Custo-efetividade da vacina contra influenza quadrivalente baseada em células comparada com a trivalente baseada em ovo do Programa Nacional de Imunizações brasileiro / Cost-effectiveness of cell-based quadrivalent versus egg-based trivalent influenza vaccination in the Brazilian National Immunization Program

Objetivos: Este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar desfechos clínico-econômicos associados à vacina contra influenza quadrivalente baseada em células (QIVc) versus a vacina trivalente atualmente utilizada (TIVe) para prevenção sazonal de influenza no Programa Nacional de Imunizações (PNI) brasileiro. Métodos: Um modelo estático de árvore de decisão foi usado. Considerou-se um total de 54.071.642 indivíduos vacinados em 2019; a circulação de influenza por subtipo foi baseada em dados de vigilância epidemiológica. A efetividade da vacina (EV) TIVe foi extraída de metanálises publicadas; já a EV relativa da QIVc foi retirada de um estudo observacional retrospectivo. A incompatibilidade antigênica da vacina com vírus circulantes foi baseada em fontes retrospectivas internacionais. O uso de recursos baseou-se em estudos do mundo real. Custos unitários foram retirados de tabelas-padrão publicados em 2019 em reais (BRL). Resultados: Substituir a TIVe pela QIVc pode evitar, anualmente, casos sintomáticos (452.065) e reduzir visitas ambulatoriais (118.735), hospitalizações (15.466), mortes (2.753), custos médicos (-BRL 46.677.357) e custos indiretos (-BRL 59.962.135). O número anual de anos de vida ajustados por qualidade de vida (QALYs) pode aumentar em 96.129. Resultados de base a partir da perspectiva do pagador mostram uma razão de custo-efetividade incremental (RCEI) de BRL 17.293/QALY e, da perspectiva da sociedade, o RCEI obtido foi de um ganho de BRL 16.669/QALY. Usando o Produto Interno Bruto (PIB) brasileiro como um limiar (BRL 34.533/QALY), trocar a TIVe pela QIVc no PNI pode ser uma estratégia altamente custo-efetiva. Conclusões: O uso da QIVc pelo PNI tem potencial para ser altamente custo-efetivo tanto da perspectiva do pagador quanto da sociedade

Objectives: This study aimed to estimate health and economic outcomes associated to cell-based quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIVc) versus current trivalent influenza vaccines (TIVe) for seasonal influenza prevention in the Brazilian National Immunization Program (NIP), from the societal and public payer perspectives. Methods: A 1-year static decision-tree model based on literature was used. 54,071,642 total vaccinated individuals in 2019 were considered; influenza subtype circulation was based on Brazilian epidemiologic data (2009-2019). TIVe vaccine effectiveness (VE) was extracted from a published meta-analysis and QIVc relative VE from an international retrospective observational study. A/H3N2 egg-adaptation and B mismatch to recommended strain were gathered from international retrospective sources. Resource use was obtained from real-world studies. Inputs were adjusted to influenza subtype and multiple age groups with Brazilian literature. Unit costs were retrieved from published standard tables in 2019 Brazilian Reais (BRL). Results: Replacing TIVe with QIVc, can annually avert symptomatic cases (452,065) and reduce outpatient visits (118,735); hospitalizations (15,466), deaths (2,753), overall medical direct costs (-BRL 46,677,357) and indirect costs (-BRL 59,962,135). The annual number of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) could be increased by 96,129. Base case results from the payer perspective show an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of BRL 17,293/QALY gained and from the societal perspective the ICER obtained was BRL 16,669/QALY gained. Using the Brazilian Gross Domestic Product (GDP) as a threshold (BRL 34,533/QALY) switching TIVe with QIVc in the NIP can be a highly cost-effective strategy, leading to a high QALY increment and preventing medical and indirect costs. Conclusions: The use of QIVc by the NIP has the potential to be highly cost-effective in the payer and society perspective

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Switching from Trivalent to Quadrivalent Seasonal Influenza Vaccine in Argentina.

The burden of seasonal influenza disease in Argentina is considerable. The cost-effectiveness of trivalent (TIV) versus quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV) in Argentina was assessed. An age-stratified, static, decision-tree model compared the costs and benefits of vaccination for an average influenza season. Main outcomes included: numbers of influenza cases; general practitioner (GP) visits; complicated ambulatory cases; hospitalizations; deaths averted; and costs per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. Epidemiological data from Argentina for 2014-2019 were used to determine the proportion of A and B strain cases, and the frequency of mismatch between vaccine and circulating B strains. To manage uncertainty, one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Switching from TIV to QIV would prevent 19,128 influenza cases, 16,164 GP visits, 2440 complicated ambulatory cases, 524 hospitalizations, and 82 deaths. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) per QALY were 13,590 and 11,678 USD from the payer's and societal perspectives, respectively. The greatest health benefits and direct medical cost savings would occur in ≥ 65-year-olds. One-way sensitivity analyses demonstrated the principal drivers of ICER to be vaccine acquisition costs, environmental B strain predominance, and B strain mismatch. Introducing QIV in Argentina would be beneficial and cost-effective relative to TIV, particularly in older adults.

Cost-effectiveness of introducing an MF59-adjuvanted trivalent influenza vaccine for older adults in Argentina.

INTRODUCTION: Influenza surveillance in Argentina reported influenza-like illness at a rate of 3500/100,000, a hospitalization rate of 15.5/100,000, and a death rate of 0.32/100,000 annually in adults aged over 65 years. The high burden of disease may be due to a combination of immunosenescence and the suboptimal clinical effectiveness of conventional, non-adjuvanted influenza vaccines in this age group. There is a clinical need for more effective influenza vaccines in this population. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of an MF59®-adjuvanted trivalent influenza vaccine (aTIV) in adults aged over 65 years in Argentina compared with the non-adjuvanted trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) used under the current national vaccination policy. METHODS: A decision tree cost-effectiveness model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of switching from TIV to aTIV in Argentinian older adults. The model compared cost and health benefits of vaccination in one influenza season from the payer perspective. The main predictions included survival, quality-adjusted survival, and costs. Model inputs were sourced from Argentina or internationally where local data was considered inaccurate. Vaccine efficacy assumptions were extracted from recently published, peer-reviewed scientific literature. RESULTS: Switching from TIV to aTIV would result in 170 deaths averted and 1310 incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per QALY was US $2660.59 from the payer perspective. In all sensitivity analyses, aTIV remained highly cost-effective. The probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed a 95% CI per QALY of US $113.74-7721.67. CONCLUSION: Introducing an adjuvanted influenza vaccine in Argentina is potentially beneficial and cost-effective relative to the currently-used TIV through the reduction of disease burden and utilization of healthcare resources.

Infecciones de piel y partes blandas en pediatría: consenso sobre diagnóstico y tratamiento: Parte 2: Celulitis, ectima y ectima gangrenoso, celulitis necrotizantes. Consideraciones finales / Skin and soft tissue infections in children: consensus on diagnosis and treatment

Las infecciones de piel y partes blandas son una causa frecuente de consulta en los centros de atención primaria de la salud. Los datos de la epidemiología local de estas infecciones son escasos; el Staphylococcus aureus y el Streptococcus pyogenes son los principales agentes etiológicos. La emergencia, en los últimos años, de cepas de S. aureus meticilino resistentes provenientes de la comunidad y S. pyogenes resistentes a eritromicina plantea controversia en la elección del tratamiento empírico inicial. Este consenso nacional está dirigido a médicos pediatras, de familia, dermatólogos, infectólogos y otros profesionales de la salud. Trata el manejo clínico, especialmente el diagnóstico y tratamiento, de las infecciones de piel y partes blandas de origen bacteriano provenientes de la comunidad en pacientes inmunocompetentes menores de 19 años de edad.

Skin and soft tissue infections are a common reason for consultation in primary health care centers. Data from the local epidemiology of these infections are rare, but Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes are known to be the major etiologic agents. The appearance in recent years of community-originated strains of methicillin-resistant S. aureus and erythromycin-resistant pyogenes raises controversy in the choice of initial empirical treatment. This national consensus is for pediatricians, dermatologists, infectologists and other health professionals. It is about clinical management, especially the diagnosis and treatment of community-originated skin and soft tissue infections in immunocompetent patients under the age of 19.

[Skin and soft tissue infections in children: consensus on diagnosis and treatment]. / Infecciones de piel y partes blandas en pediatría: consenso sobre diagnóstico y tratamiento.

Skin and soft tissue infections are a common reason for consultation in primary health care centers. Data from the local epidemiology of these infections are rare, but Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes are known to be the major etiologic agents. The appearance in recent years of community-originated strains of methicillin-resistant S. aureus and erythromycin-resistant pyogenes raises controversy in the choice of initial empirical treatment. This national consensus is for pediatricians, dermatologists, infectologists and other health professionals. It is about clinical management, especially the diagnosis and treatment of community-originated skin and soft tissue infections in immunocompetent patients under the age of 19.

Infecciones de piel y partes blandas en pediatría: consenso sobre diagnóstico y tratamiento. / [Skin and soft tissue infections in children: consensus on diagnosis and treatment].

Skin and soft tissue infections are a common reason for consultation in primary health care centers. Data from the local epidemiology of these infections are rare, but Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes are known to be the major etiologic agents. The appearance in recent years of community-originated strains of methicillin-resistant S. aureus and erythromycin-resistant pyogenes raises controversy in the choice of initial empirical treatment. This national consensus is for pediatricians, dermatologists, infectologists and other health professionals. It is about clinical management, especially the diagnosis and treatment of community-originated skin and soft tissue infections in immunocompetent patients under the age of 19.

Atención integral de niños niñas y adolescentes con VIH / Comprehensive care of children and adolescents with HIV

Con el objetivo de mejorar el acceso a una atención integral de los niños, niñas y adolescentes con VIH, esta publicación ofrece un aporte para el trabajo de los equipos de salud comprometidos con la temática en Argentina. Si definirse estrictamente como una guía el contenido contempla las recomendaciones basadas en la evidencia y la experiencia de los principales referentes de cada área y reúne los aspecto biomédicos y socio culturales de la infección, asumiendo que se trata de una mirada indispensable para el abordaje integral de los procesos salud enfermedad. El volumen pretende ser una fuente de consulta que facilite la tarea de los pediatras y hebiatras no infectologos de adultos que frecuentemente realizan el seguimiento de adolescentes con HIV, ya que resulta necesario promover el acercamiento de las pediatrías generales a las especifidades del VIH, y de los infectologos de adultos a las necesidades en la adolescencia, para reducir los obstáculos en el circuito de atención. Fortalecer esta tarea es un escalón esencial para lograr la mejor atención de los niños, niñas y adolescentes con VIH en nuestro país, entendiendo que constituyen una población especialmente vulnerable que requiere políticas especificas para una mejor respuesta desde el sector de salud, La presente demuestra, también el resultado de una experiencia innovadora de trabajo compartido entre los organismos del estado, la sociedad científica y las agencias del Sistema de Naciones Unidas