New drugs in the palliative chemotherapy of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

In inoperable advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), palliative chemotherapy is established and aims at palliation of symptoms, improvement of quality of life and prolongation of survival. In the last years, several new drugs with enhanced activity towards NSCLC and improved toxicity profile have been characterised, for example vinorelbine, gemcitabine, paclitaxel and docetaxel. Data from randomised trials suggest that regimens containing new drugs are more active than older combinations. Platin-based combinations of either vinorelbine, gemcitabine or paclitaxel have resulted in better outcome than cisplatin alone and new drugs in combination with platins are more active than the corresponding single agent. Non-platin-based combinations must be considered investigational until their non-inferiority to platin-based protocols has been proven in randomised trials on large patient populations. Patients with good performance status and adequate organ function should receive platin-based chemotherapy that includes the new drugs (vinorelbine, gemcitabine, paclitaxel or docetaxel). New drugs without platins are suitable for elderly patients and patients with poor performance status. Second-line chemotherapy prolongs survival in selected patients and should be particularly offered to patients with good performance status.

Vinorelbine-gemcitabine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): an AASLC phase II trial. Austrian Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present phase 11 trial was to determine the efficacy and toxicity of vinorelbine-gemcitabine in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From December 1997 to February 1999, 78 chemotherapy-naive patients (median age 60 years, Karnofsky performance status of 100, 90, 80 and 70 present in 5%, 41%, 36% and 18% of the patients, respectively) with stage IIIB (17%) or IV (83%) NSCLC (65% adenocarcinomas, 22% squamous-cell carcinomas, 10% large-cell carcinomas, 3% mixed-cell carcinomas) received 25 mg/m2 vinorelbine and 1200 mg/m2 gemcitabine on days 1, 8 and 15 of a four-week cycle. RESULTS: In an intent-to-treat analysis, partial responses were seen in 19% of the patients. The median duration of response was 4.4 months. The median survival time was seven months and the one-year survival rate was 32%. Myelosuppression was the main side effect with WHO grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 35% and 11% of the patients, respectively. Other side effects were usually mild to moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Vinorelbine-gemcitabine is active, well tolerated and easy to administer on an outpatient basis in advanced NSCLC. Thus a randomized comparison of this combination with platinum-based protocols is warranted in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Front-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with MTA (LY231514, pemetrexed disodium, ALIMTA) and cisplatin: a multicenter phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the activity of MTA plus cisplatin in chemotherapy-naive patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-six chemotherapy-naïve patients with NSCLC received 500 mg/m2 MTA plus 75 mg/m2 cisplatin every 21 days, with 4 mg dexamethasone orally twice daily on the day before, of, and after MTA administration. RESULTS: Median age was 58 years. WHO performance status was 0-2. Eighteen patients each had stage IIIB and IV disease. Seventeen patients each had squamous-cell and adenocarcinoma; two had undifferentiated disease. Fourteen patients (39%; 95% confidence interval: 23%-57%) showed partial response; seventeen (47%) had stable disease. Median survival was 10.9 months. Twenty-one patients (59%) experienced grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia without fever or infection. Five (14%) and six (17%) patients experienced grade 3 anemia and grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia, respectively. Nonhematological toxicities included grade 3 nausea in two patients (6%), and grade 3 and 4 diarrhea in one patient (3%) each. One patient each experienced grade 4 ALT and grade 3 bilirubin and AST elevations. CONCLUSIONS: MTA plus cisplatin is well tolerated and active against NSCLC. Further studies of this combination are warranted.

Expression of the multidrug resistance protein (MRP1) in breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The multidrug resistance protein (MRP1) is expressed in human breast carcinomas but its clinical significance remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to determine the clinical significance of MRP1 in breast cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRP1 expression of primary carcinomas from 100 breast cancer patients was immunohistochemically determined by means of the monoclonal antibodies QCRL-1/QCRL-3. RESULTS: MRP1 was negative in 20 (20%) and positive in 80 (80%) breast carcinomas. MRP1 expression was more frequent in both estrogen receptor-negative carcinomas and progesterone receptor-negative carcinomas (p = 0.1 in both cases), but was independent of tumor size and lymph node involvement. Patients with MRP1-negative carcinomas had prolongations of overall survival (p = 0.01 for death due to any cause, p = 0.04 for breast cancer-related death) and disease-free survival (p = 0.07) as compared to those with MRP1-positive carcinomas. Also in subsets of patients (negative lymph nodes; positive lymph nodes; positive estrogen receptor; T1/T2 tumors), overall survival was longer for patients with MRP1-negative carcinomas. In univariate Cox regression analyses, MRP1 positivity was associated with relative risks of 4.9 (95% CI 1.2-20.6; p = 0.03) for death due to any cause, 6.4 (95% CI 0.9-48.0; p = 0.07) for breast cancer-related death and 3.5 (95% CI 0.8-14.9; p = 0.09) for relapse. In multivariate Cox regression analyses, MRP1 positivity had relative risks of 5.1 (95% CI 1.2-21.7; p = 0.03) for death due to any cause, 6.5 (95% CI 0.8-50.1; p = 0.07) for breast cancer-related death and 3.4 (95% CI 0.8-15.1; p = 0.1) for relapse. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that MRP1 might be an important factor in breast cancer indicating excellent prognosis for patients with MRP1-negative carcinomas.

Adjuvant and induction chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

About 25%-30% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer can be resected with curative intent. However, systemic relapses occur in up to 70% of these patients. Thus, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy was evaluated in several randomised trials but the results of these trials were inconclusive with a survival benefit only in some trials. Shortcomings of these trials included low number of patients, poor patient compliance and inadequate chemotherapy protocols. A recent meta-analysis suggested an absolute survival benefit of 5% at five years for postoperative cisplatin-based chemotherapy as compared to surgery alone. Thus adjuvant chemotherapy with both improved chemotherapy protocols and improved anti-emetics is currently re-evaluated in several randomised trials on large patient populations.

Vinorelbine/gemcitabine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a phase I trial.

Vinorelbine and gemcitabine are both active as single agents in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Because of their different mechanisms of action, good tolerability and possible administration on an out-patient basis, vinorelbine/gemcitabine should be an interesting combination for palliative chemotherapy. Thus, we initiated a phase I dose-escalation trial in order to determine the maximum tolerated doses of vinorelbine/gemcitabine that can be administered without haematopoietic growth factors, the dose-limiting toxicities and the most frequent side-effects of this novel combination. 40 chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC were treated with different doses of vinorelbine/gemcitabine on days 1, 8 and 15, and this treatment cycle was repeated on day 29. Vinorelbine and gemcitabine were escalated from 10 to 30 mg/m2 and 600 to 1200 mg/m2, respectively. A total of 63 treatment cycles were administered and 27 patients received at least two treatment cycles. Dose-limiting toxicities were leucopenia plus thrombocytopenia (2 patients) and mucositis (1 patient). The maximum tolerated dose was established at 25 mg/m2 vinorelbine combined with 1200 mg/m2 gemcitabine. Frequent side-effects were leucopenia, anaemia, nausea/vomiting, flu-like symptoms, skin rashes and elevation of liver enzymes. The recommended phase II doses are 20-25 mg/m2 vinorelbine combined with 1000-1200 mg/m2 gemcitabine on days 1, 8 and 15, but myelosuppression will have to be carefully monitored.

Phase II trial of gemcitabine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Gemcitabine has shown activity in different solid tumors. In the present study we have evaluated its efficacy in 32 patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in a phase II trial. Gemcitabine (1250 mg/m2) was given intravenously as a 30-minute infusion on days 1, 8 and 15. Cycles were repeated every 4 weeks. Twenty-nine patients were evaluable for response and all patients for toxicity. Partial remissions and stable disease were seen in 4 (14%) and 13 (45%) patients, respectively. Improvement of symptoms occurred in 54% of the patients. Side effects were mild and included predominantly leukopenia and thrombocytopenia. In conclusion, gemcitabine is active and well tolerated in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Neurological monitoring of neurotoxicity induced by paclitaxel/cisplatin chemotherapy.

To evaluate the neurotoxicity of paclitaxel/cisplatin chemotherapy, we studied neurological and electrophysiological functions in 14 patients who had been treated with 1-7 courses of paclitaxel/cisplatin. The cumulative paclitaxel and cisplatin doses ranged from 175 to 1225 mg/m2 and 100-700 mg/m2, respectively. Neurological examinations as well as motor nerve conduction studies of the peroneal nerve were performed and summarised by means of a peripheral neuropathy score. Neurotoxicity with onset usually after the second treatment cycle occurred in 13 patients. 12 patients complained about sensory symptoms, 13 patients had impaired vibration sense and 8 patients developed additional muscle weakness, predominantly of the legs. Dysfunction of peroneal motor nerve conduction occurred in 13 patients. Reduction of amplitudes as well as slowing of conduction velocities were seen in 13 patients and prolonged distal latencies in 10 patients. The peripheral neuropathy score was elevated in 13 patients. Neurological symptoms, impairment of both vibration sense and tendon reflexes, and the peripheral neuropathy score increased with the cumulative doses of paclitaxel/cisplatin. Serial analysis among selected patients also revealed an increase in neurotoxicity with increasing cumulative drug doses. These data indicate the development of neurotoxicity in most patients treated with paclitaxel/cisplatin and also suggest that early signs of neurotoxicity can be detected by clinical examination with emphasis on symptoms as well as vibration sense and can be well documented by electrophysiological investigations.

Multidrug resistance in leukemias and its reversal.

Drug resistance often results in failure of anticancer chemotherapy in leukemias. Several mechanisms of drug resistance are known with multidrug resistance (MDR) being the best characterized one. MDR can be due to enhanced expression of certain genes (MDR1, MRP or LRP), alterations in glutathione-S-transferase activity or GSH levels and to reduction of the amount or the activity of topoisomerase II. Here we review the current status of the clinical significance of the various mechanisms of MDR in leukemias and also discuss possibilities for the reversal of MDR. MDR1 gene expression has been seen in many leukemias, notably in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukemia. Both MDR1 RNA and P-glycoprotein expression of the leukemic cells have been shown to correlate with poor clinical outcome in AML. However, preliminary results indicate that the MRP gene as well as the LRP gene can be expressed in AML. Thus, drug resistance in leukemias appears to be multifactorial. P-glycoprotein-mediated MDR can be reversed by several drugs. These resistance modifiers are currently evaluated with regard to their clinical efficacy. Despite some encouraging results, reversal of drug resistance and subsequent improvement in clinical outcome remains to be shown.

Clinical relevance of drug resistance genes in malignant disease.

Drug resistance is a major reason for the failure of anticancer chemotherapy. Multidrug resistance has been recognized as an important type of resistance and can be due to various mechanisms. Here we review the published data on the presence and clinical significance of these mechanisms in solid tumors and hematological malignancies. We also refer to new treatment strategies resulting from the knowledge of the various mechanisms of drug resistance present in malignant diseases.

Paclitaxel/cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel (Taxol) as single agent has shown promising activity in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Because paclitaxel lends itself to combination with other anticancer drugs, we have determined the efficacy of paclitaxel combined with cisplatin in patients with advanced NSCLC in a phase II trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with NSCLC stage IIIB or IV were treated with paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) as a 3-hour infusion after standard premedication on day 1 and cisplatin (50 mg/m2 daily) on days 1 and 2. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: All 20 patients were evaluable for response and toxic effects. Partial responses were seen in 7 (35%) patients and no change in 9 (45%) patients. Major side effects included leukopenia, anemia, alopecia and dose-limiting neurotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel/cisplatin has shown good antitumor activity in patients with advanced NSCLC and should be further evaluated in this disease. Because neurotoxicity has been dose-limiting, methods for its prevention or early detection should further enhance the clinical value of this combination chemotherapy.