Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am Surg ; 89(6): 2391-2398, 2023 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35512444

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study reviews our experience with combined cardiac and abdominal stab wounds over 12 years and reviews how changes in technology and clinical approaches have impacted our management of these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 2008 to January 2020 at a major trauma centre in South Africa. All patients with concurrent SWs to the chest and the abdomen and required both a thoracotomy for cardiac injury and a laparotomy for an intra-abdominal injury at the same setting were included. RESULTS: Twenty-two cases were identified (100% male, mean age: 27 years). Mean values of admission physiology: systolic blood pressure (SBP): 85 mmHg, pH: 7.2, base excess: -10.2 mmol/L and serum lactate 6.7 mmol/L. Thirty-two percent (7/22) of cases underwent a Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST) scan (5 positive and 2 negative). All 7 cases had intraoperatively confirmed cardiac injuries. The thoracotomy first approach was used in 18 cases (82%), and the laparotomy first approach was used in the remaining 4 cases (18%). Nineteen (86%) of the 22 laparotomies were positive. A total of 6 patients (27%) experienced one or more complications. The mean length of hospital stay was 9 days. The overall mortality was 18% (4/22) and all mortality occurred prior to 2013. DISCUSSION: Double jeopardy is still associated with an increased risk of mortality. The use of FAST and Subxiphoid Pericardial Windows (SPWs) have reduced clinical uncertainty, decreasing the need for concomitant thoracotomy and laparotomy to be performed.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Abdominais , Traumatismos Cardíacos , Ferimentos Penetrantes , Ferimentos Perfurantes , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Incerteza , Ferimentos Perfurantes/diagnóstico por imagem , Ferimentos Perfurantes/cirurgia , Ferimentos Perfurantes/complicações , Traumatismos Cardíacos/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismos Cardíacos/cirurgia , Traumatismos Cardíacos/complicações , Traumatismos Abdominais/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismos Abdominais/cirurgia , Traumatismos Abdominais/complicações , Abdome/cirurgia , Laparotomia/métodos , Ferimentos Penetrantes/cirurgia
2.
World J Surg ; 46(5): 998-1005, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35147739

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to review our decade-long experience with the management of abdominal gunshot wounds (GSWs), to document trends in our approach and to develop an evidence base for our contemporary management algorithms in a major trauma in South Africa. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study that included all adult patients with abdominal GSWs between January 2013 and October 2020 managed at a major trauma centre in South Africa. RESULT: Five hundred and ninety-six cases were included (87% male, mean age: 32 years). The median Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 12. 52% (309/596) of cases had indications of immediate laparotomy and proceeded directly to the operating room without any CT imaging. Of this cohort, the laparotomy was positive in 292 and in the remainder (5%) was negative. Of the remaining 287 cases, 209 underwent a CT scan (35%). 78 were managed without any CT imaging. Of the 78 who did not undergo CT scan, all were managed without any operation and discharged home well. Of the 209 who underwent CT scan, 99 were observed and only one case in this group subsequently required a laparotomy. The remaining 110 cases underwent a laparotomy, which was negative in 7. There were correlations with increasing use of CT, as well as a decrease in those proceeding directly to laparotomy. The overall morbidity rate was 8% (47/596). 32% (190/596) require intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The overall mortality rate was 8% (67/596). CONCLUSIONS: The management of abdominal GSWs has continued to evolve. There is now a well-defined role for selective non-operative management in this group of patients and relies on accurate CT assessment. CT scan is now an important component in the management of abdominal GSW even in our resource-constrained environment.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Abdominais , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo , Traumatismos Abdominais/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismos Abdominais/cirurgia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Laparotomia , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , África do Sul/epidemiologia , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/diagnóstico por imagem , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/cirurgia
3.
Injury ; 53(5): 1610-1614, 2022 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35065788

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Penetrating gastric injury (PGI) is common and although primary repair is sufficient for most injuries, several areas surrounding the peri-operative management remain contentious. This study reviews our experience in the management of PGI and review the clinical outcome at a major trauma centre in South Africa. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted from January 2012 to April 2020 at a major trauma centre in South Africa. RESULTS: 210 cases were included (184 male, median age: 30 years). Mechanism of injury was 59% stab wounds (SWs) and 41% gunshot wounds (GSWs). The AAST grade was predominantly (92%) grade 2 for all cases. 20% (41/210) were isolated gastric injuries. All cases underwent primary repair and there were no cases of suture line failure. Eleven cases (5%) had one or more injuries not identified at the index laparotomy: 7 were unidentified gastric injuries and the remaining 4 were unidentified non gastric injuries. There was no association between unidentified injuries and mechanism of injury or outcome. Fifty-seven (27%) cases experienced one or more complications. Eighty-two cases (39%) required intensive care unit admission. The overall median length of hospital stay was 7 (IQR 4-11) days. The overall mortality was 14%. GSW injuries were more likely to have additional organ injury, higher ISS and PATI scores, longer length of hospitalization, higher likelihood of ICU stay, greater morbidity and mortality than SW injuries. There was a slight increase in the wound sepsis rate as number of associated extra gastric injuries increased but this was not statistically significant. There was no difference in wound overall sepsis rate between SW and GSW injuries (2% vs 8%, p=0.121). CONCLUSIONS: Primary repair alone is sufficient for most PGI, but laparotomy is associated with high incidence of unidentified injury and surgeons must to be cognisant of the likelihood of these occult injuries.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Abdominais , Sepse , Traumatismos Torácicos , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo , Ferimentos Penetrantes , Ferimentos Perfurantes , Traumatismos Abdominais/cirurgia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Laparotomia , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sepse/cirurgia , África do Sul/epidemiologia , Traumatismos Torácicos/cirurgia , Centros de Traumatologia , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/cirurgia , Ferimentos Penetrantes/cirurgia , Ferimentos Perfurantes/epidemiologia , Ferimentos Perfurantes/cirurgia
4.
Am Surg ; 88(11): 2703-2709, 2022 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34965158

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study reviews our cumulative experience with the management of patients presenting with a retained knife following a penetrating neck injury (PNI). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a major trauma center in South Africa over a 15-year period from July 2006 to December 2020. All patients who presented with a retained knife in the neck following a stab wound (SW) were included. RESULTS: Twenty-two cases were included: 20 males (91%), mean age: 29 years. 77% (17/22) were retained knives and 23% (5/22) were retained blades. Eighteen (82%) were in the anterior neck, and the remaining 4 cases were in the posterior neck. Plain radiography was performed in 95% (21/22) of cases, and computed tomography (CT) was performed in 91% (20/22). Ninety-five percent (21/22) had the knife or blade extracted in the operating room (OR). Formal neck exploration (FNE) was undertaken in 45% (10/22) of cases, and the remaining 55% (12/22) underwent simple extraction (SE) only. Formal neck exploration was more commonly performed for anterior neck retained knives than the posterior neck, although not statistically significant [56% (10/18) vs 0% (0/18), P = .096]. There were no significant differences in the need for intensive care admission, length of hospital stay, morbidities, or mortalities between anterior and posterior neck retained knives. DISCUSSION: Uncontrolled extraction of a retained knife in the neck outside of the operating room may be dangerous. Retained knives in the anterior neck commonly required formal neck exploration but not for posterior neck retained knives.


Assuntos
Lesões do Pescoço , Ferimentos Penetrantes , Ferimentos Perfurantes , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Lesões do Pescoço/diagnóstico por imagem , Lesões do Pescoço/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , África do Sul/epidemiologia , Centros de Traumatologia , Ferimentos Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagem , Ferimentos Penetrantes/cirurgia , Ferimentos Perfurantes/diagnóstico por imagem , Ferimentos Perfurantes/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...