Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Indian J Sex Transm Dis AIDS ; 44(2): 121-127, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38223157

RESUMO

Introduction: Genital ulcer disease (GUD) often creates diagnostic difficulty in developing countries like India, with limited resources available in the health-care system. The changing etiology in GUDs over the years makes it imperative that a correct diagnosis is made to establish appropriate treatment and formulate awareness programs. Aims: This study was done to determine the recent trends in the demographic parameters, clinical presentations, etiology of GUDs, and their association with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Materials and Methods: An observational cross-sectional study was conducted from October 2021 to August 2022 at the Dermatology Outpatient Department in our hospital. All the patients who presented with GUDs were included after written informed consent. The diagnosis of GUD was confirmed by thorough clinical examination and appropriate laboratory test. Data were entered and analyzed using IBM SPSS software. Results: Out of 135 cases of GUDs, the majority were males (79%). The most common age group was 21-30 years, with a mean age of 35.23 ± 14.98 years. Most of the patients were heterosexual (90%). Multiple sexual partners were found in 40% of cases. Herpes genitalis was the most common GUD (59%), followed by syphilis (15%). HIV infection was found in 6.6% of cases. Conclusion: This study represents the increasing burden of viral GUDs compared to the last three decades. The ulcerative sexually transmitted infection facilitates the transmission of HIV. In this HIV era, there is a need for increased efforts toward acknowledgment, safe sexual practices, periodic screening, and sexual health awareness programs in the high-risk population.

2.
Cureus ; 14(8): e28139, 2022 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36134045

RESUMO

Introduction Topical medications are one of the most commonly used therapeutic agents in treating a wide spectrum of dermatological diseases. The misuse of topical medicines for inappropriate indications and an extended period may result in cutaneous adverse drug reactions (ADR). Aims We conducted this study to observe demographic parameters, commonly misused topical medicines, various clinical patterns of cutaneous ADR, and source of drug prescription among study participants. Materials and methods This cross-sectional observational study was conducted from October 2021 to May 2022 at the dermatology outpatient department (OPD) of a tertiary care center. All patients who presented with worsening pre-existing skin diseases or the development of skin disease after the topical application of some cream or ointment were included in the study with written informed consent. A detailed history was taken, and a clinical examination was done. Results We detected 200 cases (1.62%) of cutaneous ADR out of 12,346 OPD patients in the eight-month study period. The most common age group was 21-30 years (30%). Most of the patients had used topical medicines for fungal infections (76%). The most commonly used topical medication was a fixed drug combination (FDC) of steroid, antifungal, and antibacterial agents (40%). Tinea incognito (36%) was the most common cutaneous ADR noted. Conclusion This study shows that misuse of topical medications is rampant in our community because of their free and easy availability. There is an urgent requirement for strict regulations over the manufacturing, sales, and marketing of over-the-counter (OTC) topical medications to reduce the incidence of cutaneous ADR.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...