Aneurysm Treatment with Woven EndoBridge-17: Angiographic and Clinical Results at 12 Months from a Retrospective, 2-Center Series.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This retrospective, 2-center study investigated the feasibility, safety, and efficacy at 12-month follow-up of the treatment of ruptured, unruptured, and recurrent intracranial aneurysms using the latest generation of the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device, the WEB-17 system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Aneurysms treated with WEB-17 were extracted from the databases of 2 neurovascular centers. Patients, aneurysm characteristics, complications, and clinical and anatomic results were analyzed. RESULTS: From February 2017 to May 2021, two hundred twelve patients with 233 aneurysms (181/233, 77.7%, unruptured-recurrent, and 52/233, 22.3%, ruptured) were included. High treatment feasibility (95.3%) was reported and was similar in ruptured aneurysms (94.2%) and unruptured-recurrent aneurysms (95.6%) (P = .71) and in typical (95.4%) and atypical (94.7%) locations (P = .70), but it was lower in aneurysms with an angle between the parent artery and main aneurysm axis of ≥45° (90.2%) compared with those with an angle of <45° (97.1%) (P = .03). Global mortality and morbidity were 1.9% and 3.8% at 1 month, respectively, and 4.4% and 1.9% at 12 months, respectively. One-month morbidity (P = .02) and mortality (P = .003) were higher in the ruptured group (10.0% and 8.0%, respectively) compared with unruptured-recurrent group (1.9% and 0.0%, respectively). Overall adequate occlusion (complete occlusion and neck remnant) was 86.3%. The percentage of adequate occlusion was higher (P = .05) in the unruptured-recurrent group (88.5%) compared with the ruptured group (77.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The WEB-17 system showed high feasibility for ruptured and unruptured aneurysms, typical and atypical locations, and some aneurysms with an angle of ≥45°. As the most recent generation device, the WEB-17 also demonstrates high safety and good efficacy.

Fast Stent Retrieval during Mechanical Thrombectomy Improves Recanalization in Patients with the Negative Susceptibility Vessel Sign.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In acute ischemic stroke, the negative susceptibility vessel sign on T2*-weighted images traditionally highlights fibrin-rich clots, which are particularly challenging to remove. In vitro, fast stent retrieval improves fibrin-rich clot extraction. We aimed to evaluate whether the speed of stent retrieval influences the recanalization and clinical outcome of patients presenting with the negative susceptibility vessel sign. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were identified from a registry of patients with ischemic stroke receiving mechanical thrombectomy between January 2016 and January 2020. Inclusion criteria were the following: 1) acute ischemic stroke caused by an isolated occlusion of the anterior circulation involving the MCA (Internal Carotid Artery-L, M1, M2) within 8 hours of symptom onset; 2) a negative susceptibility vessel sign on prethrombectomy T2*-weighted images; and 3) treatment with a combined technique (stent retriever + contact aspiration). Patients were dichotomized according to retrieval speed (fast versus slow). The primary outcome was the first-pass recanalization rate. RESULTS: Of 68 patients who met inclusion criteria, 31 (45.6%) were treated with fast retrieval. Patients receiving a fast retrieval had greater odds of first-pass complete (relative risk and 95% confidence interval [RR 95% CI], 4.30 [1.80-10.24]), near-complete (RR 95% CI, 3.24 [1.57-6.68]), and successful (RR 95% CI, 2.60 [1.53-4.43]) recanalization as well as greater odds of final complete (RR 95% CI, 4.18 [1.93-9.04]), near-complete (RR 95% CI, 2.75 [1.55-4.85]), and successful (RR 95% CI, 1.52 [1.14-2.03]) recanalization. No significant statistical differences in procedure-related serious adverse events, distal embolization, or symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage were reported. No differences were noted in terms of functional independence (RR 95% CI, 1.01 [0.53-1.93]) and all-cause mortality (RR 95% CI, 0.90 [0.35-2.30]) at 90 days. CONCLUSIONS: A fast stent retrieval during mechanical thrombectomy is safe and improves the retrieval of clots with the negative susceptibility vessel sign.

Persistent Blood Flow inside the Woven EndoBridge Device More Than 6 Months after Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment: Frequency, Mechanisms, and Management-A Retrospective Single-Center Study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Due to its high safety and great efficacy, flow disruption with the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device is increasingly used to treat intracranial aneurysms. We recently identified patients with intracranial aneurysm treated with the WEB who presented with residual blood flow inside the device ("contrast-in-WEB" phenomenon) more than 6 months posttreatment. This series reports the frequency and underlying mechanisms and discusses management of this phenomenon. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients presenting with the contrast-in-WEB phenomenon in the prospectively collected data base of patients with aneurysm treated with the WEB were retrospectively collected and analyzed. RESULTS: From June 2011 to February 2019, one hundred twenty-seven patients with 133 aneurysms were treated with the WEB and had DSA follow-up at 6 months or later. Eight patients (6.3%) presented with the phenomenon. All aneurysms were wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms, including 7 unruptured and 1 ruptured aneurysm located at the MCA (5 aneurysms), anterior communicating artery (2 aneurysms), and basilar artery (1 aneurysm). All except 1 patient received dual-antiplatelet therapy preprocedure. All except 1 patient received dual-antiplatelet therapy postoperatively for at least 1 month. The most likely mechanism of the phenomenon is the absence of intradevice thrombosis related to perioperative dual-antiplatelet medication. The phenomenon is also likely associated with a low risk of bleeding except when there is residual blood flow against the aneurysm wall or in the dome. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast-in-WEB is a relatively rare phenomenon possibly induced by dual-antiplatelet therapy continued post-WEB procedure. In most cases, no additional treatment is required.

Is there a benefit of mechanical thrombectomy in patients with large stroke (DWI-ASPECTS ≤ 5)?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Whether to withhold mechanical thrombectomy when the diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) lesion exceeds a given volume is undetermined. Our aim was to identify markers that will help to select patients with large DWI lesions [DWI-Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (DWI-ASPECTS) ≤ 5] that may benefit from thrombectomy. METHODS: From May 2010 to November 2016, 82 acute ischaemic stroke patients with DWI-ASPECTS ≤5 (43 men, 64.6 ± 14.4 years, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 18.4 ± 5.4) treated with state-of-the-art mechanical thrombectomy were studied. Thrombectomy alone was performed in 28 (34%) and bridging therapy in 54 (66%) patients. Recanalization was defined as a thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score 2B-3 and significant hemorrhagic transformation as parenchymal haematoma type 2 (European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study 3 classification). Pretreatment variables were compared between patients with a good (modified Rankin Scale 0-2) and a poor (modified Rankin Scale 3-6) neurological outcome at 3 months. RESULTS: Overall, 28 patients (34%) achieved good neurological outcome at 3 months. Recanalizers were significantly more likely to achieve good outcome (61% vs. 7.3%, P < 0.0001), had lower mortality (24% vs. 49%, P = 0.03) and similar rates of parenchymal haematoma type 2 (9.8% vs. 7.3%, P = 1) compared to non-recanalizers. Regression modelling identified DWI-ASPECTS >2 [odds ratio (OR) 6.93; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-45.76, P = 0.04), glycaemia ≤6.8 mmol/l (OR 4.05; 95% CI 1.09-15.0, P = 0.03) and thrombolysis (OR 3.67; 95% CI 1.04-12.9, P = 0.04) as independent predictors of good neurological outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with DWI-ASPECTS ≤5, two-thirds of patients experienced good neurological outcome when recanalized by state-of-the-art thrombectomy, whilst only one in 14 non-recanalizers achieved similar outcomes. Pretreatment markers of good neurological outcomes were DWI-ASPECTS >2, intravenous thrombolysis and glycaemia ≤6.8 mmol/l.