Prevention and treatment of postphlebitic syndrome: results of a 3-part study.

BACKGROUND: The true incidence of postphlebitic syndrome (PPS) following proximal deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and the efficacy of graduated compression stockings in preventing and treating PPS are unknown. METHODS: A 3-part study of 202 patients evaluated 1 year after proximal DVT: 2 randomized placebo-controlled trials of stockings and 1 prospective cohort of untreated patients. Patients were evaluated for PPS, using a standardized questionnaire, and for venous valvular incompetence, using photoplethysmography and venous Doppler. They were enrolled in study 1 or study 2 if they did not have symptomatic PPS and did not have or had venous valvular incompetence, respectively, and into study 3 if they had symptomatic PPS. Study 1 patients were left untreated and followed up for development of PPS every 6 months for a mean of 55 months. Study 2 patients were randomized to a below-knee stocking (20-30 mm Hg) or a matched placebo stocking, and followed up for development of PPS every 6 months for a mean of 57 months. Study 3 patients were randomized to an active stocking (30-40 mm Hg) or a matched placebo stocking and followed up every 3 months for treatment failure, defined a priori. RESULTS: In study 1, 6 (5.0%) of 120 patients were categorized as treatment failures, a rate similar to placebo-treated study 2 patients (P =.10). In study 2, 0 (0%) of 24 active and 1 (4.3%) of 23 placebo-treated patients were categorized as treatment failures (P =.49). In study 3, 11 (61.1%) of 18 active and 10 (58.8%) of 17 placebo-treated patients were categorized as treatment failures (P>.99). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients do not have PPS 1 year after proximal DVT, and do not require stockings. We failed to show a benefit of stockings in patients with PPS, but the small numbers preclude definitive conclusions.

Postthrombotic syndrome after hip or knee arthroplasty: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Although the incidence of the postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) has been addressed in patients with symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT), less information is available on the incidence in patients who develop asymptomatic DVT after major hip or knee arthroplasty. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether symptomatic PTS occurs more frequently in patients who develop DVT after hip or knee arthroplasty than those who are free of DVT and to provide an estimate of the incidence of PTS in patients who had undergone major hip or knee arthroplasty and had proximal DVT, distal (calf) DVT, or no DVT. DESIGN AND SETTING: A cross-sectional study conducted at the Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation, Hamilton, Ontario, and the Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Two hundred fifty-five subjects who had undergone major hip or knee arthroplasty 2 to 7 years previously and had routine predischarge venography showing proximal DVT (n = 25), distal DVT (n = 66), or no DVT (n = 164) were enrolled from March 1993 through December 1998. The presence of symptomatic PTS confirmed by the presence of objectively confirmed venous valvular incompetence was ascertained. RESULTS: The rates of PTS were low and not significantly different among the 3 subgroups: 1 (4.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.1%-20.4%) of 25 patients with proximal DVT, 4 (6.1%, 95% CI = 1.7%-14.8%) of 66 patients with distal DVT, and 7 (4.3%, 95% CI = 1.7%-8.6%) of 164 patients with no DVT. CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic PTS is an uncommon complaint after major hip or knee arthroplasty. Patients who develop postoperative proximal or distal DVT and who receive 6 to 12 weeks of anticoagulant therapy are not predisposed to PTS.

Intermittent compression units for severe post-phlebitic syndrome: a randomized crossover study.

BACKGROUND: Although uncommon, severe post-phlebitic syndrome may be associated with persistent, intractable pain and swelling that interfere with work and leisure activities. This study was performed to determine whether intermittent compression therapy with an extremity pump benefits patients with this condition and, if so, whether the benefit is sustained. METHODS: The study was a randomized crossover trial. Over the period 1990 to 1996, all patients in the clinical thromboembolism program of an Ontario teaching hospital who had a history of deep vein thrombosis and intractable symptoms of post-phlebitic syndrome were recruited into the study. The study involved using an extremity pump twice daily for a total of 2 months (20 minutes per session). The patients were randomly assigned to use either a therapeutic pressure (50 mm Hg) or a placebo pressure (15 mm Hg) for the first month. For the second month, the patients used the other pressure. A questionnaire assessing symptoms and functional status served as the primary outcome measure and was administered at the end of each 1-month period. A symptom score was derived by summing the scores for individual questions. At the end of the 2-month study, patients were asked to indicate their treatment preference and to rate the importance of the difference between the 12 pressures. Treatment was considered successful if the patient preferred the therapeutic pressure and stated that he or she would continue using the extremity pump and that the difference between the therapeutic and placebo pressures was of at least slight importance. All other combinations of responses were considered to represent treatment failure. Patients whose treatment was classified as successful were offered the opportunity to keep the pump and to alter pressure, frequency and duration of pump use to optimize symptom management. In July 1996 the authors contacted all study participants whose treatment had been classified as successful to determine whether they were still using the pump and, if so, whether they were still deriving benefit. RESULTS: In total 15 consecutive patients (12 women and 3 men) were enrolled in the study. The symptom scores were significantly better with the therapeutic pressure (mean 16.5) than with the placebo pressure (mean 14.4) (paired t-test, p = 0.007). The treatment for 12 of the patients (80%, 95% confidence interval 52% to 96%) was considered successful. Of these, 9 patients continued to use the pump beyond the crossover study and to derive benefit. INTERPRETATION: The authors conclude that a trial of pump therapy is worthwhile for patients with severe post-phlebitic syndrome and that a sustained beneficial response can be expected in most such patients.

Efficacy of famotidine in the healing of active benign gastric ulceration: comparison of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory- or aspirin-induced gastric ulcer and idiopathic gastric ulceration. Long Island Jewish Medical Center Acid-Peptic Study Group.

Seventy-one of 85 consecutive patients with endoscopically confirmed active benign gastric ulcers completed an 8-week study to evaluate the effects on healing of famotidine 40 mg given as a single dose at night. The healing rate in the 48 patients in whom the ulcers were associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) or aspirin (ASA) use was compared with that in the 23 patients with idiopathic ulcers. Endoscopy, symptom assessments, antacid use, hematology, and serum chemistry were performed at weeks 4 and 8 of treatment. Famotidine 40 mg at bedtime healed 63 (89%) of the 71 ulcers at 8 weeks; the healing rate for NSAID/ASA-associated ulcers was 46 (96%) of 48, which was significantly greater than that for idiopathic ulcers (17 of 23; 74%) (P = 0.0119). Of the 54 patients who returned a questionnaire 1 to 2 years after completing the study, 20% were still taking an NSAID/ASA (mainly for cardiovascular prophylaxis). About half of the patients surveyed were taking anti-ulcer medication. None of these patients had experienced any serious ulcer complication. The results of this study suggest that differentiating NSAID/ASA-induced ulcers from idiopathic ulcers may be important with regard to healing rates and duration of therapy.

The efficacy and tolerability of famotidine and ranitidine on the healing of active duodenal ulcer and during six-month maintenance treatment, with special reference to NSAID/aspirin-related ulcers.

The subjects of this multicenter study were 160 patients with endoscopically confirmed active duodenal ulcers, randomly assigned to receive 40 mg of famotidine or 300 mg of ranitidine nightly for four to eight weeks. During a subsequent six-month maintenance treatment phase, the patients received 20 mg of famotidine or 150 mg of ranitidine nightly. After eight weeks of treatment, ulcer healing was endoscopically confirmed in 94% of the 81 famotidine-treated patients and in 80% of the 79 ranitidine-treated patients (P less than 0.01). During the first week of treatment, daytime and nighttime pain scores were significantly lower in the famotidine-treated than ranitidine-treated patients. During the maintenance treatment phase, the ulcer in 79% of 58 famotidine-treated patients and in 81% of 52 ranitidine-treated patients remained healed. Multivariate analysis of factors such as age, sex, smoking, alcohol and coffee consumption, use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), history of ulcer, and ulcer size and number showed that they had no significant effects on the differences in healing rates between the two treatment groups. The ulcers were all healed in the famotidine-treated patients whose ulcers were associated with the prior use of NSAIDs. The results of this and many other studies indicate that, unless ulcer healing is confirmed by endoscopy, treatment of active duodenal ulcers should continue for six to eight weeks.