Black Esophagus: A Rare Case of Acute Esophageal Necrosis.

Acute esophageal necrosis (AEN) also known as necrotizing esophagitis or black esophagus is an extremely rare cause of upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. This condition is considerably rare, and the exact pathophysiology of the development of AEN is still unclear. There is consensus that it is caused by a combination of esophageal mucosal injury due to gastric acid and ischemic injury due to vascular compromise. The management of AEN includes correcting the multitude of underlying predisposing conditions as well as agile symptomatic management and close monitoring for signs of hemodynamic compromise. We here present an interesting case of a middle-aged male patient who presented with hematemesis and underwent emergent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), which revealed severe necrotic esophagus. We also discussed the risk factors, pathophysiology, and management of AEN.

Gastrointestinal Tract Challenges: Chronic Inflammatory Fibroid Polyps Demystified.

An inflammatory fibroid polyp (IFP), also known as Vanek's tumor, is an uncommon benign tumor typically found as a solitary, intraluminal polyp in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Chronic IFP is characterized by persistent or recurrent inflammatory features, distinct histopathological findings, and a potential for significant GI tract involvement. Typically, IFPs occur predominantly in the gastric antrum, small intestines, and recto-sigmoid colon. They initiate within the submucosal layer and extend into the lamina propria, resulting in a noticeable bulging of the mucosal layer. They may breach the mucosal barrier on rare occasions, leading to ulceration and bleeding. This ongoing bleeding can induce persistent blood loss and symptoms typical of hypovolemic shock. When of smaller size, these growths might be accidentally detected during an endoscopic examination. Conversely, if the lesions are sizable, they can prompt symptoms of obstruction like queasiness, retching, and abdominal discomfort. Here, we present a case of a 47-year-old female who underwent a screening colonoscopy and was found to have an IFP.

Tri-modality therapy in advanced esophageal carcinoma: long-term results and insights from a developing world, institutional cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate treatment outcomes in patients from a low-middle income country (LMIC) with esophageal carcinoma who underwent esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NACRT/S). METHODS: Between 2010 and 2020, 254 patients (median follow-up: 53 months) met our inclusion criteria. Out-of-field nodal regions were determined by reviewing individual radiotherapy plans. Cox regression modelling was performed to analyze overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS), while pathological complete response (pCR) prediction utilized Poisson regression. RESULTS: The median OS was 71.4 months (interquartile range: 19.6-∞), RFS did not reach the median and pCR rate was 46%. On multivariable Cox regression, BMI [0.93 (0.89-0.98); 0.94 (0.89-0.99)] and absence of out-of-field node with extranodal extension (ENE)[0.22 (0.09-0.53); 0.30 (0.12-0.75)] influenced OS and RFS, respectively. Age [1.03 (1.01-1.06)], nodal stage [cN2-3 vs cN0: 2.67 (1.08-6.57)] and adventitial involvement [2.54 (1.36-4.72)] also influenced OS, while involved margins [3.12 (1.24-7.81)] influenced RFS. On multivariable Poisson regression, non-CROSS-chemotherapy regimens [0.65 (0.44-0.95)] and residual primary disease on pre-surgical imaging [0.73 (0.57-0.93)] were significantly associated with pCR. The most frequently involved in-field and out-of-field nodal regions were the periesophageal and perigastric (greater and lesser curvature) regions, respectively. CONCLUSION: NACRT/S is feasible and effective in patients from LMIC. Out-of-field ENE merits further investigation as a prognostic factor since it significantly influenced both OS and RFS. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The results of clinical trials are replicable in LMICs. Out-of-field ENE is an independent prognostic factor for OS and RFS.

Chronic hepatitis-C infection in COVID-19 patients is associated with in-hospital mortality.

BACKGROUND: There is little evidence about the association of pre-existing hepatitis C infection (HCV) with outcomes in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). AIM: To assess the prevalence of history of HCV among patients with COVID-19 and to study the relationship of in-hospital mortality in relation with other predictors of poor outcomes in the presence or absence of COVID-19 induced acute liver injury. METHODS: In a retrospective single-center study design, 1193 patients with COVID-19 infection were studied. Patients were then classified into those with and without a history of HCV, 50 (4.1%) and 1157 (95.9%) respectively. RESULTS: Multivariate cox-regression models showed that age, HCV, D-Dimer, and ferritin were the only predictors of in-hospital mortality. Acute liver injury and fibrosis score (Fib-4 score) were not different between both groups. Multivariate cox-regression model for liver profile revealed that aspartate aminotransferase/ alanine aminotransferase ratio, Fib-4 score, and HCV were predictors of in-hospital mortality. After propensity score matching HCV was the only predictor of mortality in the multivariate cox-regression model. A model including HCV was found to add predictive value to clinical and laboratory parameters. CONCLUSION: In patients with COVID-19, history of HCV infection leads to an accentuated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virulence, irrespective of baseline comorbidities, admission laboratory variables, or COVID-19-induced liver injury, which may be related to extrahepatic effects of HCV leading to enhanced ACE-2/TMPRSS mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 viral entry, baseline cytokine-mediated pro-inflammation, and endothelial dysfunction.

The Incidence and Mortality Impact of Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Patients requiring hospitalization to critical care units are at a higher risk for gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Although severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) infection is predominantly a pulmonary disease, other serious manifestations including thromboembolic phenomenon are reported. Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requiring mechanical ventilation, use of steroids and anticoagulation are all known to increase the risk of GI bleeding significantly. AIM: To study the incidence of GI bleeding and its impact on mortality in patients admitted with SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients admitted with SARS-CoV-2 from February 1, 2020 to April 15, 2020. We collected data including demographics, comorbid conditions, laboratory parameters, steroid and anticoagulant use. Coffee ground emesis, hematemesis, melena and hematochezia were defined as GI bleeding. All-cause mortality was reviewed for all patients included in the study. The relationship between GI bleeding and mortality was studied using logistic regression. RESULTS: We had a total of 1206 patients hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 infection with an all-cause mortality of 34% (n = 411). The overall incidence of GI bleeding was 3.1% (n = 37) with no significant difference between the patients who survived versus died during hospitalization (1.3% vs 1.5%, p = 0.77). Logistic regression analysis did not identify GI bleeding as an independent predictor of mortality. Therapeutic doses of anticoagulation were administered in 13.3% (n = 161) of patients, of which 6.8% (n = 11) developed GI bleeding. Patients were more likely to develop GI bleeding with use of therapeutic doses of anticoagulation (29.7% vs 12.8%, p = 0.003), steroids (37.8% vs 18.5%, p = 0.003) and mechanical ventilation (48.6% vs 30.4%, p = 0.018). CONCLUSION: Patients hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 infection are at risk of gastrointestinal bleeding. Therapeutic doses of anticoagulation, mechanical ventilation and steroid use are significant risk factors for GI bleeding. However, GI bleeding did not significantly alter the mortality rates in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients.

The Role of Imaging Modalities in Diagnosing Dysphagia: A Clinical Review.

Dysphagia, which is characterized by difficulty in oro-gastric bolus transit, is a common condition. It is broadly classified into oropharyngeal or esophageal pathology. A wide array of differentials for dysphagia and initial clinical suspicion of oropharyngeal or esophagus etiology can assist in further evaluation. Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) and videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) are the preferred modalities for assessing oropharyngeal bolus transit, residual, as well as determining the risk of laryngeal aspiration. High-resolution pharyngeal manometry (HRPM) is an emerging modality for optimal topographical and pressure assessment of pharyngeal anatomy. HRPM provides improved assistance in evaluating the strength of the pharyngeal muscular contraction. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is the preferred exam for patients with suspected esophageal etiology of dysphagia. Barium swallow provides luminal assessment and assists in evaluating esophageal motility; it is non-invasive, but therapeutic interventions like biopsy cannot be performed. High-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) has added another dimension in the diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders. The purpose of this review article is to help internists and primary care providers get a better understanding of the role of various imaging modalities in diagnosing dysphagia in the elderly population. This article also provides a comprehensive review and detailed comparison of these imaging modalities based on the latest evidence.

Impact of Prediabetes and Type-2 Diabetes on Outcomes in Patients with COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: The true impact of prediabetes and type-2 diabetes in patients with COVID-19 remains unknown, with studies thus far providing conflicting evidence. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective observational study involving 843 hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Primary outcomes, mortality, and mechanical ventilation use were compared among the three groups: control, prediabetes, and type-2 diabetes. Binomial regression analysis was used to determine predictors of mortality and mechanical ventilation requirement. RESULTS: Age was a significant predictor of mortality. On stratifying our patients based on their age, older patients aged 55 years and above had no difference in mortality or mechanical ventilation requirement among the three groups of control, prediabetes, and type-2 diabetes. However, among the younger population aged less than 55 years, patients with type-2 diabetes had significantly higher mortality as compared with patients in control and prediabetes groups (27% vs 12.5% vs 9%, p 0.025). Additionally, newly diagnosed type-2 diabetes patients demonstrated lower mortality rate in comparison to previously known type-2 diabetes patients (18% vs 40%, p 0.005). Outcomes in the prediabetes group were similar to that in the control group. Admission hyperglycemia was associated with higher mortality regardless of diabetes status. CONCLUSION: In older patients aged 55 years and above, status of type-2 diabetes does not influence their mortality. However, in younger patients aged less than 55 years, the presence of type-2 diabetes is an important driver of mortality. Newly diagnosed type-2 diabetes, in comparison with previously diagnosed type-2 diabetes, may have better survival. Presence of prediabetes did not affect outcomes in patients with COVID-19 infection.

Diarrhea due to SARS-CoV-2-Related Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency.

Gastrointestinal symptoms, especially diarrhea, are common with novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 infection. Angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE-2) receptors are heavily expressed in enterocytes and serve as entry receptors for SARS-CoV-2. ACE-2 receptors may also be responsible for pancreatic injury in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. Diarrhea associated with SARS-CoV-2 is usually believed to be due to viral invasion of enterocytes. However, exocrine pancreatic insufficiency resulting from SARS-CoV-2 is another plausible mechanism leading to diarrhea in such patients. We present a case series of three SARS-CoV-2-infected patients with predominant respiratory symptoms at presentation who developed diarrhea, and further fecal analysis revealed exocrine pancreatic insufficiency as the underlying mechanism.

Syphilitic Hepatitis: A Rare Cause of Acute Liver Injury.

Syphilitic hepatitis represents a rare manifestation of treponemal infection. Diagnosis is achieved with the presence of characteristic syphilitic signs and symptoms along with positive serological markers, characteristic elevated liver enzymes, and no other alternative cause of hepatobiliary insult. Here we detail a case of a patient presenting with recently diagnosed secondary syphilis causing abnormal liver enzymes. With the increasing incidence of venereal diseases in the United States, this case highlights the importance of identifying syphilis as a differential diagnosis for acute liver injury.

Acute Hepatitis in a Yemeni Immigrant Associated with Khat: A "Biological Amphetamine" Carried in Cultures.

Viral infections, alcohol, hepatic steatosis, autoimmunity medications and herbal supplements are common etiologies of hepatitis. Khat (Catha Edulis) is a commonly used recreational substance in East African and Middle Eastern countries. Khat has been reported in the literature to be associated with hepatotoxicity, which can present in several forms, including chronic liver disease. The possible pathogenesis of liver injury could be secondary to biochemical components of Khat itself or additives such as pesticides or preservatives. An autoimmune mechanism of liver injury has also been postulated, supported by sparse evidence. We present a case of a Yemeni immigrant with acute hepatitis whose fear about social norms and breaching confidentiality made it challenging to identify Khat as being the underlying cause. A 34-year-old man from Yemen presented with right upper quadrant pain of one day duration. He had predominantly elevated transaminases with mild elevation in bilirubin. His investigations were negative for the viral, metabolic or biliary etiology. A persistent focus on clinical history and the well-established physician-patient relationship revealed a history of Khat use. The liver biopsy finding of lobular hepatitis was compatible with drug-induced liver injury and established the finding of Khat hepatotoxicity. Subsequently, the patient improved with conservative management.

Prevalence of advanced liver fibrosis and steatosis in type-2 diabetics with normal transaminases: A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have an intricate bidirectional relationship. Individuals with T2DM, not only have a higher prevalence of non-alcoholic steatosis, but also carry a higher risk of progression to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Experts still differ in their recommendations of screening for NAFLD among patients with T2DM. AIM: To study the prevalence of NAFLD and advanced fibrosis among our patient population with T2DM. METHODS: During the study period (November 2018 to January 2020), 59 adult patients with T2DM and 26 non-diabetic control group individuals were recruited prospectively. Patients with known significant liver disease and alcohol use were excluded. Demographic data and lab parameters were recorded. Liver elastography was performed in all patients. RESULTS: In the study group comprised of patients with T2DM and normal alanine aminotransferase levels (mean 17.8 ± 7 U/L), 81% had hepatic steatosis as diagnosed by elastography. Advanced hepatic fibrosis (stage F3 or F4) was present in 12% of patients with T2DM as compared to none in the control group. Patients with T2DM also had higher number of individuals with grade 3 steatosis [45.8% vs 11.5%, (P < 0.00001) and metabolic syndrome (84.7% vs 11.5%, P < 0.00001)]. CONCLUSION: A significant number of patients with T2DM, despite having normal transaminase levels, have NAFLD, grade 3 steatosis and advanced hepatic fibrosis as measured by liver elastography.

Colonic Ileus, Distension, and Ischemia Due to COVID-19-Related Colitis: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) predominantly presents with respiratory symptoms, however, the involvement of the gastrointestinal system has also been reported. Isolated gastrointestinal manifestation due to COVID-19 presenting as colonic distension is uncommon. Colonic ileus from COVID-19 infection presents as dilatation on imaging, with the risk of subsequent ischemia and perforation if not recognized and treated promptly. There is no consensus on the treatment modality for COVID-19-related colitis, however, COVID-19-targeted medications in conjunction with surgical intervention have been performed for management. We present a case of a 73-year-old man who presented with abdominal pain, distention, and diarrhea. He tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and was found to have marked dilatation of the colon on imaging. He was initially given convalescent plasma to reduce inflammatory markers, as tocilizumab was contraindicated due to suspected bowel obstruction. Once more stable, he underwent surgical intervention followed by tocilizumab infusion. Pathological specimens of the colon demonstrated hemorrhagic colitis with microthrombi suggestive of COVID-19-related colitis.  Recognizing COVID-19-related colitis allows for timely diagnosis and management with targeted interventions in addition to surgery, which may prevent perforation. We suggest convalescent plasma followed by the formation of colostomy and finally infusion of tocilizumab as a feasible option for the treatment of COVID-19-related colitis. However, further research is needed in order to fully understand this entity and provide guidance for its management.

Characteristics of Patients with Post-Colonoscopy Unplanned Hospital Visit: A Retrospective Single-Center Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy, although a low-risk procedure, is not without associated adverse events. The rates of major adverse events such as perforation and bleeding after a colonoscopy are well reported. The rates of minor incidents following a colonoscopy, however, are less well examined. Recently the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) started public reporting on the quality of outpatient endoscopy facilities by using a measure of risk-standardized rates of unplanned hospital visits within 7 days of colonoscopy. AIM: We intended to record and present the characteristics of our patient population who had an unplanned hospital visit within 7 days after undergoing colonoscopy in an outpatient setting. METHODS: This is a retrospective single-center observational study. During the study period of July 2018 to December 2019, we reviewed charts of all patients who returned to the emergency room within a week of undergoing an outpatient colonoscopy. Patient demographics, clinical data and details of colonoscopy were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 5344 outpatient colonoscopies performed, our post-colonoscopy emergency room visit rate was 1.05% (n=56). The mean age of the participants was 58 years and 55% were male; 32% of our patients reported gastrointestinal symptoms such as abdominal pain or gastrointestinal bleeding. Patients with gastrointestinal symptoms had a higher rate of polypectomies performed (36.4% vs 11.8%, P = 0.04) and reported higher illicit drug use (31.9% vs 5.9%, P = 0.02) compared with those with non-gastrointestinal complaints. After colonoscopy, 41% of the patients reported reasons for emergency room visits that were entirely unrelated to the procedure. CONCLUSION: Our study highlights that unplanned visits within 7 days of colonoscopy are not necessarily related to the procedure, and those that are, tend to be due to unavoidable patient factors. Hence the CMS measure may not be an accurate determinant of the quality of procedure or facility care delivered.

Acute Cholecystitis, A Rare Complication Following Routine Colonoscopy: Case Series and Literature Review.

Colonoscopy is a commonly performed low-risk gastrointestinal procedure that may rarely result in a serious complication. Patients presenting with abdominal pain and fever after colonoscopy may have acute cholecystitis. The underlying mechanisms are unclear. Such patients usually present within 72 hours of the procedure. Treatment includes intravenous antibiotics and cholecystectomy. We present our experience of two such cases; a 56-year-old man and a 21-year-old man, both of whom developed acute calculus cholecystitis within 48 hours after a routine colonoscopy. Their symptoms resolved after cholecystectomy.

A Rare Case of Colonic Sarcoidosis Presenting as a Mass.

INTRODUCTION: Sarcoidosis is a common multisystem chronic inflammatory disease of an unidentified inciting etiology. The most common initial manifestations of this disease involve the pulmonary system, and involvement of the gastrointestinal tract is rare. Sarcoidosis of the gastrointestinal tract occurs in an oral-anal gradient, with the esophagus and stomach being the most commonly involved sites, while colonic involvement remains extremely rare. Case Presentation. We present a case of a 24-year-old African American man who was evaluated for persistent abdominal pain, chronic diarrhea, and weight loss. Workup for infectious etiologies and celiac disease was unrevealing. An inflammatory mass in the hepatic flexure was found during colonoscopy, and a computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen was significant for circumferential thickening of the cecum and ascending colon, along with nodular thickening of the peritoneum without enhancement. Malignancy and inflammatory bowel disease were the initial differentials. A peritoneal biopsy was also performed. Pathology of the colon and peritoneal biopsy was significant for the presence of noncaseating granulomas and confluent granulomatous inflammation. The patient was diagnosed with colonic sarcoidosis, and treatment with corticosteroids was initiated. Symptoms resolved with treatment, and a follow-up colonoscopy five months later showed interval healing. CONCLUSION: Although rare, colonic sarcoidosis should be considered as one of the differential diagnoses when evaluating a patient with chronic diarrhea and a mass on colonoscopy. Histopathology is the key to diagnosis as it distinguishes malignancy from sarcoidosis. Corticosteroids remain as an option for treating colonic sarcoidosis.

A rare cause of the abdominal pain in a 48-year-old woman with a history of prior colon surgery.

Fecal retention in the blind loop of end to side colonic anastomosis can lead to fecaloma without significant colonic distension. Imaging study and colonoscopy examination can assist in making a definite diagnosis. Revision surgery is the last choice when colonoscopic extraction fails.

Reevaluation of the Efficacy of First Line Regimen for Helicobacter pylori.

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori is a common cause of gastritis, peptic ulcer disease, and non-ulcer dyspepsia, and is also associated with gastric adenocarcinoma and mucosa associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma. Despite being known about for more than 30 years, finding an effective therapeutic strategy against it remains a challenge. AIM: There are no US studies evaluating the efficacy of a Levofloxacin based therapy for H. pylori infection. We here intend to study the efficacy of Levofloxacin based triple antibiotic regimen as compared to Clarithromycin based triple therapy and Bismuth based quadruple therapy in our patient population. METHODS: This is a retrospective single center observational study. Patients with Helicobacter pylori infection who underwent treatment for H. pylori with one of the three therapies, i.e. Clarithromycin triple, Bismuth Quadruple or Levofloxacin triple, were included in the study and the eradication rates were compared. The confirmation of the H. pylori was done 4 weeks after the completion of anti-microbial therapy. RESULTS: A total of 177 individuals underwent the H. pylori treatment in our retrospective review. Of these, 54% (n=97) of patients were treated with Clarithromycin based triple therapy (Group 1), 35% (n=63) were treated with Levofloxacin based regimen (Group 2), and the remaining 11% (n=17) were treated with Bismuth based quadruple therapy (Group 3). The eradication rates were significantly higher in patients treated with Clarithromycin based triple therapy as compared to Levofloxacin based triple therapy and Bismuth quadruple therapy (78.3% vs 49.2% vs 41.1% P=0.001). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our study shows significantly lower eradication rates with Levofloxacin triple therapy among a selected US population. Thus, it may not be a good first-line therapy among this US population and the Clarithromycin based regimen may still be used successfully.

Risk Factors for Liver Cirrhosis-Related Readmissions in the Largest Ethnic Minority in United States.

BACKGROUND: There are very limited data available on 30-day readmissions for ethnic minority patients with cirrhosis. The aim of the study was to identify the risk factors for 30-day readmission in ethnic minority patients admitted for cirrhosis. METHODS: We did a retrospective review of 1,373 electronic medical records of patients with cirrhosis admitted from 2009 to 2011. Several parameters including alcohol use history, discharge location and cirrhosis severity scores - model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score and Child-Pugh-Turcotte (CPT) at first admission were assessed. Statistical analysis was done using Chi-square test and t-test for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. RESULTS: There were 79 patients in the readmission group (63% male, 54% Hispanics and 22% African Americans) and 104 in the no readmission group (62% male, 58% Hispanics and 24% African Americans). History of alcohol use within a month prior to admission (55% vs. 33%, P = 0.002), platelet count at discharge (89,000 vs. 124,000, P = 0.003), and discharge with more than seven medications per day (7.3 vs. 5.2, P = 0.005) were identified as risk factors for readmissions by multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Platelet count, active alcohol use and more than seven medications at discharge are predictors of readmission. These parameters can guide future interventions to reduce readmission rate and health care costs related to cirrhosis readmissions.

Endoscopic Repair of Gastrocolic and Colocutaneous Fistulas Complicating Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube.

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube feeding has become one of the options for supplemental feeding in a selected group of patients. It is a generally safe procedure usually undertaken by a gastroenterologist or a surgeon in most cases but with over 200,000 tubes being placed yearly, there is bound to be complications. Some of the encountered complications include bleeding, site infection, tube migration, and inadvertent creation of fistula. We present our index patient admitted from a long-term care facility for feculent vomiting and fecal material through the PEG tube. Imaging and colonoscopy confirmed the presence of both a gastrocolic and a colocutaneous fistula, both closed endoscopically with an over-the-scope and through-the-scope clips, respectively. Feeding through a nasogastric tube was resumed after 48 hours, and by the second week of admission, the patient was discharged back to the facility after placement of a new PEG tube.

Co-Occurrence of Rarest Type of Dysphagia Lusoria (Type N-1) and Eosinophilic Esophagitis in a Cognitively Disabled Individual.

Dysphagia is an expressive symptom, described by an individual as "difficulty in swallowing." Dysphagia due to esophageal compression from an aberrant right subclavian artery is rare, and it is termed as "dysphagia lusoria." We present a rare case of co-occurrence of dysphagia lusoria with esophageal eosinophilia in a patient with cognitive disability which portends a case with diagnostic challenge and treatment dilemma. A 31-year-old man with intellectual disability, cerebral palsy, previous history of feeding difficulty, and esophageal food impaction presented with esophageal foreign body impaction. He has no known history of atopy and food allergies. There was no laboratory evidence of peripheral eosinophilia. The IgE-mediated allergic test was unremarkable. His prior presentation revealed a diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis. The imaging studies showed proximal esophageal dilatation with extrinsic compression at the level of the upper esophagus. The foreign bodies were removed successfully through the help of upper endoscopy. Subsequent evaluation revealed a rare type of dysphagia lusoria (type N-1) due to an aberrant left subclavian artery arising from the right-sided aortic arch. The patient's family refused further management of artery lusoria. Prolonged stasis of secretions and food in the esophagus can also lead to increased esophageal eosinophils. In our case, it remains undetermined whether increased number of esophageal eosinophils resulted from primary eosinophilic esophagitis or due to prolonged food stasis from esophageal compression caused by an aberrant subclavian artery. However, food impaction right above the compression site makes dysphagia lusoria the likely etiology.