Evaluation of Double-Faced Tubularized Preputial Flap versus Duckett's Procedure for Repair of Penoscrotal Hypospadias with Significant Penile Curvature: A Comparative Study.

Background: Proximal hypospadias, with significant curvature, is one of the most challenging anomalies. Great diversity and a large number of procedures described over the last 4 decades confirmed the fact that no single procedure has been universally accepted or successful. So, the aim of this study is to evaluate double-faced tubularized preputial flap (DFPF) versus transverse tubularized inner preputial flap (Duckett's procedure) as regards surgical outcomes, complications rate, and cosmetic results for repair of penoscrotal hypospadias with chordee. Patients and Methods. This was a prospective comparative study on 144 children with primary penoscrotal hypospadias with moderate or severe chordee, conducted at New Damietta and Assuit hospitals, Al-Azhar University, from March 2016 to March 2022. The patients were randomly divided into two equal groups; group A (n = 72) underwent DFPF, and group B (n = 72) underwent Duckett's procedure. Results: No significant difference was identified as regards demographic data. The follow-up period ranged from 20 to 66 months (mean of 28 months after DFPF and 31 months after Duckett's repair), and the complication rate was 20.1% (29 of 144 children). There were statistically significant differences between the two groups as regards the urethral stricture, penile rotation, and total complication rate. HOSE score was adopted for assessment of surgical outcomes, urine stream, and cosmetic results. Conclusions: The DFPF technique is feasible and reliable for one-stage repair of penoscrotal hypospadias with chordee and can be considered as a good option as it ensures better surgical and cosmetic outcomes with lower incidence of complications.

Telemedicine (virtual clinic) effectively delivers the required healthcare service for pediatric ambulatory surgical patients during the current era of COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed descriptive study.

BACKGROUND: Children often suffer from congenital or acquired diseases. Ambulatory cases represent the vast majority of pediatric surgical cases. COVID-19 pandemic-associated regulatory precautions had made the process of seeking medical advice at a suitable appointment such a big problem. We utilized telemedicine (online encounter) to deliver the required healthcare service for sorting and guiding pediatric ambulatory surgical patients. In this article, we aimed to: (1) present our experience, (2) evaluate the effectiveness, and (3) document the results of this technology to solve the problem of difficult healthcare accessibility. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, we compared the utilization of telemedicine (virtual clinic via video consultation) prospectively in the current era of the COVID-19 pandemic in the period from June 2020 to July 2021 to the in-person clinic encounter at the outpatient department (OPD) retrospectively in the previous year (from June 2019 until the end of May 2020) for perioperative management of pediatric ambulatory surgical patients. The study was conducted at 3 tertiary care pediatric surgery centers. The information recorded for analysis included: demographic data, surgical condition distribution, time interval from the appointment request till the actual encounter with the surgeon, conversation duration, distance traveled, and ultimate fate of the consultations. For both groups, service was evaluated after the first follow-up visit by a patient survey questionnaire (Patient Experience Assessment form) including questions relevant to each encounter. RESULTS: A total of 1124 pediatric patients with various ambulatory surgical conditions had been scheduled for virtual clinic video encounters. Of them, 1056 cases were evaluated by video consultation, supervised by their parents or caregivers, thus, achieving an attendance rate of 94%. Of the remaining cases, 2% (n = 23) were canceled and 4% (n = 45) did not attend the virtual clinic. Two-thirds of the cases live in rural /remote areas. Patients' overall satisfaction was 92%. This was in comparison to 872 pediatric ambulatory surgical patients scheduled for in-person clinic visits before the implementation of the virtual clinic. Of them, only 340 cases had attended the clinic, thus, achieving an attendance rate of 39%. Of the remaining cases, 450 cases (51.6%) were canceled and 82 cases (9.4%) did not attend the clinic (no show). About 48% of the cases live in rural areas. For this group, patients' overall satisfaction was 63%. The mean encounter duration was similar for both groups (∼ 5 min). Surgical condition distribution was also similar (p-value: 0.694). For new cases, the time interval from appointment request till the actual encounter was very short for the virtual clinic group (range: 6-15 days) as compared to the in-person clinic group (range: 30-180 days). Patients were followed up for a median period of 14 ± 3.25 months (range: 6-22 months) with no patient loss to follow-up. CONCLUSION: Telemedicine can effectively bridge the patient-physician communication gap caused by the regulatory precautions mandated by the current COVID-19 pandemic. It achieved an attendance rate of 94% and parents' / patients' overall satisfaction of 92%.

Safety and Efficacy of Laparoscopic Management of Intracanalicular Testes in Pediatrics.

Introduction: Undescended testis is a relatively common congenital anomaly in male children with a prevalence of 1%-2% in live births. Upon discovering an empty scrotum, it is important to determine whether the testis is palpable, ectopic, retractile, or nonpalpable. A canalicular or "emergent" testis is a peeping one that freely slides to and fro between the abdominal cavity and inguinal canal. It may be impalpable initially, but at a time, it emerges from the internal ring to be palpable when it is "milked" down (where it was concealed from detection). It is reported that 15%-40% of cryptorchidism are viable peeping/canalicular testis. The laparoscopic approach for treating intracanalicular undescended testes offers many advantages over open inguinal orchiopexy. It maintains the integrity of the inguinal canal and eliminates the need to divide the epigastric vessels during dissection. The ability to dissect the testicular vessels at a higher level would increase the vessel length available to bring the testis down to the scrotum without strain. The aim of this study is to present our experience and evaluate laparoscopic approach for management of intracanalicular testes regarding operative safety, efficacy, and postoperative outcomes. Patients and Methods: This is a prospective study conducted at Department of Pediatric Surgery, MCH Hospital, Bisha, Saudi Arabia and Pediatric Surgery Department, Al-Azhar University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt, in the period from October 2018 to August 2020 to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic orchiopexy for intracanalicular testis. Patients with retractile testes, ectopic testes, testes located distal to the external inguinal ring, and nonpalpable testes were excluded from the study. Results: The study was conducted on 62 male children with 70 intracanalicular (peeping) testes, with age range from 8 months to 48 months (mean age: 24 months). Among them, 26 cases (∼42%) were left-sided, 28 (∼45%) were right-sided, and 8 (∼13%) cases were affected bilaterally. Postoperatively, all testes maintained good size without postoperative hydrocele or inguinal hernia. One case (1.4%) required open redo-orchiopexy because of testicular re-ascent to the level of scrotal neck. Moreover, there was no evidence of testicular atrophy confirmed by postoperative ultrasonography. All patients had good satisfied cosmetic results obtained by parent's questionnaire at postoperative follow-up visits. Conclusion: Laparoscopic orchiopexy for management of (intracanalicular) undescended testes is safe, effective, less invasive, without disturbance of inguinal canal anatomy, and with better cosmetic results.

Role of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Management of Penetrating Abdominal Trauma in Children.

INTRODUCTION: Traditionally, exploratory laparotomy was used to treat penetrating abdominal trauma (PAT). At present, minimally invasive surgery (for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes) has developed and represents a rapidly evolving modality for dealing with PAT in stable children. In this article, we aim to present our experience, evaluate the effectiveness, and report the results of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for PAT in stable pediatric patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study involved 117 hemodynamically stable pediatric cases of PAT (caused by gunshots, stab, and accidental stab), admitted, and managed according to the severity of injury. The information recorded for analysis included demographic data, the anatomical location of injury, the initial vital data and scoring systems, the organs affected, the procedures done, operative time, need for conversion to laparoscopic-assisted approach, length of hospital stay, complications, missed injury, and mortality rate. RESULTS: Among 117 pediatric patients with PAT, 15 cases were treated conservatively and 102 cases were managed by MIS. They were 70 males and 47 females with a mean age of 7.3 ± 0.6 years (range = 1-14 years). They included 48 cases of gunshot injury, 33 cases of abdominal stab, and 36 cases of accidental stab. Laparoscopy was diagnostic (DL) in 33.3% (n = 34) and therapeutic (TL) in 66.7% (n = 68) of cases. Of the 68 TL cases, we completely managed 59 cases (86.8%) by laparoscopy, while 9 cases (13.2%) were converted to limited laparotomy. The mean operative time was 17 ± 1 minutes (range = 12-25 minutes) for DL, 85 ± 9 minutes (range = 41-143 minutes) for complete TL cases, and 89 ± 3 minutes (range = 47-149 minutes) for laparoscopic-assisted procedures. For DL cases, the mean length of hospital stay was 2 ± 0.4 days, while for complete TL cases, it was 5.4 ± 0.83 days, and for laparoscopic-assisted cases, it was 5.8 ± 0.37 days. Postoperative complications occurred in eight cases (7.84%), with five cases (4.9%) required reintervention. No missed injury or mortality was recorded in the study. The patients were followed up for a median period of 52 months. CONCLUSION: For management of PAT in children, MIS has 100% accuracy in defining the injured organs with zero percent missed injuries.

Different Techniques for Management of Problematic Urethral Catheterization in Male Children.

Background: Urethral catheterization is very common, considered a minor procedure done by physicians and well-trained nurses. However, in some traumatic or congenital cases, male catheterization is problematic. A multitude of techniques are available and still can utilize the natural urethral opening to manage this distressing situation. Among these techniques, cystoscopic-assisted retrograde catheterization and railroad techniques are reliable options. This article aimed to document application and to evaluate outcomes of both techniques for problematic male urethral catheterization. Patients and Methods: In our hospitals from February 2015 to March 2020, 167 boys with problematic urethral catheterization underwent cystoscopic-assisted catheterization technique over a guidewire and 6 cases underwent railroad technique due to failed cystoscopic-assisted technique. Both techniques were done under general anesthesia with the patient in supine position and their details will be presented later on. Results: Patients' mean age was 7.2 ± 2.9 years (range = 2-14). One hundred sixty-seven cases (96.5%) underwent cystoscopic-assisted catheterization, while only 6 cases (3.5%) were managed by railroad technique. For cystoscopic-assisted technique, mean operative time was 4 ± 1.5 minutes (range = 6-18). Mean follow-up period was 54 ± 1 months (range 6-60) with only 1 case developed urethral stricture. For the railroad technique, operative time was 7.5 ± 2.6 minutes (range = 10-34), mean follow-up was 45 ± 3 months with 3 cases developed vesicocutaneous fistula, and 4 cases developed residual urethral stricture. Conclusion: Cystoscopic-assisted retrograde catheterization is a minimally invasive, safe, and reliable technique to catheterize the exceptionally difficult male urethra.