RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Implant restorations are considered an ideal treatment option for replacement of missing teeth in partially edentulous patients. Abutment screw loosening is one of the frequently observed technical complications of implant-supported prosthesis. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and factors associated with the abutment screw loosening in cement-retained single-implant crowns. METHODS: Enrolment criteria included partially edentulous patients who have been rehabilitated with one or more cement-retained single-implant crowns with minimum postcementation period of 1 year. They were recalled and evaluated for the presence or absence of screw loosening both clinically and radiographically. They were further evaluated for the presence or absence of factors associated with screw loosening such as parafunctional habits, wider occlusal table, steep cuspal inclines, non-axial loading and cantilevering of the pontic. RESULTS: Twenty-six cement-retained single-implant crowns out of 280 showed screw loosening, making the overall prevalence rate of 10.77%. Among the factors evaluated, parafunctional habits were associated with three cases, wider occlusal table in four, steep cuspal inclines in three, non-axial loading in nine and cantilevering of the pontic in three cases. Exact reasons could not be ascertained in four cases. CONCLUSION: Abutment screw loosening seems to be a significant prosthetic complication of cement-retained single-implant crowns. Factors evaluated significantly affect the functional durability of the prosthesis. These factors should be considered while restoring to enhance the longevity of such restorations.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Esthetics represents an inseparable part of today's oral therapy, and several procedures have been proposed to preserve or enhance it. Gingival recessions may cause hypersensitivity, impaired esthetics and root caries. Keeping in mind patient's desire for improved esthetics and other related problems, every effort should be made to achieve complete root coverage. METHODS: Different types of modalities have been introduced to treat gingival recession including displaced flaps, free gingival graft, connective tissue graft, different type of barrier membranes and combination of different techniques. The aim of this study was to compare the commonly used techniques for gingival recession coverage and evaluate the results obtained. 73 subjects were selected for the present study who were randomly divided into four groups and were followed at baseline and 180 days where following parameters were recorded: (a) Assessment of gingival recession depth (RD); (b) Assessment of pocket depth (PD); (c) Assessment of clinical attachment level (CAL) and (d) Assessment of width of attached gingiva (WAG). RESULTS: Results of this study showed statistically significant reduction of gingival recession, with concomitant attachment gain, following treatment with all tested surgical techniques. However, SCTG with CAF technique showed the highest percentage gain in coverage of recession depth as well as gain in keratinized gingiva. Similar results were obtained with CAF alone. The use of GTR and other techniques showed less predictable coverage and gain in keratinized gingiva. CONCLUSION: Connective tissue grafts were statistically significantly superior to guided tissue regeneration for improvement in gingival recession reduction.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The oral cavity is an unique environment which provides an ideal medium for bacterial growth. As a result of repeated exposure to the microorganisms present in blood and saliva, the dental health professionals and the patients are at a higher risk for developing many infectious diseases. A pilot study was carried out in the Dept of Dental Surgery, Armed Forces Medical College to assess the risk of cross infection in dental clinics. METHODS: Samples were collected from different dental surgeries of the Dept of Dental Surgery, Armed Forces Medical College and sent for microbiological culture and identification to the Dept of Microbiology, Armed Forces Medical College. The sampling was carried out in two stages, before and after implementing a set protocol. RESULT: All dental unit waterlines were coated with a well established biofilm made up of filamentous and bacillus-like microorganisms in first stage of study. There was marked reduction in the number of colonies from the samples collected during second stage. Same findings were observed in the samples of aerosol produced by ultrasonic scalers. CONCLUSION: The present study concluded that the new set protocol followed is significantly effective in reducing the microbial load in the water tubing, container and aerosol production. It is an effective measure for reducing the chances of cross infection in the dental surgery.
