A nomogram for predicting pathologic node negativity after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: a nationwide, multicenter retrospective cohort study (CSBrS-012).

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the factors associated with pathologic node-negativity (ypN0) in patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) to develop and validate an accurate prediction nomogram. Methods: The CSBrS-012 study (2010-2020) included female patients with primary breast cancer treated with NAC followed by breast and axillary surgery in 20 hospitals across China. In the present study, 7,711 eligible patients were included, comprising 6,428 patients in the primary cohort from 15 hospitals and 1,283 patients in the external validation cohort from five hospitals. The hospitals were randomly assigned. The primary cohort was randomized at a 3:1 ratio and divided into a training set and an internal validation set. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed on the training set, after which a nomogram was constructed and validated both internally and externally. Results: In total, 3,560 patients (46.2%) achieved ypN0, and 1,558 patients (20.3%) achieved pathologic complete response in the breast (bpCR). A nomogram was constructed based on the clinical nodal stage before NAC (cN), ER, PR, HER2, Ki67, NAC treatment cycle, and bpCR, which were independently associated with ypN0. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the training set was 0.80. The internal and external validation demonstrated good discrimination, with AUCs of 0.79 and 0.76, respectively. Conclusion: We present a real-world study based on nationwide large-sample data that can be used to effectively screen for ypN0 to provide better advice for the management of residual axillary disease in breast cancer patients undergoing NAC.

Prognostic value of pathological nodal burden after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in initially cN0-1 breast cancer patients: a dual-center, 10-year survival analysis.

Background: There is an interest in performing de-escalating axillary surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). However, the significance of residual axillary node disease after NAC has not been well studied. Objectives: To investigate the pathological residual axillary lymph node tumor burden (ypN) of patients with initial clinical nodal stage cN0-1 breast cancer after NAC and determine its prognostic value. Design: Initial cN0-1 breast cancer patients who received NAC followed by axillary surgery at the First Hospital of Jilin University and the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University between January 2011 and December 2019 were included. Methods: Survival outcomes were compared according to different clinical and pathological stage and nodal response to NAC. The main outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Factors associated with survival were defined by Cox regression analysis. Results: A total of 911 patients were included, among whom 260 had cN0 and 651 had cN1 tumors. After NAC, 410 patients were ypN0, and another 501 were ypN+. The median follow-up time was 63 months. There was no significant difference in DFS or OS between the cN0 and cN1 groups in hormone receptor positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+) and HR-/HER2- subtypes; instead, ypN status was significantly related to DFS and OS. In HR+/HER2- subtype, both cN and ypN stages did not show significant survival differences, but the ypN number and the nodal response to NAC showed significant prognostic value (p < 0.05). Among HR-/HER2+ patients, all cN status, ypN status, ypN number, and nodal response were significantly associated with survival (p < 0.05). Furthermore, tumor biology, axillary surgery, ypN status, pathological tumor size, and radiotherapy were independent prognostic factors for DFS and OS. Conclusion: The ypN status after NAC provide more prognostic information than the initial cN stage in cN0-1 patients, and the surgical axillary staging after NAC may have high clinical value.

Effect of HER2-low-positive status on neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival outcome of breast cancer: a 10-year dual-center retrospective study.

Various novel HER2-targeted antibody-conjugated drugs (ADCs) have shown satisfactory antitumor activity in HER2-low-positive breast cancer (BC). It is urgent to clarify whether HER2-low-positive tumors have unique biological behavior and should be considered a new molecular subtype. We screened eligible BC patients and collected relevant information at the First Hospital of Jilin University and the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University from January 2010 to December 2020. A total of 1027 patients were included in our study cohort, and 66.0% (678/1027) had HER2-low-positive tumors. Compared to HER2-zero patients, HER2-low-positive patients tended to have more lymph node metastasis, a larger proportion of hormone receptor (HR)-positive tumors, and a lower proliferation rate (Ki-67). The pathologic complete response (pCR) rate of HER2-low-positive patients was lower than that of HER2-zero patients (19.3% vs 26.1%), especially in the HR-positive subgroup (12.00% vs 20.29%). However, multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that HER2 status was not an independent factor for predicting pCR. HER2-low-positive patients had a higher overall survival (OS) rate in the HR-positive subgroup. The Cox regression model analysis suggested that HER2-low-positive status did not statistically significantly affect the survival outcomes, regardless of disease-free survival (DFS) (P=0.308) or OS (P=0.066). In conclusion, HER2-low-positive tumors have unique clinical and pathological characteristics, with a lower pCR rate in the HR-positive subgroup and better survival in the HR-negative subgroup compared to HER2-zero tumors. However, the effect of HER2-low-positive status on pCR or survival outcomes was not statistically significant.

Nomogram for predicting axillary upstaging in clinical node-negative breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: The prediction of axillary lymph node status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) becoming critical because of the advocation of the de-escalation of axillary management. We investigate associated factors of axillary upstaging in clinical node-negative (cN0) breast cancer patients receiving NAC to develop and validate an accurate prediction nomogram. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 1892 breast cancer patients with stage of cT1-3N0 treated by NAC and subsequent surgery between 2010 and 2020 in twenty hospitals across China. Patients randomly divided into a training set and validation set (3:1). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed, after which a nomogram was constructed and validated. RESULTS: In total, pathologic node negativity (ypN0) achieved in 1406 (74.3%) patients and another 486 (25.7%) patients upstaged to pathologic node positive (ypN+). Breast pathologic complete response (bpCR) was achieved in 445 (23.5%) patients and non-bpCR in 1447 (76.5%) patients. A nomogram was established by ER, tumor histology, HER2 status, cycle of NAC treatment, and the bpCR, which were confirmed by multivariate logistic analysis as independent predictors of nodal upstaging in the training cohort (n = 1419). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the training cohort and validation cohort (n = 473) were 0.73 (95% CI 0.693-0.751) and 0.77 (95% CI 0.723-0.812) respectively. CONCLUSION: We present a nomogram with a nationwide large sample data which can effectively predict axillary upstaging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy to give better advice for individualized axillary lymph node management of breast cancer.

Efficacy analysis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without anthracyclines in female patients with HER2-positive breast cancer in China: a nationwide, multicenter, 10-year retrospective study (CSBrS-012).

Background: In the era of targeted therapy, whether patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer are exempted from anthracycline usage in the neoadjuvant setting is controversial. Objectives: Our objective was to retrospectively analyze the differences in pathological complete remission (pCR) rates between the anthracycline group and the nonanthracycline group. Design: The CSBrS-012 study (2010-2020) included female primary breast cancer patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) who underwent standard breast and axillary surgery post-NAC. Methods: A logistic proportional hazard model was applied to estimate the association of covariates with pCR. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance the differences in baseline characteristics, and subgroup analyses were performed using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. Results: A total of 2507 patients were enrolled: the anthracycline group (n = 1581, 63%) and the nonanthracycline group (n = 926, 37%). A pCR was recorded in 17.1% (271/1581) of patients in the anthracycline group and in 29.3% (271/926) in the nonanthracycline group, and the difference in the pCR rate between the two groups was statistically significant [odds ratio (OR) = 2.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.65-2.43); p < 0.001). In the subsequent subgroup analysis, substantial differences in pCR rates between the anthracycline and nonanthracycline groups were detected in the nontargeted [OR = 1.91, 95% CI (1.13-3.23); p = 0.015] and dual-HER2-targeted populations [OR = 0.55, 95% CI (0.33-0.92); p = 0.021) before PSM, whereas differences vanished after PSM. The pCR rates between the anthracycline and nonanthracycline groups did not differ for the single target population, either before or after PSM. Conclusion: In the presence of trastuzumab and/or pertuzumab, the pCR rate of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer receiving anthracycline was not superior to that of patients receiving nonanthracycline. Thus, our study further provides clinical evidence for exempting anthracycline treatment in HER2-positive breast cancer in the era of targeted therapy.

Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations in Chinese patients with high-risk breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide. Here, we report the prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutations in patients with high-risk breast cancer from Inner Mongolia and Jilin, China, which was a part of a nationwide project on the detection of BRCA1/2 mutations in Chinese patients with hereditary breast cancer. METHODS: According to the criteria, index patients from a total of 245 independent families were initially recruited. All 49 exons of BRCA1 and BRCA2 and adjacent noncoding regions were screened for mutations based on next-generation sequencing from collected saliva. RESULTS: We detected 17 BRCA1/2 variants in 18 of 216 (8.3%) index patients with high-risk breast cancer. Among these, seven mutations were novel, including four BRCA1 mutations (c.123_124delCAinsAT, c.5093_5096delCTAA, c.5396-2A>G, and c.2054delinsGAAGAGTAACAAGTAAGAAGAGTAACAAGAAG), and three BRCA2 mutations (c.304A>T, c.7552_7553insT, and c.9548_9549insA). The BRCA1/2 variants were identified in 14% (8/57) of the patients with triple-negative breast cancer and in 6.3% (10/159) of the patients with non-triple-negative breast cancer. There was no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.07). A higher frequency for BRCA1 mutations was observed in patients with triple-negative breast cancer than in those with non-triple-negative breast cancer (12.3% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.004). The frequencies of the BRCA2 mutations were not significantly different between patients with triple-negative breast cancer and those with non-triple-negative breast cancer (1.8% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.46). CONCLUSION: We found that patients with triple-negative breast cancer had a higher frequency of BRCA1 mutations than those with non-triple-negative breast cancer. In this study, no significant associations between the BRCA1/2 mutation status and age, family history of breast cancer, ovarian cancer, pancreatic cancer and prostate cancer, number of primary lesions, tumor size, or lymph node metastasis were observed.

Normalization in axillary lymph node management after neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer / 中华外科杂志

Downstaging of breast cancer primary lesions and metastatic axillary lymph nodes among patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has raised the new challenges and opportunities on individualized breast cancer surgical treatment. Downstaging of the primary lesion has given patients that were previously deemed inoperable or not suitable for surgery a second chance. While downstaging of the lymph nodes has made it possible for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) to safely replace axillary lymph node dissection. However, the detection rate and false negative rate of early breast cancer SLNB technique in post-NAC patients barely meet the standard of clinical practice. Therefore, it is required that SLNB in post-NAC patients to be carried out by a medical team with advanced imaging equipments and extensive experiences in SLNB. Furthermore, they should be able to precisely evaluate axillary lymph node status before and after NAC as well as mark metastatic lymph node before NAC. Indications of SLNB should be restricted to patients that are downstaged from cN0 to ycN0 or from cN1 to ycN0. Particularly, it is only safe for patients whose axillary lymph node status become negative after NAC to receive SLNB when dual tracer (blue dye and radionuclide), removing more than 2 sentinel lymph nodes and targeted axillary dissection technique are used.

Analysis of factors related to non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in 296 sentinel lymph node-positive Chinese breast cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) may be unnecessary in 20%-60% of breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node (NSLN) metastasis. The aim of the present study was to review the medical records of Chinese patients with early-stage breast cancer and positive NSLN metastasis to identify clinicopathological characteristics as risk factors for non-NSLN metastasis. METHODS: The medical records of 2008 early-stage breast cancer patients who received intraoperative sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) between 2006 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. These patients were clinically and radiologically lymph node-negative and had no prior history of receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy or endocrinotherapy. The clinicopathological characteristics of patients with positive NSLN metastasis who underwent ALND were investigated. RESULTS: In the present study, 296 patients with positive NSLN metastases underwent ALND. Positive non-NSLN metastases were confirmed in 95 patients (32.1%). On univariate analysis, ≥ 3 positive NSLN metastases (P <0.01), NSLN macrometastases ( P = 0.023), and lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.04) were associated with non-NSLN metastasis (P <0.05). In multivariate analysis, the number of positive SLNs was the most significant predictor of non-SLN metastasis. For patients with 0, 1, 2, or 3 associated risk factors, the non-SLN metastatic rates were 11.5%, 22.5%, 35.2%, and 73.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The number of positive NSLNs, NSLN macrometastases, and lymphovascular invasion were correlated with non-SLN metastasis. The number of positive SLNs was an independent predictor for non-NSLN metastasis. When 2 or 3 risk factors were present in one patient, the probability of non-NSLN was higher than that in the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 trial (27.3%); thus, avoiding ALND should be considered carefully.