REL-1017 (Esmethadone) as Adjunctive Treatment in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder: A Phase 2a Randomized Double-Blind Trial.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of REL-1017 (esmethadone), a novel N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) channel blocker, in patients with major depressive disorder who failed to benefit from one to three standard antidepressant treatments in their current major depressive episode. Methods: A 7-day phase 2 multicenter randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial, comprising three arms, was conducted to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of two dosages of REL-1017 (25 mg or 50 mg orally once a day). Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to placebo (N=22), REL-1017 25 mg/day (N=19), or REL-1017 50 mg/day (N=21). Safety scales included the 4-item Positive Symptom Rating Scale for psychotomimetic symptoms, the Clinician-Administered Dissociative States Scale for dissociative symptoms, the Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale for withdrawal signs and symptoms, and the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale for suicidality. The primary efficacy endpoint was the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Scale (MADRS) score. All 62 randomly assigned patients were included in the full analysis set population analysis. Results: Patients experienced mild or moderate transient adverse events and no evidence of dissociative or psychotomimetic effects, opioid effects, or withdrawal signs and symptoms. The improvement in MADRS score shown on day 4 in both of the REL-1017 dosage groups was sustained through day 7 (last dose) and day 14 (7 days after the last dose), with effect sizes from 0.7 to 1.0. Conclusions: This trial showed favorable safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic profiles and suggests that REL-1017 may have rapid and sustained antidepressant effects compared with placebo in patients with inadequate responses to antidepressant treatments. These results will need confirmation in larger and longer trials.

Sleep and residual sedation after administration of zaleplon, zolpidem, and placebo during experimental middle-of-the-night awakening.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of zaleplon 10 mg and zolpidem 10 mg administered during experimental middle-of-the-night awakenings in patients with sleep-maintenance insomnia using objective polysomnographic measures and to assess daytime residual sedation 4 to 7 hours after dosing using sleep-latency testing. DESIGN: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3-period, crossover design was used to study 37 adults with insomnia who received treatment during an experimental awakening 4 hours after bedtime. Latency to persistent sleep and total sleep time before and after awakening were recorded. The primary residual sedation measure was a sleep latency test conducted hourly from 4 to 7 hours after treatment. Self-report measure of alertness and concentration and digit symbol substitution tests were examined concurrently. SETTING: Sleep disorders centers. PATIENTS: Thirty-seven adults with sleep-maintenance insomnia. INTERVENTIONS: Zaleplon 10 mg, zolpidem 10 mg, or placebo. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Thirty-one patients had efficacy-evaluable data; 37 patients received at least 1 dose of study medication and were included in the safety analysis. Compared with placebo, latency to persistent sleep after both zaleplon and zolpidem was shorter and total sleep time after administration of the drugs was longer (overall p < .001, Dunnett p < .001 for all posthoc comparisons). Significant differences from placebo were not found with zaleplon in daytime-sedation measures. At 4, 5, and 7 hours after zolpidem, sleep onset on sleep latency testing was shorter than after placebo (overall p < .001 for all, Dunnett tests for posthoc comparisons p < .001, p < .001, p < .05, respectively). Self-report measures of concentration (4, 5, and 6 hours, overall p < .05, Dunnett p < .05 for each time point) and alertness (4 hours, overall p < .05, Dunnett p < .05), and Digit Symbol Substitution Test scores (4 and 5 hours, overall p < .001, Dunnett p < .01 for both time points) after zolpidem were also lower than with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Zaleplon 10 mg and zolpidem 10 mg effectively shorten sleep latency and lengthen sleep duration after dosing, when administered during experimental nocturnal awakening. Residual sedation was not detected as little as 4 hours after zaleplon 10 mg, whereas residual sedation was detected with zolpidem 10 mg up to 7 hours after treatment. These findings suggest that zaleplon may be an appropriate treatment for use when patients awaken during the night and have difficulty reinitiating sleep.

A randomized controlled trial of venlafaxine extended release in generalized social anxiety disorder.

BACKGROUND: Generalized social anxiety disorder is a debilitating psychiatric illness characterized by maladaptive thoughts about social situations. This double-blind study evaluated the anxiolytic efficacy, safety, and tolerability of venlafaxine extended release (ER) in adult out-patients with generalized social anxiety disorder. METHOD: Patients were randomly assigned to receive 12 weeks of treatment with a flexible dose of venlafaxine ER (75 to 225 mg/day) or placebo. The Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) total score was the primary efficacy variable. Secondary efficacy variables included scores on the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) and -Improvement (CGI-I) scales, Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN), and LSAS subscales. Response was defined as a CGI-I score of 1 or 2. Two definitions of remission were used: LSAS total score < or = 30 and CGI-I score of 1. RESULTS: Data from 271 patients (intent-to-treat population) were analyzed for efficacy; 279 patients were analyzed for safety. Overall, 173 patients completed the study. Improvement on the LSAS was significantly greater with venlafaxine ER treatment than with placebo at weeks 6 through 12 (p < .05, weeks 6 and 8; p < .01, week 10; and p < .001, week 12) and at weeks 8 through 12 based on CGI-S and SPIN scores. Week 12 response and remission (LSAS score < or = 30) rates were significantly greater in the venlafaxine ER group than in the placebo group (response: 44% vs. 30%, respectively, p = .018; remission: 20% vs. 7%, respectively, p < .01). Patients experienced no unexpected or serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: Venlafaxine ER is safe, well tolerated, and efficacious in the short-term treatment of generalized social anxiety disorder.

Long-term use of sedative hypnotics in older patients with insomnia.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Insomnia is a common problem that increases with age and can last months to years. While substantial data establish the efficacy and safety of short-acting hypnotic therapy for the management of short-term insomnia using benzodiazepines receptor agonists (BzRAs), there are few studies on the continued efficacy and safety of these drugs when used for sustained periods. This paper reports the results of a 1-year open-label extension phases of two randomized, double-blind trials of zaleplon. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the open-label phase, older patients self-administered zaleplon nightly from 6 to 12 months and were then followed through a 7-day single-blind placebo-controlled run-out period. RESULTS: The safety profile in this population of older adults was similar to that observed in a short-term trial of an equivalent population. The data also suggested that long-term therapy produced and maintained statistically significant improvement in time to persistent sleep onset, duration of sleep and number of nocturnal awakenings (P<0.001 for each variable) for treatment durations of up to 12 months. Discontinuation was not associated with rebound insomnia. CONCLUSION: The open-label trial of long-term hypnotic therapy with zaleplon 5 and 10 mg suggests that they are safe and effective for the treatment of insomnia in older patients. Placebo-controlled, double-blind trials are needed in zaleplon and other BzRAs to confirm these results.

Efficacy of low and higher dose extended-release venlafaxine in generalized social anxiety disorder: a 6-month randomized controlled trial.

RATIONALE: There is a need for new pharmacological treatments for generalized social anxiety disorder (GSAD), which is a common, often disabling condition. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety over 6 months duration of two dose ranges of venlafaxine extended-release (ER) with placebo in patients with GSAD. METHOD: Twenty-eight-week, double-blind, multi-center study in 386 adult outpatients with DSM-IV GSAD. Patients were randomized to placebo, venlafaxine ER fixed low dose (75 mg/day), or venlafaxine ER flexible higher dose (150-225 mg/day). Primary efficacy variable was change on the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS). Secondary efficacy variables included, among others, the proportion of responders on the CGI Global Improvement Item (score 1 or 2), and the proportion of remitters (defined as an LSAS score of

Dose-response effects of zaleplon as compared with triazolam (0.25 mg) and placebo in chronic primary insomnia.

The effects of two nights of treatment with the short-acting benzodiazepine receptor agonist zaleplon, triazolam, or placebo was assessed in chronic primary insomniacs using two concurrent, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, Latin Square crossover studies. Study 1 (n = 47) compared zaleplon (10 and 40 mg) to triazolam (0.25 mg) and placebo. Study 2 (n = 36) compared zaleplon (20 and 60 mg) to triazolam (0.25 mg) and placebo. For each study, polysomnographically recorded sleep parameters and patient reports of sleep quality were collected during baseline and two consecutive nights during the four treatment phases in each study. All doses of zaleplon produced significant decreases in latency to persistent sleep. Although no minimally effective dose could be determined, dose-response effects were apparent. Triazolam 0.25 mg produced a decrease in latency to persistent sleep that was comparable to that of zaleplon 10 mg. Only the triazolam dose and the 60 mg dose of zaleplon produced significant increases in total sleep time over placebo. Zaleplon 40 and 60 mg and triazolam produced decreases in the percentage of REM sleep compared to placebo. Patient reports of efficacy were consistent with objective findings. In addition, all doses of zaleplon tended to increase while triazolam decreased the percentage of stage 3/4 sleep. There was no evidence of residual daytime impairment for any of the zaleplon doses, however, triazolam administration produced significant impairment in performance on a digit copying test. A higher number of adverse events were seen with the 40 and 60 mg doses of zaleplon compared to triazolam (0.25) and placebo. At higher doses, zaleplon is more effective than triazolam at reducing latency to persistent sleep in chronic insomnia and is not associated with the decrease in slow-wave sleep or residual impairment observed with triazolam. However, increases in total sleep time were apparent only at doses which produced concomitant increases in the number of adverse events. In contrast, triazolam (0.25 mg) produced increases in total sleep time (;25 min) and decreases in latency to persistent sleep at a dose of 0.25 mg. Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Zaleplon, A Novel Nonbenzodiazepine Hypnotic, Effectively Treats Insomnia in Elderly Patients Without Causing Rebound Effects.

BACKGROUND: Insomnia is a very common symptom, particularly in the elderly. Thus, all hypnotic medications should be carefully evaluated in the elderly population. Zaleplon, a new nonbenzodiazepine hypnotic with a short elimination half-life (approximately 1 hour), was evaluated in the current study. METHOD: This multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled outpatient study evaluated the efficacy and safety of zaleplon, 5 and 10 mg, in elderly patients with insomnia (as defined by DSM-IV); zolpidem, 5 mg, was the active comparator. Sleep was assessed in 549 elderly patients (>/= 65 years old) by using morning questionnaires completed after each of 7 baseline nights during which placebo was given, 14 nights of double-blind treatment, and 7 nights of placebo after discontinuation of active treatment. RESULTS: Zaleplon, 10 mg, and zolpidem, 5 mg, significantly reduced sleep latency during both weeks of the study. Zaleplon, 5 mg, reduced sleep latency only during week 2. Sleep duration was increased with zolpidem, 5 mg, during weeks 1 and 2 and with zaleplon, 10 mg, during week 1. No clinically significant rebound insomnia was observed after discontinuation of treatment with zaleplon, whereas evidence of rebound effects was seen with zolpidem. There was no significant difference between either zaleplon dose and placebo in the frequency of any central nervous system adverse events. CONCLUSION: Zaleplon is effective in reducing latency to sleep without evidence of undesired effects in elderly patients with insomnia.