Baseline and on treatment ECGs were measured on Day 1 (3 timepoints predose) and Day 5, respectively. The primary statistical analysis failed to demonstrate a lack of effect of losmapimod on the QT interval leading to a positive finding. However, simulations using the concentration-effect model established for QTcF vs. losmapimod concentration at concentrations 4× the maximum concentration of the therapeutic dose did not exceed the regulatory thresholds of concern of 5 milliseconds for the mean (4.57 milliseconds) and 10 milliseconds for the upper bound of the 90%CI (90%CI 2.88, 6.10). Modeling demonstrated that the discrepant results may have been due to a baseline shift after repeat dosing and baseline differences between the treatments. Considering the results of the concentration-effect modeling, previous losmapimod data, and the high false-positive rate associated with the ICH E14 statistical analysis, the statistical analysis was likely a false-positive.