Endodontic Clinical Outcome after Separated Instrument Removal Using a Spinal Needle Technique: A Retrospective Study of Thirty Years of Clinical Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Current methods for the removal of separated endodontic instruments (RSI) are not predictable. METHODS: The primary outcome of this retrospective study was to assess the clinical and radiographic success (CRS) of teeth in case of RSI after a 5-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes were to evaluate (1) the effectiveness in RSI and (2) the risk of root fracture after RSI. The study protocol was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT05128266). The patients were treated by the same endodontist between January 1991 and December 2019. The RSI was performed under the operative microscope as follows: first, the dentine surrounding the coronal part of the broken instrument was selectively removed by using a small ultrasonic tip to loosen the fragment; then, a modified spinal needle was used to catch and remove the instrument. The 1-, 3-, 5-, and >5-year CRS were recorded. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine independent predictors of failure (ie, tooth number, type of root canal, shape of the root canal, type of broken instrument, apicocoronal level of the separated instrument, presence of periapical lesions, and root perforations). RESULTS: A total of 158 teeth were included in this study. Finally, 131 instruments underwent RSI (82.9%). RSI was an independent predictor of CRS after 1-year of treatment (odds ratio: 58.3; 95% confidence interval: 27.42-95.73, P < .05). At the 5-year follow-up, only 10 of 131 teeth (7.6%) failed. All failures were caused by root fracture (10/10) (χ2 test, P < .05). Separated instruments located in the apical third of the root were more difficult to remove (13/49 cases, 26.5%; χ2 test, P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed technique can achieve excellent effectiveness in RSI, can achieve a high CRS rate when a periapical lesion is present, is not associated to a significant increase in root fracture incidence, and should be performed with the help of an operative microscope.

Repair of teeth with cracks in crowns and roots: An observational clinical study.

AIM: This retrospective observational study investigated the survival rate of teeth with radicular cracks that were restored using composite materials. METHODOLOGY: The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Sistema Sanitario Nazionale (prot. N°2370CELazio1), Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04430205. Between 1991 and 2019, 87 teeth with radicular cracks (87 patients [46 men, 41 women, mean age 50.2 years]) were treated with adhesive composite restorations. Forty-five cracks were observed in the maxillary posterior teeth (molars and premolars), 40 in the mandibular posterior teeth and only two cracks in the anterior teeth, both in maxilla. Based on the depth of the crack, teeth were categorized as proximal radicular cracked teeth (PRCT), in which the fracture line was restricted within the pulpal floor or the coronal one-third of the root and deep radicular cracked teeth (DRCT), in which the fracture line extended to the middle and apical thirds of the root canal up to the apex. Bone loss/recovery was evaluated radiographically at 1-year follow-up. All patients were treated using surgical microscopy by the same operator. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine independent predictors of extraction. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to analyse PRCT and DRCT. RESULTS: Among 87 cracked teeth, 66 were molars, 19 premolars and 2 incisors. Fifty-two were DRCT, 35 were PRCT, 46 had a periodontal probing defect. Patients were followed up for a mean of 66.9 months (standard deviation 44.6, min 1 to max 172). Lack of probing depth was a significant protective factor against extraction (odds ratio [OR] 0.027, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.003-0.27, p < .05), whereas further bone loss (OR 10.63, 95% CI 2.08-54.36, p < .05) was a risk factor for extraction. More than 50% of teeth treated with the adhesive protocol were functional (46 of 87 teeth [χ2 test], p < .05) at 5-year follow-up. Among the PRCT group, a 78% survival rate at 5 years was found, while among the DRCT group, a 58% survival rate was found. CONCLUSION: Composite resin restorations resulted in tooth survival in >50% of patients; 85.4% of PRCT and 61.5% of DRCT were functional after 5 years of follow-up.

A new technique to make transparent teeth without decalcifying: description of the methodology and micro-hardness assessment.

Diaphanisation and other in vitro endodontic models (i.e., plastic blocks, micro-CT reconstruction, computerised models) do not recreate real root canal working conditions: a more realistic endodontic model is essential for testing endodontic devices and teaching purposes. The aim of this study was to describe a new technique to construct transparent teeth without decalcifying and evaluate the micro-hardness of so treated teeth. Thirty freshly extracted teeth were randomly divided into three groups as follows: 10 non-treated teeth (4 molars, 3 premolars, 3 incisors; control group - G1), 10 teeth were diaphanised (4 molars, 4 premolars, 2 incisors - G2) and 10 teeth were treated with the new proposed technique (2 molars, 6 premolars, 2 incisors - G3). Vickers hardness tester (MHT-4 and AxioVision microscope, Carl Zeiss, 37030 Gottingen, Germany - load=50 g, dwell time=20s, slope=5, 50× magnification) was used to determine microhardness (Vickers Hardness Number - VHN). Statistical analysis was performed using the Intercooled Stata 8.0 software (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA). Only groups 1 and 3 could be tested for hardness because diaphanised teeth were too tender and elastic. Differences in enamel VHN were observed between G1 (mean 304.29; DS=10.44; range 283-321) and G3 (mean 318.51; DS=14.36; range 295.5-339.2) - (p<0.05); differences in dentine VHN were observed between G1 (mean 74.73; DS=6.62; range 63.9-88.1) and G3 (mean 64.54; DS=5.55; range 51.2-72.3) - (p<0.05). G3 teeth presented a slightly lower VHN compared to G1, probably due to some little structural differences among groups, and were dramatically harder than the diaphanised teeth. The described technique, thus, can be considered ideal for testing endodontic instruments and for teaching purposes.

Efficacy and safety of various active irrigation devices when used with either positive or negative pressure: an in vitro study.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of different devices available for canal cleansing. METHODS: The following systems were tested: passive ultrasonic irrigation, EndoVac (Discus Dental, Culver City, CA), and the irrigation ultrasonic needle (ProUltra PiezoFlow Irrigation Ultrasonic Needle; Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties, Tulsa, OK) used in both the injection mode (IUNI) and the aspiration mode (IUNA). In the control group, traditional irrigation with a syringe and side-vented needle was used. A resin model was used with 4 lateral canals (respectively at 2, 5, 8, and 11 mm from the apical foramen) filled with bovine pulp stained with fuchsin. The model also included a 2-mm chamber in communication with the apex, again filled with bovine pulp, which enabled the measurement of the extrusion of NaOCl beyond the apex. RESULTS: With regard to efficacy, the most effective systems were found to be those using the ultrasonic needle, either in aspiration or injection modes; EndoVac was the least effective. Conversely, IUNI was found to bring the highest risk with regard to the extrusion of sodium hypochlorite beyond the apex. EndoVac was the safest but only by a slight margin compared with IUNA and passive ultrasonic irrigation. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this study, the system that best reconciles efficacy and safety appears to be IUNA.

Investigation on the shaping ability of nickel-titanium files when used with a reciprocating motion.

INTRODUCTION: The introduction of nickel-titanium (NiTi) files into clinical practice has improved the quality of canal shaping, but increasing the curvature of the root canal (or the diameter of the master instrument that prepares the full working length) could result in more transportation, straightening, and aberration of the canal. Nickel-titanium instruments are significantly safer and have an extended cyclic fatigue life when used with a reciprocating movement. The purpose of this study was to compare the shaping ability of FlexMaster NiTi instruments when used in either continuous or reciprocating movements. METHODS: Thirty-two Endo Training Blocks ISO 15, 2% taper, 10-mm radius of curvature, and 70° angle of curvature were prepared, according to the group, with FlexMaster NiTi instruments either in continuous rotation or in reciprocating (60° clockwise, 40° counterclockwise) movement. Preoperative and postoperative images of the simulated canals were taken under standardized conditions. The preoperative and postoperative images were combined exactly. The amount of resin removed was determined both for the inner (convex) and the outer (concave) sides of the curvature at 10 different points. RESULTS: In the most apical third of the canal, the Continuous group produced the largest enlargement of the canal as compared with the Reciprocating group (P < .05). In the apical third, the Continuous group displayed significantly greater enlargement of the canal at the external side. CONCLUSIONS: The shaping of simulated canals is more centered by using a reciprocating motion when compared with continuous rotation, but the reciprocating motion could be more time-consuming.