Inflammation as an aetiological trigger for depressive symptoms in a prospective cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

OBJECTIVE: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is often comorbid with mood disorders and depressive symptoms. The aetiology of depressive symptoms in IBD, however, remains largely unknown. Consistent with the inflammatory hypothesis of depression, the aim of this study was to explore the prospective associations between inflammatory biomarkers and depressive symptoms in a cohort of IBD patients with and without a previous clinical diagnosis of mood disorder. METHOD: IBD clinical activity was determined using the Harvey-Bradshaw Index for CD and the Partial Mayo score for UC; serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and faecal calprotectin (fCAL) were used as biomarkers of systemic and intestinal inflammation, respectively. Participants were administered the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-depression (HADS-D) at baseline and 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: Eighty-four participants (50 ± 16 years; 75% UC and 25% CD) were included in the main analyses. Longitudinal moderated regression models showed that baseline CRP significantly predicted follow-up HADS-D scores among individuals with a previous mood disorder diagnosis (ß = 0.843, p < .001), but not among individuals without (ß = -0.013, p = .896), after controlling for baseline HADS-D scores, body mass index, IBD phenotype, sex, and perceived stress. Likely due to lower power, results on FCAL (n = 31) were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that IBD patients with previous diagnosis of mood disorder may be at higher risk of inflammation-related depressive symptoms.

Switching from VEDOlizumab intravenous to subcutaneous formulation in ulcerative colitis patients in clinical remission: The SVEDO Study, an IG-IBD study.

BACKGROUND: The administration of biological drugs in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) is increasingly moving from intravenous to subcutaneous formulations. AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of vedolizumab subcutaneous administration after switching from intravenous administration in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients in corticosteroid-free clinical remission. METHODS: An observational, multicentre, prospective study was conducted by the Italian Group for the study of IBD (IG-IBD). UC patients in clinical remission (pMAYO < 2) not receiving steroids for > 8 months before the switch, and with at least 6 months of follow-up were included. Switch from intravenous to subcutaneous vedolizumab was defined as successful in patients not experiencing a disease flare (pMAYO ≥ 2) or needing oral steroids or stopping subcutaneous vedolizumab during the 6 months of follow-up after the switch. RESULTS: Overall, 168 patients were included. The switch was a success in 134 patients (79.8%). Vedolizumab retention rate was 88.7% at month six. C-reactive protein and faecal calprotectin values did not change after the switch (p = 0.07 and p = 0.28, respectively). Ten of the 19 patients who stopped subcutaneous formulation switched back to intravenous formulation recapturing clinical remission in 80%. Side effects were observed in 22 patients (13.1%). CONCLUSION: Effectiveness of switching from intravenous to subcutaneous vedolizumab formulation in UC patients in steroid-free clinical remission is confirmed in a real-world setting.