Functional imaging in neuroendocrine tumors: assessment of molecular heterogeneity using [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC and [18F]FDG PET/CT.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was evaluate the diagnostic performance of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC and [18F]FDG PET/CT in patients with histologically proven neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), as well as the correlation of the visualized findings with the tumor grade. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We included 50 patients with NETs who underwent both [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC and [18F]FDG PET/TC. The pooled sensitivity of both scans was compared, as well as [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC and [18F]FDG for each tumor grade (grade 1/G1, grade 2/G2 and grade 3/G3). Also, the sensitivity of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC and [18F]FDG as a function of the continuous variable Ki-67 was investigated. Finally, the number of lesions detected by both PET radiopharmaceuticals for each tumor grade was compared. RESULTS: The pooled sensitivity of both PET/CT (96%) was higher than [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC (84%) and [18F]FDG (44%) separately, with statistically significant differences. The sensitivity of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC was higher than [18F]FDG in both G1 (p = 0.004) and G2 (p < 0.001). In G3 the performance of both scans detected disease in 100% of this subgroup. The sensitivity of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC and [18F]FDG PET/CT correlated significantly with the Ki-67 proliferative index. In G2 patients the number of lesions detected with [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC was higher than [18F]FDG. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of both PET/CT, particularly in G2 and G3, demonstrates the molecular heterogeneity of metastatic NETs and contributes to the selection of a more appropriate treatment, particularly in those high-grade patients who may benefit from radionuclide therapy (PRRT).

Papel de los factores inflamatorios sistémicos en los tumores neuroendocrinos gastroenteropancreáticos (TNE-GEP) tratados con péptidos marcados con radionúclidos (PRRT): de la biología a la teragnosis / Role of systemic inflammatory factors in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT): From biology to theragnosis

Objetivo Los índices inflamatorios sistémicos se han validado como indicadores de inflamación sistémica como marcadores predictivos de mal pronóstico para diversas enfermedades oncológicas. Sin embargo, se desconoce el impacto pronóstico de los marcadores de inflamación sistémica en pacientes con tumores neuroendocrinos gastroenteropancreáticos (TNE-GEP) tratados con péptidos marcados con radionúclidos (PRRT). Métodos Realizamos un estudio observacional, retrospectivo, multicéntrico de 40 pacientes con TNEs-GEP y TNE de origen desconocido tratados con PRRT entre el 2016 y el 2020. Los marcadores inflamatorios sistémicos se calcularon de la siguiente manera: relación neutrófilos a linfocitos (NLR)=recuento de neutrófilos/recuento de linfocitos, relación de monocitos a linfocitos (MLR)=recuento de monocitos/recuento de linfocitos, relación de plaquetas a linfocitos (PLR)=recuento de plaquetas/recuento de linfocitos, relación de albúmina a linfocitos (ALR)=niveles de albúmina/recuento de linfocitos y relación derivada de neutrófilos a linfocitos (dNLR)=recuento de neutrófilos/(recuento de leucocitos – recuento de neutrófilos). Se utilizaron datos analíticos basales pretratamiento y después de la segunda dosis para el cálculo de los distintos índices. Resultados La mediana de edad fue de 63 años (rango 41-85), el 55% eran hombres. Los valores de corte de referencia para NLR fueron 2,61, para MLR 0,31, para PLR 110,14, para ALR 2,39 y para dNLR 1,71. Los valores de corte después de la segunda dosis fueron, para NLR 2,3, para MLR 0,3, para PLR 131,61, ALR 4,16 y dNLR 1,48. La mediana de la sobrevivencia libre de progresión (SLP) fue de 21,7 meses (IC del 95%: 10,7-32,8 m) y la supervivencia global (SG) fue de 32,1 meses (IC del 95%: 19,6-44,7 m), la SLP fue más corta en pacientes con NLR elevado (p=0,001), ALR (0,03) y dNLR (p=0,001) en el análisis basal. La tasa de control de enfermedad (DCR) fue del 81% y la tasa de respuesta objetiva (ORR) del 18% (AU)

Aim Systemic inflammatory factors have been validated as indicators of ongoing systemic inflammation that could be predictive markers of poor prognosis for oncological outcomes. However, the prognostic impact of systemic inflammation markers is unknown in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). Methods We conducted an observational, retrospective, multicentric study of 40 patients with GEP or unknown origin NETs treated with PRRT between 2016 and 2020. The systemic inflammatory markers were calculated as follows: neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR)=neutrophil count/lymphocyte count, monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR)=monocyte count/lymphocyte count, platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR)=platelet count/lymphocyte count, albumin to lymphocyte ratio (ALR)=albumin levels/lymphocyte count and derived Neutrophil to Lymphocyte ratio (dNLR)=neutrophil count/(leucocytes count – neutrophils count). Baseline analysis and after the second dose were used for the calculation of different ratios. Results The median age was 63 years (range 41–85), 55% were male. The baseline cut-off values for NLR were 2.61, for MLR 0.31, for PLR 110.14, for ALR 2.39 and for dNLR 1.71. The cut-off values after the 2° dose were, for NLR 2.3, for MLR 0.3, for PLR 131.61, ALR 4.16, and dNLR 1.48. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 21.7 months (95% CI 10.7–32.8 months) and overall survival (OS) was 32.1 months (95% CI 19.6–44.7 months), PFS was shorter in patients with elevated NLR (P=0.001), ALR (0.03), and dNLR (P=0.001) in baseline analysis. DCR was 81% and ORR 18%. Conclusions In GEP or unknown origin NETs treated with PRRT, we have identified the predictive and prognostic impact of baseline systemic inflammatory factors (AU)

Descripción de un método de cuantificación diferente para la carga de amiloide (DPDload) y validación de SPECT/TC en amiloidosis cardíaca / Description of a different quantification method for amyloid burden (burdenDPD) and validation of SPECT/CT in cardiac amyloidosis

Introducción Los radiotrazadores con afinidad ósea como el [99mTc]Tc-DPD han demostrado una alta sensibilidad y especificidad en el diagnóstico no invasivo de la amiloidosis cardíaca (AC) por transtirretina (ATTR-AC). Este estudio tiene como objetivo validar el uso de la SPECT/TC y evaluar la utilidad de la cuantificación de la captación (cargaDPD) en el tejido miocárdico como información potencial sobre la carga amiloide. Métodos Se trata de un análisis retrospectivo de 46 pacientes con sospecha de AC, en el que 23 casos con ATTR-AC fueron sometidos a dos métodos de cuantificación para estimar la carga amiloide (cargaDPD) a través de imágenes planares y de una SPECT/TC. Resultados La SPECT/TC aportó un valor añadido significativo en el diagnóstico del paciente con AC (p<0,05). La estimación de la carga amiloide comprobó que la pared del VI más afectada es el tabique interventricular en la mayoría de los casos, y la existencia de una relación significativa entre la captación de Perugini y la carga de DPD. Conclusiones Validamos la necesidad de la SPECT/TC como complemento de la imagen planar en el diagnóstico de la AC-TTR. Por su parte, el cálculo de la carga amiloide continúa siendo un área de investigación compleja y requiere de más estudios, con un mayor número de pacientes, que permitan validar un método estandarizado de cuantificación de la carga de amiloide, tanto para el diagnóstico como para el seguimiento del tratamiento (AU)

Background Bone tracers such as [99mTc]Tc-DPD have shown high sensitivity and specificity in the non-invasive diagnosis of transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-AC). This study aims to validate SPECT/CT and assess the usefulness of uptake quantification (burdenDPD) in the myocardial tissue as potential information on the amyloid burden. Methods In a retrospective analysis of 46 patients with suspected CA, 23 cases with ATTR-AC had two quantification methods conducted to estimate amyloid burden (burdenDPD) through planar scintigraphic scans and a SPECT/CT. Results SPECT/CT significantly provided an added value in the patient's diagnosis with CA (P<.05). The estimation of the amyloid burden substantiated that the most affected wall of the LV is the interventricular septum in most cases and the existence of a significant relationship between the Perugini score uptake and the burdenDPD. Conclusions We validate the need for SPECT/CT to complement planar imaging in diagnosing ATTR-AC. For its part, quantifying the amyloid load continues to be a complex area of research. It requires further studies with a larger number of patients to validate a standardized method of amyloid load quantification, both for diagnosis and treatment monitoring (AU)

Role of systemic inflammatory factors in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT): From biology to theragnosis.

AIM: Systemic inflammatory factors have been validated as indicators of ongoing systemic inflammation that could be predictive markers of poor prognosis for oncological outcomes. However, the prognostic impact of systemic inflammation markers is unknown in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). METHODS: We conducted an observational, retrospective, multicentric study of 40 patients with GEP or unknown origin NETs treated with PRRT between 2016 and 2020. The systemic inflammatory markers were calculated as follows: neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR)=neutrophil count/lymphocyte count, monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR)=monocyte count/lymphocyte count, platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR)=platelet count/lymphocyte count, albumin to lymphocyte ratio (ALR)=albumin levels/lymphocyte count and derived Neutrophil to Lymphocyte ratio (dNLR)=neutrophil count/(leucocytes count - neutrophils count). Baseline analysis and after the second dose were used for the calculation of different ratios. RESULTS: The median age was 63 years (range 41-85), 55% were male. The baseline cut-off values for NLR were 2.61, for MLR 0.31, for PLR 110.14, for ALR 2.39 and for dNLR 1.71. The cut-off values after the 2° dose were, for NLR 2.3, for MLR 0.3, for PLR 131.61, ALR 4.16, and dNLR 1.48. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 21.7 months (95% CI 10.7-32.8 months) and overall survival (OS) was 32.1 months (95% CI 19.6-44.7 months), PFS was shorter in patients with elevated NLR (p=0.001), ALR (0.03), and dNLR (p=0.001) in baseline analysis. DCR was 81% and ORR 18%. CONCLUSIONS: In GEP or unknown origin NETs treated with PRRT, we have identified the predictive and prognostic impact of baseline systemic inflammatory factors.