Ten-year experience of an outpatient clinic for CKD-5 patients with multidisciplinary team and educational support.

PURPOSE: To analyze the results of an outpatient clinic with a multidisciplinary team and educational support for patients with late-stage CKD (lsCKD), to check its possible effect on their outcomes. METHODS: Longitudinal cohort study on patients followed up in the MaReA (Malattia Renale Avanzata = CKD5) outpatient clinic at ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia from 2005 to 2015 for at least six months. Trajectory of renal function over time has been evaluated only in those patients with at least four estimations of eGFR before referring to MaReA. RESULTS: Seven hundred and six patients were enrolled, their mean age was 72 ± 14 years, 59% were males. At the end of the study, 147 (21%) were still on MaReA, 240 (34%) on dialysis, 92 (13%) on very low-protein diet (VLPDs), 13 (2%) on pre-hemodialysis clinic, 23 (3%) improved renal function, 10 (1%) transplanted, 62 (9%) transferred/lost to follow-up, and 119 (17%) died. Optimal dialysis start (defined as start with definitive dialysis access, as an out-patient and without lsCKD complications) occurred in 180/240 (75%) patients. The results showed a slower eGFR decrease during MaReA follow-up compared to previous renal follow-up: - 2.0 vs. - 4.0 mL/min/1.73 m2 BSA/year (p < 0.05), corresponding to a median delay of 17.7 months in dialysis start in reference to our policy in starting dialysis. The patient cumulative survival was 75% after 24 months and 25% after 70. LIMITATIONS: (1) lack of a control group, (2) one-center-study, (3) about all patients were Caucasians. CONCLUSION: The follow-up of lsCKD patients on MaReA is associated with an optimal and delayed initiation of dialysis.

Incremental peritoneal dialysis: a 10 year single-centre experience.

INTRODUCTION: Incremental dialysis consists in prescribing a dialysis dose aimed towards maintaining total solute clearance (renal + dialysis) near the targets set by guidelines. Incremental peritoneal dialysis (incrPD) is defined as one or two dwell-times per day on CAPD, whereas standard peritoneal dialysis (stPD) consists in three-four dwell-times per day. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Single-centre cohort study. Enrollement period: January 2002-December 2007; end of follow up (FU): December 2012. INCLUSION CRITERIA: incident patients with FU ≥6 months, initial residual renal function (RRF) 3-10 ml/min/1.73 sqm BSA, renal indication for PD. RESULTS: Median incrPD duration was 17 months (I-III Q: 10; 30). There were no statistically significant differences between 29 patients on incrPD and 76 on stPD regarding: clinical, demographic and anthropometric characteristics at the beginning of treatment, adequacy indices, peritonitis-free survival (peritonitis incidence: 1/135 months-patients in incrPD vs. 1/52 months-patients in stPD) and patient survival. During the first 6 months, RRF remained stable in incrPD (6.20 ± 2.02 vs. 6.08 ± 1.47 ml/min/1.73 sqm BSA; p = 0.792) whereas it decreased in stPD (4.48 ± 2.12 vs. 5.61 ± 1.49; p < 0.001). Patient survival was affected negatively by ischemic cardiopathy (HR: 4.269; p < 0.001), peripheral and cerebral vascular disease (H2.842; p = 0.006) and cirrhosis (2.982; p = 0.032) and positively by urine output (0.392; p = 0.034). Hospitalization rates were significantly lower in incrPD (p = 0.021). Eight of 29 incrPD patients were transplanted before reaching full dose treatment. CONCLUSIONS: IncrPD is a safe modality to start PD; compared to stPD, it shows similar survival rates, significantly less hospitalization, a trend towards lower peritonitis incidence and slower reduction of renal function.

Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis in an Italian center: thirty year experience.

BACKGROUND: Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) is a rare but life-threatening complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD). Its incidence and prevalence are still not clearly defined. No data exist on the prevalence of EPS in Italy. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the incidence and prevalence of EPS, and identify potential factors useful for prevention or early diagnosis of EPS. METHODS: A retrospective study in patients starting PD between 1979 and 2013 in one Italian center. Data on demographics, occurrence of EPS, time on PD, peritoneal equilibration test, and therapy for EPS were gathered. RESULTS: EPS occurred in 26/920 patients with a prevalence of 2.8 % and incidence of 1/105 patient-years. The prevalence increased with the time spent on PD: 0.4 % for PD duration <2 years, 3 % (2-4 years), 4 % (4-6 years), 6 % (6-8 years), 8 % (8-10 years), 18 % (10-12 years), 75 % (12-14 years), 67 % (>14 years). EPS prevalence was not higher in PD patients transplanted: 5/172 (2.9 %); only two of them (1.2 %) were diagnosed while with a functioning graft. In only one patient (0.6 %) was the diagnosis made during hemodialysis; the other 23 were diagnosed while still on PD. Mortality due to EPS was 38.5 %, and was associated with PD duration. Therapy with steroids reduced mortality [hazard ratio 0.047 (95 % CI: 0.008-0.273); p < 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience the prevalence of EPS is low, but increases progressively with the duration of PD. The transfer to hemodialysis or transplantation does not appear to be a key factor for EPS. Therapy with steroids significantly improves the outcome.

A randomized, pilot trial to evaluate glomerular filtration rate by creatinine or cystatin C in naive HIV-infected patients after tenofovir/emtricitabine in combination with atazanavir/ritonavir or efavirenz.

BACKGROUND: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimated by Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation based on creatinine or cystatine C may be more accurate methods especially in patients without chronic kidney disease. There is lack of data on GFR estimated by these methods in patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy. METHODS: Antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected patients were randomized to tenofovir/emtricitabine in association with atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/r) or efavirenz (EFV) Patients had to have an actual creatinine clearance >50 mL/minute (24-hour urine collection) and were followed for 48 weeks. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients (48 ATV/r, 43 EFV) were recruited. Using the CKD-EPI creatinine formula, there was a significant decrease in GFR up to week 48 in patients receiving ATV/r (4.9 mL/minute/m(2), P = 0.02) compared with a not statistically significant increment in patients prescribed EFV. Using the cystatin C-based equation, we found greater decrease in GFR in both arms, although, in the EFV arm, the decrease was not statistically significant (5.8 mL/minute/m(2), P = 0.92). At multivariable analysis, ATV/r was a significant predictor of greater decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (P = 0.0046) only with CKD-EPI creatinine. CONCLUSIONS: ATV/r plus tenofovir caused greater GFR decreases compared with EFV. The evaluation of eGFR by cystatin C confirmed this result, but this method seemed to be more stringent, probably precluding the possibility to detect a significant difference in the pattern of eGFR evolution between the two arms over time. More studies are needed to understand the clinical relevance of these alterations and whether cystatin C is a more appropriate method for monitoring GFR in clinical practice.