Subjective and objective effects of the novel triple reuptake inhibitor tesofensine in recreational stimulant users.

Tesofensine is a (triple) reuptake inhibitor of noradrenaline, dopamine, and serotonin that is in development for the treatment of obesity. The abuse potential of triple reuptake inhibitors is not yet known, and so this study was undertaken to evaluate the potential abuse-related effects of tesofensine in humans. It was designed as a single-dose, randomized, double-blind, crossover study involving tesofensine vs. placebo, D-amphetamine (positive control for dopaminergic/stimulant effects), bupropion, and atomoxetine (negative/unscheduled controls) in recreational stimulant users (N = 52). Subjective and objective measures were assessed for 48 h after drug administration. The study results show that the effects of D-amphetamine were significantly greater than those of placebo on all primary and secondary subjective measures. The effects of tesofensine were not significantly different from those of placebo and were lower than those of D-amphetamine 30 mg on all primary and most secondary measures. The effects of tesofensine were either lower than or not different from those of bupropion or atomoxetine. These results demonstrate that the abuse potential for tesofensine is no greater than that of bupropion or atomoxetine, and tesofensine is therefore unlikely to be recreationally abused.

Paroxetine in the treatment of panic disorder. A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: This study compared the efficacy and tolerability of paroxetine with placebo in the treatment of panic disorder. METHOD: After three weeks of placebo, patients received 12 weeks of treatment with paroxetine (20, 40, or 60 mg) or placebo, and finally two weeks of placebo. Dosages were adjusted according to efficacy and tolerability. Standardised cognitive therapy was given to all patients. The primary measure of outcome was reduction in the number of panic attacks. RESULTS: Analysis of the results showed statistically significant differences in favour of paroxetine between the two treatment groups in two out of the three primary measures of outcome, i.e. 50% reduction in total number of panic attacks and number of panic attacks reduced to one or zero over the study period. For the third measure of outcome, the mean change in the total number of attacks from baseline, there was a positive trend in favour of paroxetine. The results of the primary measures of outcome were strongly supported by the results of the secondary efficacy measures of outcome. In addition, paroxetine, at all doses, was very well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Paroxetine plus cognitive therapy was significantly more effective than placebo plus cognitive therapy in the treatment of panic disorder.

The effect of paroxetine on cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of neurotransmitter metabolites in depressed patients.

This paper describes the effect of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibiting drug (SSRI), paroxetine, on cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of neurotransmitter metabolites in depressed patients. 5-Hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA), 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol (MHPG) and homovanillic acid (HVA) were measured at baseline and after 3 weeks of treatment with 30 mg paroxetine daily. In line with similar studies on other SSRIs, influence on both the serotonin and noradrenaline metabolite was found. The mechanism behind the action of paroxetine on both 5-HIAA and MHPG is assumed to be an expression of the linkage between the serotonergic and noradrenergic systems in the brain. A frequently reported correlation between 5-HIAA and HVA was also found. The analysis of paroxetine in CSF proves the transportation of the drug into the central nervous system.

Paroxetine and imipramine treatment of depressive patients in a controlled multicentre study with plasma amino acid measurements.

In a 12-week double-blind study with 36 patients with major depressive episode (DSM-III), paroxetine (Seroxat, Aropax) showed significantly quicker onset of efficacy on the Melancholia Scale, and better tolerance than imipramine. Plasma concentration analyses showed no clear concentration-efficacy correlation in either treatment group. During long-term treatment paroxetine seemed to be superior to imipramine in preventing relapse; both treatments were well tolerated. A significant correlation between baseline plasma tryptophan: large neutral amino acids ratio and final Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) score and a trend towards an inverse correlation between this ratio and percentage reduction in HRSD score were seen in the paroxetine group but not in the imipramine group. In line with previous studies, these results support the hypothesis that paroxetine is an effective and well tolerated antidepressant.

Paroxetine: pharmacokinetic and antidepressant effect in the elderly.

To evaluate the pharmacokinetic properties, efficacy, and tolerability of paroxetine in elderly depressed patients, a clinical study was set up--initially at Aalborg Psychiatric Hospital in Denmark, and subsequently at the University Hospital in Linköping, Sweden. A total of 21 patients with a median age of 72 years were included in the study. After a single dose of 20 or 30 mg of paroxetine followed by two drug-free days, treatment continued with 20 or 30 mg daily for seven weeks. The majority of patients showed a continuous reduction in their HAMD scores, starting in the second week of treatment. Paroxetine was well tolerated at the doses given, and side-effects were mostly mild and transient. Steady-state, pre-dose plasma levels of paroxetine showed considerable variability, and the median steady-state concentration was higher in elderly patients compared with data from a previous study in young volunteers. Elimination half-lives also showed variability between these elderly patients, but tended to be longer after cessation of multiple dosing than after a single dose. They also tended to be longer than in the young volunteers. The results of this study do not advocate reduced doses of paroxetine in the elderly, but further studies are warranted.

Efficacy and tolerance of femoxetine and imipramine in the treatment of depressive states. A randomized, double-blind study.

Fifty-two patients with depressive illness characterized by four symptoms (periodical course, psychomotor retardation, diurnal variation, unrealistic self-depreciation) and a score of at least 18 on the Hamilton Depression Scale 1-17 (HDS) were allocated to a double-blind randomized study with femoxetine and imipramine. Patients were diagnosed according to RDC and further classified according to the Newcastle-II index. During the six weeks of treatment, efficacy was evaluated by means of HDS and a global evaluation. Side-effect symptoms were recorded on a check-list by questioning. After six weeks of treatment with femoxetine or imipramine (recommended daily standard dosages are 600 mg femoxetine and 150 mg imipramine (b.i.d.); in the present study, dosages were flexible and could be adjusted according to effect/side-effects) evaluation of efficacy based on HDS, a six-item subscale, groups of HDS items as well as single items showed no statistically significant differences between the treatment groups except with regard to the factor for sleep disturbances in the HDS, where greatest reduction was seen in the femoxetine group. No statistically significant differences regarding side-effect profile were seen. However, in the imipramine group, higher frequencies of such moderate to severe symptoms as dry mouth, constipation and urination difficulties were observed (the greatest difference was seen for dry mouth, p 0.1, while p-values for the remaining two symptoms were greater than 0.1). Moreover, based on the patients' own opinion on side-effects, femoxetine seemed to be better tolerated. One patient took an overdosage of approx. 26 g femoxetine; half of the intake was removed by gastric emptying at the hospital.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Dose-response curve for the ergotamine-induced decrease of peripheral systolic blood pressure in man.

Ergotamine tartrate (approximately 0.05, 0.125, 0.25 and 0.5 mg per 70 kg body weight) was given intravenously to 5 volunteers in a double-blind cross-over study. For 6 hours the following parameter were studied: arm, ankle and big toe systolic blood pressures. A dose-dependent but transient increase of arm systolic blood pressure was found. For changes of ankle-arm systolic gradients no dose-response curve could be established. Toe-arm systolic gradients showed a dose-dependent decrease, which at 4 to 6 hours seems suitable for pharmacodynamic comparison of different doses or routes of administration of ergotamine tartrate.

The pharmacokinetics of the individual constituents of an aspirin-metoclopramide combination ('Migravess').

A study was carried out in 10 healthy volunteers, aged between 22 and 28 years, to investigate the pharmacokinetics of an aspirin-metoclopramide combined preparation compared with those of the individual components given alone. Blood levels were determined before and after administration of a single dose of the three medications given at weekly intervals. No significant difference was found in the bioavailability of either the aspirin or metoclopramide from the combination as compared to the individual components.