A multicenter randomized controlled feasibility trial of a digital self-management intervention for adults with epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: Self-management interventions may enhance health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in epilepsy. However, several barriers often impair their implementation in the real world. Digital interventions may help to overcome some of these barriers. Considering this, the Helpilepsy Plus Prototype was developed as a prototype smartphone-delivered self-care treatment program for adults with epilepsy. METHODS: The 12-week Helpilepsy Plus Prototype was evaluated through a randomized controlled feasibility trial with a waiting-list control (WLC) group. Outcome measurement at baseline and at 12 weeks assessed adherence to the prototype intervention and changes in epilepsy-related outcomes. The primary endpoint was patient autonomy measured with EASE, and secondary endpoints included HRQoL measured with QOLIE-31, health literacy measured with HLQ, anxiety, and depression symptoms measured with HADS. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a heterogeneous sample of participants to assess user-friendliness and usefulness. The prototype program was delivered through the Neuroventis Platform (Neuroventis, BV, Overijse, Belgium), a certified medical device (under EU/MDD Class I, and EU/MDR grace period). RESULTS: Ninety-two patients were included (46 in the intervention group, 46 in WLC). Most participants (63%, 58/92 women, median age 30 years) had pharmacoresistant epilepsy (61%, 56/92). Only 22% of participants (10/46) in the intervention group completed at least half of all intervention sessions. No significant differences between the intervention group and WLC were observed. Although there was a larger proportion of patients in the intervention group with meaningful improvements in HRQoL compared to WLC (19/46 versus 11/46), the difference was not significant (p = 0.119). Qualitative feedback showed that participants would appreciate more personalization, such as adaptation of the content to their current epilepsy knowledge level, a more interactive interface, shorter text sections, and interaction through reminders and notifications. SIGNIFICANCE: Digital interventions should allow sufficient scope for personalization and interaction to increase patient engagement and enable benefits from self-care apps. Feedback loops allow the participatory development of tailored interventions. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of an app-based self-help intervention. Study participants were either randomly assigned to a group that had access to the app or a group that received access to the app after the end of the study. Although a larger proportion of participants in the intervention group showed a relevant improvement in quality of life, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. Less than one-fifth of participants in the intervention group attended at least half of all intervention sessions; patient feedback showed that patients required more personalization and interactive options.

Predictors for and use of rescue medication in adults with epilepsy: A multicentre cross-sectional study from Germany.

BACKGROUND: Seizure clusters, prolonged seizures, and status epilepticus are life-threatening neurological emergencies leading to irreversible neuronal damage. Benzodiazepines are current evidence-based rescue therapy options; however, recent investigations indicated the prescription of mainly unsuitable benzodiazepines and inappropriate use of rescue medication. OBJECTIVE: To examine current use, satisfaction, and adverse events concerning rescue medication in patients with epilepsy in Germany. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was conducted at epilepsy centres in Frankfurt am Main, Greifswald, Marburg, and Münster between 10/2020 and 12/2020. Patients with an epilepsy diagnosis were assessed based on a questionnaire examining a 12-month period. RESULTS: In total, 486 patients (mean age: 40.5, range 18-83, 58.2 % female) participated in this study, of which 125 (25.7 %) reported the use of rescue medication. The most frequently prescribed rescue medications were lorazepam tablets (56.8 %, n = 71 out of 125), buccal midazolam (19.2 %, n = 24), and rectal diazepam (10.4 %, n = 13). Seizures continuing for over several minutes (43.2 %, n = 54), seizure clusters (28.0 %, n = 35), and epileptic auras (28.0 %, n = 35) were named as indications, while 28.0 % (n = 35) stated they administered the rescue medication for every seizure. Of those continuing to have seizures, 46.0 % did not receive rescue medication. On average, rescue medication prescription occurred 7.1 years (SD 12.7, range 0-66) after an epilepsy diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Unsuitable oral benzodiazepines remain widely prescribed for epilepsy patients as rescue medication. Patients also reported inappropriate use of medication. A substantial proportion of patients who were not seizure-free did not receive rescue medication prescriptions. Offering each patient at risk for prolonged seizures or clusters of seizures an individual rescue treatment with instructions on using it may decrease mortality and morbidity and increase quality of life. .

Consultation Requests and Satisfaction with a Telehealth Network for Epilepsy: Longitudinal Analysis of the Epilepsy Network Hessen Evaluation.

Background: Telemedicine improves access to specialized medical expertise, as required for paroxysmal disorders. The Epilepsy Network Hessen Evaluation (ENHE) is a pilot cross-sectoral teleconsultation network connecting primary neurologists and pediatricians with epilepsy centers in Hessen, a federal German state. Methods: We prospectively and longitudinally evaluated telehealthcare in the ENHE. Participating physicians rated each consultation for satisfaction and impact on further management. The survey was administered at each consultation and 3 months later. Results: We analyzed 129 consultations involving 114 adult and pediatric patients. Their mean age was 34 years (standard deviation: 26, range: 0.1-91 years), 48% were female, and 34% were children and adolescents. The most common consultation requests were co-evaluation of an electroencephalogram (electroencephalogram [EEG]; 76%) and therapeutic (33%) and differential diagnosis (24%) concerns. Physicians transmitted one paraclinical examination on average (range: 1-4), predominantly EEG (85%), followed by magnetic resonance imaging (17%) and written records (9%). Response rates were 72% for the initial and 67% for the follow-up survey. Across respondents, 99% (n = 92) were satisfied with the ENHE. Overall, 80% of the consultations contributed to the diagnosis, and 90% were considered helpful for treatment, influencing it in 71% of cases. Seizure frequency had decreased more often (96%) than increased (4%) at 3 months. The initial diagnosis was confirmed in 78% of patients. Discussion: In this pilot teleconsultation network for paroxysmal disorders, diagnostic and therapeutic advice was perceived as helpful. Clinical outcomes were largely positive, suggesting tele-epileptology is viable for paroxysmal (seizure) disorders.

Transient postictal dysphagia in older adults with focal structural epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: Seizures can cause transient neurological symptoms, such as hemiparesis and aphasia. However, temporary swallowing changes leading to postictal dysphagia have not been previously described. Therefore, this study evaluated the presence of swallowing disorders following seizure. In addition, dysphagia severity and duration of any recovery from dysphagic symptoms were investigated. METHODS: The local clinical database of all fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) examinations performed from 2008 to 2019 was screened for patients diagnosed with seizures, but excluding patients with intensive care unit admission or intubation >24 h. Patient charts were evaluated to identify preexisting dysphagia or potential concurrent medical causes for dysphagia, including hyponatremia, increased intracranial pressure, sepsis, or other encephalopathies associated with infections, or other possible causes at the time of admission. Patients receiving >.5 defined daily doses of benzodiazepines or neuroleptics were also excluded. Age, sex, seizure semiology and etiology, comorbidities, concurrent pneumonia, and dysphagia course during hospitalization were evaluated as predictors of the occurrence of dysphagia or its potential duration. RESULTS: We identified 41 patients with dysphagia following a seizure, without evidence of any concurrent cause of swallowing dysfunction. These patients all presented with focal structural epilepsy, they had a mean age of 79 ± 11.3 years (range = 44-95 years), and 21 were women. The mean Elixhauser Comorbidity Score was 4.8. Hospital-acquired pneumonia was detected in 21 patients (51.2%). FEES diagnosed mild and severe dysphagia in 21 (51.2%) and 20 (48.8%) patients, respectively. Dysphagia improved significantly (p = .001) during hospitalization, persisting for an average of 3.9 days (median = 3 days, SD = 2.07 days, range = 1-8 days). SIGNIFICANCE: Dysphagia is a potential transient neurological deficit following seizure. Our findings suggest that older patients, with focal structural epilepsy, are at risk for postictal dysphagia. Further studies are needed to ascertain the prevalence, complications, and predictors of postictal dysphagia. Dysphagia screening may improve early detection in patients with relevant risk factors, as well as reduce the occurrence of aspiration pneumonia.

Fenfluramine for the treatment of status epilepticus: use in an adult with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Novel treatments are needed to control refractory status epilepticus (SE). This study aimed to assess the potential effectiveness of fenfluramine (FFA) as an acute treatment option for SE. We present a summary of clinical cases where oral FFA was used in SE. METHODS: A case of an adult patient with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) who was treated with FFA due to refractory SE is presented in detail. To identify studies that evaluated the use of FFA in SE, we performed a systematic literature search. RESULTS: Four case reports on the acute treatment with FFA of SE in children and adults with Dravet syndrome (DS) and LGS were available. We report in detail a 30-year-old woman with LGS of structural etiology, who presented with generalized tonic and dialeptic seizures manifesting at high frequencies without a return to clinical baseline constituting the diagnosis of SE. Treatment with anti-seizure medications up to lacosamide 600 mg/d, brivaracetam 300 mg/d, valproate 1,600 mg/d, and various benzodiazepines did not resolve the SE. Due to ongoing refractory SE and following an unremarkable echocardiography, treatment was initiated with FFA, with an initial dose of 10 mg/d (0.22 mg/kg body weight [bw]) and fast up-titration to 26 mg/d (0.58 mg/kg bw) within 10 days. Subsequently, the patient experienced a resolution of SE within 4 days, accompanied by a notable improvement in clinical presentation and regaining her mobility, walking with the assistance of physiotherapists. In the three cases reported in the literature, DS patients with SE were treated with FFA, and a cessation of SE was observed within a few days. No treatment-emergent adverse events were observed during FFA treatment in any of the four cases. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the reported cases, FFA might be a promising option for the acute treatment of SE in patients with DS and LGS. Observational data show a decreased SE frequency while on FFA, suggesting a potentially preventive role of FFA in these populations. KEY POINTS: We summarize four cases of refractory status epilepticus (SE) successfully treated with fenfluramine. Refractory SE resolved after 4-7 days on fenfluramine. Swift fenfluramine up-titration was well-tolerated during SE treatment. Treatment-emergent adverse events on fenfluramine were not observed. Fenfluramine might be a valuable acute treatment option for SE in Dravet and Lennox-Gastaut syndromes.

Management of status epilepticus in pregnancy: a clinician survey.

BACKGROUND: Status epilepticus in pregnancy (SEP) is rare and life-threatening for both mother and fetus. There are well-established guidelines for the management of women with epilepsy during pregnancy; however, there is little evidence guiding the management of SEP, leading to uncertainty among treating physicians. Therefore, this survey aims to investigate the real-world practices of physicians treating SEP to explore management approaches for improvements in care. METHODS: An anonymous, electronic survey was created and distributed to neurointensivists and neurologists between September and December 2021. RESULTS: One hundred physicians initiated the survey and 95 completed it in full: 87 (87%, 87/100) identified neurology as their primary specialty, 31 had subspecialty training in neurocritical care, and 48 had subspecialty training in epilepsy and/or clinical neurophysiology. Over half of the survey respondents (67%, 67/100) reported having participated in the management of SEP, with 48.9% (49/98) having done so in the past year. Most survey respondents (73%, 73/100) reported that their management approach to SEP is different than that of non-pregnant patients. Survey respondents were more likely to involve epilepsy consultants when treating SEP (58.5%, 58/99) and the vast majority involved Obstetrics/Maternal Fetal Medicine consultants (90.8%, 89/98). Survey respondents showed a clear preference for levetiracetam (89.7%, 87/97) in the treatment of benzodiazepine refractory status epilepticus followed by lacosamide (61%, 60/98) if an additional second line agent was needed. Valproate and phenobarbital were unlikely to be used. There was less agreement for the management of refractory and super-refractory SEP. CONCLUSIONS: Levetiracetam is the most frequently used anti-seizure medication (ASM) for benzodiazepine-refractory SEP. Survey participants tended to manage SEP differently than in non-pregnant patients including greater involvement of interdisciplinary teams as well as avoidance of ASMs associated with known teratogenicity.

The impact of referring patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy to an epilepsy center for presurgical diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Epilepsy surgery is an established treatment for drug-resistant focal epilepsy (DRFE) that results in seizure freedom in about 60% of patients. Correctly identifying an epileptogenic lesion in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is challenging but highly relevant since it improves the likelihood of being referred for presurgical diagnosis. The epileptogenic lesion's etiology directly relates to the surgical intervention's indication and outcome. Therefore, it is vital to correctly identify epileptogenic lesions and their etiology presurgically. METHODS: We compared the final histopathological diagnoses of all patients with DRFE undergoing epilepsy surgery at our center between 2015 and 2021 with their MRI diagnoses before and after presurgical diagnosis at our epilepsy center, including MRI evaluations by expert epilepsy neuroradiologists. Additionally, we analyzed the outcome of different subgroups. RESULTS: This study included 132 patients. The discordance between histopathology and MRI diagnoses significantly decreased from 61.3% for non-expert MRI evaluations (NEMRIs) to 22.1% for epilepsy center MRI evaluations (ECMRIs; p < 0.0001). The MRI-sensitivity improved significantly from 68.6% for NEMRIs to 97.7% for ECMRIs (p < 0.0001). Identifying focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) and amygdala dysplasia was the most challenging for both subgroups. 65.5% of patients with negative NEMRI were seizure-free 12 months postoperatively, no patient with negative ECMRI achieved seizure-freedom. The mean duration of epilepsy until surgical intervention was 13.6 years in patients with an initial negative NEMRI and 9.5 years in patients with a recognized lesion in NEMRI. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that for patients with DRFE-especially those with initial negative findings in a non-expert MRI-an early consultation at an epilepsy center, including an ECMRI, is important for identifying candidates for epilepsy surgery. NEMRI-negative findings preoperatively do not preclude seizure freedom postoperatively. Therefore, patients with DRFE that remain MRI-negative after initial NEMRI should be referred to an epilepsy center for presurgical evaluation. Nonreferral based on NEMRI negativity may harm such patients and delay surgical intervention. However, ECMRI-negative patients have a reduced chance of becoming seizure-free after epilepsy surgery. Further improvements in MRI technique and evaluation are needed and should be directed towards improving sensitivity for FCDs and amygdala dysplasias.

Status epilepticus in pregnancy.

Status epilepticus is a frequent neurological emergency associated with a case fatality of about 10-15% depending on age, cause, and other factors, and a high burden for patients, caregivers, and society. In pregnancy, it can occur in two different clinical constellations: (1) In women with a history of epilepsy and (2) as new onset status epilepticus in pregnancy (NOSEP). Both entities are relatively rare but differ in terms of etiology. Here we describe the epidemiology, etiologies, diagnosis, clinical course with the maternal and fetal outcome, and the suggested management strategies for either manifestation. This paper was presented at the 8th London-Innsbruck Colloquium on Status Epilepticus and Acute Seizures held in September 2022.

Supply problems of antiseizure medication are common among epilepsy patients in Germany.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the frequency of reported antiseizure medication (ASM) supply problems among patients with epilepsy (PWE) in Germany. METHODS: The Epi2020 study was a multicenter study focusing on different healthcare aspects of adult PWE in Germany. In addition to basic clinical and demographic characteristics, PWE were asked to answer a questionnaire regarding supply difficulties regarding their ASM, and if they had to discontinue ASM treatment due to supply problems. Generic switch of medication was recorded, and adverse effects were measured using the Liverpool Adverse Events Profile (LAEP) scale. Data were analyzed to detect predictors of supply problems. RESULTS: In total, 434 PWE with a mean age of 40 years (median 37 years, SD = 15.5, range: 18-83 years, 254 female) participated in this study. 53.7% of PWE (n = 233) reported that at least once in the past 12 months their ASM was not available at the pharmacy, and 24.9% (n = 108) reported having experienced ASM supply problems three times or more during the past 12 months. Patients with epilepsy treated with carbamazepine and zonisamide reported frequent problems with availability in 45.8% and 44.8% respectively, whereas those treated with lacosamide and valproate reported supply problems less frequently (17.0% and 16.4%, respectively). Nine patients (2.1%) were unable to take their ASM as prescribed at least once in the past 12 months due to supply problems. Forty-nine patients (11.3%) reported having to switch ASM due to supply difficulties with generic replacement occurring in 39.4% (n = 171) of patients. Those with supply problems were more likely to be treated with more ASMs and scored higher on the LAEP. CONCLUSION: Supply problems with ASM are frequent among PWE in Germany and are reported for older and newer ASMs. Supply problems contribute to ASM nonadherence and are positively correlated with the number of ASM taken and adverse events.

Use of Health-Related Apps and Telehealth in Adults with Epilepsy in Germany: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

Background: Telehealth can improve the treatment of chronic disorders, such as epilepsy. Telehealth prevalence and use increased during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. However, familiarity with and use of telehealth and health-related mobile applications (apps) by persons with epilepsy remain unknown. Methods: We investigated telehealth use, demographics, and clinical variables within the multicenter Epi2020 cross-sectional study. Between October and December 2020, adults with epilepsy completed a validated questionnaire, including individual questions regarding knowledge and use of apps and telehealth. Results: Of 476 included individuals (58.2% women; mean age 40.2 ± 15.4 years), 41.6% reported using health-related apps. Health apps were used more frequently (pedometer 32.1%, exercise app 17.6%) than medical apps (health insurance 15.1%, menstrual apps 12.2%) or apps designed for epilepsy (medication reminders 10.3%, seizure calendars 4.6%). Few used seizure detectors (i.e., apps as medical devices 1.9%) or mobile health devices (fitness bracelet 11.3%). A majority (60.9%) had heard the term telehealth, 78.6% of whom had a positive view. However, only 28.6% had a concrete idea of telehealth, and only 16.6% reported personal experience with telehealth. A majority (55%) would attend a teleconsultation follow-up, and 41.2% would in a medical emergency. Data privacy and availability were considered equally important by 50.8%, 21.8% considered data privacy more important, and 20.2% considered data availability more important. Current health-related app use was independently associated with younger age (p = 0.003), higher education (p < 0.001), and subjective COVID-19-related challenges (p = 0.002). Persistent seizure occurrence (vs. seizure freedom ≥12 months) did not affect willingness to use teleconsultations on multivariable logistic regression analysis. Conclusions: Despite positive telehealth views, few persons with epilepsy in Germany are familiar with specific apps or services. Socioeconomic factors influence telehealth use more than baseline epilepsy characteristics. Telehealth education and services should target socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals to reduce the digital care gap. German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00022024; Universal Trial Number: U1111-1252-5331).

Early Epilepsy Surgery in Benign Cerebral Tumors: Avoid Your 'Low-Grade' Becoming a 'Long-Term' Epilepsy-Associated Tumor.

Epilepsy surgery in low-grade epilepsy-associated neuroepithelial tumors (LEAT) is usually evaluated in drug-resistant cases, often meaning a time delay from diagnosis to surgery. To identify factors predicting good postoperative seizure control and neuropsychological outcome, the cohort of LEAT patients treated with resective epilepsy surgery at the Epilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine-Main, Germany between 2015 and 2020 was analyzed. Thirty-five patients (19 males (54.3%) and 16 females, aged 4 to 40 years (M = 18.1), mean follow-up 33 months) were included. Following surgery, 77.1% of patients remained seizure-free (Engel IA/ILAE 1). Hippocampus and amygdala resection was predictive for seizure freedom in temporal lobe epilepsy. In total, 65.7% of all patients showed cognitive deficits during presurgical workup, decreasing to 51.4% after surgery, predominantly due to significantly less impaired memory functions (p = 0.011). Patients with presurgical cognitive deficits showed a tendency toward a longer duration of epilepsy (p = 0.050). Focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (p = 0.019) and young age at onset (p = 0.018) were associated with a higher likelihood of cognitive deficits after surgery. Therefore, we advocate early epilepsy surgery without requiring proof of drug-resistance. This refers especially to lesions associated with the non-eloquent cortex.

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on physical and mental health status and care of adults with epilepsy in Germany.

BACKGROUND: To mitigate the potential consequences of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on public life, the German Federal Government and Ministry of Health enacted a strict lockdown protocol on March 16, 2020. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on physical and mental health status and the supply of medical care and medications for people with epilepsy (PWE) in Germany. METHODS: The Epi2020 study was a large, multicenter study focused on different healthcare aspects of adults with epilepsy. In addition to clinical and demographic characteristics, patients were asked to answer a questionnaire on the impact of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic between March and May 2020. Furthermore, the population-based number of epilepsy-related admissions in Hessen was evaluated for the January-June periods of 2017-2020 to detect pandemic-related changes. RESULTS: During the first wave of the pandemic, 41.6% of PWE reported a negative impact on their mental health, while only a minority reported worsening of their seizure situation. Mental and physical health were significantly more negatively affected in women than men with epilepsy and in PWE without regular employment. Moreover, difficulties in ensuring the supply of sanitary products (25.8%) and antiseizure medications (ASMs; 19.9%) affected PWE during the first lockdown; no significant difference regarding these impacts between men and women or between people with and without employment was observed. The number of epilepsy-related admissions decreased significantly during the first wave. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis provides an overview of the general and medical care of epilepsy patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. PWE in our cohort frequently reported psychosocial distress during the first wave of the pandemic, with significant adverse effects on mental and physical health. Women and people without permanent jobs especially reported distress due to the pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic has added to the mental health burden and barriers to accessing medication and medical services, as self-reported by patients and verified in population-based data on hospital admissions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), DRKS00022024. Registered October 2, 2020, http://www.drks.de/DRKS00022024.

Benzodiazepines in the Management of Seizures and Status Epilepticus: A Review of Routes of Delivery, Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy, and Tolerability.

Status epilepticus (SE) is an acute, life-threatening medical condition that requires immediate, effective therapy. Therefore, the acute care of prolonged seizures and SE is a constant challenge for healthcare professionals, in both the pre-hospital and the in-hospital settings. Benzodiazepines (BZDs) are the first-line treatment for SE worldwide due to their efficacy, tolerability, and rapid onset of action. Although all BZDs act as allosteric modulators at the inhibitory gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)A receptor, the individual agents have different efficacy profiles and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, some of which differ significantly. The conventional BZDs clonazepam, diazepam, lorazepam and midazolam differ mainly in their durations of action and available routes of administration. In addition to the common intravenous, intramuscular and rectal administrations that have long been established in the acute treatment of SE, other administration routes for BZDs-such as intranasal administration-have been developed in recent years, with some preparations already commercially available. Most recently, the intrapulmonary administration of BZDs via an inhaler has been investigated. This narrative review provides an overview of the current knowledge on the efficacy and tolerability of different BZDs, with a focus on different routes of administration and therapeutic specificities for different patient groups, and offers an outlook on potential future drug developments for the treatment of prolonged seizures and SE.

Persistent knowledge gaps between 2005 and 2020 in women with epilepsy: Comparison of multicenter studies from Germany.

OBJECTIVE: Epilepsy is a chronic condition that can affect patients of all ages. Women with epilepsy (WWE) require access to specific counseling and information regarding issues related to contraception, pregnancy, and hormonal effects on seizure control and bone mineral density. This study investigated the knowledge among WWE regarding their condition, and whether epilepsy-specific knowledge has improved over the last 15 years. METHODS: A total of 280 WWE aged 18 to 82 years participated in this multicenter, questionnaire-based study. The study was conducted at four epilepsy centers in Germany, between October 2020 and December 2020. Sociodemographic and epilepsy-specific data for participating women were analyzed and compared with the results of a similar survey performed in 2003-2005 among 365 WWE in Germany. RESULTS: The questionnaire-based survey revealed considerable knowledge deficits without significant improvements over the last 15 years, particularly among those with less education and with regards to information on the more pronounced effects of epilepsy in older WWE (>50 years), including interactions with menopause and osteoporosis. In WWE ≤29 years, a significant increase in the knowledge score was observed in 2020 compared with this age group in 2005 (mean 7.42 vs. 6.5, p = .036). Mothers frequently reported epilepsy-related concerns regarding childrearing, particularly of seizures scaring their child and the need to rely on other people. CONCLUSION: WWE continue to demonstrate inadequate epilepsy-related knowledge. Despite increasing information availability and the aspiration toward better awareness among medical professionals, overall knowledge has not increased sufficiently compared with the levels observed in recent studies.

Gender differences in concerns about planning to have children and child-rearing among patients with epilepsy: A prospective, multicenter study with 477 patients from Germany.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the concerns and worries about planning to have children and being a parent as a person with epilepsy and investigate gender differences in these perceptions. METHODS: The Epi2020 study was a large multicenter study focusing on different healthcare aspects of adult patients with epilepsy in Germany. In addition to basic clinical and demographic characteristics, patients were asked to answer a questionnaire regarding their plan to have children, if they had children, and concerns about their children's health. Data were analyzed to detect differences between men and women with epilepsy according to age group. RESULTS: In total, 477 patients with epilepsy with a mean age of 40.5 years (SD = 15.5, range: 18-83 years) participated in this study; 280 (58.7%) were female and 197 (41.3%) were male. Both women and men frequently reported concerns and worries about having children: In the age group below 45 years of age, 72.5% of women and 58.2% of men described being worried to some extent that their children may also suffer from epilepsy (p = .006). Furthermore, 67.3% of women and 54.2% of men below the age of 45 years reported being worried that their children may be disabled (p = .003). Women were more likely to have family members who are reluctant to support their desire to have children (p = .048). CONCLUSION: Women with epilepsy of childbearing age are significantly more likely to report major concerns that their children might be disabled or also have epilepsy than men with epilepsy and, therefore, express more concerns about choosing to have a child. However, men also report frequent concerns and worries, and this should be addressed not only on request but should be included in the provision of general information on epilepsy.

Patients' knowledge about epilepsy-related risks, morbidity, and mortality: A multicenter cohort study from Germany.

INTRODUCTION: Patient education is a central component of quality care. Enhancing patient knowledge can improve patients' quality of life and facilitate successful self-management. We sought to identify patients' knowledge levels and knowledge gaps regarding epilepsy-related risks, morbidity, and mortality. METHODS: Adult patients with epilepsy presenting to the university hospitals in Frankfurt, Greifswald, and Marburg between February 2018 and May 2020 were asked to participate in this questionnaire-based study. RESULTS: A total of 238 patients (52% women), with a mean age of 39.2 years (range: 18-77 years), participated in this study. Spontaneously, the majority of patients (51.3%) named driving a car, and other traffic-related accidents as possible causes of morbidity and mortality, and 23.9% of patients reported various causes of premature death, such as suffocation, drowning, and respiratory or cardiac arrest due to seizures. Falls due to epilepsy (19.7%) and injuries in general (17.6%) were named as further causes of morbidity and mortality. The vast majority were aware that alcohol (87.4%), sleep deprivation (86.6%), and risky activities in daily life (80.3%) increased the risk of seizure occurrence or increased morbidity and mortality. Regarding overall mortality, 52.1% thought that people with epilepsy were at greater risk of premature death, whereas 46.2% denied this fact to be true. Only 29.4% were aware of status epilepticus, and 27.3% were aware of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). Driving ability, working ability, and seizure risk were named as major or moderate concerns among patients, but the risk of premature mortality was not a major concern. One-quarter of all patients (26.9%) indicated that they were not counseled about any risk factors or causes of morbidity or mortality by their physicians. CONCLUSIONS: A lack of knowledge concerning premature mortality, SUDEP, and status epilepticus exists among adult patients with epilepsy. A substantial number of patients indicated that these issues were not discussed adequately by their physicians.

Long-term efficacy, tolerability, and retention of brivaracetam in epilepsy treatment: A longitudinal multicenter study with up to 5 years of follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to evaluate the long-term efficacy, retention, and tolerability of add-on brivaracetam (BRV) in clinical practice. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study recruited all patients who initiated BRV between February and November 2016, with observation until February 2021. RESULTS: Long-term data for 262 patients (mean age = 40 years, range = 5-81 years, 129 men) were analyzed, including 227 (87%) diagnosed with focal epilepsy, 19 (7%) with genetic generalized epilepsy, and 16 (6%) with other or unclassified epilepsy syndromes. Only 26 (10%) patients had never received levetiracetam (LEV), whereas 133 (50.8%) were switched from LEV. The length of BRV exposure ranged from 1 day to 5 years, with a median retention time of 1.6 years, resulting in a total BRV exposure time of 6829 months (569 years). The retention rate was 61.1% at 12 months, with a reported efficacy of 33.1% (79/239; 50% responder rate, 23 patients lost-to-follow-up), including 10.9% reported as seizure-free. The retention rate for the entire study period was 50.8%, and at last follow-up, 133 patients were receiving BRV at a mean dose of 222 ± 104 mg (median = 200, range = 25-400), including 52 (39.1%) who exceeded the recommended upper dose of 200 mg. Fewer concomitant antiseizure medications and switching from LEV to BRV correlated with better short-term responses, but no investigated parameters correlated with positive long-term outcomes. BRV was discontinued in 63 (24%) patients due to insufficient efficacy, in 29 (11%) for psychobehavioral adverse events, in 25 (10%) for other adverse events, and in 24 (9%) for other reasons. SIGNIFICANCE: BRV showed a clinically useful 50% responder rate of 33% at 12 months and overall retention of >50%, despite 90% of included patients having previous LEV exposure. BRV was well tolerated; however, psychobehavioral adverse events occurred in one out of 10 patients. Although we identified short-term response and retention predictors, we could not identify significant predictors for long-term outcomes.

Benefits, safety and outcomes of long-term video EEG monitoring in pediatric patients.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate benefits of in-hospital, long-term video EEG monitoring (LVEM) for pediatric patients, from a therapeutic perspective and from the perspectives of patients and their families. METHODS: A monocentric retrospective cohort study was conducted. Patients aged 0-18 years who underwent LVEM for epilepsy surgery eligibility, epilepsy syndrome clarification, or medication adjustment were evaluated regarding paroxysmal event type, change in seizure frequency and patients' benefits using a standardized evaluation protocol. RESULTS: A total of 163 (88 boys and 75 girls, mean age 10.9 years) pediatric patients underwent 178 LVEM sessions, with a mean duration of 5.4 days. The rate of habitual event detection was 69.1%. Epilepsy diagnosis was confirmed in 147 patients and excluded in 16 patients (9.8%). LVEM results altered the diagnosis of 37.4% of patients. Diagnosis remained unchanged in 49.1% of patients and was specified in 13.5% of patients. Epilepsy surgery was performed in 32 patients, and 64% of epilepsy patients deemed ineligible for epilepsy surgery underwent medication adjustments. Patients or their families found LVEM helpful in 75% of cases. Significant seizure reductions and improvements in the disease course were reported by 45% of epilepsy patients. Three episodes of non-convulsive status epilepticus occurred, representing 1.7% of admissions and 1.9% of patients diagnosed with epilepsy, while no injuries were observed. CONCLUSIONS: LVEM is beneficial for pediatric patients from both a medical perspective and from the perspective of patients and their families, even if patients are ineligible for epilepsy surgery. LVEM is well-tolerated with a low risk of status epilepticus and injuries.

Postoperative outcomes and surgical ratio at a newly established epilepsy center: The first 100 procedures.

PURPOSE: To describe the patients' characteristics, surgical ratio, and outcomes following epilepsy surgery at the newly established Epilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine-Main. METHODS: We retrospectively studied the first 100 consecutive patients, including adult (n = 77) and pediatric (n = 23) patients, with drug-resistant epilepsy who underwent resective or ablative surgical procedures at a single, newly established epilepsy center. Patient characteristics, seizure and neuropsychological outcomes, histopathology, complications, and surgical ratio were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 28.8 years (children 10.6 years, adults 34.2 years). The mean epilepsy duration was 11.9 years (children 3.9 years, adults 14.3 years), and the mean follow-up was 1.5 years. At the most recent visit, 64% of patients remained completely seizure free [Engel IA]. The rates of perioperative complications and unexpected new neurological deficits were 5%, each. The proportion of patients showing deficits in one or more cognitive domains increased six months after surgery and decreased to presurgical proportions after two years. Symptoms of depression were significantly decreased and quality of life was significantly increased after surgery. The surgical ratio was 25.3%. CONCLUSION: Similar postsurgical outcomes were achieved at a newly established epilepsy center compared with long-standing epilepsy centers. The lower time to surgery may reflect a general decrease in time to surgery over the last decade or the improved accessibility of a new epilepsy center in a previously underserved area. The surgical ratio was not lower than reported for established centers.

Cenobamate for the treatment of focal epilepsies.

INTRODUCTION: Antiseizure drugs (ASDs) play a central and crucial role in the treatment of epilepsy patients because the majority require anticonvulsant treatment for an extended period of time. Due to the fact that 30% of patients are refractory to medical treatment, new therapeutic options are necessary. Cenobamate is the latest approved antiepileptic drug in focal epilepsy, and its mode of action is thought to be mediated by blocking voltage-gated sodium channels and interaction with the GABAergic system. AREAS COVERED: This article reviews animal studies, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and the phase 1 to 3 trials and open-label extension data on cenobamate. EXPERT OPINION: Cenobamate has the potential to perform as an important ASD because trial data are indicative of remarkable responder and seizure freedom rates so far not seen with other ASDs. Cenobamate demonstrated significant efficacy at a dosage between 100 and 400 mg per day. The side-effect profile of this drug is comparable to other ASDs and is mainly CNS related; in particular, somnolence, dizziness, headache, diplopia, and nystagmus. However, slow titration is mandatory to decrease the risk of drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) that was observed in several patients with fast uptitration schemes.