Surgical stabilization of rib fractures in the geriatric trauma population is associated with equivalent outcomes to a younger cohort: A propensity matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) improves outcomes in chest wall trauma. Geriatric patients are particularly vulnerable to poor outcomes; yet, this population is often excluded from SSRF studies. Further delineating patient outcomes by age is necessary to optimize care for the aging trauma population. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted examining outcomes among patients aged 40+ for whom an SSRF consult was placed between 2017 and 2022 at a level 1 trauma center. Patients were categorized into geriatric (65+) and adult (40-64), as well as 80 years and older (80+) and 79 and younger (40-79). Patient outcomes were assessed comparing non-operative and operative management of chest wall trauma. Propensity matched analysis was performed to evaluate mortality differences between adult and geriatric patients who did and did not undergo SSRF. RESULTS: A total of 543 patients had an SSRF consult. Of these, 227 were 65+, and 73 were 80+. A total of 129 patients underwent SSRF (24 %). The percentage of patients undergoing SSRF did not vary between 40 and 64 and 65+ (23.7 % and 23.6 %, respectively, p = 0.97) or 40-79 and 80+ (24.0 vs 21.9, p = 0.69). Patients undergoing SSRF had higher chest injury burden and were more likely to require mechanical ventilation and ICU level care on admission. Overall, in-hospital mortality rate was 4.6 %. Among patients who underwent SSRF, mortality rate did not significantly differ between 65+ and 40-64 (7.8% vs 2.7 %, p = 0.18) or 80+ and 40-79 (6.3% vs 4.6 %, p = 0.77). This remained true in propensity matched analysis. CONCLUSION: Geriatric and octogenarian patients with rib fractures underwent SSRF at similar rates and achieved equivalent outcomes to their younger counterparts. SSRF did not differentially affect mortality outcomes based on age group in propensity matched analysis. SSRF is safe for geriatric patients including octogenarians.

Considering the Interaction between Surgical Approach and Timing on Complication Rates of Complex Orbital Fracture Repair.

OBJECTIVE: The optimal approach and timing of complex orbital fracture repair is an unresolved issue that is complicated by unique clinical presentations and patient-specific considerations. Early surgical repair in less than 14 days is associated with fewer complications; however, there are no guidelines addressing the optimal timing for surgical repair. This study assesses the time of surgical repair and surgical outcomes of complex orbital fractures. METHODS: Retrospective chart review from 2010 to 2022. Adult patients with orbital fractures are treated with surgical repair. RESULTS: In all, 94 patients presented with orbital fractures and were treated with 108 surgeries. Postoperative complications: vision disturbance 33/108 (30.6%), gaze restriction 12/108 (11.1%), lid malposition 10/108 (9.3%), globe complication 13/108 (12.0%), and hardware issues 14/108 (13.0%). Postoperative complications were not significantly associated with the surgical approach used for fracture repair or the time of surgical repair. CONCLUSION: Postoperative complications following surgical repair of orbital fractures are not associated with surgical approach or time of repair following the initial injury.