EuMAR stakeholder engagement: an analysis of medically assisted reproduction (MAR) data collection practices in EU countries†.

STUDY QUESTION: What are the current national medically assisted reproduction (MAR) data collection systems across EU Member States, and how can these countries contribute to a unique, cycle-by-cycle registry for the European Monitoring of Medically Assisted Reproduction (EuMAR) project? SUMMARY ANSWER: The study identified significant variation in MAR data collection practices across Member States, with differences in data types, collection methods, and reporting requirements; the EuMAR project emerges as an opportunity to enhance data standardization and improve MAR data collection in the EU. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: There is a need for new approaches in MAR data collection that include long-term and cross border follow-up. The EuMAR project intends to establish a unified, cycle-by-cycle registry of data on MAR treatments in EU countries, from which accurate cumulative outcomes can be calculated. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This cross-sectional study involved a survey and interviews with stakeholders from 26 EU Member States conducted in 2023 over a period of seven months. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Representatives from national competent authorities and professional associations involved in MAR data collection in EU countries were invited to complete the survey and interviewed to assess current data flows, information requirements, and their interest in the EuMAR project. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Half of the participating countries reported having a national MAR registry with cycle-by-cycle data (n = 13), while 31% reported having a national registry with aggregated data (n = 8) and 19% reported having no national registry (n = 5). Of the countries with a national cycle-by-cycle registry, eight countries collect identifiable data, five countries collect pseudonymized data, and one country collects fully anonymized data. Informed consent is required in 10 countries. The main advantages that participants expected from a European registry like EuMAR were the possibility of obtaining national statistics in the absence of a national registry and improving the calculation of cumulative outcomes. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The results of the study are based on self-reported data, which may be subject to bias, however, the validity of the collected information was verified with different means, including follow-up calls for clarifications and sharing final transcript reports. The feasibility of the proposed data flow models will be tested in a pilot study. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Despite the heterogeneity of data collection practices across EU countries, the results show that stakeholders have high expectations of the benefits that the EuMAR registry can bring, namely the improvement of data consistency, cross-border comparability, and cumulative live birth rates, leading to better information for patients, health care providers and policy makers. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The EuMAR project was co-founded by ESHRE and the European Commission (101079865-EuMAR-EU4H-2021-PJ2). No competing interests were declared. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Failure to detect DNA in blastocoel fluid is associated with a higher live birth rate in both PGT-A and conventional IVF/ICSI cycles.

STUDY QUESTION: Is the presence of DNA in the blastocoel fluid (BF) of expanded blastocysts, assessed by whole genome amplification (WGA), associated with the clinical outcome at the first transfer? SUMMARY ANSWER: At the first transfer, blastocysts with negative BF-WGA have more chance to implant and to develop to term than those with positive BF-WGA results, both in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) cycles (where only euploid blastocysts resulting from the chromosomal analysis of trophectoderm (TE) biopsies were transferred) and in IVF/ICSI conventional cycles. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Retrospective studies conducted in patients undergoing PGT-A have shown that the incidence of negative BF-WGA was significantly higher in TE-euploid blastocysts than in TE-aneuploid blastocysts. In addition, after the transfer of TE-euploid blastocysts, the ongoing clinical pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the group with negative BF-WGA compared with those with positive BF-WGA. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A prospective cohort study including 102 consecutive PGT-A patients (Group 1) and 88 consecutive conventional IVF/ICSI patients (Group 2), was conducted between January 2019 and December 2021. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: In both groups, BFs were collected from expanded blastocysts of high grade and processed for WGA. DNA amplification was evaluated by agarose gel electrophoresis for the presence (positive BF-WGA) or absence (negative BF-WGA) of a band. Directly after the BF retrieval, blastocysts from Group 1 underwent TE biopsy and vitrification. In Group 2, blastocysts were vitrified immediately after BF collection. In Group 1, only euploid blastocysts were considered for transfer according to the results of TE biopsies. In both groups, the selection of the blastocyst to be transferred was based on BF-WGA results giving priority, if available, to those with negative amplification. The primary outcome investigated was the live birth rate (LBR) at the first transfer. The main variable under investigation was the negative BF-WGA and results were corrected for confounders (maternal and paternal age, number of retrieved oocytes, male factor) by multiple logistic regression analysis. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: In Group 1, 60 patients transferred negative BF-WGA blastocysts and 42 positive BF-WGA blastocysts, and the LBR at the first transfer was 53.3% and 26.2%, respectively (P = 0.0081). After testing for selected confounders in a multiple logistic analysis, the transfer of blastocysts with negative BF-WGA resulted in an odds ratio of (OR) 3.52 (95% CI: 1.48-8.88, P = 0.0057) compared to transfer of positive BF-WGA blastocysts. In Group 2, at the first transfer 30 deliveries resulted from blastocysts with negative BF-WGA (48.4%) and three from the transfer of positive BF-WGA blastocysts in 26 patients (11.5%; P = 0.0014). Multiple logistic analysis indicated that the transfer of blastocysts with negative BF-WGA resulted in an OR 6.89 (95% CI: 1.98-32.95, P = 0.0056) compared to transfer of positive BF-WGA blastocysts. The LBR per transfer and the cumulative LBR per patient showed the same trend. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The study was performed in a single center. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The data from this study highlight the heterogeneity of blastocysts of similar morphology, even in those classified as euploid by TE analysis. Failure to detect DNA in BFs after WGA is associated with a significantly higher LBR at the first embryo transfer as well as per transfer and per patient. The processing of the BF by WGA is an easy and cost-effective tool that could become a valuable option to offer patients the highest chances of term pregnancy in the shortest time possible. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The study received no funding from external sources. There are no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Birefringence properties of human immotile spermatozoa and ICSI outcome.

RESEARCH QUESTION: In sperm samples with complete asthenozoospermia, pregnancies are achieved by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), but this condition has a negative impact on fertilization and embryo development owing to the difficulty of identifying viable cells for oocyte injection. Is the selection of sperm cells with head birefringence properties under polarizing light a successful strategy to identify viable spermatozoa? DESIGN: This study included 192 ICSI cycles with complete asthenozoospermia (83 ejaculated and 109 testicular samples) performed under polarized light. Two types of sperm head birefringence were distinguished: partial (presumably reacted spermatozoa) and total (presumably intact acrosome). In some sperm cells, no birefringence was present. The main outcome of the study was the cumulative live birth rate (cLBR) per ICSI cycle. RESULTS: Seventy-three deliveries resulted with 38.0% cLBR per ICSI cycle. The injection of birefringent spermatozoa led to significantly higher rates of fertilization, embryo development and implantation compared with the absence of birefringence (P < 0.001). Similarly, the resulting cLBR were 53.6% and 9.0%, respectively (P < 0.001). Spermatozoa with partial head birefringence yielded significantly higher fertilization and embryo utilization rates compared with total birefringence. The cLBR showed the same trend (62.7% and 46.7%, respectively, P = 0.048). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed the pattern of partial birefringence to be strongly associated with live birth rate. CONCLUSIONS: Immotile sperm cells with birefringence properties under polarized light have higher chances of inducing fertilization and embryo development compared with non-birefringent cells. In addition, a pattern of partial birefringence, associated with a reacted acrosome, is the strongest predictive factor for live birth delivery, both in ejaculated and testicular samples.

IVF Lite: a smart IVF programme based on mild ovarian stimulation for good prognosis patients.

RESEARCH QUESTION: The IVF Lite programme is based on mild ovarian stimulation including up to three fresh/frozen embryo transfers within 12 months. Is it effective and safe in good prognosis patients? DESIGN: Single-centre prospective study on infertile patients at their first IVF attempt (female age ≤38 years, anti-Müllerian hormone concentrations >1.5 ng/ml and/or FSH ≤10 mIU/ml). Induction of multiple follicular growth was based on a fixed protocol consisting of clomiphene citrate (100 mg/day) from day 3 to 7 of the menstrual cycle and 150 IU of recombinant FSH on days 5, 7 and 9. In case of low follicular recruitment (fewer than four follicles), the cycle was cancelled. The IVF Lite programme was considered complete after a live birth delivery or up to three embryo transfers within 12 months. The primary outcome was the cumulative live birth rate (cLBR) per couples that completed the programme. RESULTS: A total of 369 patients completed the IVF Lite programme, with 239 live births; 132 patients delivered after one embryo transfer (35.8%), 70 after a second embryo transfer (cLBR 54.7%), and 37 after a third attempt (cLBR 64.8%). No cases of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome or clinical complications occurred. Spontaneous dropout rate from the programme was 4.5%. The cLBR per intention to treat was 46.8%. CONCLUSIONS: The IVF Lite programme proved to be effective and safe in good prognosis patients with a good response to clomiphene citrate stimulation. It was well tolerated and implied low gonadotrophin consumption. Two-thirds of the patients achieved a live birth at the completion of the programme.

Oocyte donation: not all oocyte cryobanks are the same.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Is the efficacy of imported vitrified oocyte donation affected by the cryobank of origin? DESIGN: Longitudinal cohort study, including 249 completed oocyte warming cycles from 200 recipients (January 2016-July 2020). No severe male factor was included. Vitrified oocytes were provided by three Spanish cryobanks. Primary outcome was cumulative live birth delivery rate (CLBR) per completed oocyte warming cycle. RESULTS: After warming 1535 oocytes, 1244 survived (81.0%) and 945 fertilized (76.0%); embryo utilization rate was 65.3%. The overall CLBR per completed cycle was 47.0% but was lower in cryobank 1 (31.2%) versus cryobank 2 (56.0%, P = 0.0010) and cryobank 3 (50.8%, P = 0.0241). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified survival of four or more oocytes as the strongest predictor for delivery (P = 0.0282). Only 202 out of 249 oocyte warming cycles had four or more survived oocytes in a proportion that was significantly lower in cryobank 1 versus cryobank 2 (70.1% versus 89.0%, P = 0.0020); comparison with cryobank 3 (81.0%) was not significant. In the 202 oocyte warming cycles, CLBR in cryobank 1 (37.0%) was lower versus cryobank 2 (58.8%, P = 0.0115) and cryobank 3 (60.8%, P = 0.0019), suggesting a reduced viability in oocytes from cryobank 1 that survived warming. CONCLUSIONS: Differences were found in the efficacy of imported vitrified oocytes in relation to the cryobank of origin. Each centre needs to evaluate the results internally when starting a collaboration with an oocyte cryobank to establish the necessary measures to maximize treatment efficacy.

ESHRE Clinical Embryologist certification: the first 10 years.

STUDY QUESTION: What has the ESHRE programme 'ESHRE Certification for Clinical Embryologists' achieved after 10 years? SUMMARY ANSWER: The post-exam analysis showed a pass rate of 60% for Clinical and 50% for Senior Clinical Embryologists and a high level of internal consistency of all exams, leading to a total of 773 certified Clinical and 493 Senior Clinical Embryologists over the decade. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: In an ESHRE survey on the educational and professional status of Clinical Embryology in Europe, it was found that education of laboratory personnel working in the field of assisted reproduction is highly variable between countries. In 2008, ESHRE introduced a programme, curriculum and certification in the field of Clinical Embryology. Knowledge gained by postgraduate study of recommended literature, following a clear curriculum, is verified by a written two-level exam for obtaining a certificate for Clinical (basic) or Senior Clinical (advanced) Embryologists. With a total of 1266 certificates awarded over a period of 10 years and recognition by the Union Européenne des Médecins Spécialistes and their Council for European Specialists Medical Assessment, the ESHRE Clinical Embryology exams have become an internationally recognized educational standard in the field of Clinical Embryology. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: A retrospective analysis of all applications for ESHRE Clinical (2009-2018) and Senior Clinical Embryologist Certification (2008-2018) and exam results of the first decade was carried out by the Steering Committee for Clinical Embryologist Certification. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS: A total of 2894 applications for ESHRE Certification for Clinical Embryologists and the results of 10 exams for the Clinical (1478 candidates) and 11 exams for Senior Clinical (987 candidates) levels were analysed. A detailed post-exam retrospective analysis was performed regarding difficulty, discrimination and reliability levels of 1600 multiple-choice questions (MCQs) with a single best answer among four options, from eight different curriculum topics (Basic cell biology, Genetics, Developmental biology, Female reproduction, Male reproduction, IVF laboratory, Cryopreservation and Laboratory management), representing the core theoretical knowledge of Clinical Embryology. Difficulty levels of the MCQs were subsequently compared regarding each topic and each yearly exam. The participation and success rates in the ESHRE Clinical Embryology exams were also assessed in terms of the educational and geographic backgrounds of candidates. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Over the 10 years studied, the mean pass rate for the Clinical Embryologist exam was 60% (range 41-86%), and for the Senior Clinical Embryologist exam was 50% (range 34-81%). On average, 63% European candidates and 35% non-European candidates passed the Clinical Embryologist exam, while 52% European candidates and 31% non-European candidates passed the Senior Clinical Embryologist exam. The candidates' educational level impacted on the success of the Clinical Embryologist exam but not of the Senior Clinical Embryologist exam. The mean difficulty indices by study topic showed that in the period of 10 years, there were no statistically significant differences between topics, for either the Clinical or Senior Clinical Embryologist exams. However, the overall exam difficulty varied between years. Reassuringly, the exam MCQ discrimination and reliability indices always showed a high level of internal consistency in all exams. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: Some data from the initial ESHRE certification programme were not obtained electronically, in particular data for education, implying tables and figures reflect the specified valid data periods. Several countries exhibit different study profiles for those working in ART laboratories, such that laboratory technicians/technologists predominate in some countries, while in others only biologists and medical doctors are allowed to work with human embryos. Such differences could consequently affect the exam performance of candidates from specific countries. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The ESHRE exams on Clinical Embryology are the most widely, internationally accepted tests of knowledge in the rapidly growing area of human reproduction. Clinical Embryology is increasingly recognized as a specific discipline for scientific staff who are collaborating closely with clinicians in managing human infertility through medically assisted reproduction. The analysis of the first 10 years of application of a two-level exam for Clinical Embryology shows a consistent high quality and reliability of the exam and MCQs used. These results represent an important follow-up of the quality of the ESHRE Certification programme for Clinical Embryologists, and convincingly position Clinical Embryology in the wider group of health disciplines that are harmonized through professional bodies such as ESHRE and European Board & College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. The exams provide a clear step towards the increasing professional recognition and establishment of Clinical Embryology within health systems at both European and international level. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: No competing interest. All costs of the Steering Committee meetings were covered by ESHRE.

Deoxyribonucleic acid detection in blastocoelic fluid: a new predictor of embryo ploidy and viable pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate blastocysts, defined as euploid and aneuploid by trophectoderm (TE) cell analysis, for the presence of DNA in the blastocoelic fluid (BF) detected by whole-genomic amplification (WGA); and to correlate the presence of DNA in BF with the clinical outcome after the transfer of TE-euploid blastocysts. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: In vitro fertilization unit. PATIENT(S): This study included 91 patients performing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy on TE cells from January 2015 to December 2017. In the case of ET, only single blastocyst transfers were performed. INTERVENTION(S): Blastocoelic fluids and TE cells were retrieved from 256 blastocysts before vitrification. All blastocysts were diagnosed by array-comparative genomic hybridization (a-CGH) on TE cells. Amplification and a-CGH of DNA from BFs was performed at a later time after TE biopsy and ET. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Whole-genomic amplification of BFs, evaluation of the chromosome condition in BFs and TE cells, and correlation of BF results with the clinical outcome of TE-euploid transferred blastocysts. RESULT(S): The incidence of amplification after WGA was significantly lower in BFs from TE-euploid blastocysts (n = 32, 45%) when compared with the aneuploid ones (n = 150, 81%), resulting in 182 BFs with successful DNA amplification. When submitted to a-CGH, informative results were obtained from 172 BFs. Comparison of these results with those from the corresponding TE cells gave a ploidy concordance of 93.6% and a mean number of aneuploid events per sample that was higher in BFs than in TE cells (2.0 vs. 1.4, respectively). After the transfer of 53 TE-euploid blastocysts, the clinical pregnancy rate was 77% in the group with BF-failed amplification, and 37% after BF-successful amplification. The same trend was found for the ongoing pregnancy rate (68% vs. 31.5%, respectively). CONCLUSION(S): The presence of DNA in BFs detected by WGA is correlated with the blastocyst ploidy condition defined by TE cell biopsy and with the implantation potential of TE-euploid blastocysts. These findings could have a clinical implication for the selection of the most viable embryo for transfer because, after submitting BFs to WGA, priority would be given to TE-euploid blastocysts with BF-failed amplification. Similarly, BF-failed amplification could be an additional selection criterion to prioritize embryos for transfer even in conventional IVF cycles with blastocysts that were vitrified after BF aspiration.