Endoscopic, "Scarless" Composite Flap Face and Neck Lift.

Deep-plane or composite flap facelift techniques allow deep structural rejuvenation of the face by release of retaining ligaments in the subsuperficial musculoaponeurotic system (sub-SMAS) plane with elevation and fixation of the SMAS/platysma/skin flap as a single, "en bloc" unit. This means that in the cases with mild to moderate skin laxity, the preauricular incision serves the purpose of access only. The author therefore developed an endoscopic-assisted, en bloc composite flap face and neck lift without a preauricular incision. The technique uses the prezygomatic and premasseteric (facial) and subplatysmal (neck) spaces as ideal optical cavities for endoscopic dissection and ligament release. Verticalization of fixation vectors and modified concho-mastoid traction sutures are used to minimize preauricular skin redundancy. The surgical procedure is described in detail. Clinical experience in 41 consecutive cases and comparison to other techniques with respect to relevant anatomy are also presented. This endoscopic en bloc composite flap facelift technique consistently and safely produced results comparable to conventional, "open" composite flap facelifts done by the same surgeon on similar candidates during a prior period.

Total Composite Flap Facelift and the Deep-Plane Transition Zone: A Critical Consideration in SMAS-Release Midface Lifting.

BACKGROUND: Recent anatomic studies suggest the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) layer attenuates in the midface. This led the author to switch from a bilamellar high SMAS dissection to a "total composite flap" technique, preserving skin and SMAS/platysma as one layer in a critical "deep-plane transition zone" (DTZ) lateral to the zygomaticus major muscle. This allows traction on the SMAS to translate to the malar fat pad via a "cantilever bridge" effect, which is lost when skin is undermined in the DTZ. OBJECTIVES: This paper attempts to answer the question of whether the composite flap or bilamellar technique better lifts the midface, comparing groups where the DTZ was undermined: (1) only at a sub-SMAS level; or (2) at both subcutaneous and sub-SMAS levels. METHODS: Thirty-five patients underwent bilamellar facelifts with skin and SMAS separated in the DTZ. Midfacial elevation was measured using size-matched preoperative and 18-month (average) postoperative photographs for the 70 hemi-midfaces. The same analysis was done for 35 patients undergoing total composite flap facelift, maintaining skin and SMAS as one layer in the DTZ. The two groups were compared. RESULTS: In the bilamellar group, the mean percentage of midfacial elevation at 18 months postoperative was 5.5% (range, 0.0%-17.8%). In the composite flap group, the percentage was 11.7% (range, 0.1%-32.3%). The difference was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Maintaining skin-SMAS attachments in the DTZ improves midface elevation during SMAS facelifting, exploiting a "cantilever bridge" effect of the skin transferring traction on the SMAS to the malar fat pad.

Radiotherapy: effects on expanded skin.

Although the combination of radiation and tissue expansion has been associated with a significant rate of complications, the specific pathophysiology has yet to be clearly elucidated. The objective of this study was to develop a model to identify and examine specific histologic changes associated with tissue expansion and irradiation. Rectangular 50-cc silicone tissue expanders were placed subcutaneously over the midline dorsum of 18 adult New Zealand white rabbits. Preoperative radiographic dosimetry demonstrated that the radiation portal was away from vital intraabdominal structures. The expanders were inflated with 10 cc of saline every other day for a total of 80 cc. Expanders were left in place for 2 to 3 weeks to allow fibrovascular capsule formation. The rabbits were then divided into three groups (six rabbits per group), each receiving one of three nonfractionated doses of radiation (20, 25, or 35 Gy). Half of the expanded skin was irradiated using a single dose, and the other half served as a nonirradiated control. Capsules and skin were harvested 6 weeks after the delivery of radiation, allowing the beginning of chronic radiation changes to occur. Using hematoxylin and eosin staining, histomorphometric analysis was performed. The data were analyzed using Student's test. Although irradiation did not affect dermal thickness, it did cause a statistically significant increase in epidermal thickness. At 20, 25, and 35 Gy the increase in epidermal thickness was 43, 90, and 130 percent, respectively. Although significant epidermal changes could be identified, capsular and dermal alterations were not evident. Further studies evaluating the long-term effects of alterations in capsular formation caused by radiation may be required.