Opioid Prescription Trends Among Orthopaedic, Primary Care, and Pain Management Providers in Spine Surgery Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine prescription trends across specialties in the perioperative care of patients undergoing spine surgery from 2018 to 2021. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A range of measures, including implementation of state prescription drug monitoring programs, have been instituted to combat the opioid epidemic. Considering the continued presence of opioids for spine-related pain management, a better understanding of the patterns of opioid prescription practices may be important for future intervention. METHODS: All patients aged 18 years and older who underwent elective posterior lumbar decompression and fusion, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, and anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion from 2018 to 2021 were retrospectively identified. Patient demographics and surgical characteristics were collected through a Structured Query Language search and manual chart review. Opioid prescription data were collected through Pennsylvania's Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) database and grouped into the following prescriber categories: primary care, pain management, physiatry, and orthopaedic surgery. RESULTS: Of the 1,062 patients, 302 (28.4%) underwent anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion, 345 (32.4%) underwent posterior lumbar decompression and fusion, and 415 (39.1%) underwent transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. From 2018 to 2021, there were no significant differences in total opioid prescriptions from orthopaedic surgery (P = 0.892), primary care (P = 0.571), pain management (P = 0.687), or physiatry (P = 0.391) providers. Pain management providers prescribed the most opioids between 1 year and 2 months preoperatively (P = 0.003), between 2 months and 1 year postoperatively (P = 0.018), and overall (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Despite increasing national awareness of the opioid epidemic and the establishment of statewide prescription drug monitoring programs, prescription rates have not changed markedly in spine patients. Pain management and primary care physicians prescribe opioids at a higher rate in the chronic periods before and after surgery, likely in part because of longitudinal relationships with these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Provider opinions on effectiveness of physical therapy as treatment for glenohumeral arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Physical therapy (PT) is a described first-line treatment option for glenohumeral arthritis, but its efficacy for treating this spectrum of disease is not well understood. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the opinions of expert providers-orthopedic surgeons and physical therapists-regarding the utility of PT in treating glenohumeral arthritis in different stages of radiographic severity. Our goal is to identify areas of interprofessional majority agreement as well as areas without agreement that warrant further investigation. METHODS: A 35-question survey was created and distributed via email to members of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and the American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Therapists, collecting information on demographics, professional experience, and the perceived benefit of PT for patients with different stages of glenohumeral arthritis based on radiographic severity. Survey responses were analyzed for inter-professional differences in distribution of answer choices as well as for majority agreement statements. Items with >50% agreement from a professional group were considered statements of majority agreement. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety surgeons and 39 physical therapists completed the survey. Surgeons and therapists demonstrated different distribution of answer choices in 25 of the 29 nondemographic related questions (86%). Surgeons and therapists reached the same majority statement in 8 items (28%) and reached disagreeing majority statements in 4 items (14%). They agreed on the benefits of PT for mild arthritis, the benefits of corticosteroid injections, the frequency of strengthening exercises, and that PT failure should not be required for surgical approval in patients with severe arthritis. They disagreed on the whether PT exacerbates symptoms in patients with moderate arthritis, and whether preoperative PT influences postoperative outcomes. CONCLUSION: Both surgeons and therapists agreed that PT may be less beneficial for patients with more advanced radiographic arthritis and that PT failure should not be required for insurance approval for surgical intervention in patients with severe glenohumeral arthritis. Further research is needed to determine the efficacy of PT for patients with moderate arthritis as well as the utility of preoperative PT for improving postoperative outcomes.

Piezo1 regulates the regenerative capacity of skeletal muscles via orchestration of stem cell morphological states.

Muscle stem cells (MuSCs) are essential for tissue homeostasis and regeneration, but the potential contribution of MuSC morphology to in vivo function remains unknown. Here, we demonstrate that quiescent MuSCs are morphologically heterogeneous and exhibit different patterns of cellular protrusions. We classified quiescent MuSCs into three functionally distinct stem cell states: responsive, intermediate, and sensory. We demonstrate that the shift between different stem cell states promotes regeneration and is regulated by the sensing protein Piezo1. Pharmacological activation of Piezo1 is sufficient to prime MuSCs toward more responsive cells. Piezo1 deletion in MuSCs shifts the distribution toward less responsive cells, mimicking the disease phenotype we find in dystrophic muscles. We further demonstrate that Piezo1 reactivation ameliorates the MuSC morphological and regenerative defects of dystrophic muscles. These findings advance our fundamental understanding of how stem cells respond to injury and identify Piezo1 as a key regulator for adjusting stem cell states essential for regeneration.