Racial Disparities in Diagnosis and Treatment of Depression Associated with Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze potential racial disparities in the diagnosis and management of depression associated with androgen deprivation therapy. METHODS: TriNetX health record network was queried for prostate cancer patients treated with androgen deprivation therapy from 2003-2023. Differences in rates of depression diagnosis and treatment were compared between White and Black patients. Means, odds ratios, and t tests were calculated in univariate analysis with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Data were queried from 93 health care organizations to yield 78,313 prostate cancer patients treated with androgen deprivation therapy. Patients on androgen deprivation therapy had 60% greater odds of developing depression vs other patients [9% vs 6%; odds ratio (OR) 1.6; 95% CI (1.5-1.7); P <.0001]. Of those with depression secondary to androgen deprivation therapy, only 35% were treated with antidepressants. After starting androgen deprivation therapy, White patients had 30% greater odds of being diagnosed with depression, compared to Black patients [10% vs 8%; OR 1.3; 95% CI (1.2-1.4); P <.001]. White patients also had higher odds of being treated with a first line antidepressant than Black patients [56% vs 48%; OR 1.4, 95% CI (1.2-1.6), P <.001]. CONCLUSION: This analysis confirms a significant association between androgen deprivation therapy and the development of clinical depression, and highlights its medical undertreatment. Importantly, our findings also indicate significant racial disparities in the identification and treatment of depression. Routine screening initiatives that account for social determinants of health may alleviate this disparity. Limitations of this study include retrospective design and lack of data describing severity of depression, which might correlate with need for medication.

The Impact of a Concierge Medicine Model on Door to Doctor Time and Patient Flow in an Urban Emergency Department.

INTRODUCTION: Emergency Department (ED) crowding negatively impacts patient outcomes, patient satisfaction, and patient safety. One solution involves introducing a Concierge Physician (CP) whose sole purpose is to provide a brief initial assessment (BIA) and aid patient navigation through the ED. The goal of this study was to quantify the impact of a CP on patient flow dynamics in an urban ED setting. METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational cohort study in an urban academic ED over a 6-month period. Initially, the CP was present in the treatment area during weekdays; during the last half of the observation period, an additional CP was added to the waiting room on weekends. We identified four major milestones in the ED visit with regards to patient throughput. Adult patients presenting to the ED with a triage level of Urgent (ESI 3) were analyzed for this study. Data were stratified based on the patient's ultimate disposition (admitted or discharged) and presented as means with predictive analysis. RESULTS: Between August 2016 and January 2017, the ED evaluated 42,397 adult patients. Of those, 26,976 (64%) were triage level Urgent (3). Of the level 3 patients, 10,279 (38%) received a BIA from a CP. Patients evaluated by a CP were seen approximately 30 mins faster (40% reduction in Door to Doctor time), but stayed 30 mins longer in the ED on average, because the medical decision-making process took >1 hr longer when the patient was initially evaluated by a CP. CONCLUSION: Adapting a concierge medicine model to rapidly evaluate patients resulted in a dramatically reduced Door to Doctor time, but an increase in overall time spent in the ED. This discrepancy was a direct result of the delay in physician disposition.