Disability-Specific Education in US Internal Medicine Primary Care Residency Programs: A Survey of Program Directors.

Phenomenon: The dearth of disability-specific education in United States medical schools and residency programs has perpetuated health care inequities experienced by people with disabilities. In this study, we surveyed internal medicine primary care residency program directors about the disability-specific education they offer their learners, their attitudes toward physicians' preparedness to care for people with disabilities, and their perceived challenges to offering more robust disability-specific education. Approach: We developed an on-line survey and forwarded it in 3 weekly emails during October of 2022 to 104 primary care residency program directors. We collected basic information about the residency programs and queried whether they were providing disability-specific education to their residents, which topics were being covered, and perceived barriers to offering additional disability-focused curricula. Data analyses included descriptive statistics, chi-squared, and independent samples t-tests. Findings: Forty-seven program directors responded (response rate 45.2%). The largest plurality of programs was in the Northeast, their average number of primary care residents was 15.6, most (67.4%) hosted primary care clinics in hospitals or academic centers, and 55.6% had affiliated divisions or departments of rehabilitation medicine. The majority of respondents felt that both internists and their own residents (88.3% and 77.8%, respectively) are inadequately educated in the care of people with disabilities, yet only 13 (28.9%) offered disability-focused curricula, and they tended to be narrow in scope. Only 8 of those 13 respondents (61.5%) reported that their disability curricula were required, rather than optional. Participants listed a number of barriers to implementing disability-focused education including a lack of advocacy for such work (65.2%), lack of time in the curriculum (63.0%), lack of expectation by educational governing boards that physicians understand disability-specific care considerations (60.9%), and lack of affiliated expertise in the care of people with disabilities (52.2%). Insights: While the program directors training future primary care physicians largely understand that physicians are inadequately prepared to offer equitable health care to individuals with disabilities, few of them are offering disability-specific education to their residents and most see significant barriers to doing so.

The Dearth of Disability Medical Education and a Partial Solution.

Issue: While over one-quarter of adult Americans have a disability, there is a paucity of disability-specific curricula in American medical schools and residency programs. Potential consequences of this educational dearth include persistent inaccessibility of health care facilities and delivery of inequitable health care to individuals with disabilities. Evidence: Several working groups have proposed disability-specific competencies for health professions education and means by which to integrate them into existing curricula. A limited number of medical schools and residency programs have formally introduced disability-specific materials into their curricula. To our knowledge, however, there are no generalist (internal medicine or family medicine) residency programs that offer specialized training in the clinical care of people with disabilities. Implications: Offering generalist physicians the opportunity to acquire the clinical and cognitive skills required to provide thorough and equitable health care to people with disabilities is critically important. There are too few physiatrists to see to their care needs. In this manuscript, we present a novel concentration in an Internal Medicine residency program in the care of individuals with a variety of disabilities. Our hope is that this work will initiate discussions among educational leaders about how to address the lack of graduate medical education-level training in disability care. We also hope it will afford program directors the opportunity to implement similar concentrations and tracks and will eventually produce a generation of generalists who are well-equipped to help care for people with disabilities.

Development and Implementation of an International Virtual Didactic Series for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Graduate Medical Education During COVID-19.

ABSTRACT: Coronavirus disease of 2019 presented significant challenges to residency and fellowship programs. Didactic lectures were particularly affected as redeployment of faculty and trainees, limitations on in-person gathering, and other barriers limited opportunities for educational engagement. We sought to develop an online didactic series to address this gap in graduate medical education.Lecturers were recruited via convenience sample and from previous Association of Academic Physiatrists presenters from across the United States and Canada; these presented via Zoom during April and May 2020. Lecturers and content reflected the diverse nature of the specialty. Learning objectives were adapted from the list of board examination topics provided by the American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.Fifty-nine lectures were presented. Maximum concurrent live viewership totaled 4272 and recorded lecture viewership accounted for an additional 6849 views, for a total of at least 11,208 views between the date of the first lecture (April 9, 2020) and May 1, 2021. Live viewers of one of the lectures reported participating from several states and 16 countries.The Association of Academic Physiatrists-led virtual didactics augmented graduate medical education during the coronavirus disease of 2019 pandemic, and data confirm that the lectures have continued to enjoy a high level of viewership after the cessation of live lectures.

A survey of internal and family medicine residents: Assessment of disability-specific education and knowledge.

BACKGROUND: The literature suggests that primary care physicians are inadequately educated in the care of people with disabilities. No study to date has evaluated whether internal medicine (IM) and family medicine (FM) residents have received disability-specific education or their level of comfort in caring for people with physical disabilities. OBJECTIVES: To assess IM and FM residents' receipt of disability-specific education during medical school and residency; to evaluate their self-reported comfort in managing secondary conditions associated with physical disabilities and in coordinating therapies and services for individuals with disabilities; to gauge their interest in receiving disability-specific education. METHODS: An on-line survey distributed to residents at a convenience sample of ten academic IM and FM residency programs in the northeastern United States. Participants (n = 176) were asked about their socio-demographic and training-specific characteristics and their self-assessed ability to manage secondary conditions associated with physical disabilities and coordinate care and services for individuals with disabilities. Chi Square tests were used to compare participant characteristics and outcomes. RESULTS: Few participants had received disability-specific education during medical school or residency (34.6% and 11.2%, respectively), and nearly all (96.0%) expressed interest in receiving more. Small minorities reported feeling comfortable managing common secondary conditions or in coordinating therapies and services for individuals with disabilities. CONCLUSION: Although one-fifth of adult Americans have a disability, few of our participating IM and FM residents had received disability-specific education or felt comfortable managing the care of people living with disabilities. Our results indicate a need to develop and disseminate disability-specific curricula.

Improving the Assessment of Resident Competency: Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Milestones 2.0.

ABSTRACT: In 2015, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education published the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Milestones 1.0 as part of the Next Accreditation System. This was the culmination of more than 20 yrs of work on the part of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education to improve graduate medical education competency assessments. The six core competencies were patient care, medical knowledge, systems-based practice, practice-based learning and improvement, professionalism, and interpersonal and communication skills. While providing a good foundation for resident assessment, the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Milestones 1.0 was not without faults. With input from program directors, national organizations, and the public, the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Milestones 2.0 strives to further advance resident assessment, providing improvements through the integration of the harmonized Milestones and the addition of a supplemental guide.

Use of the Electrodiagnostic Entrustable Professional Activity for Competency Assessment in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Training Programs.

Entrustable professional activities have emerged as a means for the evaluation of resident competency that is expressed in terms of the assessed need for supervision. Recently, 19 physical medicine and rehabilitation-specific entrustable professional activities were published (Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;96:762-764). The electrodiagnostic entrustable professional activity and six new electrodiagnostic entrustable professional activities subcategories (observable practice activities) were piloted as an entrustable professional activities/observable practice activities set within five residency programs. Survey-based (quantitative) and open-ended (qualitative) feedback was collected from participants. Participating attendings found this method feasible and generally reported satisfaction with the entrustable professional activities/observable practice activities as a means of providing feedback to residents. Residents were less clear on the added value of this approach. Qualitative data supported the need for adjustments to the entrustment scale to allow for more gradations within supervisory levels, a standardized orientation of residents to the use of observable practice activities and an increased quantity of assessments for each observable practice activities category to allow for demonstration of resident progress toward independence. Use of the electrodiagnostic entrustable professional activity/observable practice activities set shows promise as a means for observational competency assessment in the outpatient setting. However, feedback acquired through this pilot study suggests changes that could be made to improve future implementation.

Utilization of medicinal cannabis for pain by individuals with spinal cord injury.

Study design: A cross-sectional multi-center study using an on-line survey addressing utilization, knowledge, and perceptions of medicinal cannabis (MC) by people with spinal cord injury (SCI). Objective: To characterize differences between current (CU), past (PU), and never users (NU) of MC with SCI; to determine why people with SCI use MC; to examine reports of MCs' efficacy and tolerability by individuals with SCI. Setting: Three academic medical centers in the United States. Methods: Comparison of demographic and attitudinal differences between CU, PU, and NU and differences in the groups' reports of pain, health, and quality of life (QOL). Evaluation of utilization patterns and perceived efficacy of MC among CU and PU and reports of side effects of MC versus prescription medications. Data were analyzed using either Chi Square, distribution-free exact statistics, or t-tests for continuous data. Results: Among a nationwide sample (n = 353) of individuals with SCI, NU were less likely than CU and PU to believe that cannabis ought to be legalized and more likely to endorse risks of use. Current users and PU reported greater pain interference in daily life than did NU, but there were no between group differences in QOL or physical or emotional health. Current users and PU took MC to address pain (65.30%), spasms (63.30%), sleeplessness (32.70%), and anxiety (24.00%), and 63.30% reported it offered "great relief" from symptoms. Participants reported that MC is more effective and carries fewer side effects than prescription medications. Conclusions: Medicinal cannabis is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for a number of SCI-related symptoms.

Attitudes toward and knowledge of medical cannabis among individuals with spinal cord injury.

Study design: An observational study based on an online survey addressing attitudes toward and knowledge of cannabis among people living with spinal cord injury (SCI). Objectives: To characterize attitudes toward and knowledge of cannabis among a nationwide sample (n = 353) of people with SCI. To determine if knowledge and attitudes are influenced by socio-demographic and injury-specific factors. Setting: Three academic medical centers in the US. Methods: Distribution of an online survey through email lists maintained by 3 SCI centers. Results: Participants largely believed that cannabis use is safe, has potential therapeutic benefits, and ought to be legal. Substantial pluralities felt that cannabis use is attended by moderate to great health-related and social risks (15.5% and 25.5%, respectively), and a majority (55.9%) felt it is attended by moderate to great legal risks. Subjects' duration of injury, employment status, and personal history of controlled or illicit substances influenced certain beliefs and attitudes. Conclusions: This study is the first to assess beliefs about and attitudes toward cannabis use among a nationwide sample of people with SCI. While limited, it provides a roadmap for future research. It also offers medical providers an initial understanding of which factors may encourage or dissuade their patients with SCI from seeking medical cannabis treatment.

Entrustable Professional Activities For Residency Training in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

Entrustable professional activities are observable units of professional practice that can potentially provide a link between competency-based medical education and clinical practice. The authors, part of a subcommittee of the Association of Academic Physiatrists Education Committee, identified a set of entrustable professional activities that would serve residency training programs in the specialty of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Using a modified Delphi process, residency program directors in the field reviewed and validated a set of entrustable professional activities. The final set of 19 entrustable professional activities is presented in this article.

Greater trochanteric pain syndrome diagnosis and treatment.

Lateral hip pain, or greater trochanteric pain syndrome, is a commonly seen condition; in this article, the relevant anatomy, epidemiology, and evaluation strategies of greater trochanteric pain syndrome are reviewed. Specific attention is focused on imaging of this syndrome and treatment techniques, including ultrasound-guided interventions.