Challenges of Cellular Therapy During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Currently, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread worldwide and continues to rise. There remains a significant unmet need for patients with hematological malignancies requiring specialized procedures and treatments, like cellular therapy to treat or cure their disease. For instance, chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy is approved for relapsed/refractory (after two or more lines of therapy) diffuse large B cell lymphoma and B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia that is refractory or in the second relapse in patients younger than 25 years of age. Similarly, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) can be a lifesaving procedure for many patients, such as those with acute myeloid leukemia with high-risk cytogenetics. Unfortunately, the COVID-19 pandemic has thrust upon the hematologists and transplant specialists' unique challenges with the implementation and management of cellular therapy. One of the significant concerns regarding this immunocompromised patient population is the significant risk of acquiring SARS-CoV-2 infection due to its highly contagious nature. Experts have recommended that if medically indicated, especially in high-risk disease (where chemotherapy is unlikely to work), these lifesaving procedures should not be delayed even during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, proceeding with CAR-T cell therapy and HSCT during the pandemic is a considerable task and requires dedication from the transplant team and buy-in from the patients and their family or support system. Open conversations should be held with the patients about the risks involved in undergoing cellular therapies during current times and the associated future uncertainties.

Continuation of Over-the-Counter Biotin Supplements in the Inpatient Setting: An Unexpected Source of Laboratory Error.

BACKGROUND: Over the past decade, use of high-dose biotin has increased significantly and can lead to erroneous results on some clinical immunoassays. In collaboration with pharmacists at our institution, we discovered that high biotin doses were being administered to inpatients as a continuation of patient-reported home biotin use. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated high-dose biotin administration in 226 inpatient encounters from 2009 to 2019 and its potential impact on concurrent immunoassay testing. RESULTS: In 96% of cases, biotin was administered in the inpatient setting as a continuation of patient-reported home use. In total, 322 immunoassays capable of biotin interference were performed across 100 inpatient encounters with high-dose biotin administration. Troponin T and TSH were the most commonly performed immunoassays in this cohort. DISCUSSION: Even though less than 5% of all high-dose biotin orders at our institution are placed for inpatients, hospitalized patients are still at risk for mismanagement due to erroneous immunoassay results. Immunoassay testing susceptible to biotin interference was performed in approximately 45% of inpatient encounters with biotin administration. Laboratories utilizing biotin-susceptible, sensitive cardiac troponin assays should be particularly cautious. Pharmacokinetic data for biotin clearance is especially lacking for certain populations likely to be hospitalized, such as those with renal failure. Given that medical conditions requiring high-dose biotin therapy are extremely rare, we recommend restricting biotin dosing during inpatient encounters for all other patients.

ABO-incompatible platelets are associated with increased transfusion reaction rates.

BACKGROUND: ABO compatibility can affect platelet transfusion safety and efficacy, and ABO-incompatible (ABOi) platelets likely increases the risks of transfusion reactions though the magnitude of this risk is unclear. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Data collected on all platelet transfusions administered over 36+ months were classified based on patient and product ABO blood group type and merged with a data set that included all transfusion reactions reported during that period. The transfusion reaction rates among various subsets was calculated. RESULTS: In patients greater than 1 year of age, the transfusion reaction rate in the ABO-compatible (ABO-identical) platelet group was 1.0%, while the ABOi platelet group had an elevated reaction rate of 1.7%. The increased reaction rate for ABOi platelets held true even if the analysis were limited to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Healthcare Safety Network qualifying reactions or just allergic or febrile nonhemolytic reactions. The increased reaction rate with ABOi platelets was independent of unit age. Surprisingly, major-incompatible transfusions (A/B antigen incompatible) had the highest rate of reactions, at 2.0%. During the study period, three acute hemolytic reactions were reported out of 2522 plasma-incompatible platelet transfusions (0.12%). CONCLUSIONS: Our results find that compatible platelet transfusions have the lowest rate of transfusion reactions. While hemolytic reactions were observed with plasma-incompatible transfusions, the rate was low. Transfusion of ABO antigen-incompatible platelets had the highest rate of transfusion reactions and resulted in a transfusion reaction rate 1.5 to 2 times that of ABO compatible transfusions.