Relationship Between Facial Bone Dimensions, Orofacial Implant Position, and Esthetic Outcomes of Single-Tooth Implants.

PURPOSE: To investigate the association between the orofacial implant position distance (ID) and facial bone crest thickness (FBCT) in single-tooth implant crowns (STICs) placed in the esthetic zone and to predict the presence of facial bone above the implant shoulder, as well as its impact on Pink and White Esthetic Scores (PES and WES) and patient-related outcome measures (PROMs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, all patients treated with STICs in the esthetic zone between 2006 and 2013 with at least 12 months postloading were invited to enroll. CBCTs were used to assess ID and FBCT. Esthetic outcomes included the PES and WES. PROMs included a participant satisfaction questionnaire with 13 questions formulated for this study. Descriptive statistics and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were used. The associations between ID, FBCT, esthetic outcomes, and PROMs were calculated. RESULTS: Data were available for 60 implants. Mean ID was 2.02 mm (SD = 0.77). Mean FBCT at the implant shoulder was 0.99 mm (SD = 0.98). FBCT was significantly associated with higher PES scores (P = .040), but not with WES scores (P = 0.149). FBCT was significantly associated with ID (P = .009), and implants positioned ≥ 1.6 mm palatal in relation to the adjacent teeth were likely to have higher FBCT. CONCLUSIONS: FBCT influences PES and is more predictable if implants are positioned ≥ 1.6 mm palatal in relation to the adjacent teeth.

Relationship between labial bone dimensions, labio-palatal implant position and esthetic outcomes of single tooth implants.

PURPOSE: To investigate the association between the oro-facial implant position distance (ID) and facial bone crest thickness (FBCT) in single-tooth implant crowns (STIC) placed in the esthetic zone, and predict presence of facial bone above the implant shoulder and its impact on Pink and White Esthetic Score (PES and WES) and patient related outcome measurements (PROMS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, all patients treated with STIC in esthetic zone between 2006 and 2013, with at least 12 months post-loading were invited to enroll. CBCTs were used to assess ID and FBCT. Esthetic outcomes included the PES and WES. PROMS measures included participants' satisfaction questionnaire with 13 formulated questions for this study. Descriptive statistics and ROC analysis were used. The association between ID, FBCT, esthetic outcomes and PROMS were calculated. RESULTS: Data was available for 60 implants. Mean ID was 2.02mm (SD=0.77). Mean FBCT at implant shoulder was 0.99mm (SD=0.98). FBCT was significantly associated with higher PES scores (P=0.040), but not with WES scores (P=0.149). FBCT was significantly associated with ID (P=0.009) and implants positioned ≥ 1.6mm palatal in relation to the adjacent teeth were likely to have higher FBCT. CONCLUSIONS: FBCT influences PES and is more predictable if implants are positioned ≥ 1.6mm palatal in relation to the adjacent teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2023. Doi: 10.11607/ijp.8052.

Migrating salivary stones: report of three cases.

Patients with salivary calculi are normally managed by removal of the calculus or, if necessary, the affected gland. If it is left untreated, a stone may migrate into the adjacent tissues. We present three patients in whom salivary calculi tracked to the surface of the skin. Two were removed under local anaesthetic, and the third patient was lost to follow up.

Dental and maxillofacial abnormalities following treatment of malignant tumours in children.

There is a wide range of malignant tumours with an embryonic origin that can affect children in their early childhood including Rhabdomyosarcoma, Osteosarcoma, Chloroma, Retinoblastoma and neuroblastoma. Different protocols have been developed over the past years to treat these tumours and different combinations of radiotherapy, surgery and chemotherapy were used. This improved the survival rate considerably. This treatment has a marked effect on growth of soft and hard tissues in the affected regions of the head and face, leading to facial and dental abnormalities that become evident with growth. The great effect of radiotherapy and chemotherapy on craniofacial skeletal growth should be considered in all cases undergoing treatment for tumours. The resulting dental and maxillofacial abnormalities should be expected in all cases and its management require involvement of different members of the medical team including maxillofacial surgeon, restorative dentist, orthodontist, psychologist, dietician, speech therapist, the patient and the parents in order to achieve maximum results. This paper presents four patients who underwent radiotherapy and chemotherapy for treatment of embryonic tumours and discusses the main side effects of the treatment.

Case report--Scanora imaging of an unusual unerupted tooth located entirely below the inferior dental canal.

We present an unusual case of an unerupted tooth located beneath the inferior dental canal (IDC) seen as an incidental finding on a dental panoramic radiograph (DPR). An unerupted premolar was identified on the DPR lying horizontally and located entirely below the inferior dental canal in the first and second molar region. The crown was distally orientated and was somewhat demineralised. As this unerupted tooth appeared to have an intimate relationship with the inferior dental canal, which in turn had a close relationship with the distal roots of the lower left first molar, this relationship was investigated further. Spiral tomography using Soredex's Scanora unit was used to obtain three contiguous 2 mm thick cross-sectional images of the area, which showed the separation of the inferior dental canal from both the first molar tooth above and the unerupted premolar. This case highlights the role of Scanora cross-sectional imaging in establishing accurately the relationship between teeth and the inferior dental canal and to document the unusual position of this unerupted tooth.

Interpretation of dental and maxillofacial radiographs: a comparative study using an X-ray viewing box and window.

AIM: To ascertain if interpretation of radiographs by holding them up to a window rather than using a light viewing box has led to underdetection of clinically significant radiographic abnormalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty members of staff were selected randomly. They were divided into two group i.e., ten house offers (Group 1), five specialist registrars and five demonstrators (Group 2). They interpreted 10 radiographs by first holding them up against a window, and then by using a light viewing box. A score out of 10 was obtained at each time (one for each film). RESULTS: A mean score of 6.6 (6 per cent) was obtained for Group 1 and a mean score of 8 (80 per cent) was obtained for Group 2 when radiographs were interpreted using a window. The mean score for both groups was 10 when a light viewing box was used. CONCLUSION: Important radiographic abnormalities went undetected when the light box was not used. Awareness should be raised among hospital staff with regard to the importance of using light viewing boxes for the interpretation of radiographs.