An individual-based versus group-based exercise and counselling intervention for improving quality of life in breast cancer survivors. A feasibility and efficacy study.

BACKGROUND: Cancer and its treatments produce lingering side-effects that undermine the quality of life (QOL) of survivors. Exercise and psycho-therapies increase QOL among survivors, however, research is needed to identify intervention characteristics most associated with such improvements. OBJECTIVE: This research aimed to assess the feasibility of a 9 week individual or group based exercise and counselling program, and to examine if a group based intervention is as effective at improving the QOL of breast cancer survivors as an individual-based intervention. METHODS: A three group design was implemented to compare the efficacy of a 9 week individual (IEC n = 12) and group based exercise and counselling (GEC n = 14) intervention to a usual care (UsC n = 10) group on QOL of thirty-six breast cancer survivors. RESULTS: Across all groups, 90% of participants completed the interventions, with no adverse effects documented. At the completion of the intervention, there was a significant difference between groups for change in global QOL across time (p < 0.023), with IEC improving significantly more (15.0 points) than the UsC group (1.8 points). The effect size was moderate (0.70). Although the GEC improved QOL by almost 10.0 points, this increase did not reach significance. Both increases were above the minimally important difference of 7-8 points. CONCLUSION: These preliminary results suggest a combined exercise and psychological counseling program is both a feasible and acceptable intervention for breast cancer survivors. Whilst both the individual and group interventions improved QOL above the clinically important difference, only the individual based intervention was significant when compared to UsC.

Equações para a previsão da potência aeróbia (VO2) de jovens adultos brasileiros / Equations for predicting aerobic power (VO2) of young Brazilian adults

FUNDAMENTO: O VO2 pode ser previsto, com base em parâmetros antropométricos e fisiológicos, para determinadas populações. OBJETIVO: Propor modelos preditivos do VO2 submáximo e máximo para jovens adultos brasileiros. MÉTODOS: Os 137 voluntários (92 homens) foram submetidos ao teste progressivo de esforço máximo (GXT) no ciclo ergômetro (Monark®, Br). Medidas de trocas gasosas e ventilatórias foram realizadas em circuito aberto (Aerosport® TEEM 100, EUA). Em outro grupo, 13 voluntários foram submetidos ao GXT e a um teste de onda quadrada (SWT), para avaliar a validade externa das fórmulas do ACSM, de Neder et al e do nomograma de Åstrand-Ryhming. Adotou-se o delineamento experimental de validação cruzada e o nível de significância de p < 0,05. RESULTADOS: Para homens durante esforços submáximos deduziu-se um modelo matemático, com base na carga de trabalho, massa corporal e idade, que explicou 89 por cento da variação do VO2 com o EPE (erro padrão da estimativa) = 0,33 l.min-1. Para a carga máxima do grupo masculino outro modelo, com as mesmas variáveis, explicou 71 por cento da variação VO2 com EPE = 0,40 l.min-1. Para as mulheres foi possível explicar 93 por cento da variação VO2 com EPE = 0,17 l.min-1, no esforço submáximo e máximo, com apenas uma equação que empregava as mesmas variáveis independentes. CONCLUSÃO: Os modelos derivados no presente estudo demonstraram ser acurados para a previsão do VO2 submáximo e máximo em jovens adultos brasileiros.

BACKGROUND: VO2 may be predicted with base on anthropometric and physiological parameters for determined populations. OBJECTIVE: To propose models for submaximal and maximal VO2 prediction in young Brazilian adults. METHODS: A total of 137 volunteers (92 men) underwent graded maximal exercise test (GXT) in a cycle ergometer (MonarkTM, Br). Gas exchange and respiratory measurements were performed in an open circuit (AerosportTM TEEM 100, USA). In another group, 13 volunteers underwent GXT and a square wave test (SWT) in order to evaluate the external validity of Neder et al's formula, ACSM's formula, and of Åstrand-Ryhming nomogram. The study design chosen was a cross-validation and the significance level was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: For men during submaximal exercises, a mathematical model was deduced with base on workload, body mass, and age, which explained 89 percent of the VO2 variation, with SEE (standard error of the estimate) = 0.33 l.min-1. For the maximum load in the male group, another model with the same variables explained 71 percent of VO2 variation, with SEE = 0.40 l.min-1. For women, 93 percent of VO2 variation could be explained, with SEE = 0.17 l.min-1, both in submaximal and maximal exercise, with only one equation by use e of the same independent variables. CONCLUSION: The models derived in the present study proved to be accurate to predict submaximal and maximal VO2 in young Brazilian adults.

[Equations for predicting aerobic power (VO(2)) of young Brazilian adults].

BACKGROUND: VO2 may be predicted with base on anthropometric and physiological parameters for determined populations. OBJECTIVE: To propose models for submaximal and maximal VO2 prediction in young Brazilian adults. METHODS: A total of 137 volunteers (92 men) underwent graded maximal exercise test (GXT) in a cycle ergometer (MonarkTM, Br). Gas exchange and respiratory measurements were performed in an open circuit (AerosportTM TEEM 100, USA). In another group, 13 volunteers underwent GXT and a square wave test (SWT) in order to evaluate the external validity of Neder et al's formula, ACSM's formula, and of Astrand-Ryhming nomogram. The study design chosen was a cross-validation and the significance level was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: For men during submaximal exercises, a mathematical model was deduced with base on workload, body mass, and age, which explained 89% of the VO2 variation, with SEE (standard error of the estimate) = 0.33 l.min-1. For the maximum load in the male group, another model with the same variables explained 71% of VO2 variation, with SEE = 0.40 l.min-1. For women, 93% of VO2 variation could be explained, with SEE = 0.17 l.min-1, both in submaximal and maximal exercise, with only one equation by use e of the same independent variables. CONCLUSION: The models derived in the present study proved to be accurate to predict submaximal and maximal VO2 in young Brazilian adults. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2010; [online]. ahead print, PP.0-0).