PedCRIN tool for the biosamples management in pediatric clinical trials.

In pediatric clinical research, it is essential to implement ethical and regulatory requirements, training, and facilities to grant the proper management of specimens, considering that blood sampling may be difficult, the number of specimens is usually limited, and all efforts should be made to minimize sample volumes. In the context of the Pediatric Clinical Research Infrastructure Network (PedCRIN) project, an easy-to-use tool has been developed to guide investigators and sponsors in managing specimens and associated data in compliance with the applicable European rules in the context of pediatric clinical trials. Key topics and research questions to properly manage biosamples and related data in the context of pediatric trials were identified by PedCRIN partners; the current European regulatory/ethical and legal resources were searched for and analyzed; the items/measures/procedures to ensure regulatory compliance of a pediatric trial with regards to biosamples were defined. A checklist of the key items to be considered for the management of biological samples in pediatric clinical trials in compliance with the European applicable rules and legislation, was prepared. It is publicly available on the PedCRIN website https://ecrin.org/projects/pedcrin. Five different topics were covered: consent and assent; minimizing harm and maximizing welfare; sampling volume; skills, training and facilities required for sampling; and long-term storage of biological material. This exercise addressed a specific need in the field of pediatric research to implement ad hoc procedures for specimen handling. In fact, specific guidance on the management of biosamples in pediatrics is not available.

Paediatric clinical research in Europe: an insight on experts' needs and perspectives.

PedCRIN is a Horizon 2020 project aimed to develop a paediatric component of ECRIN (European Clinical Research Infrastructure Network) including tools supporting the conduct of neonatal and paediatric trials. A structured, cross-sectional, closed-ended questionnaire was electronically administered from April to May 2017 to stakeholders involved in paediatric clinical research to capture their needs to receive infrastructural support to cover specific research gaps. The questionnaire included 6 headings and 29 subheadings. Each item was evaluated using a Likert-scale. 147 questionnaires were returned (response rate of 24.6%). The application of innovative study design and the preparation of protocols for paediatric interventional clinical trials had the highest frequency of high need for support (123 and 117 respondents, respectively). Similarly, the identification and applications to relevant calls for funding was acknowledged as an area in which support is needed (123 respondents declaring high need). In 14 out of 29 activities, need for support was significantly higher in the respondents not being part of a Paediatric Research Network or Consortium (especially for regulatory expertise, pharmacovigilance and GCP training). Conclusions: These results document that the achievement of PedCRIN objectives would greatly advantage the paediatric research community.

Innovative study design for paediatric clinical trials.

PURPOSE: Despite representing a fundamental step towards the efficacious and safe utilisation of drugs in the paediatric population, the conduct of clinical trials in children poses several problems. Methodological issues and ethical concerns represent the major obstacles that have traditionally limited paediatric research. The randomised clinical trial, mainstay of clinical studies to assess the effects of any therapeutic intervention, shows some weaknesses that make it scarcely applicable to the paediatric population. Alternative and innovative approaches to clinical trial design in small populations have been developed in the last few decades with the aim of overcoming the limits related to small samples and to the acceptability of the trial. METHODS: This systematic review describes a variety of alternative designs to assess efficacy and safety in the paediatric population, including their applicability, advantages, disadvantages and real case examples. Approaches include sequential and adaptive designs, Bayesian methods and other innovative approaches. RESULTS: By limiting the sample size and increasing acceptability, these methods may rationally limit the amount of experimentation in children to what is achievable, necessary and ethical CONCLUSION: Thanks to their features, these methods represent a reliable way of ultimately improving paediatric care.