Does distraction osteogenesis improve the airway volume and quality of life of obstructive sleep apnoea patients secondary to temporomandibular joint ankylosis?

Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) ankylosis leads to mandibular micrognathia that severely collapses the upper airway causing obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), resulting in deterioration and compromise in the quality of life (QoL) of patients. In this study, we aimed to calculate airway volume changes, apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI), and improvement in quality of life before and after distraction osteogenesis (DO). Fourteen Patients with OSA secondary to TMJ ankylosis at a mean (SD) age of 17.5 (5.43) years were enrolled in this prospective study. Multivector mandibular distractors were used in all patients following the standard Ilizarov distraction protocol with a mean (SD) anteroposterior distraction of 16.21 (4.37) mm and a consolidation period of 116.92 (14.35) days. The patients were followed up for six months. A polysomnography test (PSG) was done to quantify AHI and a low-dose computed tomographic scan was done to calculate airway volume using Dolphin medical imaging software pre and post-DO. The QoL of the patients was calculated using the OSA-18 questionnaire. Results analysis depicted that the mean (SD) preoperative AHI was 51.44 (37.99)/h which was improved to 9.57 (9.74)/h (p = 0.001) after DO. Airway volume was calculated on Dolphin software before and after DO showed a significant improvement in airway volume by 121.12% (98.30)%. Similarly, the OSA-18 questionnaire showed significant improvement in QoL from severe to normal. This study suggested that DO increases the corpus length of the mandible, leading to an increment in airway volume, which improves the QoL.

Does the Retromandibular Transparotid Approach Provide Quicker Access to Fracture of Mandibular Subcondyle Compared With the Retromandibular Transmasseteric Anterior Parotid Approach?

PURPOSE: Limited studies are available in the literature comparing various surgical approaches for the management of condylar fractures, and those comparing different types of retromandibular approaches are even fewer in number. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of 2 variants of the retromandibular approach-retromandibular transmasseteric anterior parotid (RMTMAP) and retromandibular transparotid (RMTP) in terms of exposure time, blood loss, facial nerve palsy, sialoceles or parotid fistula formation, infection, and esthetics of scar tissue. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was designed in patients with mandibular subcondylar fractures requiring operative intervention. Patients were randomized into 2 groups based on a computer-generated randomization table. Group A included 37 cases, treated with the RMTMAP approach, and group B included 38 cases treated with the RMTP approach. The primary outcome variable was exposure time. Secondary outcome variables were blood loss during exposure, complications like facial nerve palsy, sialocele formation, surgical site infection, and scar esthetics. All patients were followed for 3 months. Collected data were analyzed using the χ2 and analysis of variance tests. RESULTS: The mean exposure time for fractures treated with the RMTMAP approach and RMTP approach was 21.08 ± 9.18 and 13.57 ± 6.09, respectively (P < .05). The mean blood loss for RMTMAP and RMTP approach was 11.75 ± 5.11 and 9.9 ± 3.77 mL, respectively (P = .078). No facial nerve injury was seen in patients treated with the RMTMAP approach, whereas 3 (7.8%) patients in the RMTP group had transient facial nerve injury (P = .08). CONCLUSIONS: This study concludes that the RMTP approach provides quicker access to the condyle as compared with the RMTMAP approach. However, the incidence of transient facial nerve injury was more in the RMTP approach. Except for reduced blood loss in the RMTP approach, all other parameters were comparable in both the approaches.