Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Pharm Pract ; 31(2): 257-260, 2023 Apr 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36535005

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To explore the extent to which adults 65-years and older who reported taking 10 or more non-prescription products were interested in deprescribing. METHODS: During an online semi-structured interview, participants were asked to imagine their primary care provider raised the idea of deprescribing. Participants sorted each prescription and non-prescription medication into a category: continue, stop or lower (deprescribe), or unsure. Findings were summarized using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. KEY FINDINGS: Participants (n = 15) were interested in deprescribing 6% of the non-prescription medications (n = 12/207). CONCLUSIONS: Older adults were resistant to deprescribing non-prescription products.


Assuntos
Desprescrições , Humanos , Idoso , Polimedicação , Medicamentos sem Prescrição , Prescrições
2.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 63(1): 135-143, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36243654

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There are more than 300,000 over-the-counter (OTC) medications on the market making it challenging for consumers to select safe and effective products to treat their minor ailments. OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify consumer perceptions about the use of a clinical decision support system, OTC Coach, to help them make informed decisions about OTC medications. METHODS: We developed a prototype of the OTC Coach that focused on treating fever in adults. We recruited community members who were 18 years and older via our institutional research website. Participants completed a 30- to 45-minute video interview in which they initially discussed their perceptions and experiences of using OTC medications. We subsequently shared the OTC Coach prototype and sought feedback related to the content and format of the tool. We asked participants to rate their likelihood of using the tool to treat a new symptom (10-point Likert scale, 1 = not at all to 10 = extremely likely) and conducted a qualitative and quantitative analysis of these findings. RESULTS: Among 20 participants, 11 (55%) were female, 10 (50%) were white, and the mean age was 47.9 years (range 18-81 years). Participants reported that the tool was easy to understand. The questions reported as being extremely important by most participants were allergies (n = 17, 85%), increased risk of bleeding (n = 15, 75%), temperature (n = 12, 60%), and duration of symptoms (n = 12, 60%). Three-fourths of participants (n = 15) selected a score of 7 or higher when asked about their likelihood of using this tool for a new symptom. Concerns that were raised included ensuring that the tool accounted for their personal health history, data storage, and accessibility. CONCLUSION: Consumers were interested in using an electronic tool to determine if their symptoms can be self-treated and, if so, which medications are appropriate.


Assuntos
Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas , Adulto , Humanos , Feminino , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Masculino , Medicamentos sem Prescrição/efeitos adversos , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...