Patterns of care in patients with cervical cancer 2012: results of a survey among German radiotherapy departments and out-patient health care centers.

BACKGROUND: Platinum-based primary or adjuvant chemoradiation is the treatment of choice for patients with cervical cancer. However, despite national guidelines and international recommendations, many aspects in diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up of patients with cervical cancer are not based on valid data. METHODS: To evaluate the current patterns of care for patients with cervical cancer in Germany, a questionnaire with 25 items was sent to 281 radiooncologic departments and out-patient health care centers. RESULTS: The response rate was 51%. While 87% of institutions treat 0-25 patients/year, 12 % treat between 26 and 50 and only 1% treat more than 50 patients/year. In 2011, the stage distribution of 1,706 treated cervical cancers were IB1, IB2, IIA, IIB, IIIA/IIIB, and IV in 11, 12, 11, 22, 28, and 16%, respectively. CT (90%) and MRI (86%) are mainly used as staging procedures in contrast to PET-CT with 14%. Interestingly, 27% of institutions advocate surgical staging prior to chemoradiation. In the majority of departments 3D-based (70%) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (76%) are used for percutaneous radiation, less frequently volumetric arc techniques (26%). Nearly all colleagues (99.3%) apply conventional fractioning of 1.8-2 Gy for external-beam radiotherapy, in 19% combined with a simultaneous integrated boost. Cisplatinum mono is used as a radiosensitizer with 40 mg/m(2) weekly by 90% of radiooncologists. For boost application in the primary treatment, HDR (high-dose rate) brachytherapy is the dominant technique (84%). In patients after radical hysterectomy pT1B1/1B2, node negative and resection in sound margins adjuvant chemoradiation is applied due to the occurrence of 1-4 other risk factors in 16-97%. There is a broad spectrum of recommended primary treatment strategies in stages IIB and IVA. CONCLUSION: Results of the survey underline the leading role but also differences in the use of chemoradiation in the treatment of cervical cancer patients in Germany.

Aspects of Therapy for Cervical Cancer in Germany 2012 - Results from a Survey of German Gynaecological Hospitals.

Introduction: In spite of the existence of guidelines and international recommendations, many aspects in the diagnosis, therapy and follow-up of patients with cervical cancer are not based on validated data. A broad spectrum of different opinions and procedures concerning the therapy for patients with cervical cancer is under controversial discussion by the responsible gynaecologists in German hospitals. Methods: The present study is intended to picture the current treatment situation for cervical cancer in Germany. For this purpose a specially developed questionnaire with questions divided into 19 subsections was sent to all 688 gynaecological hospitals in Germany. Results: The response rate to the questionnaire was 34 %. 91 % of the hospitals treated between 0 and 25 patients with cervical cancer per year. 7.5 % treated between 26 and 50 and 1.4 % of the hospitals more than 50 patients per year. The bimanual examination was the most frequently used staging method (98 %); PET-CT was the least used staging method (2.3 %). Interestingly 48 % of the hospitals used surgical staging. The great majority of the hospitals (71 %) used abdominal radical hysterectomy (Wertheim-Meigs operation) to treat their patients. TMMR via laparotomy was used by 13 %. 16 % of the hospitals performed laparoscopic or robot-assisted radical hysterectomies. The sentinel concept was hardly used even in the early stages. It must be emphasised that in 74 % of the hospitals radical hysterectomies were performed even in cases with positive pelvic lymph nodes and in 43 % also in cases with positive paraaortic lymph nodes. The therapy of choice for FIGO IIB cancers is primary radiochemotherapy (RCTX) in 21 % of the hospitals; operative staging followed by radiochemotherapy in 24 % and treatment by radical hysterectomy followed by adjuvant RCTX was employed in this situation by 46 % of the hospitals. In 15-97 % of the hospitals for node-negative and in sano resected patients in stage pT1B1/1B2 after radical hysterectomy, an adjuvant RCTX is recommended when further risk factors exist (LVSI, tumour > 4 cm, age < 40 years, adenocarcinoma, S3). Conclusion: A broad spectrum of differing staging and therapy concepts is in use for patients with cervical cancer in Germany. A standardisation of therapy is needed. An update of national guidelines could help to achieve more transparency and a standardisation of treatment for patients with cervical cancer.

Emission patterns and emission rates of MVOC and the possibility for predicting hidden mold damage?

UNLABELLED: Laboratory trials were performed in order to search for the variety of the production of microbial volatile organic compounds (MVOC), which could be used as indicators for hidden mold damage. Concerning MVOC production the experiments showed a dependency on the mold genus/species, the different strains used and the building materials used as substrate. It could be proved that the production of certain MVOC is not consistent at all times. On the whole low emission rates in terms of microg/h/m2 of the MVOC were found. Extrapolating the emissions rates from the laboratory trails to an indoor air situation results in concentrations below the analytical detection limit in most cases. According to these results only heavy or very large fungal contaminations might be detected by this method in indoor air. The studies were performed at the Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charite, Germany. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Microorganisms like bacteria and molds produce a huge variety of substances, and a part of them are released into the environment. Some compounds like, e.g. alcohols or ketones are volatile, therefore found in the air and called MVOC. Those compounds were considered helpful to track especially hidden mold damage. The study presented here showed, that the emission pattern varies from genus to genus and sometimes even from fungal strain to fungal strain. The results concerning the emission rates from different infested building materials proved, that the concentrations produced are much too low to be detected in indoor air, especially considering the dilution because of ventilation. Therefore, we conclude that MVOC should not be used as predictors for mold damage in indoor environments.