Rheumatic disease presenting as septic arthritis: a report of 10 cases.

To determine the forms and characteristics of rheumatic diseases whose initial presentation mimics septic arthritis. Retrospective study of 398 patients hospitalized between 1979 and 2005 for arthritis diagnosed and treated as septic. In 10 cases, initial presentation of a rheumatic disease was highly suggestive of septic arthritis, and the patient was treated as such. Three had rheumatoid arthritis, 3 spondyloarthropathies, 2 unclassified rheumatic diseases, 1 Wegener granulomatosis and 1 cytosteatonecrosis. Mean time to diagnosis of rheumatic arthritis was 6 months. There were 7 males and 3 females aged from 15 to 77 years. Six had fever, and 3 had leucocytosis. Average ESR was 68 mm/1 h, and C-reactive protein was above 100 mg/l in 6 patients. Five patients had radiological signs suggestive of septic arthritis. Joint fluid count was above 100,000 WBCs/mm(3) in 2/5. Synovial biopsy suggested septic arthritis in 5 out of 6. These cases of pseudoseptic arthritis were indistinguishable from true septic arthritis. Follow-up is required in septic arthritis with negative culture findings to exclude rheumatic disease.

Do all lupus patients need statins?

Statin therapy decreases cardiovascular morbidity and mortality rates when used as either primary or secondary prevention. An immunomodulating effect of statins has been suggested. Incontrovertible evidence of accelerated atheroma has been obtained in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Routine statin therapy in SLE patients might therefore produce both cardiovascular and immunological benefits. However, routine statin therapy is inappropriate in SLE patients, the main reason being the absence of a vast interventional study done specifically in this population. An immunomodulating role for statins in SLE has not been convincingly established. The effect of statin therapy on markers for subclinical atheroma (intima-media thickness changes over time) is unclear, and there are no studies proving that statins are effective when used for primary or secondary cardiovascular prevention. Nevertheless, we believe that a serum lipid profile should be obtained once a year in all SLE patients. There is a sound rationale for classifying all SLE patients as being at high cardiovascular risk and those receiving secondary prevention as at very high risk. Consequently, the serum LDL-cholesterol level must be kept below 100 mg/dL and 70 mg/dL in these two populations, respectively. Statins are the only widely recommended drugs for achieving these treatment targets. Statin therapy requires specific monitoring precautions (transaminase levels) given the high prevalence of comorbidities and use of concomitant medications in SLE patients.