Hormonal Contraceptives Do Not Influence Concussion Recovery in Collegiate Athletes: Data from the NCAA-DoD CARE Consortium.

INTRODUCTION: The hormonal withdrawal hypothesis suggests that progesterone reduction in women after concussion may lead to greater symptom burden and longer recoveries. Current evidence indicates that hormonal stability after head injury may be an important moderator of postconcussive recovery. Thus, female athletes using hormonal contraceptives (HC) may exhibit better recovery profiles as their hormone levels are artificially stabilized. Our investigation sought to examine the relation between HC use and concussion outcomes in female student-athletes. METHODS: This longitudinal study examined concussion outcomes from female student-athletes participating in the NCAA-DoD CARE Consortium Research Initiative, including academic years 2014 to 2020. Eighty-six female collegiate athletes reporting HC use (HC+) were group matched on age, body mass index, race/ethnicity, sport contact level, concussion history, and current injury characteristics (i.e., amnesia, loss of consciousness) to 86 female collegiate athletes reporting no HC use (HC-). All participants had sustained a concussion and completed the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool, 3rd edition Symptom Scale, Brief Symptom Inventory-18, and Immediate Post-concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing at preinjury baseline, 24 to 48 h postinjury, and when cleared for unrestricted return to play. To provide an index of recovery trajectory, days between injury and unrestricted return to play were calculated. RESULTS: Groups did not differ on length of recovery, postconcussion symptoms, psychological health, or cognitive assessments. No differences were observed between groups on any measure when accounting for baseline levels of performance. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that HC use does not influence recovery trajectory, symptoms, or recovery of cognitive function after concussion.

N2b Reflects the Cognitive Changes in Executive Functioning After Concussion: A Scoping Review.

Objectives: The N2b is an event-related potential (ERP) component thought to index higher-order executive function. While the impact of concussion on executive functioning is frequently discussed in the literature, limited research has been done on the role of N2b in evaluating executive functioning in patients with concussion. The aims of this review are to consolidate an understanding of the cognitive functions reflected by the N2b and to account for discrepancies in literature findings regarding the N2b and concussion. Methods: A scoping review was conducted on studies that used the N2b to measure cognitive functioning in healthy control populations, as well as in people with concussions. Results: Sixty-six articles that met inclusion criteria demonstrated that the N2b effectively represents stimulus-response conflict management, response selection, and response inhibition. However, the 19 included articles investigating head injury (using terms such as concussion, mild head injury, and mild traumatic brain injury) found widely varied results: some studies found the amplitude of the N2b to be increased in the concussion group, while others found it to be decreased or unchanged. Conclusion: Based on the available evidence, differences in the amplitude of the N2b have been linked to response selection, conflict, and inhibition deficits in concussion. However, due to large variations in methodology across studies, findings about the directionality of this effect remain inconclusive. The results of this review suggest that future research should be conducted with greater standardization and consistency.