Survival and functional status after resection of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the selection factors for and results of second resections performed to treat recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GM), we studied 301 patients with GM who were treated from the time of diagnosis using two prospective clinical protocols. METHODS: The patients were prospectively followed from the time of diagnosis, using clinical and radiographic criteria after maximal surgical resection and external beam radiotherapy with or without adjuvant chemotherapy. Resection of recurrent GM was performed at the recommendation of the treating clinicians. The results of the second resections were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed using multivariate logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier-Turnbull survival analysis, Cox regression, and propensity score stratification. RESULTS: Forty-six patients underwent second resections during the study period. The actuarial rate of the second resections was 15% of the patients 1 year after diagnosis and 31% 2 years after diagnosis. Younger age (P = 0.01) and more extensive initial resection (P = 0.02), but not Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score at the time of diagnosis or recurrence, predicted a higher chance of selection for reoperation after initial tumor recurrence. Twenty-eight percent of the patients had improved KPS scores after undergoing reoperation, 49% were stable, and 23% had declines in KPS scores of 10 to 30 points. There was no operative mortality. After reoperation, 85% of the patients received chemotherapy, 11% received brachytherapy or underwent stereotactic radiosurgery, and 17% underwent third resections. The median survival period after reoperation was 36 weeks. Higher preoperative KPS scores predicted longer survival periods after reoperation (P = 0.03). Age and interval since diagnosis were not significant prognostic factors. The median high-quality survival period (KPS score, > or =70) was 18 weeks. The median survival period after first tumor progression was 23 weeks for 130 patients treated using the same protocols who did not undergo reoperations. Patients who did undergo reoperations experienced clinically and statistically significantly longer survival periods. However, this was determined to be partially because of selection bias. CONCLUSION: Survival after resection of recurrent GM remains poor despite advances in imaging, operative technique, and adjuvant therapies. High-quality survival after resection of recurrence to treat GM seems to have increased significantly since an earlier report from our institution.

Survival benefit of hyperthermia in a prospective randomized trial of brachytherapy boost +/- hyperthermia for glioblastoma multiforme.

PURPOSE: To determine if adjuvant interstitial hyperthermia (HT) significantly improves survival of patients with glioblastoma undergoing brachytherapy boost after conventional radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Adults with newly-diagnosed, focal, supratentorial glioblastoma < or = 5 cm in diameter were registered postoperatively on a Phase II/III randomized trial and treated with partial brain radiotherapy to 59.4 Gy with oral hydroxyurea. Those patients whose tumor was still implantable after teletherapy were randomized to brachytherapy boost (60 Gy at 0.40-0.60 Gy/h) +/- HT for 30 min immediately before and after brachytherapy. Time to progression (TTP) and survival from date of diagnosis were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: From 1990 to 1995, 112 eligible patients were entered in the trial. Patient ages ranged from 21-78 years (median, 54 years) and KPS ranged from 70-100 (median, 90). Most commonly due to tumor progression or patient refusal, 33 patients were never randomized. Of the patients, 39 were randomized to brachytherapy ("no heat") and 40 to brachytherapy + HT ("heat"). By intent to treat, TTP and survival were significantly longer for "heat" than "no heat" (p = 0.04 and p = 0.04). For the 33 "no heat" patients and 35 "heat" patients who underwent brachytherapy boost, TTP and survival were significantly longer for "heat" than "no heat" (p = 0.045 and p = 0.02, respectively; median survival 85 weeks vs. 76 weeks; 2-year survival 31% vs. 15%). A multivariate analysis for these 68 patients adjusting for age and KPS showed that improved survival was significantly associated with randomization to "heat" (p = 0.008; hazard ratio 0.51). There were no Grade 5 toxicities, 2 Grade 4 toxicities (1 on each arm), and 7 Grade 3 toxicities (1 on "no heat" and 6 on the "heat" arm). CONCLUSION: Adjuvant interstitial brain HT, given before and after brachytherapy boost, after conventional radiotherapy significantly improves survival of patients with focal glioblastoma, with acceptable toxicity.

Long-term follow-up after high-activity 125I brachytherapy for pediatric brain tumors.

A retrospective review including long-term follow-up (4.6-12.0 years) was performed of all 28 pediatric patients who underwent high-activity 125I brachytherapy at the University of California, San Francisco, for primary or recurrent brain tumors from 1980 until 1991. There were 4 glioblastomas, 11 high-grade nonglioblastoma multiforme (NGM) malignant gliomas, 10 contrast-enhancing low-grade NGM, 2 choroid plexus carcinomas, and 1 rhabdomyosarcoma. The 13 survivors included 7 of 8 patients with primary high-grade NGM, 2 of 3 patients with primary low-grade NGM, and 3 of 7 patients with recurrent low-grade NGM. Necrosis (with or without tumor) was identified in 17 of 22 reoperated patients. The mean Karnofsky performance status was 88 +/- 9 at the time of brachytherapy, 87 +/- 7 at 3 years, and 87 +/- 9 in 11 patients alive at 6-12 years. Brachytherapy is a useful modality for treating selected pediatric brain tumors, and although focal necrosis is a common sequela, it does not tend to have a major impact on the Karnofsky performance status, if the implant site is amenable to reoperation.

Demonstration of brachytherapy boost dose-response relationships in glioblastoma multiforme.

PURPOSE: To evaluate brachytherapy dose-response relationships in adults with glioblastoma undergoing temporary 125I implant boost after external beam radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Since June 1987, orthogonal radiographs using a fiducial marker box have been used to verify brain implant source positions and generate dose-volume histograms at the University of California, San Francisco. For adults who underwent brachytherapy boost for glioblastoma from June 1987 through December 1992, tumor volumes were reoutlined to ensure consistency and dose-volume histograms were recalculated. Univariate and multivariate analysis of various patient and treatment parameters were performed evaluating for influence of dose on freedom from local failure (FFLF) and actuarial survival. RESULTS: Of 102 implant boosts, 5 were excluded because computer plans were unavailable. For the remaining 97 patients, analyses with adjustment for known prognostic factors (age, KPS, extent of initial surgical resection) and prognostic factors identified on univariate testing (adjuvant chemotherapy) showed that higher minimum brachytherapy tumor dose was strongly associated with improved FFLF (p = 0.001). A quadratic relationship was found between total biological effective dose and survival, with a trend toward optimal survival probability at 47 Gy minimum brachytherapy tumor dose (corresponding to about 65 Gy to 95% of the tumor volume); survival decreased with lower or higher doses. Two patients expired and one requires hospice care because of brain necrosis after brachytherapy doses > 63 Gy to 95% of the tumor volume with 60 Gy to > 18 cm3 of normal brain. CONCLUSION: Although higher minimum tumor dose was strongly associated with better local control, a brachytherapy boost dose > 50-60 Gy may result in life-threatening necrosis. We recommend careful conformation of the prescription isodose line to the contrast enhancing tumor volume, delivery of a minimum brachytherapy boost dose of 45-50 Gy in conjunction with conventional external beam radiotherapy, and reoperation for symptomatic necrosis.

Radiation response and survival time in patients with glioblastoma multiforme.

The determine the value of radiographically assessed response to radiation therapy as a predictor of survival in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), the authors studied a cohort of 301 patients who were initially treated according to uniform clinical protocols. All patients had newly diagnosed supratentorial GBM and underwent the maximum safe resection followed by external- beam radiation treatment (60 Gy in standard daily fractions or 70.4 Gy in twice-daily fractions of 160 cGy). The radiation response and survival rates were assessable in 222 patients. The extent of resection and the immediate response to radiation therapy were highly correlated with survival, both in a univariate analysis and after correction for age and Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) score in a multivariate Cox model (p< 0.001 for radiation response and p=0.04 for extent of resection). A subgroup analysis suggested that neuroimaging obtained within 3 days after surgery served as a better baseline for assessment of radiation response than images obtained later. Imaging obtained within 3 days after completion of a course of radiation therapy also provided valid radiation response scores. The impact of the radiographically assessed radiation response on survival time was comparable to that of age or KPS score. This information is easily obtained early in the course of the disease, may be of value for individual patients, and may also have implications for the design and analysis of trials of adjuvant therapy for GBM, including volume-dependent therapies such as radiosurgery or brachytherapy.

Large effect of age on the survival of patients with glioblastoma treated with radiotherapy and brachytherapy boost.

A retrospective review was undertaken to study the influence of age on the survival of patients undergoing brachytherapy boost for glioblastoma multiforme. From February 1981 through December 1992, 159 adults with primary glioblastoma multiforme underwent high-activity iodine-125 brain implant boost after external beam radiotherapy. There were 98 men and 61 women, ranging in age from 18 to 73 years (median, 52 yr). Karnofsky performance scores ranged from 70 to 100 (median, 90). Surgery before radiotherapy consisted of biopsy in 7% of patients, subtotal resection in 66%, and gross total resection in 27%. External beam radiotherapy doses ranged from 39.6 to 76.8 Gy, with 91% of patients receiving 59.4 to 61.2 Gy. Brachytherapy doses ranged from 35.7 to 66.5 Gy (median, 55.0 Gy) at 0.30 to 0.70 Gy per hour (median, 0.43 Gy/h). Reoperations were performed in 81 patients (51%). Information on quality of life was available for 13 of the 14 living 3-year survivors; 10 patients were steroid independent, and mean Karnofsky performance scores had decreased from 92 at the time of brachytherapy to 75 at the last follow-up. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that age was the most important parameter influencing survival (P < 0.0005). The nine patients 18 to 29.9 years old had a 3-year survival probability of 78 +/- 14% (median survival was not yet reached at the time of this report), with a follow-up of 145 to 511 weeks in living patients (median, 322 wk).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Patterns of recurrence of glioblastoma multiforme after external irradiation followed by implant boost.

PURPOSE: To study patterns of recurrence in patients with focal primary glioblastoma treated on Northern California Oncology Group protocol 6G-82-2 including surgery, focal external beam radiotherapy (59.4-60 Gy) with oral hydroxyurea followed by temporary brain implant with high-activity iodine-125 sources (50 Gy), and six cycles of chemotherapy with procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Serial brain imaging scans were available for review in 25 of 34 patients with glioblastoma who underwent brain implant boost. Of 381 scans performed between the date of diagnosis and the date of death or last follow-up, 362 (95%) were re-reviewed. Disease progression was scored as local (within 2 cm of the implant site), separate within the brain parenchyma (> or = 2 cm from the implant site), subependymal, or systemic. Both initial and subsequent failures were scored. RESULTS: Three patients are 5-year survivors, without evidence of disease, at 267, 292, and 308 weeks. Of the 22 initial sites of failure, 17 (77%) were local, three (14%) were separate brain lesions (one of which was due in retrospect to multicentric disease at diagnosis), one (5%) subependymal, and one (5%) systemic. Five patients with local failure later had other sites of failure, including a separate brain lesion in 1, subependymal spread in 3, and both in 1. One patient with separate brain failure later had local progression and then subependymal spread. CONCLUSION: Although there was a significant risk of separate brain lesions or subependymal spread over time, local tumor progression was the predominant pattern of failure.

Proliferative potential and prognostic evaluation of low-grade astrocytomas.

Despite their histological similarity, low-grade astrocytomas vary widely in their clinical behavior. To elucidate this variable behavior, we measured the proliferative potential of 69 primary and 18 recurrent low-grade astrocytomas and correlated the results with the clinical characteristics and outcome. Each patient received an intravenous infusion of bromodeoxyuridine (BUdR); BUdR-labeled nuclei in excised tumor specimens were identified by immunoperoxidase staining. The BUdR labeling index (LI), or S-phase fraction, ranged from < 1 to 9.3%; the LI was < 1% in 64 (74%) patients and > or = 1% in 23 patients (26%). The LI did not appear to be associated with age, sex, tumor location, or whether the tumor was primary or recurrent. A Cox proportional-hazards analysis of the influence of the LI and other variables (age, sex, tumor location, extent of surgery, primary versus recurrent tumor) on survival showed that the LI and extent of surgery (total resection, subtotal resection, biopsy) were significant in predicting both survival and progression-free survival for all patients and for patients with primary tumors. The LI was also significant in predicting progression-free survival for patients with recurrent tumors. The correlation between the BUdR LI and both survival and time to recurrence suggests that the outcome of low-grade astrocytomas varies according to the proliferative potential. The growth rate of these histologically similar tumors should be assessed individually in order to select specific treatment.

A phase II study of intravenous carboplatin for the treatment of recurrent gliomas.

Thirty-two patients with recurrent glioma who had previously received radiation therapy and chemotherapy with nitrosoureas were treated with intravenous carboplatin every 3 weeks, starting at a dose of 350 mg/m2, with a dose escalation of 25 mg/m2 every 6 weeks until a level 4 hematologic toxicity was reached. Of the 28 patients who could be evaluated for a response, 50% demonstrated a response or had stabilization of their disease after two infusions of carboplatin. Their median time to tumor progression and median duration of survival were 19 weeks and 38 weeks. Thrombocytopenia was the major toxicity and was severe in one-third of the patients. No neurologic or renal toxicities were noted. Carboplatin has demonstrated activity against recurrent gliomas in patients who have already had extensive chemotherapy. Increasing the dose of carboplatin may improve the rate of response and the duration of progression-free survival in patients with recurrent glioma.

Interstitial brachytherapy for newly diagnosed patients with malignant gliomas: the UCSF experience.

Although interstitial brachytherapy appears to be effective in treating recurrent malignant gliomas, it has been studied less extensively in patients with newly diagnosed tumors. To examine the effect of this treatment when used at the time of primary diagnosis, we retrospectively reviewed the records of 88 patients who received temporary interstitial implants of 125I for newly diagnosed malignant gliomas. This brachytherapy was preceded by a course of external radiation therapy and followed, in some cases, by chemotherapy. The median duration of survival after the beginning of external radiation therapy was 87 weeks in patients with glioblastoma multiforme and 160 weeks in those with anaplastic gliomas. In 46% of patients with glioblastoma multiforme and 56% of those with anaplastic gliomas, a second operation was necessary to remove symptomatic radiation necrosis, recurrent tumor, or both. Our results support the conclusion that interstitial brachytherapy used at the primary diagnosis lengthens survival in selected patients with glioblastoma multiforme. However, the toxicity is significant in terms of the need for surgical resection of symptomatic necrosis. In patients with anaplastic gliomas, the toxicity associated with the treatment probably outweighs its advantages.