How-To Create an Orthopaedic Systematic Review: A Step-by-step Guide Part II: Study Execution.

Systematic reviews are the apex of the evidence-based pyramid, representing the strongest form of evidence synthesizing results from multiple primary studies. In particular, a quantitative systematic review, or meta-analysis, pools results from multiple studies to help answer a respective research question. The aim of this review is to serve as a guide on how to: (1) design, (2) execute, and (3) publish an orthopaedic arthroplasty systematic review. In Part II, we focus on methods to assess data quality through the Cochrane Risk of Bias, Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies criteria, or Newcastle-Ottawa scale; enumerate various methods for appropriate data interpretation and analysis; and summarize how to convert respective findings to a publishable manuscript (providing a previously published example). Use of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines is recommended and standard in all scientific literature, including that of orthopedic surgery. Pooled analyses with forest plots and associated odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals are common ways to present data. When converting to a manuscript, it is important to consider and discuss the inherent limitations of systematic reviews, including their inclusion and/or exclusion criteria and overall quality, which can be limited based on the quality of individual studies (eg, publication bias, heterogeneity, search/selection bias). We hope our papers will serve as starting points for those interested in performing an orthopaedic arthroplasty systematic review.

The Association of Dental Caries or Dental Implant Placement Within One Year of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty on Medical and Implant Complications.

BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) adverse events among patients who have dental diagnoses remain unclear. We sought to determine if dental caries or dental implant placements increased (1) 90-day medical complications, (2) 90-day readmissions, and (3) 2-year implant-related complications, including periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) after THA. METHODS: A nationwide database for primary THAs from 2010 to 2021 was queried to compare 3 patient cohorts. Patients who had a history of dental implants or caries within 12 months prior to THA (n = 1,179) or 12 months after THA (n = 1,218) were case-matched to patients who did not have dental history (n = 6,090) by age and comorbidities. Outcomes included 90-day complications, 90-day readmissions, and 2-year implant-related complications. Logistic regression models computed the odds ratios (ORs) of complications and readmissions. P values less than .006 were significant. RESULTS: Patients who had dental caries or implant placement 12 months before or after THA experienced 1.6-fold greater odds of 90-day medical complications compared to case-matched patients. Readmissions within 90 days increased for patients who had a dental history before (11.7% versus 8.3%; OR: 1.49, P < .0001) and after (14.2% versus 8.3%; OR: 1.84, P < .0001) THA compared to case-matched patients. A dental caries diagnosis or dental implant placement within 12 months following THA increased 2-year implant complications compared to case-matched patients (15.2% versus 9.3%; OR: 1.69, P < .0001), including PJIs (5.3% versus 2.8%; OR: 1.98, P < .0001), dislocations (4.4% versus 2.7%; OR: 1.63, P = .002), and THA revisions (3.9% versus 2.5%; OR: 1.61, P = .005). CONCLUSIONS: Dental diagnoses within 12 months of THA are associated with increased medical complications. Dental diagnoses occurring 12 months after THA are associated with greater implant-related complications, including PJIs. Delaying invasive dental procedures for 12 months after THA may be advisable.

How-To Create an Orthopaedic Systematic Review: A Step-by-Step Guide Part I: Study Design.

Systematic reviews are conducted through a consistent and reproducible method to search, appraise, and summarize information. Within the evidence-based pyramid, systematic reviews can be at the apex when incorporating high-quality studies, presenting the strongest form of evidence given their synthesis of results from multiple primary studies to level IV evidence, depending on the studies they incorporate. When combined and supplemented with a meta-analysis using statistical methods to pool the results of 3 or more studies, systematic reviews are powerful tools to help answer research questions. The aim of this review is to serve as a guide on how to: (1) design; (2) execute; and (3) publish an orthopaedic arthroplasty systematic review and meta-analysis. In Part I, we discuss how to develop an appropriate research question as well as source and screen databases. To date, commonly used databases to source studies include PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science. Although not all-encompassing, this paper serves as a starting point for those interested in performing and/or critically reviewing lower extremity arthroplasty systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

How-To Create an Orthopaedic Systematic Review: A Step-by-Step Guide. Part III: Executing a Meta-Analysis.

At the top of the evidence-based pyramid, systematic reviews stand out as the most powerful, synthesizing findings from numerous primary studies. Specifically, a quantitative systematic review, known as a meta-analysis, combines results from various studies to address a specific research question. This review serves as a guide on how to: (1) design; (2) perform; and (3) publish an orthopedic arthroplasty systematic review. In Part III, we focus on how to design and perform a meta-analysis. We delineate the advantages and disadvantages of meta-analyses compared to systematic reviews, acknowledging their potential challenges due to time constraints and the complexities posed by study heterogeneity and data availability. Despite these obstacles, a well-executed meta-analysis contributes precision and heightened statistical power, standing at the apex of the evidence-based pyramid. The design of a meta-analysis closely mirrors that of a systematic review, but necessitates the inclusion of effect sizes, variability measures, sample sizes, outcome measures, and overall study characteristics. Effective data presentation involves the use of forest plots, along with analyses for heterogeneities and subgroups. Widely-used software tools are common in this domain, and there is a growing trend toward incorporating artificial intelligence software. Ultimately, the intention is for these papers to act as foundational resources for individuals interested in conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the context of orthopaedic arthroplasty, where applicable.

Preoperative Depression Screening for Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Evaluation of Its Modifiability on Outcomes in Patients Who Have Depression.

INTRODUCTION: Few studies have evaluated preoperative depression screenings in patients who have depression. We studied whether depression screenings before total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were associated with lower: 1) medical complications; 2) emergency department (ED) utilizations and readmissions; 3) implant complications; and 4) costs. METHODS: A nationwide sample from January 1, 2010 to April 30, 2021 was collected using an insurance database. Depression patients were 1:1 propensity-score matched based on those who had (n=29,009) and did not have (n=29,009) pre-operative depression screenings or psychotherapy visits within 3 months of TKA. A case-matched population who did not have depression was compared (n=144,994). A 90-day period was used to compare complications and healthcare utilization and 2-year follow-up for periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) and implant survivorship. Costs were 90-day reimbursements. Logistic regression models computed odds ratios (OR) of depression screening on dependent variables. P-values less than 0.001 were significant. RESULTS: Patients who did not receive preoperative screening were associated with higher medical complications (18.7 versus 5.2%, OR:4.15, P < 0.0001) and ED utilizations (11.5 versus 3.2%, OR: 3.93, P < 0.0001) than depressed patients who received screening. Patients who had screening had lower medical complications (5.2 versus 5.9%, OR: 0.88, P < 0.0001) and ED utilizations compared to patients who did not have depression (3.2 versus 3.8%, OR: 0.87, P = 0.0001). Two-year PJI incidences (3.0 versus 1.3%, OR: 2.63, P < 0.0001) and TKA revisions (4.3 versus 2.1%, OR: 2.46, P < 0.0001) were greater in depression patients who were not screened preoperatively versus screened patients. Depression patients who had screening had lower PJIs (1.3 versus 1.8%, OR: 0.74, P < 0.0001) compared to non-depressed patients. Reimbursements ($13,949 versus $11,982; P < 0.0001) were higher in depression patients who did not have screening. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-operative screening was associated with improved outcomes in depression patients.

Assessing Ability for ChatGPT to Answer Total Knee Arthroplasty-Related Questions.

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence in the field of orthopaedics has been a topic of increasing interest and opportunity in recent years. Its applications are widespread both for physicians and patients, including use in clinical decision-making, in the operating room, and in research. In this study, we aimed to assess the quality of ChatGPT answers when asked questions related to total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: ChatGPT prompts were created by turning 15 of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines into questions. An online survey was created, which included screenshots of each prompt and answers to the 15 questions. Surgeons were asked to grade ChatGPT answers from 1 to 5 based on their characteristics: (1) relevance, (2) accuracy, (3) clarity, (4) completeness, (5) evidence-based, and (6) consistency. There were 11 Adult Joint Reconstruction fellowship-trained surgeons who completed the survey. Questions were subclassified based on the subject of the prompt: (1) risk factors, (2) implant/intraoperative, and (3) pain/functional outcomes. The average and standard deviation for all answers, as well as for each subgroup, were calculated. Inter-rater reliability (IRR) was also calculated. RESULTS: All answer characteristics were graded as being above average (ie, a score > 3). Relevance demonstrated the highest scores (4.43 ± 0.77) by surgeons surveyed, and consistency demonstrated the lowest scores (3.54 ± 1.10). ChatGPT prompts in the Risk Factors group demonstrated the best responses, while those in the Pain/Functional Outcome group demonstrated the lowest. The overall IRR was found to be 0.33 (poor reliability), with the highest IRR for relevance (0.43) and the lowest for evidence-based (0.28). CONCLUSIONS: ChatGPT can answer questions regarding well-established clinical guidelines in total knee arthroplasty with above-average accuracy but demonstrates variable reliability. This investigation is the first step in understanding large language model artificial intelligence like ChatGPT and how well they perform in the field of arthroplasty.

Trends in utilization, demographics, and costs of platelet-rich plasma injections: a ten-year nationwide investigation.

INTRODUCTION: Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) has become one of the most popular biologic treatments in orthopedic surgery. Despite this, its utilization over the last decade has not been investigated. METHODS: We conducted a search using Current Procedural Terminology codes to identify patients who received PRP injections between 2010 and 2019 using the PearlDiver database. The purpose was to 1) determine annual trends of PRP injections of the ankle, hip, knee, shoulder, and elbow for cartilaginous, tendinous, ligamentous, meniscal/labral, and miscellaneous pathologies; 2) compare baseline demographics of patients receiving these injections; and 3) analyze costs. RESULTS: A total of 23,716 patients who received PRP injections were identified; 54.4% were female. The incidence of PRP injections was between 1.6 and 4.3 per 100,000 orthopedic patients. The most common anatomic locations targeted for PRP therapy was the knee (36.7%), followed by the shoulder/elbow (30.5%), then the ankle (19.6%) and hip (13.6%). Subgroup analysis revealed that most common use of PRP was for knee cartilaginous pathologies, followed by shoulder/elbow tendinous pathologies. The number of injections used in the knee significantly increased between 2010 and 2019 (p< 0.001), and trended toward significantly increasing in the shoulder/elbow (p = 0.055). Average annual costs for PRP injections ranged from $711.65 for ankles and $1,711.63 for hips; costs significantly changed for 3 of the 4 anatomic locations. By 2019, average PRP injection costs for each area clustered around $1000. CONCLUSION: Between 2010 and 2019, there was an increase in usage of PRP injections in the knee (cartilaginous pathologies) and the shoulder/elbow (tendinous pathologies). PRP costs demonstrated early variability but clustered around $1000 by 2019. Further studies into drivers of prices and cost-effectiveness of PRP are needed to provide clarity into the true costs to patients and healthcare providers.

Semaglutide Use Prior to Total Hip Arthroplasty Results in Fewer Postoperative Prosthetic Joint Infections and Readmissions.

BACKGROUND: Semaglutide, a novel diabetes management medication, is known for its efficacy in inducing weight loss. Despite this, its impact on outcomes after total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate if THA patients on semaglutide demonstrate: (1) fewer medical complications; (2) fewer implant-related complications; (3) fewer readmissions; and (4) lower costs. METHODS: Using a national claims database from 2010 to 2021, we retrospectively examined diabetic patients prescribed semaglutide who underwent primary THA. This yielded 9,465 patients (Semaglutide = 1,653; Control = 7,812). Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the following outcomes: 90-day postoperative medical complications, 2-year implant-related complications, 90-day readmissions, in-hospital lengths of stay, and day-of-surgery and 90-day episode of care costs. RESULTS: Semaglutide users exhibited lower 90-day readmission rates (6.2 versus 8.8%; odds ratio 0.68; P < .01) and reduced prosthetic joint infections (1.6 versus 2.9%; odds ratio 0.56; P < .01). However, medical complication rates, hospital stays, same-day surgical costs, and 90-day episode costs showed no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights semaglutide users undergoing THA with fewer 90-day readmissions and 2-year prosthetic joint infections. Although no variance appeared in medical complications, hospital stays, or costs, the medication's notable glycemic control and weight loss benefits could prompt pre-surgery consideration. Further research is essential for a comprehensive understanding of semaglutide's impact on post-THA outcomes.

Crohn's disease is associated with higher rates of implant-related complications following primary total knee arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: In Western countries, there has been a rise in the prevalence of Crohn's Disease (CD) and primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study delves deeper into the effects of CD on TKA patients by examining (1) the length of in-hospital stay (LOS); (2) the rates of readmission; (3) complications related to implants; and (4) the costs associated with care. METHODS: A retrospective analysis using the PearlDiver database was conducted, encompassing the time frame between January 1st, 2005 and March 31st, 2014, focusing on patients who underwent TKA and were either diagnosed with CD or not. Patients with CD were paired with control subjects at a 1:5 ratio based on age, gender, and medical comorbidities. The analysis comprised a total of 96,229 patients (CD = 16,039; non-CD = 80,190). RESULTS: Patients with CD had a notably longer hospital stay (3 v. 2 days, p < 0.0001) and faced significantly higher rates of 90-day readmissions and complications (19.80% v. 14.91%, OR: 1.40, p < 0.0001; 6.88% v. 4.88%, OR: 1.43, p < 0.0001 respectively). Additionally, CD patients incurred greater expenses on the surgery day ($18,365.98 v. $16,192.00) and within 90 days post-surgery ($21,337.46 v. $19,101.42). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates longer in-hospital LOS, higher rates of readmissions, implant-related complications, and costs of care among CD patients following primary TKA.

The Association of Inflammatory Bowel Disease with Postoperative Complications, Re-admissions and Emergency Department Visits Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a systemic inflammatory disorder of the gut. Few studies have evaluated whether patients with a history of IBD have worse outcomes following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate whether IBD is associated with increased: (1) medical complications; (2) readmissions; and (3) emergency department (ED) visits. METHODS: Using a nationwide claims database, patients with IBD undergoing primary THA were identified and matched to a comparison group according to age, sex and the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Outcomes assessed included the development of 90-day medical complications, 90-day re-admissions and 90-day ED visit rates. A p-value <0.0001 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Patients with IBD had a greater incidence and odds ratio of total medical complications (31.90% vs. 11.47%; OR 2.89; p < 0.0001) compared with matched controls. IBD patients had significantly higher incidence and odds ratio of developing acute kidney injury (5.46 vs. 1.46%; OR 3.92; p < 0.0001), cerebrovascular accident (1.32 vs. 0.35%; OR 3.79; p < 0.0001), pneumonia (4.02 vs. 1.30%; OR 3.19; p < 0.0001), respiratory failure (1.21 vs. 0.41%; OR 2.94; p < 0.0001), deep vein thrombosis (0.89% vs. 0.30%; OR 2.93; p < 0.0001), and other adverse events. IBD patients also had higher incidence and odds ratio of 90-day re-admissions (4.20% vs. 3.23%; OR 1.31; p < 0.0001) and ED visits (6.56% vs. 3.99%; OR 1.69; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study found that patients with IBD are at increased risk of 90-day medical complications, re-admissions, and ED visits. Due to its systemic nature, surgeons operating on these patients should be aware of the disease's extra-intestinal manifestations, and the potential postoperative risks in IBD patients. Providers should use this investigation when educating patients on potential risks of elective THA.

Inflammatory bowel disease patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty have higher odds of implant-related complications.

PURPOSE: This study evaluates whether IBD patients are at increased risk of implant-related complications after THA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study from 01 January 2010 to 31 October 31 2020 using an administrative claims database was performed. IBD patients undergoing THA (n = 11,025), without corticosteroid treatment, were propensity score matched to controls in a 1:5 ratio (n = 55,121) based on age, sex, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Outcomes evaluated included periprosthetic fracture, aseptic loosening, prosthetic joint infection, and THA revision within 2 years of index procedure. Chi-square analyses were used to compare the matched cohorts. The association of IBD and implant-related complications was evaluated using logistical regression to calculate odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), and p-values. A p-value < 0.001 was used as the significance threshold. RESULTS: Patients with IBD had a greater incidence and odds of total implant complications (7.03% vs. 3.98%; OR 1.76; p < 0.001) compared with matched controls. IBD patients had significantly higher incidence and odds of developing periprosthetic fracture (0.50% vs. 0.20%; OR 2.46; p < 0.001), THA revisions (2.21% vs. 1.17%; OR 1.91; p < 0.001), aseptic loosening (1.45% vs. 0.84%; OR 1.75; p < 0.001), and prosthetic joint infection (2.87% vs. 1.77%; OR 1.64; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with IBD who underwent primary THA had a significantly higher risk of implant-related complications compared to matched controls. Providers should use this study to appropriately assess post-complication risk factors for their patients with IBD.

Does Semaglutide Use Decrease Complications and Costs Following Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) and obesity are associated with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) complications. Semaglutide, a medication for DM and weight loss, can potentially affect TKA outcomes. This study investigated whether semaglutide use during TKA demonstrates fewer: (1) medical complications; (2) implant-related complications; (3) readmissions; and (4) costs. METHODS: A retrospective query was performed using a National database to 2021. Patients undergoing TKA for osteoarthritis with DM and semaglutide use were successfully propensity score-matched to controls semaglutide = 7,051; control = 34,524. Outcomes included 90-day postoperative medical complications, 2-year implant-related complications, 90-day readmissions, in-hospital lengths of stay, and costs. Multivariate logistical regressions calculated odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals, and P values (P < .003 as significance threshold after Bonferroni correction). RESULTS: Semaglutide cohorts had higher incidence and odds of myocardial infarction (1.0 versus 0.7%; OR 1.49; P = .003), acute kidney injury (4.9 versus 3.9%; OR 1.28; P < .001), pneumonia (2.8 versus 1.7%; OR 1.67; P < .001), and hypoglycemic events (1.9 versus 1.2%; OR 1.55; P < .001), but lower odds of sepsis (0 versus 0.4%; OR 0.23; P < .001). Semaglutide cohorts also had lower odds of prosthetic joint infections (2.1 versus 3.0%; OR 0.70; P < .001) and readmission (7.0 versus 9.4%; OR 0.71; P < .001), and trended toward lower odds of revisions (4.0 versus 4.5%; OR 0.86; P = .02) and 90-day costs ($15,291.66 versus $16,798.46; P = .012). CONCLUSION: Semaglutide use during TKA decreased risk for sepsis, prosthetic joint infections, and readmissions, but also increased risk for myocardial infarction, acute kidney injury, pneumonia, and hypoglycemic events.

Postoperative Complications, Readmissions, Lengths of Stay, and Cost Analyses of Patients Who Have Atrial Septal Defects After Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Atrial septal defects (ASDs) are a common congenital heart defect. This study aimed to determine whether patients diagnosed with ASDs undergoing total joint arthroplasty have differences in 1) medical complications, 2) readmissions, 3) lengths of stay (LOS), and 4) costs. METHODS: Using an administrative claims data set, a retrospective query from 2010 to 2020 was performed. The ASD patients were 1:5 ratio matched with controls, yielding a total of 45,695 total knee arthroplasty (TKA) (ASD = 7,635, control = 38,060) and 18,407 total hip arthroplasty (THA) (ASD = 3,084, control = 15,323) patients. Outcomes included medical complications, readmissions, LOS, and costs. Logistical regressions were used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and P values. P values < 0.001 were significant. RESULTS: The ASD patients had higher odds of medical complications after TKA (38.8 versus 21.0%; OR 2.09; P < .001) and THA (45.2 versus 23.5%; OR 2.1; P < .001), noticeably deep vein thromboses, strokes, and other thromboembolic complications. The ASD patients were not significantly more likely to be readmitted after TKA (5.3 versus 4.7%; OR 1.13; P = .033) or THA (6.0 versus 5.7%; OR 1.05; P = .531). Patient LOS was not significantly greater in ASD patients undergoing TKA (3.2 versus 3.2 days; P = .805) but was greater after THA (5.3 versus 3.76 days; P < .001). Same-day surgery costs were not significantly increased in ASD patients after TKA ($23,892.53 versus $23,453.40; P = .066) but were after THA ($23,981.93 versus $23,579.18; P < .001). Costs within 90 days were similar between cohorts. CONCLUSION: The ASD patients have greater 90-day complications following primary total joint arthroplasty. Providers may consider preoperative cardiac clearance or adjusting anticoagulation in this population to mitigate these risks. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

The Careful Return of Sports Medicine Procedures in the United States During COVID-19: Comparison of Utilization, Patient Demographics, and Complications.

OBJECTIVES: Sports medicine procedures encompass some of the highest-volume elective surgeries performed annually. Elective surgery was suspended because of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (COVID-19) pandemic; therefore, the purpose was to compare temporal trends in procedural volume, patient demographics, and postoperative complications of elective sports medicine procedures in 2019 and 2020. METHODS: Using a multicenter, nationwide sample, a retrospective query of the 2019 to 2020 American College of Surgeon's National Surgery Quality Improvement Program database was conducted for all patients undergoing common elective sports medicine procedures. Temporal trends in utilization, demographics, and 30-day complications were compared pre-COVID (2019 and 2020Q1) with post-COVID (2020Q2-Q4). Linear regression was used to evaluate changes in procedural volume over time. A significance threshold of P < 0.05 was used. RESULTS: A total of 48,803 patients underwent elective surgery in 2019 (n = 27,883) and 2020 (n = 20,920), a 25.0% decline. Procedural utilization declined by 42.5% in 2020Q2 and never returned to prepandemic baseline in 2020Q3-Q4. The percentage decline in case volume from 2019 to 2020Q2 was greatest for meniscectomy (47.6%), rotator cuff repair (42.7%), labral repair (41.6%), biceps tenodesis (41.3%), and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (38.5%). Total complication rates were similar in 2019 (1.31%) versus 2020 (1.51%; P = 0.072). The 30-day readmission (0.74% versus 0.67%; P = 0.374), reoperation (0.35% versus 0.35%; P = 0.963), and mortality (0.01% versus 0.01%; P = 0.657) rates were similar between calendar years. CONCLUSIONS: Sports medicine procedures declined during the second quarter of 2020. Despite pandemic restrictions, patients who did undergo surgery did not experience increased complications. The present study may be used by surgeons, hospitals, and subspecialty societies to support the careful utilization of elective surgery during COVID-19. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, prognostic study.

Anemia Severity and the Risks of Postoperative Complications and Extended Length of Stay Following Primary Total Elbow Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Anemia is a modifiable risk factor that may influence postoperative complications following orthopedic surgical procedures. The objective was to determine the influence of preoperative anemia severity on postoperative complications and length of stay (LOS) following total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program registry was queried from 2006 to 2019 for patients undergoing primary TEA. Using the World Health Organization definitions of anemia, patients undergoing TEA were stratified into 3 cohorts: nonanemia (hematocrit >36% for women, >39% for men), mild anemia (hematocrit 33%-36% for women, 33%-39% for men), and moderate-to-severe anemia (hematocrit <33% for both women and men). Patient demographics, surgical time, LOS, and postoperative complications were compared between the groups. A P value <.004 was considered significant. RESULTS: After exclusion, 589 patients, of whom 369 (62.6%) did not have anemia, 129 (21.9%) had mild anemia, and 91 (15.5%) had moderate/severe anemia, were included. Increasing severity of anemia was associated with an increased average hospital LOS (2.30 vs 2.81 vs 4.91 days, P < .001). There was a statistically significant increase in blood transfusions (1.08% vs 7.75% vs 17.58%, P < .001), major complications (9.21% vs 17.83% vs 34.07%, P < .001), any complications (11.11% vs 23.26% vs 36.26%, P < .001), and extended LOS ≥6 days (6.23% vs 6.98% vs 31.87%, P < .001) with increasing severity of anemia. Multivariate analysis identified moderate-to-severe anemia was significantly associated with major complications and extended LOS (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative anemia is a modifiable risk factor for medical and surgical complications within 30 days of TEA.

The 5-Item Modified Frailty Index for Risk Stratification of Patients Undergoing Total Elbow Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Frailty, quantified using the 5-item modified frailty index (mFI-5), has been shown to predict adverse outcomes in orthopaedic surgery. The utility in total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) patients is unclear. We evaluated if increasing frailty would correlate with worse postoperative outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective assessment of patients in the American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program undergoing primary TEA was performed. The mFI-5 was calculated by assigning 1 point for each comorbidity (diabetes, hypertension, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and functionally dependent health status). Poisson regression was used to evaluate mFI-5 scores on complications, length of stay (LOS), and adverse discharge. A significance threshold was at P < .05. RESULTS: In total, 609 patients were included; 34.5% (n = 210) were not frail (mFI = 0), 44.0% (n = 268) were slightly frail (mFI = 1), and 21.5% (n = 131) were frail (mFI ≥ 2). As mFI score increased from 0 to ≥ 2, the following rates increased: any complication (9.0%-19.8%), major complication (11.0%-20.6%), cardiac complication (0.0%-2.3%), hematologic complication (3.3%-9.2%), adverse discharge (2.9%-22.9%), and LOS from 2.08 to 3.97 days (all P < .048). Following adjustment, Poisson regression demonstrated patients with a mFI ≥ 2 had increased risk of major complication (risk ratio [RR]: 2.13; P = .029), any complication (RR: 2.49; P = .032), Clavien-Dindo IV complication (RR: 5.53; P = .041), and adverse discharge (RR: 5.72; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Frailty is not only associated with longer hospitalizations, but more major complications and non-home discharge. The mFI-5 is a useful risk stratification that may assist in decision-making for TEA.

The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on elective unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the USA: further evidence that outpatient arthroplasty is safe and effective.

PURPOSE: In response to COVID-19, elective surgeries including unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKA) decreased. We aimed to quantify and compare temporal trends in utilization and complications in the calendar year 2019 (pre-pandemic) to 2020 in the USA. METHODS: The 2019 to 2020 ACS-NSQIP database was queried for patients undergoing elective UKA. Patients prior to COVID-19 (2019 and 2020 Q1) were compared to those after (2020 Q2-Q4). Case volumes, patient demographics, complications, and lengths of stay (LOS) were compared between years. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare patient demographics. Linear regression was conducted to evaluate the change in case volumes. P values less than 0.05 were significant. RESULTS: In total, 3361 patients underwent UKA: 1880 in 2019 and 1481 in 2020. The number of outpatient UKAs increased (56.4% vs. 65.6%; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the volume of cases in 2019Q1 through 2020Q1 (p = 0.424). Case volumes fell by 60% in 2020Q2 compared with the average quarterly volume in 2019. Comparing 2019 to 2020, there was no significant difference in rates of total complications (2.1% vs. 2.2%; p = 0.843), minor complications (1.2% vs. 0.9%; p = 0.529), major complications (1.1% vs. 1.4%; p = 0.447), infection complications (1.0% vs. 0.8%; p = 0.652), wound complications (0.1% vs. 0.1%; p = 1.0), cardiac complications (0.0% vs. 0.1%; p = 0.111), pulmonary complications (0.1% vs. 0.2%; p = 0.473), hematology complications (0.1% vs. 0.1%; p = 1.0), renal complications (0.1% vs. 0.0%; p = 1.0), and Clavien-Dindo IV complications (0.1% vs. 0.4%; p = 0.177). CONCLUSION: UKA case volumes declined during the second quarter of 2020. A significant proportion of surgeries were transitioned outpatient, despite no change in complication rates.

Risk factors for the development of a peri-prosthetic joint infection up to 2 Years following primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Background: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has become commonly used to treat glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA), of which complications such as peri-prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) may develop. The objective of this study was to compare patient demographics of those who did and did not develop PJIs within 2 years after primary RSA for GHOA and identify risk factors for this sequela. Methods: A nationwide database was queried from 2005 to 2014 for Medicare patients treated with primary RSA (International Classification of Disease (ICD-9) procedural code 81.88) for GHOA. Patients who developed PJIs within 2-years of primary RSA defined the study group, whereas those who were devoid of infections represented the comparison group. Our study consisted of 51,824 patients, of which 879 (1.69%) developed a PJI. Patient demographics comprising the Elixhauser comorbidity index (ECI) were compared using Chi-Square analyses. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to compute the odds-ratios (OR) of patient-specific factors associated with acquiring a PJI within 2 years after RSA. P values less than 0.002 were significant. Results: Patients developing a PJI had higher mean ECI (8 vs. 6; p < 0.0001). The greatest risk factors for developing PJIs within 2-years following RSA were male sex (OR: 2.10, 95%CI: 1.81-2.43, p < 0.0001), pathologic weight loss (OR: 1.78, 95%CI: 1.45-2.17, p < 0.0001), iron deficiency anemia (OR: 1.75, 95%CI: 1.49-2.06, p < 0.0001), morbid obesity (OR: 1.52, 95%CI: 1.21-1.88, p = 0.0001), rheumatoid arthritis (OR: 1.32, 95%CI: 1.13-1.54, p = 0.0003), arrhythmias (OR: 1.26, 95%CI 1.09-1.46, p = 0.001), and depressive disorders (OR: 1.23, 95%CI 1.06-1.43, p = 0.001). Conclusions: The greatest risk factors for PJIs within 2 years of primary RSA included male sex; additional modifiable risk factors included iron deficiency anemia, pathologic weight loss, and obesity. Preoperative screening can help to identify modifiable risk factors and alter management for high-risk patients to potentially minimize PJIs.