Acute cholecystitis, obesity, and steatohepatitis constitute the lethal triad for bile duct injury (BDI) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

OBJECTIVE: The most feared complication during laparoscopic cholecystectomy remains a bile duct injury (BDI). Accurately risk-stratifying patients for a BDI remains difficult and imprecise. This study evaluated if the lethal triad of acute cholecystitis, obesity, and steatohepatitis is a prognostic measure for BDI. METHODS: A retrospective review of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) registry was performed. All laparoscopic cholecystectomy cases within the main NSQIP database for 2012-2019 were queried. Two study cohorts were constructed. One with the lethal triad of acute cholecystitis, BMI ≥ 30, and steatohepatitis. The other cohort did not have the full triad present. Multivariate analysis was performed via logistic regression modeling with calculation of odds ratios (OR) to identify independent factors for BDI. An uncontrolled and controlled propensity score match analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 387,501 cases were analyzed. 36,887 cases contained the lethal triad, the remaining 350,614 cases did not have the full triad. 860 BDIs were identified resulting in an overall incidence rate 0.22%. There were 541 BDIs within the lethal triad group with 319 BDIs in the other cohort and an incidence rate of 1.49% vs 0.09% (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified the lethal triad as an independent risk factor for a BDI by over 15-fold (OR 16.35, 95%CI 14.28-18.78, P < 0.0001) on the uncontrolled analysis. For the controlled propensity score match there were 29,803 equivalent pairs identified between the cohorts. The BDI incidence rate remained significantly higher with lethal triad cases at 1.65% vs 0.04% (P < 0.001). The lethal triad was an even more significant independent risk factor for BDI on the controlled analysis (OR 40.13, 95%CI 7.05-356.59, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The lethal triad of acute cholecystitis, obesity, and steatohepatitis significantly increases the risk of a BDI. This prognostic measure can help better counsel patients and potentially alter management.

Risk factors and outcomes for cholangitis after hepatic resection.

INTRODUCTION: There is a paucity in the literature in regard to the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes for post-operative cholangitis following hepatic resection. METHODS: Retrospective review of the ACS NSQIP main and targeted hepatectomy registries for 2012-2016. RESULTS: A total of 11,243 cases met the selection criteria. The incidence of post-operative cholangitis was 0.64% (151 cases). Multivariate analysis identified several risk factors associated with the development of post-operative cholangitis, stratified out by pre-operative and operative factors. The most significant risk factors were biliary anastomosis and pre-operative biliary stenting with odds ratios (OR) of 32.39 (95% CI 22.91-45.79, P value < 0.0001) and 18.32 (95% CI 10.51-31.94, P value < 0.0001) respectively. Cholangitis was significantly associated with post-operative bile leaks, liver failure, renal failure, organ space infections, sepsis/septic shock, need for reoperation, longer length of stay, increased readmission rates, and death. CONCLUSION: Largest analysis of post-operative cholangitis following hepatic resection. While a rare occurrence, it is associated with significantly increased risk for severe morbidity and mortality. The most significant risk factors were biliary anastomosis and stenting.

Comparison of survival for metastatic pancreatic cancer patients treated with CPI-613 versus resected borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer patients.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains suboptimal. Therapeutic agents with a novel mechanism of action are desperately needed; one such novel agent is CPI-613 targets. We here analyze the outcomes of 20 metastatic pancreatic cancer patients treated with CPI-613 and FOLFIRINOX in our institution and evaluate their outcomes to borderline-resectable patients treated with curative surgery. METHODS: A post hoc analysis was performed of the phase I CPI-613 trial data (NCT03504423) comparing survival outcomes to borderline-resectable cases treated with curative resection at the same institution. Survival was measured by overall survival (OS) for all study cases and disease-free survival (DFS) for resected cases with progression-free survival for CPI-613 cases. RESULTS: There were 20 patients in the CPI-613 cohort and 60 patients in the surgical cohort. Median follow-up times were 441 and 517 days for CPI-613 and resected cases, respectively. There was no difference in survival times between CPI-613 and resected cases with a mean OS of 1.8 versus 1.9 year (p = 0.779) and mean PFS/DFS of 1.4 versus 1.7 years (p = 0.512). There was also no difference in 3-year survival rates for OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.063, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.302-3.744, p = 0.925) or DFS/PFS (HR = 1.462, 95% CI 0.285-7.505, p = 0.648). CONCLUSION: The first study to evaluate the survival between metastatic patients treated with CPI-613 versus borderline-resectable cases undergoing curative resection. Analysis revealed no significant differences in survival outcomes between the cohorts. Study results are suggestive that there may be potential utility with the addition of CPI-613 to potentially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma, although additional research with more comparable study groups are required.

Pivotal Role of Genetic Counselors in the Uptake of Germline Genetic Testing in Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer and the Impact of Testing on Surgical Decision Making.

BACKGROUND: Genetic testing is increasingly utilized in breast cancer patients; however, testing rates remain low. We aimed to evaluate the rate of genetic testing at a tertiary academic medical center utilizing a multidisciplinary clinic model including genetic counselor. METHODS: A single-center retrospective chart review was performed on a cohort of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients from January 2018 through February 2019. Patients were reviewed for genetic screening eligibility, consultation with a genetic counselor, and test results. RESULTS: Final analysis included 426 patients. 261 (61.3%) were found to meet National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for genetic testing, of which 178 patient (68.2%) underwent testing and 32 patients (12.3%) declined testing. Of the 165 not eligible for testing, 5 patients were tested. A total of 183 patients underwent testing and 116 (63.4%) had a negative result, 17 (9.3%) were positive for at least one gene mutation and 50 (27.3%) were identified to have a variant of unknown significance (VUS). There was a positive association between those patients who met with a genetic counselor and eligibility for testing (OR 31.1, 95% CI 16.0-60.5). CONCLUSIONS: Genetic testing result has become an increasingly important factor when defining optimal surgical treatment for breast cancer patients. Increasing the availability of genetic consultation for breast cancer patients can improve testing rates and patient selection.

Long-Term Survival in Patients Treated with Cytoreduction and Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Mesothelioma at a Single High-Volume Center.

BACKGROUND: Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare diagnosis with a dismal prognosis if untreated. Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) is shown to significantly improve survival. Our institution is uniquely positioned to report long-term outcomes in MPM with CRS-HIPEC, due to our robust peritoneal surface disease program existing over the past three decades. METHODS: Our prospectively maintained, single-institution database of CRS-HIPEC cases was reviewed, identifying 111 consecutive patients with MPM over 28 years (1993-2021). Prognostic, operative, and pathologic factors were reviewed. Overall survival (OS) and conditional survival (CS) analyses were performed. RESULTS: The average age was 55.1 years; 58.6% of patients were male; 17 of 111 patients (15.3%) had a second CRS-HIPEC. At first CRS-HIPEC, the average PCI score was 18.7, and the perfusate drugs were platinum-based (72.1%) and mitomycin C (27.9%). The resection status at first CRS-HIPEC was R2a (46.4%), followed by R0-1 (29.1%), and R2b-c (24.5%). Median OS was 3.3 years for the entire cohort, with 75th and 25th percentiles at 10.7 months and 10.6 years. Median CS was improved if patients survived to the 1-year postoperative mark (4.9 years, p < 0.01) and trended toward further improvement with each passing year. If 3-year postoperative survival was achieved, the median CS improved to 6.1 years. CONCLUSIONS: This represents one of the largest and lengthiest, single-center, longitudinal, case series of peritoneal mesothelioma treated with CRS-HIPEC. The OS suggests efficacy for CRS-HIPEC for MPM. Long-term survival improves significantly after patients achieve the 1-year, postoperative mark.

Effect of three-dimensional intraoperative imaging on surgical outcomes with breast conservation therapy.

BACKGROUND: Breast conservation therapy (BCT) is frequently performed for breast cancer and associated with a significant risk for positive margins. Intraoperative three-dimensional (3-D) tomosynthesis potentially could limit the risk of positive margins. METHODS: Retrospective review of an institutional breast cancer registry. Evaluated BCT cases for a two year time period prior to and after the introduction of intraoperative 3-D tomosynthesis. Primary outcome was the effect of 3-D tomosynthesis on margin positivity rates. Secondary measures were the impact of 3-D tomosynthesis on additional margin procurements at the index surgery and operative time. RESULTS: A total of 228 cases were evaluated with 106 cases utilizing 3-D tomosynthesis and 122 cases with standard imaging. No significant difference in margin positivity rates between the cohorts at 23.9% versus 15.8% for 3-D tomosynthesis and standard imaging respectively (OR 1.53, CI 0.772-3.032, P = 0.221). 3-D tomosynthesis was associated with increased margin procurement rates (OR 2.34, 95%CI 1.303-4.190, P = 0.004) and longer operative times (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Intraoperative 3-D tomosynthesis was not found to limit margin positivity rates or improve the performance of the procedure.

High-risk liver patients are not associated with adverse events following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Pancreaticoduodenectomy performed with underlying hepatic disease has been reported to have increased adverse events postoperatively. This study aimed to further evaluate that association. METHODS: Retrospective review of the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) main and targeted pancreatectomy registries for 2014-2016. High-risk liver patients were defined by MELD scores, received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and had hepatosteatosis; two separate subgroups of MELD ≥9 and ≥ 11. High-risk liver patients were then compared to control cases via propensity score matching. RESULTS: There were 156 and 132 cases that met the high-risk liver criteria for the MELD cutoffs of ≥9 and ≥ 11 respectively. Propensity score matching left 2527 cases for final adjusted analysis. On both univariate and multivariate analysis high-risk liver patients were not associated with increased adverse events following Whipple resection. Lack of association with increased adverse events held for both the ≥9 and ≥ 11 MELD score cohorts. CONCLUSION: High-risk liver patients defined by MELD scores, neoadjuvant chemotherapy utilization, and hepatosteatosis were not associated with any increased incidence of adverse events following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Patients with underlying high-risk liver disease in this study did not appear to pose as a contraindication for oncologic resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Effect of preoperative liver-directed therapy prior to hepatic resection.

INTRODUCTION: Hepatobiliary malignancies present with advanced disease precluding upfront resection. Liver-directed therapy (LDT), particularly Y-90 radioembolization and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), has become increasingly utilized to facilitate attempt at oncologic resection. However, the safety profile of preoperative LDT is limited. METHODS: Retrospective review of the ACS NSQIP main and targeted hepatectomy registries for 2014-2016. Primary objective was evaluation of outcomes between preoperative LDT cases and those that received upfront resection. RESULTS: A total of 8923 cases met selection criteria. 192 cases (2.15%) received either Y-90 or TACE prior to hepatectomy. Multivariate analysis for all study patients revealed preoperative LDT significantly increased the risk of perioperative transfusion (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.445-3.328, P < 0.0001), sepsis (OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.104-4.411, P = 0.022), and liver failure (OR 2.72, 95% CI 1.562-4.747, P < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis found for primary hepatobiliary malignancies LDT only increased the risk for liver failure. While for secondary hepatic tumors LDT significantly increased perioperative transfusion, sepsis, cardiac failure, renal failure, liver failure, and mortality. The complication profile also significantly increased with advanced T stage. Conversely, on propensity score matching preoperative LDT did not significantly increase perioperative complications. CONCLUSION: Preoperative LDT has the potential to convert inoperable hepatic tumors into resectable disease but there is a general increased risk for significant postoperative complications, most notable liver failure. However, on controlled analysis preoperative LDT does not increase perioperative complications and should not be considered a contraindication to resection.

Exposure to Neoadjuvant Oxaliplatin-Containing Chemotherapy, Does it Effect Intraperitoneal Hyperthermic Chemotherapy Perfusion?

INTRODUCTION: Patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) are commonly exposed to oxaliplatin neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAT) regimens. The impact of systemic exposure to oxaliplatin prior to HIPEC with oxaliplatin is unknown. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of our institutional registry of CRS/HIPEC cases who received oxaliplatin-containing NAT, and compared patients who underwent HIPEC with oxaliplatin versus cases perfused with mitomycin C. The primary outcome was survival, defined by overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Subgroup analysis was performed based on primary tumor etiology and completeness of cytoreduction. RESULTS: A total of 333 cases satisfied the selection criteria-159 appendiceal primaries (all high-grade disease) and 174 colorectal cases. Thirty-one cases (9.3%) underwent HIPEC with oxaliplatin, with the remaining 302 cases (90.7%) receiving mitomycin C. Both cohorts were identical in regard to baseline characteristics, and both groups were alike in regard to NAT regimens and oxaliplatin exposure. There was no difference in survival outcomes. OS times were 2.9 (± 2.8) and 2.8 ( ± 3.6) years for oxaliplatin and mitomycin C perfusions, respectively (p = 0.94), and the 5-year OS rates were also similar at 9.7 and 18.5% (odds ratio [OR] 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.14-1.67, p = 0.24) for oxaliplatin and mitomycin cases, respectively. Likewise, DFS findings were similar, with survival of 2.5 (± 4.5) and 1.8 (± 2.4) years for oxaliplatin and mitomycin perfusions, respectively (p = 0.21). There was no difference in 5-year DFS rates, at 10.5 and 7.8% (OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.30-6.56, p = 0.68) for oxaliplatin and mitomycin C, respectively. Subgroup analysis found minimal discordant findings from the main results. CONCLUSION: This analysis found no discernable association with NAT oxaliplatin exposure in regard to survival outcomes following CRS/HIPEC stratified out by perfusion agent.

Impact of myometrium invasion on survival outcomes following cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC).

INTRODUCTION: Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) is an effective surgical intervention for peritoneal surface malignancy. The effect of myometrium invasion on outcomes is unknown. METHODS: Retrospective review of our institutional registry with analysis of CRS-HIPEC cases involving a hysterectomy. Compared cases with myometrium invasion versus those without invasion. Primary outcome was survival as measured by overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary outcome was the evaluation of risk factors for myometrium invasion based on multivariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 126 cases of CRS-HIPEC involving a hysterectomy were identified. Ninety-seven cases (76.9%) had no myometrium invasion and the remaining 29 cases (23.1%) had malignant invasion. The presence of myometrial invasion was a significant negative survival prognostic factor. The OS was halved with mean survival times of 2.8 (±2.3) versus 5.8 (±4.7) years for cases with and without invasion, respectively (p = 0.002). Five-year OS rates were also inferior with myometrium invasion at 17.4% versus 53.8% (odds ratio [OR] = 0.181, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.057-0.580, p = 0.002). A similar trend was present with DFS with mean survival times of 1.4 (±0.9) versus 3.7 (±3.9) years for noninvasion and invasion cases (p = 0.009). The 5-year DFS rates were 0% versus 34.8% (OR = 0.652, 95% CI: 0.549-0.775, p = 0.004). Secondary analysis significantly associated several risk factors with myometrium invasion to include lymph node positivity (OR = 2.539, 95% CI: 1.074-6.003, p = 0.012), colorectal primary tumors (OR = 2.248, 95% CI: 1.094-5.161, p = 0.035), and high-grade tumors (OR = 2.160, 95% CI: 1.080-4.820, p = 0.038). CONCLUSION: Myometrium invasion is a significant negative prognostic factor for survival following CRS-HIPEC. Several risk factors are potentially predictive of identifying those at high-risk for myometrium invasion.

Switching Perfusion Agents for Repeat Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Surgical Dogma or Evidence-Based Practice?

BACKGROUND: A common practice is to switch chemotherapy perfusion agents for repeat cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC). However, there is a paucity of objective benefit with this practice. METHODS: A retrospective review of our institutional registry involving repeat CRS-HIPEC cases was conducted, comparing cases that underwent a perfusion agent switch versus those cases with no switch. The primary outcome of this study was survival, measured by overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). A subgroup analysis was performed on the basis of primary etiology. RESULTS: A total of 101 cases met selection criteria. Mitomycin C was used as the index perfusion agent in 84% of cases, while oxaliplatin was utilized in the remaining 16% of cases. In total, 66 cases underwent a perfusion switch, with 35 cases using the same agent. Analysis revealed no survival benefit with HIPEC perfusion switch. For OS, there were similar mean survival times of 5.2 (± 4.1) years and 5.1 (± 3.6) years for cases with perfusion switch and no perfusion switch, respectively (P = 0.985). The 5-year OS rates were also similar at 61.4% and 53.3% for switch and non-switch cases, respectively [odds ratio (OR) 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54-3.56, P = 0.49]. Mean DFS was 4.0 (± 4.2) years and 3.6 (± 3.8) years for switch and non-switch cases, respectively (P = 0.74). The 5-year DFS rates had a greater difference with statistical trend, with rates of 53% versus 28% for switch and non-switch cases, respectively (OR 2.91, 95% CI 0.86-9.86, P = 0.081). Subgroup analysis had a similar trend to the main results. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings revealed no survival benefit with switching perfusion agents. Analysis suggests that the practice of perfusion switch is ineffective.

Management of peritoneal surface metastases from colorectal cancer: Cytoreductive surgery, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, pressurized intraperitoneal chemotherapy, and beyond.

This article provides a contemporary review of the current surgical management of peritoneal surface malignancy (PSM) of colorectal origin. A brief review of the founding history of surgical intervention for PSM is followed by a focused review of the level I evidence, current clinical questions, and evolving advancements. While not intended to address all the facets of PSM, this review aims to provide the reader with the essential knowledge and resources to effectively provide surgical care for carcinomatosis due to colorectal malignancies.

Association of primary tumor laterality with surgical outcomes for colorectal liver metastases: results from the Colorectal Liver Operative Metastasis International Collaborative (COLOMIC).

BACKGROUND: Primary laterality of colorectal cancer is thought to be associated with differences in outcomes. Liver metastasis is the most common site of solitary colorectal cancer spread. However, how primary colorectal cancer laterality affects outcomes in colorectal liver metastasis remains unclear. METHODS: The Colorectal Liver Operative Metastasis International Collaborative (COLOMIC) of operative hepatectomy cases for colorectal liver metastasis was compiled from five participating institutions. This included consecutive cases from 2000 to 2018 at all sites. A total of 884 patients were included in this study. Univariate, multivariate, and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed. RESULTS: Patients with left-sided versus right-sided cancers had significantly better overall survival: 49.4 vs. 41.8 months (p < 0.05). Patients with KRAS mutations had significantly worse median overall survival compared to KRAS wild-type (43.6 vs 56.1 months; p < 0.001). In left-sided cancers, KRAS mutations were associated with significantly worse median overall survival compared to KRAS wild-type cancers (43.6 vs 56.6 months; p < 0.01). This association was absent in patients with right-sided primary tumors. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed different variable sets (non-overlapping) were associated with overall survival, when comparing left-sided and right-sided cancers. CONCLUSION: Understanding how primary tumor laterality and related biological aspects affect long-term outcomes can potentially inform treatment decisions for patients with colorectal liver metastases.