RESUMO
BACKGROUND: An effective therapy of persistent atrial fibrillation beyond pulmonary vein isolation remains unsatisfactory. Targeting endocardial low-voltage areas represents an approach of substrate modification. This prospective, randomized study investigated the efficacy of ablation of low-voltage areas versus PVI and additional linear ablations in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation in terms of single-procedure arrhythmia-free outcome and safety. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total number of 100 patients undergoing de-novo catheter ablation for persistent AF were randomized in a 1:1 ratio into two different treatment arms: group A: pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and, if low-voltage areas were present, a substrate modification. Group B: PVI and, if atrial fibrillation persisted, additional ablations, such as linear ablation and/or ablation of non-PV triggers. A total of 50 patients were randomized into each group without significant differences in baseline characteristics. During a mean follow-up of 17.64 ± 4.5 months after a single procedure, 34 (68%) patients of group A were free of arrhythmia recurrence versus 28 (56%) patients in group B (p = ns). In group A, 30 (60%) patients did not show endocardial fibrosis and received solely PVI. Both procedures were performed with a low number of complications; no pericardial effusion or stroke were seen in either group. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of patients with persistent atrial fibrillation do not show low-voltage areas. A total of 70% of the patients receiving solely PVI did not show any recurrence of atrial fibrillation, and therefore, extensive additional ablation should be avoided in de-novo patients.
