Biodegradation ability of two selected microbial autochthonous consortia from a chronically polluted marine coastal area (Priolo Gargallo, Italy).

The aims of this study were: (i) the characterization of the structure of the indigenous microbial community associated with the sediments under study; (ii) the isolation and characterization of microbial consortia able to degrade the aged hydrocarbons contaminating the sediments, and (iii) the assessment of related biodegradation capability of selected consortia. Samples of surface sediments were collected in Priolo Gargallo harbour (Sicily, Italy). The samples were analysed for physical, chemical (GC-FID analysis) and microbiological characteristics (qualitative (16S rDNA clone library) and quantitative (DAPI, CFU and MPN count) analysis). The sediment samples were used for the selection of two microbial consortia (indicated as PSO and PSM) with high biodegradation capacity for crude oil (∼95%) and PAHs (∼63%) respectively. Genetic analysis showed that Alcanivorax and Cycloclasticus were the dominant genera in both the PSO and PSM consortia. Oil-polluted environments naturally develop an elevated biorecovery potential. The presence of a highly specialized microbial flora (adapted to support the contamination) and their stimulation through favourable induced conditions provides a promising recovery strategy. The chance to identify and select indigenous bacteria and/or consortia with a high biodegradation capacity is fundamental for the development and optimization of bioaugmentation strategies especially for those concerning in situ applications.

Allochthonous bioaugmentation in ex situ treatment of crude oil-polluted sediments in the presence of an effective degrading indigenous microbiome.

Oil-polluted sediment bioremediation depends on both physicochemical and biological parameters, but the effect of the latter cannot be evaluated without the optimization of the former. We aimed in optimizing the physicochemical parameters related to biodegradation by applying an ex-situ landfarming set-up combined with biostimulation to oil-polluted sediment, in order to determine the added effect of bioaugmentation by four allochthonous oil-degrading bacterial consortia in relation to the degradation efficiency of the indigenous community. We monitored hydrocarbon degradation, sediment ecotoxicity and hydrolytic activity, bacterial population sizes and bacterial community dynamics, characterizing the dominant taxa through time and at each treatment. We observed no significant differences in total degradation, but increased ecotoxicity between the different treatments receiving both biostimulation and bioaugmentation and the biostimulated-only control. Moreover, the added allochthonous bacteria quickly perished and were rarely detected, their addition inducing minimal shifts in community structure although it altered the distribution of the residual hydrocarbons in two treatments. Therefore, we concluded that biodegradation was mostly performed by the autochthonous populations while bioaugmentation, in contrast to biostimulation, did not enhance the remediation process. Our results indicate that when environmental conditions are optimized, the indigenous microbiome at a polluted site will likely outperform any allochthonous consortium.

Hepatic arterial infusion using pirarubicin combined with systemic chemotherapy: a phase II study in patients with nonresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: A prospective phase II study was performed to determine the feasibility, efficacy and safety of arterial hepatic infusion (HAI) using pirarubicin combined with intravenous chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From December 1991 to April 1994, 75 patients with unresectable colorectal metastases confined to the liver were included in this multicenter study to receive intra-arterial hepatic pirarubicin and a systemic monthly regimen of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid. Sixty-four patients were analyzed in the intention-to-treat analysis and 61 in the per-protocol analysis. RESULTS: Tolerance of this regimen was rather good; however, functional catheter problems were observed in 29 patients (45%) resulting in failure of HAI in 21 cases (33%) after a median of three cycles; vomiting grade 3 was present in 12.5% of patients, neutropenia grade 4 in 23% and alopecia grade 3 in 19%. The overall response rate was 31.9% in intention-to-treat analysis, and 39.3% in per-protocol analysis. Extrahepatic progression was reported in only 21.7% of patients. Time to hepatic progression and extra-hepatic progression was 8.3 and 15 months, respectively, in intention-to-treat analysis, and 11 and 18 months, respectively, in per-protocol analysis. Median survival was 19 and 20 months in intention-to-treat analysis and per-protocol, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, the combination of intra-arterial pirarubicin and intravenous chemotherapy demonstrated some efficacy and good tolerance in the treatment of isolated colorectal liver metastases. This treatment seems to prevent extra-hepatic spread and prolong survival time. The results of this study have to be confirmed by new trials using more active systemic chemotherapy.

Factors predicting for efficacy and safety of docetaxel in a compassionate-use cohort of 825 heavily pretreated advanced breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To identify predictive factors for efficacy and safety in advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients treated in the French compassionate-use docetaxel program. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 825 ABC patients treated with docetaxel (100 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks) were source-reviewed and analyzed for prognostic factors associated with overall response rate (ORR), time to treatment failure (TTF), overall survival (OS), febrile neutropenia, mucositis, and severe fluid retention syndrome by univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The ORR was 22.9% (95% confidence interval, 20.2% to 26.2%). The median TTF and OS were 4.0 and 9.8 months, respectively. By multivariate analysis, secondary anthracycline-resistant disease was significantly associated (P <. 05) with lower ORR and shorter TTF and OS, whereas anthracycline-refractory disease was associated with shorter OS. Poor performance status was associated with lower ORR, shorter TTF, and shorter OS. Liver dysfunction (transaminase levels > 1.5 times the upper limit of normal [ULN] and alkaline phosphatase [AP] level > three times ULN) and time since first relapse less than 24 months were associated with shorter TTF and OS. Other significant correlations included the following: elevated CA 15-3 serum level with lower ORR; more than two involved sites, and minor transaminase and AP level abnormalities with shorter OS; and no previous chemotherapy for ABC with shorter TTF. According to multivariate analysis, ORR, TTF, and OS were not decreased in patients with liver metastases but without liver dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Docetaxel activity was maintained in heavily pretreated ABC patients and in those with liver metastasis; docetaxel must be used cautiously, however, in patients with liver dysfunction in whom high morbidity risk necessitates strict adherence to dose-adaptation guidelines.

Irinotecan combined with bolus fluorouracil, continuous infusion fluorouracil, and high-dose leucovorin every two weeks (LV5FU2 regimen): a clinical dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study in patients with pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose of irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV), using a biweekly LV5FU2 regimen and increasing doses of CPT-11, and to assess the efficacy of this combination in pretreated patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients had metastatic CRC and a World Health Organization performance status of 0 or 1. CPT-11 was administered over a 90-minute infusion every 2 weeks at a range of dose levels (100, 120, 150, 180, 200, 220, and 260 mg/m(2)). LV5FU2 was started 1 hour after the end of the biweekly CPT-11 infusion and was also administered on day 2. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were entered onto this trial; 549 cycles were administered. The MTD was not reached at 260 mg/m(2), and a dose level of 300 mg/m(2) was added. The MTD as defined in the protocol was not reached at this dose level either, but all patients had cycles delayed and/or required a dose reduction. This dose was deemed to be the MTD. To take into account both the toxicity of and compliance with the biweekly schedule, the recommended CPT-11 dose was established at 180 to 200 mg/m(2). Antitumor activity was observed at almost all dose levels, with an objective response rate of 22%. Median time to progression was 6.3 months and overall survival was 15 months. CONCLUSION: The biweekly CPT-11/LV5FU2 combination is feasible and safe, without overlapping toxicity. CPT-11 at 180 to 200 mg/m(2) in combination with LV5FU2 has been selected as the recommended dose for further studies.

Combination of oxaliplatin plus irinotecan in patients with gastrointestinal tumors: results of two independent phase I studies with pharmacokinetics.

PURPOSE: Two phase I studies of the oxaliplatin and irinotecan combination were performed in advanced gastrointestinal cancer patients to characterize the safety and pharmacokinetics of the regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with a performance status (PS) of < or = 2 and normal hematologic, hepatic, and renal functions received oxaliplatin (2-hour intravenous infusion) followed 1 hour later by irinotecan administered over a 30-minute period, every 3 weeks. Dose levels that were explored ranged from 85 to 110 mg/m(2) for oxaliplatin and 150 to 250 mg/m(2) for irinotecan. Plasma pharmacokinetics of total and ultrafiltrable platinum, irinotecan, SN-38, and its glucuronide, SN-38G, were determined. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients with gastrointestinal carcinomas (24 with colorectal cancer [CRC], four with pancreas cancer, four with gastric cancer, three with hepatocarcinoma, and four with other) received 216 treatment cycles. Median age was 54 years (range, 21 to 72 years); 95% had PS of 0 to 1; all but six had failed fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy. The maximum-tolerated dose was oxaliplatin 110 mg/m(2) plus irinotecan 200 mg/m(2) in one study and oxaliplatin 110 mg/m(2) plus irinotecan 250 mg/m(2) in the other study. Grade 3 to 4 diarrhea and febrile neutropenia were dose-limiting toxicities; other toxicities included emesis and dose-cumulative neuropathy. Recommended dose for phase II studies is oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) and irinotecan 200 mg/m(2). At this dose (12 patients, 65 cycles), grade 3 and 4 toxicities per patient included the following: emesis in 42% of patients, neutropenia in 33% (febrile episodes in 17%), peripheral neuropathy in 25%, delayed diarrhea in 17%, and thrombocytopenia in 8%. Two patients with Gilbert's syndrome experienced severe irinotecan toxicity. No plasmatic pharmacokinetic interactions were detected. Seven partial responses were observed in 24 CRC patients. CONCLUSION: This combination is feasible, with activity in 5-FU-resistant CRC patients. Phase I studies that explore the every-2-weeks schedule, in addition to phase II studies of this schedule (as well as in combination with 5-FU) as second-line therapy of metastatic CRC, are ongoing.

Efficacy and safety of docetaxel (Taxotere) in heavily pretreated advanced breast cancer patients: the French compassionate use programme experience.

The aim of this investigation was to assess retrospectively docetaxel safety and efficacy in advanced breast cancer patients in a French compassionate use programme. Patients had received > 1 prior chemotherapy regimen for advanced disease, were either anthracycline-resistant (that is progressed within 6 months after anthracycline-based chemotherapy) or had received the maximum cumulative dose. The recommended docetaxel dose was 100 mg/m2/cycle (75 mg/m2 in case of liver function impairment: transaminases > 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN), alkaline phosphatases > 3 x ULN). Between August 1993 and December 1995, 889 patients were treated in 67 French centres, of whom 870 were evaluable for safety and 825 were evaluable for patient and treatment characteristics and efficacy. 20.5% (of the 825 patients evaluable for baseline characteristics) had poor performance status (PS > or = 2), 49.3% liver metastasis and 9.6% biological liver dysfunction. 98.4% had been previously treated by anthracyclines, 50.8% had resistant disease and 37.1% had received > 2 prior palliative chemotherapy lines. The most frequent severe toxicity, febrile neutropenia (reported in 223/870 (25.6%) patients evaluable for safety), caused 10 deaths, 6 of these being patients with severe liver impairment before inclusion. Fluid retention syndrome and other common non-haematological toxicities were well tolerated. 3.1% (28/889) of all patients and 11.4% of those with liver dysfunction, died from treatment-related causes. The overall response rate in 825 assessable patients was 22.9% (95% confidence interval (CI): 20.2-26.2%). Median time to treatment failure was 4 months (95% CI: 3.6-4.3) and median survival was 9.8 months (95% CI: 8.8-10.7). This report on the largest series of unselected advanced breast cancer patients treated with docetaxel, supports previous phase II studies, confirming docetaxel's utility in patients relapsing after failing anthracycline-containing palliative chemotherapy.

Pathophysiology and therapy of irinotecan-induced delayed-onset diarrhea in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a prospective assessment.

PURPOSE: Irinotecan (CPT-11), a camptothecin derivative, has shown efficacy against colorectal cancer. Delayed-onset diarrhea is its main limiting toxicity. The aim of this study was to determine the pathophysiology of CPT-11-induced delayed-onset diarrhea and assess the efficacy of combined antidiarrheal medication in a phase II, prospective, successive-cohorts, open study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with advanced colorectal cancer refractory to fluorouracil (5-FU) therapy received CPT-11 350 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. The first cohort of 14 consecutive patients explored for the mechanism of diarrhea received acetorphan (a new enkephalinase inhibitor) 100 mg three times daily; the second 14-patient cohort received, in addition to acetorphan, loperamide 4 mg three times daily. Before treatment, and if late diarrhea occurred, patients underwent colon mucosal biopsies for CPT-11 and topoisomerase I levels; intestinal transit time; fecalogram; fat and protein excretion; alpha1-antitrypsin clearance; D-xylose test; blood levels for vasoactive intestinal polypeptide, glucagon, gastrin, somatostatin, prostaglandin E2, and carboxylesterase; CPT-11/SN-38 and SN-38 glucuronide pharmacokinetics; and stool cultures. RESULTS: Delayed-onset diarrhea occurred during the first three treatment cycles in 23 patients (82%). Electrolyte fecal measurements showed a negative or small osmotic gap in nine of nine patients and an increased alpha1-antitrypsin clearance in six of six patients. There were no modifications in stool cultures or hormonal dysfunction. Four of 11 patients (36%) with delayed-onset diarrhea in the first cohort responded to acetorphan, whereas nine of 10 patients (90%) responded to the combination of acetorphan and loperamide (P < .02). CONCLUSION: CPT-11-induced delayed-onset diarrhea is caused by a secretory mechanism with an exudative component. Early combined treatment with loperamide and acetorphan seems effective in controlling the diarrheal episodes.

Comparison of the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of irinotecan after administration by the intravenous versus intraperitoneal route in mice.

Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a new drug active in colorectal cancer. A comparison was made of the efficacy and pharmacokinetics of CPT-11 after i.p. versus i.v. administration to mice. We found that i.p. administration of CPT-11 to mice bearing C26 colon cancer was more efficient and less toxic than i.v. administration; a 100-mg i.p. dose induced an increase in life span equivalent to that produced by a 300-mg i.v. dose, and toxic deaths appeared after doses of 400 mg/kg given i.v. and 800 mg/kg given i.p. Pharmacokinetic parameters of CPT-11 and SN-38 were compared after i.v. or i.p. administration in mice bearing P388 leukemia ascites. Peritoneal CPT-11 and SN-38 AUC values were higher after i.p. administration than after i.v. injection. Plasmatic AUC values remained equivalent. Moreover, peritoneal CPT-11 clearance was 10-fold lower after i.p. versus i.v. administration. If the survival and pharmacologic advantage of i.p. CPT-11 in the murine model considered can be translated to a safe and practical mode of therapy in patients and if local toxicity does not prove to be a major adverse effect, then a potentially useful agent could be added to the drugs known to be active when given by the i.p. route for adjuvant therapy in colon cancer.

Severe CPT-11 toxicity in patients with Gilbert's syndrome: two case reports.

BACKGROUND: CPT-11 is hydrolyzed to its active metabolite SN-38, which is mainly eliminated through conjugation by hepatic uridine diphosphate glucuronosyl transferases (UGTs) to the glucuronide (SN-38G) derivative. Preclinical studies showed that UGT*1.1 is the isozyme responsible for SN-38 glucuronidation. Patients with Gilbert's syndrome have deficient UGT*1.1 activity, therefore may have an increased risk for related CPT-11 toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two patients with metastatic colon cancer and Gilbert's syndrome were treated with CPT-11 based chemotherapy. CPT-11, SN-38 and SN-38G pharmacokinetics parameters were obtained. Serum bilirubin was analysed by alkaline methanolysis and HPLC. RESULTS: Both patients presented grade 4 neutropenia and/or diarrhea (NCI-CTC) in every treatment cycle. Biliary index (after Gupta et al) values were well above 4000. CONCLUSION: We present the first clinical evidence linking bilirubin glucuronidation status and CPT-11 related toxicity. The severe toxicity experienced by the two patients with Gilbert's syndrome treated with CPT-11 based chemotherapy has a genetic basis. Individuals with Gilbert's syndrome have an enhanced risk for CPT-11 toxicity. Unconjugated serum bilirubin could be predictive parameter of CPT-11 toxicity.

High dose-intensity of irinotecan administered every 3 weeks in advanced cancer patients: a feasibility study.

PURPOSE: To assess, on a multicenter basis, the feasibility of treating advanced cancer patients with high-dose irinotecan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients who met the usual phase I criteria (26 men and nine women) were included. Primary tumor sites were colon, head and neck, unknown primary, kidney, liver, and others. All had been previously treated. Irinotecan was given at the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) (600 mg/m2) or the level below (500 mg/m2) as a 30-minute infusion once every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were entered in the four participating centers at the MTD of 600 mg/m2. This dose level was clearly shown not to be feasible: 14 patients (78%) had grade 3 to 4 neutropenia, with febrile episodes in 11 patients; grade 3 to 4 diarrhea was observed in nine patients; and one toxic death occurred. Subsequently, 17 not heavily pretreated patients were included at 500 mg/m2 and carefully monitored. The safety of this dose level was considered acceptable: 41% of patients had grade 3 to 4 neutropenia, 24% experienced grade 3 to 4 diarrhea, and no febrile granulocytopenia or toxic death occurred. Six partial responses were documented in metastatic colorectal cancer, all in patients who had previously received conventional chemotherapy, four in patients who had exhibited progressive disease under fluorouracil (5FU)-based chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: We plan to study the higher dose-intensity 500-mg/m2 level on good-risk and carefully monitored patients. This could enlarge the spectrum of tumors sensitive to irinotecan and improve the already good results observed in colorectal cancers.

Phase II study of irinotecan in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer in chemotherapy-naive patients and patients pretreated with fluorouracil-based chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of irinotecan (CPT-11) in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer in both chemotherapy-naive and pretreated patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred thirteen patients (aged 18 to 75 years) with metastatic colorectal cancer, World Health Organization (WHO) performance status < or = 2, and life expectancy > or = 3 months were treated with CPT-11 350 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. All 178 patients eligible for efficacy analysis had not received more than one prior fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy regimen (adjuvant or palliative) and had adequate hematologic, renal, and hepatic function. RESULTS: Primary tumor sites were the colon (71%) and rectum (28%). Sixty-six percent of the patients had > or = two metastatic sites. Ninety-eight percent of the patients had undergone previous surgery, and 77.5% had received prior chemotherapy. Thirty-two of 178 eligible patients achieved on objective response (four complete responses [CRs] and 28 partial responses [PRs]; response rate, 18%; 95% confidence interval, 12.6% to 24.4%), 65 were stable, and 59 progressed. The response rate was 17.7% in the pretreated group and 18.8% in the chemotherapy-naive group. Within the former subgroup, response rates of 16.1% were reported in patients who were progressive on prior 5-FU chemotherapy and 19.1% in patients who were progressive off such treatment. The median duration of objective response (9.1 months) and median time to achievement of a response (9.3 weeks) did not differ between chemotherapy-naive and pretreated patients. The most frequent adverse events were neutropenia, which developed in 80% of the patients, delayed diarrhea (87%), alopecia (88%), fatigue (81%), and nausea/vomiting (77%). All these adverse events were manageable. Severe (WHO grade 3 or 4) neutropenia was only observed in 18% of the cycles, leukopenia in 11%, delayed diarrhea in 11%, and nausea and vomiting in 3%. Development of simultaneous grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and delayed diarrhea during 4% of the cycles was the safety issue of greatest concern. CONCLUSION: CPT-11 has definite activity in the treatment of advanced metastatic colorectal cancer both in chemotherapy-naive and in pretreated patients who experienced disease progression on 5-FU, which suggests a lack of cross-resistance between CPT-11 and 5-FU. Diarrhea and neutropenia, the major toxicities of CPT-11, contribute to the risk to develop febrile neutropenic sepsis.

CPT-11 (irinotecan) in the treatment of colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers in the Western World. Although 50% of patients are cured by surgery alone, the outcome is poor in high-risk patients (Dukes stages B2 and C) despite adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based regimens. CPT-11 (irinotecan) is a promising new agent for the treatment of colorectal cancer with a unique mechanism of action. CPT-11 is a DNA topoisomerase I inhibitor, which has not demonstrated susceptibility to the P-glycoprotein-mediated multidrug-resistant phenotype. Phase II studies with CPT-11 have demonstrated definite activity against colorectal cancer in both chemotherapy-naive and pretreated patients (response rates of 15-32% observed) even with clinical evidence of resistance to 5-FU. The response rate appears to be consistent, reproducible and equivalent to that achieved with 5-FU plus folinic acid in chemotherapy-naive patients.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of irinotecan (CPT-11) administered daily for three consecutive days every three weeks in patients with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a phase I and pharmacokinetic study to determine the maximum tolerable dose (MTD), toxicities, pharmacokinetic profile, and antitumor activity of Irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with refractory solid malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-six patients were entered in this phase I study. CPT-11 was administered intravenously over 30 minutes for 3 consecutive days every 3 weeks. Dose levels ranged from 33 mg/m2/day to 115 mg/m2/day on days 1 through 3. The pharmacokinetics of total CPT-11 and its active metabolite SN-38 were assayed by HPLC. RESULTS: The combination of leukopenia and diarrhea was dose-limiting toxicity at 115 mg/m2/day dose level, since 50% of the patients (5/10) experienced either grade 3-4 leukopenia, or diarrhea, or both. Leukopenia appeared to be a cumulative toxicity, with a global increase in its incidence and severity upon repeated administration of CPT-11. Other toxicities included nausea, vomiting, fatigue and alopecia. CPT-11 and active metabolite SN-38 pharmacokinetics were determined in 21 patients (29 courses). Both CPT-11 and SN-38 pharmacokinetics presented a high interpatient variability. CPT-11 mean maximum plasma concentrations reached 2034 ng/ml at the MTD (115 mg/m2). The terminal-phase half-life was 8.3 h and the mean residence time 10.2 h. The mean volume of distribution at steady state was 141 l/m2/h. CPT-11 rebound concentrations were observed in many courses at about 0.5 to 1 hour following the end of the i.v. infusion, which is suggestive of enterohepatic recycling. Total body clearance did not vary with increased dosage (mean = 14.3 l/h/m2), indicating linear pharmacokinetics within the dose range administered in this trial. The total area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) increased proportionally to the CPT-11 dose. Mean metabolite SN-38 peak levels reached 41 ng/ml at the MTD. A significant correlation was observed between CPT-11 area under the curve (AUC) and its corresponding metabolite SN-38 AUC (r = 0.52, p < 0.05). SN-38 rebound concentrations were observed in many courses at about 0.5 to 1 hour following the end of the i.v. infusion, which is suggestive of enterohepatic recycling. Mean 24-h urinary excretion of CPT-11 accounted for 10% of the administered dose by the third day, whereas SN-38 urinary excretion accounted for 0.18% of the CPT-11 dose. In this phase I trial, the hematological toxicity correlated with neither CPT-11 nor SN-38 AUC. Diarrhea grade correlated significantly with CPT-11 AUC. Two partial (breast adenocarcinoma and carcinoma of unknown primary) and 2 minor (hepatocarcinoma and pancreatic adenocarcinoma) responses were observed. CONCLUSION: The MTD for CPT-11 administered in a 3 consecutive-days-every-3 weeks schedule in this patient population is 115 mg/m2/day. The recommended dose for phase II studies is 100 mg/m2/day.

Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of irinotecan (CPT-11) and active metabolite SN-38 during phase I trials.

BACKGROUND: Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a novel water-soluble camptothecin derivative selected for clinical testing based on its good in vitro and in vivo activity in various experimental systems, including pleiotropic drug-resistant tumors. Its mechanism of action appears mediated through topoisomerase I inhibition. The purpose of this study was to describe CPT-11 and active metabolite SN-38 population pharmacokinetics, examine patient characteristics that may influence pharmacokinetics, and to investigate pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships that may prove useful in the future clinical management of this drug. PATIENTS AND METHODS: As part of 3 Phase I studies including 235 patients, pharmacokinetics of CPT-11 and metabolite SN-38 were determined in 107 patients. CPT-11 was administered as a 30-min i.v. infusion according to 3 different schedules: daily for 3 consecutive days every 3 weeks, weekly for 3 weeks, and once every 3 weeks. Patients characteristics were the following: median age 53 years; 62 men, 45 women; 105 caucasians, 2 blacks; performance status was 0-1 in 96 patients; tumor sites were predominantly colon, rectum, head and neck, lung, ovary and breast; with the exception of 6 patients, all had been previously treated with surgery, chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. CPT-11 and metabolite SN-38 were simultaneously determined by HPLC using fluorescence detection. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using model-independent and model-dependent analyses. RESULTS: 168 pharmacokinetic data sets were obtained in 107 patients (97 first courses, 43 second courses, 23 third courses, 4 fourth courses, and 1 fifth course). Rebound concentrations of CPT-11 were frequently observed at about 0.5 to 1 h following the end of the i.v. infusion, which is suggestive of enterohepatic recycling of the drug. Model-independent analysis yielded the following mean population pharmacokinetic parameters for CPT-11: a terminal half-life of 10.8 h, a mean residence time (MRT) of 10.7 h, a volume of distribution at steady state (Vdss) of 150 L/m2, and a total body clearance of 14.3 L/m2/h. Model-dependent analysis disclosed a CPT-11 plasma disposition as either biphasic or triphasic with a mean terminal half-life of 12.0 h. The volume of distribution Vdss (150 L/m2) and total body clearance (14.8 L/m2/h) yielded almost identical values to the above model-independent analysis. The active metabolite SN-38 presented rebound concentrations in many courses at about 1 h following the end of the i.v. infusion which is suggestive of enterohepatic recycling. The mean time at which SN-38 maximum concentrations was reached was at 1 h since the beginning of the 0.5 h infusion (i.e., 0.5 h post i.v.). SN-38 plasma decay followed closely that of the parent compound with a mean apparent terminal half-life of 10.6 h. Mean 24 h CPT-11 urinary excretion represented 16.7% of the administered dose, whereas metabolite SN-38 recovery in urine was minimal (0.23% of the CPT-11 dose). The number of CPT-11 treatments did not influence pharmacokinetic parameters of either the parent compound or metabolite SN-38. Although CPT-11 pharmacokinetics presented an important interpatient variability, both CPT-11 maximum concentrations (Cmax) and the CPT-11 area under the plasma concentration versus time curves (AUC) increased proportionally and linearly with dosage (Cmax, r = 0.78, p < 0.001); CPT-11 AUC, r = 0.88, p < 0.001). An increase in half-life and MRT was observed at higher dosages, although this did not influence the linear increase in AUC as a function of dose. The volume of distribution at steady state (Vdss) and the total body clearance (CL) were not affected by the CPT-11 dose. Metabolite SN-38 AUC increased proportionally to the CPT-11 dose (r = 0.67, p < 0.001) and also with the parent compound AUC (r = 0.75, p < 0.001) (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Phase I study of retelliptine dihydrochloride (SR 95325 B) using a single two-hour intravenous infusion schedule.

Retelliptine dihydrochloride (SR 95325 B, NSC D-626717-W) is an ellipticine derivative having a very high level of antitumor activity in resistant murine solid tumor models. We studied in a Phase I trial escalating doses of retelliptine using a single 2-hour IV infusion schedule. Data from other Phase I studies allowed a starting dose of 80 mg/m2 and a rapid dose escalation. Included were 15 patients (M/F = 13/2) with a median age of 55 (range: 17-72). There were 22 courses delivered at the following dose levels: 80, 180, 700, 900, 1,200, and 1,500 mg/m2. Primary tumor types were kidney (6 patients), colon (3 patients), pancreas (2 patients), and others (4 patients). Mild dose-related visual troubles (blurring, accommodation troubles, oculomotor paresis) occurred in 9/11 patients starting from 700 mg/m2. Asymptomatic EKG anomalies, including significant prolongation of PR and QRS intervals occurred at 1500 mg/m2 (in 3/3 patients) marking the maximum tolerated dose. Both visual and EKG anomalies were spontaneously reversible few minutes to few hours after the end of infusion. Other possible drug-related toxicity occurred sporadically such as somnolence, bronchospasm, dry mouth, and vomiting (2 patients each). There were no significant laboratory anomalies. Neither drug-related deaths nor objective complete or partial responses were observed. The recommended dose for Phase II trial using the 2-hour intravenous infusion schedule is 1,200 mg/m2.

Phase II trial of pirarubicin in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.

Eighteen patients with either metastatic or locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma were treated with intravenous infusion of Pirarubicin 50 mg/m2/day every 3 weeks. Seventeen patients were evaluable for response. One had minor response, 5 had stable disease, and 11 had progression of disease. Hematological toxicity was moderate, leading to a dose reduction in only 1 patient; there was no clinical cardiac toxicity. We conclude that Pirarubicin used with this dosage and schedule has no activity in advanced pancreatic carcinoma.

Efficacy of combined 5-fluorouracil and cisplatinum in advanced gastric carcinomas. A phase II trial with prognostic factor analysis.

Combined chemotherapy has demonstrated a degree of efficacy in gastric carcinoma. As 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and cisplatinum are two of the most active drugs, we have tested the efficacy of combined 5FU and cisplatinum in a prospective phase II trial. Cycles were administered every 4 weeks and consisted of 5FU 1000 mg/m2/day 5 days continuous intravenous (i.v.) infusion and cisplatinum 100 mg/m2 on day 2. Cycles were repeated according to tolerance and efficacy. 87 patients entered the study, 57 with metastatic or recurrent tumour (M) and 30 with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC). The response rate for the 83 evaluable patients was 43% [95% confidence interval (CI) 30-56%]. There were four complete responses (5%), 32 partial responses (39%), 34 cases of stable disease and 13 cases of progressive disease. Responses were more frequent in patients with a good performance status (P = 0.02), with their primary located in the cardia (P = 0.003), with a non-linitis plastica tumour form (P = 0.003) or a tumour containing less than 50% of independent cells (P = 0.016). Median survival was 9 months for the total population. It was better in patients with a good performance status (P = 0.01), and those who did not have linitis plastica (P = 0.005). Toxicity was acceptable, although grade 3-4 neutropenia was reported in 22% of the cycles, mucositis in 14% and 3 patients died of septic complications. The combination of 5FU and cisplatinum is effective in terms of tumour response in advanced gastric cancer and warrants testing with the other active regimens.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric carcinoma--a phase II trial with combined continuous intravenous 5-fluorouracil and bolus cisplatinum.

Locally advanced gastric adenocarcinomas (LAGC) have a poor prognosis, particularly when tumours are bulky, located in the cardia or in the event of locoregional lymph node involvement. Patients bearing these tumours were entered in a phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, combining continuous intravenous 5-fluorouracil (5FU) (1000 mg/m2 for 5 days) and cisplatinum (CDDP) (100 mg/m2 on day 2) repeated every 4 weeks, for one to six cycles according to response and tolerance. 30 patients have been entered, 26 after clinical evaluation (CAT scan and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy) and 4 with unresectable tumours at prior laparotomy. Median age was 60 years, 15/30 patients had a tumour of the cardia, 15/30 had enlarged lymph nodes and 7/30 had linitis plastica (diffuse type). A mean number of three cycles was administered (range 1-6). 27 of the 30 patients were evaluable for response. One patient achieved a complete response (CR) and 14 a partial response (56%; 95% confidence interval 38-74%). No patient had tumour progression, and only 1/6 with linitis plastica responded. 28 patients underwent surgery, and 23 had a macroscopically complete resection (77% of the 30 entered patients); RO resections were performed in 60% of the cases, mainly after an objective response (13/15 versus 4/12 in nonresponders). No pathological CR were seen. Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in eight cycles (5 patients), with five septic complications and one death due to toxicity. Four postoperative complications were observed: 2 cases of severe pneumonia and 2 subphrenic abscesses. One postoperative death, due to intravascular disseminated coagulation, was observed at day 30. Median survival was 16 months and the 1-, 2- and 3-year survival was 67, 42 and 38%, respectively. Patients with linitis plastica had a significantly shorter survival (P < 0.002). We conclude that neodjuvant chemotherapy is feasible in LAGC, although randomised trials are warranted to demonstrate its efficacy on survival and resection rates.