Is Doppler/Dopplex ultrasonography reliable in the assessment of percutaneous ablative therapies of hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: After hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) interventional therapies, noninvasive vascular diagnostic imaging [duplex, Color/power Doppler ultrasonography, and triphasic computed tomography (CT)] determines the lesion complete/incomplete ablation. The aim was to analyze the usefulness of duplex, color/power Doppler ultrasonography in HCC ablation after percutaneous ablative therapies (PATs). METHODS: We included 30 patients with 33 HCCs subjected to duplex/Doppler ultrasonography, ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), and triphasic CT, all these before and after PATs. RESULTS: One week after treatment ended, out of 21 lesions with pretreatment positive color-Doppler, signals disappeared in 19 (90.5%) lesions. Out of 29 lesions with pretreatment positive power-Doppler, signals disappeared in 24 (82.8%). Out of 13 lesions with pretreatment intralesional power/duplex arterial signals, signals disappeared in eight (61.5%). There was a significant correlation (P < 0.05) between power-Doppler arterial signals and FNAC. Before HCC ablation, power-Doppler demonstrated a sensitivity 40% and specificity 96% in HCC detection in relation to FNAC, it had a sensitivity 60% and specificity 85% in HCC detection compared to triphasic CT. After HCC ablation, power-Doppler had a sensitivity and specificity of 100% in viable malignancy detection in relation to FNAC. Power-Doppler had a sensitivity 89% and specificity 93% in residual malignancy detection in relation to triphasic CT. CONCLUSION: Power-Doppler is a good positive test as intralesional arterial signals in a cirrhotic liver lesion is highly suggestive of HCC. Power-Doppler was sensitive in HCC ablation assessment in pretreatment positive cases only. Both triphasic CT and duplex/Doppler are complementary and the use of different diagnostic modalities after ablation is mandatory.

High sustained virologic response rate using generic directly acting antivirals in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus Egyptian patients: single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a major health problem in Egypt, with a high prevalence of genotype 4. AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of generic sofosbuvir (SOF) plus generic daclatasvir (DAC) with or without ribavirin in the treatment of Egyptian chronic HCV patients compared with the use of brand drugs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational study that included 234 Egyptian chronic HCV patients was carried out. Patients were classified into two groups: group A (101 patients) received brand SOF 400 mg plus brand DAC 60 mg and group B (134 patients) received generic SOF 400 mg plus generic DAC 60 mg with or without ribavirin for 12 weeks. The end point was a sustained virological response at 12 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: Thirty-eight (37.2%) patients in group A were treatment experienced compared with 12 (9.02%) patients in group B; there were 39 (38%) cirrhotic patients in group A and 22 (16.5%) cirrhotic patients in group B. In group A, 50% of patients received ribavirin, while in group B, 42.1% of patients received ribavirin. All patients were followed up; all of them attended their week 12 post-treatment visit with negative HCV RNA, with achievement of sustained virological response at 12 in 100% of patients receiving generic drugs (group B) and 99% of patients receiving brand drugs (group A). Generic SOF and DAC were well tolerated, with mild adverse events including fatigue and headache. CONCLUSION: Use of generic SOF and DAC with or without ribavirin is an extremely effective and a well-tolerated treatment for Egyptian chronic HCV patients.