Rosuvastatin demonstrates greater reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol compared with pravastatin and simvastatin in hypercholesterolaemic patients: a randomized, double-blind study.

BACKGROUND: Rosuvastatin (Crestor), a new, highly efficacious statin, has demonstrated dose-dependent low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reductions of up to 65% in a dose-ranging programme with doses of 1 to 80 mg. DESIGN: A randomized, double-blind multicentre trial compared rosuvastatin with commonly used starting doses of pravastatin and simvastatin to determine relative efficacy in LDL-C reduction and impact on other lipid parameters in primary hypercholesterolaemia. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 502 patients (greater-than-or-equal 18 years; LDL-C greater-than-or-equal 4.14 mmol/l [160 mg/dl] and < 6.50 mmol/l [250 mg/dl] and triglycerides less-than-or-equal 4.52 mmol/l [400 mg/dl]) were randomized to 12 weeks of rosuvastatin 5 mg (n = 120) or 10 mg (n = 115), pravastatin 20 mg (n=]137) or simvastatin 20 mg (n = 130). Rosuvastatin 5 and 10 mg reduced LDL-C by 42 and 49%, respectively, compared with 28% for pravastatin (P < 0.001 versus both rosuvastatin doses) and 37% for simvastatin (P < 0.01 versus rosuvastatin 5 mg; P < 0.001 versus 10[?]mg). National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel II (NCEP ATP II) goals were achieved by 87% of rosuvastatin 10[?]mg patients, 71% of rosuvastatin 5[?]mg patients, 53% of pravastatin patients, and 64% of simvastatin patients; similar proportions of patients achieved NCEP ATP III goals. European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) goals were achieved by 83, 63, 20 and 50% of patients, respectively. All study treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Both doses of rosuvastatin were more effective than pravastatin and simvastatin in meeting NCEP ATP II and EAS LDL-C targets. Rosuvastatin 10 mg was more effective than pravastatin and simvastatin in meeting NCEP ATP III targets.

Effects of acarbose treatment in Type 2 diabetic patients under dietary training: a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-year study.

This 24-months, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomised, group comparison study investigated the effect of acarbose vs placebo for improving metabolic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes under dietary training insufficiently controlled by diet alone. Patients randomised to acarbose had their dose increased in a stepwise manner to week 5. From week 5 onwards, they received 100 mg three times daily. This incremental dosing scheme was matched in the placebo group. All patients received specialist, intensive, continuous dietary training and counselling throughout the 2 yr of the study. Of the 74 patients randomised, 60 were included in the per-protocol analysis (28 receiving acarbose; 32 receiving placebo). HbA1c was the primary target variable. Per-protocol analysis found that, after 24 months, the mean difference in HbA1c relative to baseline value was -1.71+/-1.6% in the acarbose group and -0.82+/-1.1% in the placebo group. End-point values were 6.85+/-1.7% in the acarbose group and 7.41+/-1.1% in the placebo group. This difference between acarbose and placebo was statistically significant (p=0.02). Patients were defined as responders if they did not require additional treatment with an antidiabetic agent during the study. The responder rate under acarbose therapy was 89%, compared with 47% for placebo (p=0.0005). Acarbose-treated responders improved their HbA1c level to 6.45+/-0.82% after 24 months. The efficacy of acarbose was consistent throughout the study; decreasing efficacy was not evident. The results demonstrate the efficacy of acarbose for improving metabolic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes, even when such patients receive good dietary treatment and counselling.

Efficacy and safety of a new cholesterol synthesis inhibitor, atorvastatin, in comparison with simvastatin and pravastatin, in subjects with hypercholesterolemia.

BACKGROUND: High levels of total and LDL-cholesterol are associated with an increased risk of atherosclerotic vascular disease. Lowering of serum cholesterol levels by pharmacologic intervention with inhibitors of cholesterol synthesis, the so-called statins, reduces the incidence of cardiovascular events in subjects with and without atherosclerotic manifestations. In a 16-week, multicenter, randomized, open-label cross-over study we compared the efficacy and safety of the new compound atorvastatin for reducing LDL-cholesterol with simvastatin or pravastatin. METHODS: Following a 4-week placebo-controlled baseline period patients with LDL-cholesterol between 4.1 and 6.2 mmol/l and serum triglycerides below 3.4 mmol/l were randomly assigned to treatment either with 5 or 20 mg atorvastatin, or with 10 mg simvastatin or 20 mg pravastatin once daily for 4 weeks. After a placebo-washout period of 4-6 weeks, patients switched to the alternate treatment. At the end of weeks 3 and 4 of each study phase the serum concentrations of lipid parameters and apolipoproteins as well as safety parameters were determined. RESULTS: A total of 78 subjects entered the study. Treatment with 5 mg atorvastatin reduced total and LDL-cholesterol by 21 and 27%, respectively, which was similar to 10 mg simvastatin (total cholesterol -20%, LDL-cholesterol -28%) and 20 mg pravastatin (-18 and -24%, respectively). The effects of this low dose of atorvastatin on triglyceride levels (-16%) was not different from that of simvastatin and pravastatin (-8 and -11%, respectively). Treatment with 20 mg atorvastatin caused significantly larger reductions in total cholesterol (-33%) and LDL-cholesterol (-44%), serum triglycerides (-23%), and apo B (-40%) compared to simvastatin and pravastatin. Atorvastatin was well-tolerated, and no serious or medically important adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that atorvastatin is a safe and very efficacious cholesterol-lowering agent, which also possesses significant triglyceride-lowering properties.

Double-Blind Comparison of Apolipoprotein and Lipoprotein Particle Lowering Effects of Atorvastatin and Pravastatin Monotherapy in Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia.

METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 305 subjects with primary hypercholesterolemia were randomized in a 3:1 ratio to receive either atorvastatin 10 mg daily or pravastatin 20 mg daily according to a 16-week double-blind comparative study of the effect on apolipoprotein and lipoprotein particle levels. All patients had low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol levels between 4.2 and 6.6 mM and triglyceride concentrations below 4.5 mM at baseline. After 16 weeks of treatment, apoB (-27% and -16%; P <.001), apoE (-13.3% and -5.6%; P <.05) and the triglyceride-rich LpC-III:B particle (-33% and -26%; P <.05) levels were reduced to a significantly greater extent in the atorvastatin than in the pravastatin treatment group. Both atorvastatin and pravastatin increased apoA-I levels, an effect that was more pronounced in the pravastatin group (+7% and +11%; P <.002). The increased apoA-I levels predominated on LpA-I in the atorvastatin group (+11%) and on LpA-I:A-II in the pravastatin group (+13%). ApoA-II levels were decreased with atorvastatin to a greater extent than with pravastatin (-1% and +2.8%; P <.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although atorvastatin and pravastatin belong to the same therapeutic family, they produce different effects in apoliprotein concentrations in hypercholesterolemic patients. Atorvastatin, an agent of the new generation, appears to efficiently reduce apoB-containing lipoprotein particles containing apoC-III.

Efficacy and safety of atorvastatin compared to pravastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia.

Plasma cholesterol and other lipoproteins play a significant role in the development of atherosclerosis and subsequent coronary heart disease (CHD). This 1 year study was designed to confirm the efficacy and safety of atorvastatin (Lipitor) compared to pravastatin, a marketed agent for low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction in hypercholesterolemic patients. Patients were recruited at 26 centers in six European countries. After a 6 week placebo baseline phase, patients were randomized to receive atorvastatin 10 mg or pravastatin 20 mg daily. The dose could be doubled at week 16, if LDL-C levels remained > or = 3.4 mmol/l (135 mg/dl). Atorvastatin significantly lowered LDL-C from baseline by 35% compared with 23% for pravastatin (P < 0.05). A total of 72% of atorvastatin patients attained the LDL-C target level of < 3.4 mmol/l, compared to 26% of pravastatin patients. Atorvastatin also significantly reduced TC, TG and apo B (P < 0.05). Safety was assessed by recording adverse events and measuring clinical laboratory parameters. The adverse event profile was similar for both treatment groups and neither treatment caused clinically relevant laboratory abnormalities. Atorvastatin 10 and 20 mg once daily is superior to pravastatin 20 and 40 mg once daily in treating patients with hypercholesterolemia.