[10-year risk of fractures (FRAX) in people with diabetes type 2].

AIM: To study indicators of bone mineral densit (BMD) and trabecular bone score (TBS) and to reveal the 10-year fracture risk (FRAX®) taking into account the data obtained in persons with type 2 diabetes (DM2). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A clinical study of the type of case - control. The study included 122 people with and without DM2. All persons were: questionnaires, anthropometry, densitometry, determination of TBS and fracture risk on the FRAX®. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Persons with DM2 who underwent a fracture had lower T-score values in all areas except the spine, unlike those with DM2, but without fracture. However, persons with DM2 had a fracture at high values of T-score in vertebrae and hips in comparison with persons without DM. Using the TBS, we did not get a significant difference in any of the examined groups. We also found no differences in the risk of recurrent fractures among women with and without DM2 using FRAX® without densitometry and FRAX® adjusted for TBS. The values of FRAX® by T-score in the group of persons with DM with fractures were significantly lower (p=0.029 for major fractures, p=0.024 for hip fractures) than in persons without DM with fractures. CONCLUSION: Persons with DM2 and fractures have higher BMD values, lower than the FRAX fracture risk values adjusted for the T-score, do not differ significantly in TBS, which determines the difficulties in diagnosis, the need to find additional methods for early diagnosis of increased fracture risk in patients with DM2.

[The chylomicronemia under interpretation of the results of detection of lipid profile of blood].

The lipid profile of blood of several population screenings was studied in the framework of the international project HAPIEE. The sampling consisted of 9357 patients aged from 45 to 69 years. All participants of the study were notified in advance about blood sampling on an empty stomach for analysis. The blood serum was not totally clear and triglycerides concentration of 2.65 mmol/l in 16% of cases. The examined patients approved in 3.5% that blood was not taken on an empty stomach. The diabetes mellitus was diagnosed in 1.6% of patients. Among the rest 10.9% of patients with blood samples not totally clear half of them had concentration of glucose in blood higher than 5.5 mmol/l. Some of them probably came to screening not on an empty stomach and did not approve it. The epidemiologic studies require a strict regulation of daytime of food intake prior to blood sampling for analysis. The degree of blood clearness and blood glucose concentrations are to be regulated to and in some case the analysis is to be repeated.